QJs
A suited connector — straight and flush draws in the same holding.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 60.0% · #28
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 26.4% · #14
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 18.6% · #13
- Chen score
- 9
- Combos
- 4 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.3%
- Favourite against
- 115 of 168 hands
QJs (queen-jack suited) wins 60.0% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 28th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 16.6% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 26.4% and its rank moves to 14; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 18.6% for rank 13. A suited connector — straight and flush draws in the same holding.
Its suited/offsuit twin QJo runs at 58.0% (rank 39), a gap of 2 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 55 at 60.3%, and directly below is A6s at 59.9%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, QJs is a favourite against 115 of them and an underdog against 53. Its best matchup is J2o at 77.4% and its worst is QQ at 15.9% — a spread of 61.5 points, which is why calling QJs simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 4 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 77 at 50.5%.
QJs dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against J2o at 77.4%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them KQs, which leaves QJs with only 29.2%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 suited hands it comes 11 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 7.2 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 24.1 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, QJs lands +9 points from the middle of the pack, and 27 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 60.0% against one opponent, 44.1% against two, 30.3% against four and 18.6% against eight. That last figure is 168% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 9 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why QJs reads as 60.0% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 60.0% against one opponent down to 18.6% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
How often QJs hits the flop
Exact counts over all 19,600 flops and 2,118,760 five-card boards from the 50 cards left once your two are out — no simulation.
QJs pairs the board on the flop — at least one of its two ranks hits — 32.4% of the time, and flops top pair or better (the paired card is the highest on the board, or two pair and up) 22.8%. By the river it has made a pair or better 48.7% of the time.
For straights, the flop completes one 0.980% of the time (192 flops), gives an eight-out draw 6.37% and a four-out gutshot 14.8%. By the river a straight using a hole card completes 6.96% of the time. For flushes, two or more of its suit land on the flop 11.8% of the time (a made flush 0.842%), and a flush is complete by the river 6.40%.
Put together, QJs flops a pair or better or a strong draw (a flush draw or an eight-out straight draw) 47.9% of the time — rank 16 of the 156 unpaired hands (tied with 1 other). The highest is JTs, T9s, 98s and 4 others at 50.6% and the lowest AKo, A2o at 32.8%.
| Outcome | Probability | Count / total | Frequency | Odds against |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flop a pair or better (either card hits) | 32.4% | 6,356 / 19,600 | 1 in 3.1 | 2.1 to 1 |
| top pair or better (highest card on board, or two pair and up) | 22.8% | 4,460 / 19,600 | 1 in 4.4 | 3.4 to 1 |
| two pair (both cards hit) | 2.02% | 396 / 19,600 | 1 in 49.5 | 48.5 to 1 |
| trips (one card hits twice) | 1.35% | 264 / 19,600 | 1 in 74.2 | 73.2 to 1 |
| Flop a made straight | 0.980% | 192 / 19,600 | 1 in 102 | 101 to 1 |
| Flop an eight-out straight draw | 6.37% | 1,248 / 19,600 | 1 in 15.7 | 14.7 to 1 |
| Flop a four-out gutshot | 14.8% | 2,896 / 19,600 | 1 in 6.8 | 5.8 to 1 |
| Flop a made flush (three of your suit) | 0.842% | 165 / 19,600 | 1 in 119 | 118 to 1 |
| Flop a flush draw (two of your suit) | 10.9% | 2,145 / 19,600 | 1 in 9.1 | 8.1 to 1 |
| Pair or better, or a strong draw (flush draw or eight-out straight draw) or better | 47.9% | 9,392 / 19,600 | 1 in 2.1 | 1.1 to 1 |
| Pair or better by the river | 48.7% | 1,032,752 / 2,118,760 | 1 in 2.1 | 1.1 to 1 |
| Straight by the river (using a hole card) | 6.96% | 147,472 / 2,118,760 | 1 in 14.4 | 13.4 to 1 |
| Flush by the river (both hole cards) | 6.40% | 135,597 / 2,118,760 | 1 in 15.6 | 14.6 to 1 |
How the flop moves QJs's equity
Equity against one random hand with the flop out and the turn and river to come. Exact counts over every deal of the opponent's two cards and the board — no simulation.
Against one random hand, QJs goes from 60.3% before the flop up to 80.9% when either card pairs, and down to 50.4% when both miss. It connects 32.4% of the time (6,356 of 19,600 flops). Missing with a card above Q on board leaves 54.1%; missing with nothing above Q leaves 47.2%.
By board shape: rainbow 59.8%, two-tone 60.8%, monotone 57.8%. Two of your suit (a flush draw) gives 69.3% (10.9% of flops), and three of your suit (a made flush) 95.8% (0.842%). A paired board gives 59.0%, and a connected board (three ranks within five) 55.8%. The best row in the table is "Three of your suit (made flush)" at 95.8%, the worst "and nothing above Q" at 47.2%.
The 60.0% at the top of the page is a 400,000-hand simulation; this table counts every deal of the opponent's two cards and the five-card board (2,097,572,400 per starting hand), which puts the pre-flop figure at 60.26% (a gap of 0.26 points). Each equity is taken with the flop out and the turn and river still to come.
| Flop | How often | Flops (of 19,600) | QJs equity | vs before the flop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before the flop (average of every flop) | 100.0% | 19,600 | 60.3% | — |
| Either card hits (a matching rank on the flop) | 32.4% | 6,356 | 80.9% | +20.6pt |
| Neither card hits | 67.6% | 13,244 | 50.4% | −9.9pt |
| and nothing above Q | 36.4% | 7,140 | 47.2% | −13.1pt |
| and at least one card above Q | 31.1% | 6,104 | 54.1% | −6.2pt |
| Rainbow (three different suits) | 39.7% | 7,774 | 59.8% | −0.4pt |
| Two-tone (two cards share a suit) | 55.1% | 10,803 | 60.8% | +0.5pt |
| Monotone (all three one suit) | 5.22% | 1,023 | 57.8% | −2.5pt |
| Three of your suit (made flush) | 0.842% | 165 | 95.8% | +35.5pt |
| Exactly two of your suit (flush draw) | 10.9% | 2,145 | 69.3% | +9.1pt |
| Paired board (two or more of a rank) | 17.2% | 3,364 | 59.0% | −1.2pt |
| Connected board (three ranks within five, A can play low) | 18.8% | 3,684 | 55.8% | −4.4pt |
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | QJs equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 19.2% | -30.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 17.6% | -32.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 15.9% | -34.1 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 36.8% | -13.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 47.1% | -2.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 48.1% | -1.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 49.0% | -1.0 | COINFLIP |
| AKs | 8 | 36.5% | -13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 50.5% | +0.5 | COINFLIP |
| AQs | 10 | 30.0% | -20.0 | DOMINATED |
| AJs | 11 | 30.0% | -20.0 | DOMINATED |
| AKo | 12 | 38.9% | -11.1 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 41.9% | -8.1 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 31.1% | -18.9 | DOMINATED |
| AJo | 15 | 31.2% | -18.8 | DOMINATED |
| KQs | 16 | 29.2% | -20.8 | DOMINATED |
| 66 | 17 | 50.6% | +0.6 | COINFLIP |
| A9s | 18 | 43.6% | -6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 44.6% | -5.4 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 29.2% | -20.8 | DOMINATED |
| A8s | 21 | 43.9% | -6.1 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 41.2% | -8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| KQo | 23 | 30.2% | -19.8 | DOMINATED |
| A7s | 24 | 44.7% | -5.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A9o | 25 | 46.5% | -3.5 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 30.3% | -19.7 | DOMINATED |
| 55 | 27 | 50.9% | +0.9 | COINFLIP |
| A6s | 29 | 44.4% | -5.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 42.8% | -7.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A8o | 31 | 46.6% | -3.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 43.9% | -6.1 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 43.5% | -6.5 | HIGH CARD |
| QTs | 34 | 69.8% | +19.8 | DOMINATING |
| A4s | 35 | 43.9% | -6.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 47.5% | -2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K8s | 37 | 44.0% | -6.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 44.0% | -6.0 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 52.5% | +2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 45.6% | -4.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9s | 41 | 69.9% | +19.9 | DOMINATING |
| A5o | 42 | 46.8% | -3.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 44.3% | -5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 44.7% | -5.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A6o | 45 | 47.4% | -2.6 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 70.4% | +20.4 | DOMINATING |
| QTo | 47 | 73.8% | +23.8 | DOMINATING |
| 44 | 48 | 51.4% | +1.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 44.5% | -5.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 46.9% | -3.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 70.1% | +20.1 | DOMINATING |
| K8o | 52 | 46.9% | -3.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 46.8% | -3.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 44.4% | -5.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 70.4% | +20.4 | DOMINATING |
| Q9o | 56 | 74.0% | +24.0 | DOMINATING |
| JTo | 57 | 74.3% | +24.3 | DOMINATING |
| K7o | 58 | 47.5% | -2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K4s | 59 | 44.5% | -5.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 47.1% | -2.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 70.4% | +20.4 | DOMINATING |
| K6o | 62 | 47.3% | -2.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 44.6% | -5.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 70.9% | +20.9 | DOMINATING |
| T9s | 65 | 64.4% | +14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8o | 66 | 74.1% | +24.1 | DOMINATING |
| 33 | 67 | 52.0% | +2.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6s | 68 | 70.3% | +20.3 | DOMINATING |
| K2s | 69 | 44.7% | -5.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 74.3% | +24.3 | DOMINATING |
| K5o | 71 | 47.3% | -2.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5s | 72 | 69.9% | +19.9 | DOMINATING |
| J7s | 73 | 72.1% | +22.1 | DOMINATING |
| T8s | 74 | 65.1% | +15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K4o | 75 | 47.4% | -2.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7o | 76 | 74.7% | +24.7 | DOMINATING |
| Q4s | 77 | 70.3% | +20.3 | DOMINATING |
| J8o | 78 | 74.8% | +24.8 | DOMINATING |
| T9o | 79 | 67.4% | +17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K3o | 80 | 47.4% | -2.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 70.8% | +20.8 | DOMINATING |
| Q6o | 82 | 74.1% | +24.1 | DOMINATING |
| 98s | 83 | 63.4% | +13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 66.1% | +16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J6s | 85 | 72.1% | +22.1 | DOMINATING |
| K2o | 86 | 47.5% | -2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 74.0% | +24.0 | DOMINATING |
| 22 | 88 | 52.4% | +2.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q2s | 89 | 71.2% | +21.2 | DOMINATING |
| J5s | 90 | 71.6% | +21.6 | DOMINATING |
| T8o | 91 | 67.9% | +17.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J7o | 92 | 76.5% | +26.5 | DOMINATING |
| J4s | 93 | 72.3% | +22.3 | DOMINATING |
| 97s | 94 | 64.4% | +14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4o | 95 | 74.3% | +24.3 | DOMINATING |
| T6s | 96 | 67.1% | +17.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 72.4% | +22.4 | DOMINATING |
| 98o | 98 | 66.3% | +16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 69.0% | +19.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3o | 100 | 74.9% | +24.9 | DOMINATING |
| 87s | 101 | 63.3% | +13.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J6o | 102 | 76.1% | +26.1 | DOMINATING |
| J2s | 103 | 72.8% | +22.8 | DOMINATING |
| 96s | 104 | 65.3% | +15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 75.4% | +25.4 | DOMINATING |
| J5o | 106 | 75.9% | +25.9 | DOMINATING |
| T5s | 107 | 67.8% | +17.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 68.0% | +18.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 97o | 109 | 67.4% | +17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 86s | 110 | 63.8% | +13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 76.3% | +26.3 | DOMINATING |
| T6o | 112 | 70.0% | +20.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 68.2% | +18.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 95s | 114 | 66.0% | +16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 63.7% | +13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J3o | 116 | 76.8% | +26.8 | DOMINATING |
| 87o | 117 | 66.4% | +16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T2s | 118 | 68.4% | +18.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 64.5% | +14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 68.2% | +18.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 70.8% | +20.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 77.4% | +27.4 | DOMINATING |
| 94s | 123 | 67.2% | +17.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 63.5% | +13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 70.9% | +20.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 93s | 126 | 67.3% | +17.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 66.8% | +16.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 62.4% | +12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 68.9% | +18.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 65.7% | +15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 71.4% | +21.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 92s | 132 | 67.7% | +17.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 66.6% | +16.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 74s | 134 | 64.7% | +14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 71.8% | +21.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 64s | 136 | 63.4% | +13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 67.4% | +17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 61.9% | +11.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 66.9% | +16.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 70.3% | +20.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 66.4% | +16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 67.0% | +17.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 65.9% | +15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 65o | 144 | 65.0% | +15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 93o | 145 | 70.4% | +20.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 63.1% | +13.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 65.0% | +15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 68.8% | +18.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 70.6% | +20.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 63.9% | +13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 67.6% | +17.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 67.2% | +17.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 64.6% | +14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 64o | 155 | 66.4% | +16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 66.0% | +16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 70.0% | +20.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 64.9% | +14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 70.2% | +20.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 69.0% | +19.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 53o | 161 | 66.0% | +16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 63o | 162 | 67.8% | +17.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 65.3% | +15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 66.7% | +16.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 70.5% | +20.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 52o | 166 | 67.7% | +17.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 69.0% | +19.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 68.0% | +18.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 68.3% | +18.3 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of QJs?
60.0% against one random opponent, which ranks it 28 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 26.4%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 18.6%.
How much better is QJs than QJo?
QJs is worth 60.0% and QJo 58.0%, a difference of 2 points — rank 28 versus rank 39.
How many of the 168 other hands does QJs beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 115 hands and an underdog against 53. 4 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
How often does QJs hit the flop?
A pair or better 32.4%, top pair or better 22.8%. A made straight 0.980% and an eight-out straight draw 6.37%, a flush draw or better 11.8%. One of those happens 47.9% of the time (all 19,600 flops counted).
What is QJs worth when it misses the flop?
Against one random hand, 50.4% on a flop where neither card pairs (60.3% before the flop, 80.9% when it connects). Exact counts over every deal of the opponent's cards and the board.
446 words / 41 distinct figures — Method
