Suited connectors

Suited connectors covers 12 hands. Their average equity against a single random opponent is 50.4%, from AKs at 67.2% (rank 8 of 169) down to 32s at 35.9% (rank 163). That is a spread of 31.3 points inside a single hand type.

At a nine-handed table (eight opponents) the average falls to 15.3%, and even AKs holds only 22.4%. The all-hand average against eight opponents is 12.2%, so this type sits above the field once the pot goes multiway. AKs ranks 8 heads-up and 4 nine-handed.

Placed against the full 169, 2 of these 12 hands make the top twenty and 4 reach the top fifty. The middle of the group is 87s at 47.9% (rank 101). In deck terms the group accounts for 48 of the 1,326 possible two-card holdings, or 3.6% of everything you are dealt, so each individual decision carries more weight simply because the spot comes up rarely. The table below lists every hand with its own numbers.

Put AA on the other side of the table — a hand you will run into often — and the best this group can do is 87s at 22.4%, while the worst is AKs at 12.1%. That is a 10.3-point spread inside one hand type, and 0 of them still hold even money or better against it. Grouping hands is useful shorthand, but once you know the specific opponent, the individual figure is the one that matters.

The biggest step in the ordering falls between AKs at 67.2% and KQs at 63.4%, a drop of 3.8 points, and that is where the group effectively splits into an upper and a lower tier. Elsewhere neighbouring hands are often separated by less than half a point, so remembering where the real step is will serve you better than memorising exact positions in the ranking.

Everything on this page assumes the opponent holds a random hand and that the pot is played to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges and can be made to fold, so read these figures as a measure of raw strength rather than as advice on how to play the group. Each hand was simulated over 400,000 showdowns against a single opponent, and every hand-versus-hand figure enumerates all suit layouts before running 200,000 simulated boards. The method page sets out how those numbers were checked against exact enumeration.