74o
Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 38.6% · #151
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 11.4% · #151
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 7.5% · #148
- Chen score
- 1.5
- Combos
- 12 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.9%
- Favourite against
- 24 of 168 hands
74o (seven-four offsuit) wins 38.6% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 151th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 89.3% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 11.4% and its rank moves to 151; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 7.5% for rank 148. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
Its suited/offsuit twin 74s runs at 41.8% (rank 134), a gap of 3.2 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.2 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 43s at 38.7%, and directly below is 54o at 38.1%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.6 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 74o is a favourite against 24 of them and an underdog against 144. Its best matchup is 42o at 67.9% and its worst is 77 at 10.1% — a spread of 57.8 points, which is why calling 74o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 73s at 50.9%.
74o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 42o at 67.9%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A7s, which leaves 74o with only 25.5%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 65 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 26.8 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 6.3 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 74o lands -12.4 points from the middle of the pack, and 150 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 38.6% against one opponent, 24.4% against two, 13.9% against four and 7.5% against eight. That last figure is 68% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 1.5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 74o reads as 38.6% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 38.6% against one opponent down to 7.5% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | 74o equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 15.3% | -34.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 15.6% | -34.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 15.2% | -34.8 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 15.4% | -34.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 15.0% | -35.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 14.9% | -35.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 13.8% | -36.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 33.7% | -16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 10.1% | -39.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 33.2% | -16.8 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 33.2% | -16.8 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 35.3% | -14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 33.0% | -17.0 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 34.8% | -15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 34.9% | -15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 33.0% | -17.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 66 | 17 | 29.3% | -20.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 33.2% | -16.8 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 32.8% | -17.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A8s | 21 | 33.1% | -16.9 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 32.9% | -17.1 | HIGH CARD |
| KQo | 23 | 34.8% | -15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A7s | 24 | 25.5% | -24.5 | DOMINATED |
| A9o | 25 | 34.8% | -15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 34.8% | -15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 55 | 27 | 30.2% | -19.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 32.4% | -17.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A6s | 29 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 33.3% | -16.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A8o | 31 | 34.4% | -15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 35.3% | -14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 34.4% | -15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| QTs | 34 | 32.4% | -17.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A4s | 35 | 26.6% | -23.4 | DOMINATED |
| A7o | 36 | 26.4% | -23.6 | DOMINATED |
| K8s | 37 | 33.4% | -16.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 39.0% | -11.0 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 34.8% | -15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9s | 41 | 32.6% | -17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A5o | 42 | 37.0% | -13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 26.2% | -23.8 | DOMINATED |
| A6o | 45 | 38.0% | -12.0 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 31.9% | -18.1 | HIGH CARD |
| QTo | 47 | 33.9% | -16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 44 | 48 | 34.4% | -15.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 27.7% | -22.3 | DOMINATED |
| Q8s | 51 | 32.9% | -17.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 35.0% | -15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 41.3% | -8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 31.9% | -18.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| JTo | 57 | 33.3% | -16.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K7o | 58 | 27.3% | -22.7 | DOMINATED |
| K4s | 59 | 27.3% | -22.7 | DOMINATED |
| A2o | 60 | 42.1% | -7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 26.6% | -23.4 | DOMINATED |
| K6o | 62 | 38.0% | -12.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 40.2% | -9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 32.4% | -17.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 31.3% | -18.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8o | 66 | 34.5% | -15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 46.9% | -3.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6s | 68 | 36.1% | -13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 40.9% | -9.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 33.6% | -16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 38.2% | -11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5s | 72 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J7s | 73 | 26.9% | -23.1 | DOMINATED |
| T8s | 74 | 31.6% | -18.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K4o | 75 | 28.6% | -21.4 | DOMINATED |
| Q7o | 76 | 27.4% | -22.6 | DOMINATED |
| Q4s | 77 | 27.3% | -22.7 | DOMINATED |
| J8o | 78 | 33.9% | -16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 32.7% | -17.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K3o | 80 | 42.4% | -7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 40.0% | -10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q6o | 82 | 37.9% | -12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 31.1% | -18.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 27.7% | -22.3 | DOMINATED |
| J6s | 85 | 36.5% | -13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 43.5% | -6.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 37.8% | -12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 22 | 88 | 48.4% | -1.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q2s | 89 | 40.7% | -9.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J5s | 90 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 33.2% | -16.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J7o | 92 | 28.0% | -22.0 | DOMINATED |
| J4s | 93 | 28.0% | -22.0 | DOMINATED |
| 97s | 94 | 27.0% | -23.0 | DOMINATED |
| Q4o | 95 | 28.8% | -21.2 | DOMINATED |
| T6s | 96 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 40.2% | -9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 32.5% | -17.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 28.4% | -21.6 | DOMINATED |
| Q3o | 100 | 42.2% | -7.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 87s | 101 | 28.6% | -21.4 | DOMINATED |
| J6o | 102 | 38.6% | -11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 40.8% | -9.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 35.1% | -14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 43.1% | -6.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 38.1% | -11.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 36.6% | -13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 28.6% | -21.4 | DOMINATED |
| 97o | 109 | 28.0% | -22.0 | DOMINATED |
| 86s | 110 | 34.8% | -15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 29.4% | -20.6 | DOMINATED |
| T6o | 112 | 37.6% | -12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 95s | 114 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 37.6% | -12.4 | DOMINATED |
| J3o | 116 | 42.4% | -7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 87o | 117 | 29.6% | -20.4 | DOMINATED |
| T2s | 118 | 41.0% | -9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 36.7% | -13.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 38.2% | -11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 43.3% | -6.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 29.9% | -20.1 | DOMINATED |
| 75s | 124 | 41.5% | -8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 29.9% | -20.1 | DOMINATED |
| 93s | 126 | 40.3% | -9.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 36.6% | -13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 51.3% | +1.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 37.6% | -12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 30.3% | -19.7 | DOMINATED |
| T3o | 131 | 42.3% | -7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 92s | 132 | 41.2% | -8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 39.5% | -10.5 | DOMINATED |
| 74s | 134 | 47.5% | -2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 43.2% | -6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 64s | 136 | 62.4% | +12.4 | DOMINATING |
| 85o | 137 | 37.6% | -12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 60.8% | +10.8 | DOMINATING |
| 83s | 139 | 41.5% | -8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 31.2% | -18.8 | DOMINATED |
| 75o | 141 | 43.5% | -6.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 42.2% | -7.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 50.9% | +0.9 | COINFLIP |
| 65o | 144 | 54.6% | +4.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 93o | 145 | 42.9% | -7.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 56.2% | +6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 57.7% | +7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 31.6% | -18.4 | DOMINATED |
| 92o | 149 | 43.6% | -6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 62.2% | +12.2 | DOMINATING |
| 54o | 152 | 64.3% | +14.3 | DOMINATING |
| 72s | 153 | 52.1% | +2.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 57.6% | +7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 64o | 155 | 66.0% | +16.0 | DOMINATING |
| 62s | 156 | 58.7% | +8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 43.7% | -6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 63.9% | +13.9 | DOMINATING |
| 82o | 159 | 44.3% | -5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 54.0% | +4.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 53o | 161 | 59.5% | +9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 63o | 162 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 60.4% | +10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 65.9% | +15.9 | DOMINATING |
| 72o | 165 | 55.1% | +5.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 52o | 166 | 60.8% | +10.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 62.4% | +12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 67.9% | +17.9 | DOMINATING |
| 32o | 169 | 64.1% | +14.1 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of 74o?
38.6% against one random opponent, which ranks it 151 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 11.4%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 7.5%.
How much better is 74o than 74s?
74o is worth 38.6% and 74s 41.8%, a difference of 3.2 points — rank 151 versus rank 134.
How many of the 168 other hands does 74o beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 24 hands and an underdog against 144. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
440 words / 46 distinct figures — Method
