169hands
MENU
MATCHUPPREFLOPALL-IN

KK vs QQ

KK
VS
QQ
81.9%
equity for KK — QQ takes 18.1%

Pair over pair — the higher pair is roughly an 80/20 favourite.

KK Win
81.7%
Tie
0.5%
KK Lose
17.9%
Card combinations
36
KK vs random
82.5% · #2
QQ vs random
79.9% · #3
Breakdown

Win, tie and loss for KK

Win 81.7%Lose 17.9%

When KK and QQ get all in before the flop, KK wins 81.9% of the time and QQ takes 18.1%. Broken down, KK wins outright 81.7%, chops 0.5% and loses 17.9% — a margin of 63.8 points. Pair over pair — the higher pair is roughly an 80/20 favourite.

The same matchup shifts depending on how the suits overlap. With no shared suit the number is 81.1% (for example Ks Kh against Qd Qc); with both suits shared it is 82.6% (Ks Kh against Qs Qh). That is a spread of 1.51 points across the 36 distinct card combinations, and it comes almost entirely from whether the two hands are fighting over the same flush.

Add a third player holding a random hand and the split becomes KK 67.6%, QQ 17.1%, random 15.4%. KK gives up 14.3 points and QQ gives up 1, so the favourite loses more than the underdog does. Extra players always eat into the leader's share faster than into anyone else's.

Taken on their own, KK is worth 82.5% against a random hand (rank 2 of 169) and QQ is worth 79.9% (rank 3). The gap between them in the ranking is only 2.6 points, yet head to head the gap is 63.8 points — a reminder that a ranking table and a direct matchup are two different questions.

Framed as a run of one hundred identical all-ins, KK scoops roughly 82 pots, splits about one, and loses the remaining 18. Against eight random opponents rather than this one specific hand, KK would be down to 29.6% and QQ to 24.5%, so the shape of this particular confrontation matters far more than either hand's standing in the overall ranking.

From QQ's side, 18.1% is the break-even point for calling an all-in at 4.52:1 pot odds. Put another way, the call is profitable as long as the amount you have to put in is less than 18.1% of the pot you are playing for. KK holds the other 81.9% of that same pot.

Two caveats keep this figure honest. First, it is showdown equity across all 36 card combinations with five board cards still to come — there is no fold equity in it, so the value of shoving in practice is usually higher than the raw percentage suggests. Second, it assumes QQ really does hold exactly QQ; against the wider range a player would actually get all in with, KK's 81.9% moves. Use the individual pages for KK and QQ to see how each of them fares against all 168 other holdings before treating this single pairing as the whole picture.

By shared suits

Overlapping suits move the number

200,000 simulated showdowns per condition. The example column shows one concrete four-card layout.

ConditionExampleCombosKK EquityWinTieLose
No shared suitKs Kh vs Qd Qc681.1%80.9%0.4%18.7%
One shared suitKs Kh vs Qs Qd2481.9%81.7%0.5%17.9%
Both suits sharedKs Kh vs Qs Qh682.6%82.4%0.5%17.1%
Three-way

Adding a random third hand

200,000 simulated showdowns, with the third hand dealt at random each time.

KK
67.6%
vs heads-up -14.3pt
QQ
17.1%
vs heads-up -1.0pt
Random third hand
15.4%
Player count

At a bigger table

Random opponentsKKQQ
182.5%79.9%
268.9%65.0%
449.3%44.9%
829.6%24.5%

Related

FAQ

KK or QQ — which is ahead preflop?

KK is the favourite. KK takes 81.9% and QQ 18.1%, a margin of 63.8 points, with 0.5% of hands ending in a chop.

Do the suits change KK vs QQ?

Yes. With no shared suit it is 81.1%, and with both suits shared it is 82.6% — a swing of up to 1.51 points.

What happens three-way?

With one extra random hand in the pot the split is KK 67.6%, QQ 17.1%, random 15.4%. KK drops 14.3 points compared with heads-up.

429 words / 29 distinct figures — Method