169hands
MENU
offsuit

74o

38.6%
Equity vs one random hand — #151 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
38.6% · #151
6-handed (5 opponents)
11.4% · #151
9-handed (8 opponents)
7.5% · #148
Chen score
1.5
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
24 of 168 hands

74o (seven-four offsuit) wins 38.6% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 151th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 89.3% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 11.4% and its rank moves to 151; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 7.5% for rank 148. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin 74s runs at 41.8% (rank 134), a gap of 3.2 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.2 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 43s at 38.7%, and directly below is 54o at 38.1%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.6 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 74o is a favourite against 24 of them and an underdog against 144. Its best matchup is 42o at 67.9% and its worst is 77 at 10.1% — a spread of 57.8 points, which is why calling 74o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 73s at 50.9%.

74o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 42o at 67.9%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A7s, which leaves 74o with only 25.5%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 65 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 26.8 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 6.3 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 74o lands -12.4 points from the middle of the pack, and 150 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 38.6% against one opponent, 24.4% against two, 13.9% against four and 7.5% against eight. That last figure is 68% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 1.5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 74o reads as 38.6% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 38.6% against one opponent down to 7.5% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%20%40%38.6124.4218.0313.9411.459.568.477.58opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
74o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rank74o equityvs 50%Shape
AA115.3%-34.7PAIR VS CARDS
KK215.6%-34.4PAIR VS CARDS
QQ315.2%-34.8PAIR VS CARDS
JJ415.4%-34.6PAIR VS CARDS
TT515.0%-35.0PAIR VS CARDS
99614.9%-35.1PAIR VS CARDS
88713.8%-36.2PAIR VS CARDS
AKs833.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
77910.1%-39.9PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1033.2%-16.8HIGH CARD
AJs1133.2%-16.8HIGH CARD
AKo1235.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
ATs1333.0%-17.0HIGH CARD
AQo1434.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
AJo1534.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
KQs1633.0%-17.0HIGH CARD
661729.3%-20.7PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1833.2%-16.8HIGH CARD
ATo1934.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
KJs2032.8%-17.2HIGH CARD
A8s2133.1%-16.9HIGH CARD
KTs2232.9%-17.1HIGH CARD
KQo2334.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
A7s2425.5%-24.5DOMINATED
A9o2534.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
KJo2634.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
552730.2%-19.8PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2832.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
A6s2936.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
K9s3033.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
A8o3134.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
A5s3235.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
KTo3334.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
QTs3432.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
A4s3526.6%-23.4DOMINATED
A7o3626.4%-23.6DOMINATED
K8s3733.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
A3s3839.0%-11.0HIGH CARD
QJo3934.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
K9o4034.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
Q9s4132.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
A5o4237.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
A2s4339.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
K7s4426.2%-23.8DOMINATED
A6o4538.0%-12.0HIGH CARD
JTs4631.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
QTo4733.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
444834.4%-15.6PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4936.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
A4o5027.7%-22.3DOMINATED
Q8s5132.9%-17.1HIGH CARD
K8o5235.0%-15.0HIGH CARD
A3o5341.3%-8.7HIGH CARD
K5s5436.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
J9s5531.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
Q9o5634.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
JTo5733.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
K7o5827.3%-22.7DOMINATED
K4s5927.3%-22.7DOMINATED
A2o6042.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
Q7s6126.6%-23.4DOMINATED
K6o6238.0%-12.0HIGH CARD
K3s6340.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
J8s6432.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
T9s6531.3%-18.7HIGH CARD
Q8o6634.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
336746.9%-3.1PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6836.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
K2s6940.9%-9.1HIGH CARD
J9o7033.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
K5o7138.2%-11.8HIGH CARD
Q5s7236.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
J7s7326.9%-23.1DOMINATED
T8s7431.6%-18.4HIGH CARD
K4o7528.6%-21.4DOMINATED
Q7o7627.4%-22.6DOMINATED
Q4s7727.3%-22.7DOMINATED
J8o7833.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
T9o7932.7%-17.3HIGH CARD
K3o8042.4%-7.6HIGH CARD
Q3s8140.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
Q6o8237.9%-12.1HIGH CARD
98s8331.1%-18.9HIGH CARD
T7s8427.7%-22.3DOMINATED
J6s8536.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
K2o8643.5%-6.5HIGH CARD
Q5o8737.8%-12.2HIGH CARD
228848.4%-1.6PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8940.7%-9.3HIGH CARD
J5s9036.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
T8o9133.2%-16.8HIGH CARD
J7o9228.0%-22.0DOMINATED
J4s9328.0%-22.0DOMINATED
97s9427.0%-23.0DOMINATED
Q4o9528.8%-21.2DOMINATED
T6s9635.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
J3s9740.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
98o9832.5%-17.5HIGH CARD
T7o9928.4%-21.6DOMINATED
Q3o10042.2%-7.8HIGH CARD
87s10128.6%-21.4DOMINATED
J6o10238.6%-11.4HIGH CARD
J2s10340.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
96s10435.1%-14.9HIGH CARD
Q2o10543.1%-6.9HIGH CARD
J5o10638.1%-11.9HIGH CARD
T5s10736.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
T4s10828.6%-21.4DOMINATED
97o10928.0%-22.0DOMINATED
86s11034.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
J4o11129.4%-20.6DOMINATED
T6o11237.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
T3s11339.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
95s11435.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
76s11537.6%-12.4DOMINATED
J3o11642.4%-7.6HIGH CARD
87o11729.6%-20.4DOMINATED
T2s11841.0%-9.0HIGH CARD
85s11935.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
96o12036.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
T5o12138.2%-11.8HIGH CARD
J2o12243.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
94s12329.9%-20.1DOMINATED
75s12441.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
T4o12529.9%-20.1DOMINATED
93s12640.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
86o12736.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
65s12851.3%+1.3HIGH CARD
95o12937.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
84s13030.3%-19.7DOMINATED
T3o13142.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
92s13241.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
76o13339.5%-10.5DOMINATED
74s13447.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
T2o13543.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
64s13662.4%+12.4DOMINATING
85o13737.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
54s13860.8%+10.8DOMINATING
83s13941.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
94o14031.2%-18.8DOMINATED
75o14143.5%-6.5HIGH CARD
82s14242.2%-7.8HIGH CARD
73s14350.9%+0.9COINFLIP
65o14454.6%+4.6HIGH CARD
93o14542.9%-7.1HIGH CARD
53s14656.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
63s14757.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
84o14831.6%-18.4DOMINATED
92o14943.6%-6.4HIGH CARD
43s15062.2%+12.2DOMINATING
54o15264.3%+14.3DOMINATING
72s15352.1%+2.1HIGH CARD
52s15457.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
64o15566.0%+16.0DOMINATING
62s15658.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
83o15743.7%-6.3HIGH CARD
42s15863.9%+13.9DOMINATING
82o15944.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
73o16054.0%+4.0HIGH CARD
53o16159.5%+9.5HIGH CARD
63o16260.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
32s16360.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
43o16465.9%+15.9DOMINATING
72o16555.1%+5.1HIGH CARD
52o16660.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
62o16762.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
42o16867.9%+17.9DOMINATING
32o16964.1%+14.1HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
74s41.8%

FAQ

What is the equity of 74o?

38.6% against one random opponent, which ranks it 151 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 11.4%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 7.5%.

How much better is 74o than 74s?

74o is worth 38.6% and 74s 41.8%, a difference of 3.2 points — rank 151 versus rank 134.

How many of the 168 other hands does 74o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 24 hands and an underdog against 144. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

440 words / 46 distinct figures — Method