63o

63o (six-three offsuit) wins 36.1% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 162th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 95.9% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 10.8% and its rank moves to 155; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 7.1% for rank 153. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin 63s runs at 39.5% (rank 147), a gap of 3.4 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.4 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 53o at 36.3%, and directly below is 32s at 35.9%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 63o is a favourite against 13 of them and an underdog against 155. Its best matchup is 32o at 64.2% and its worst is 66 at 10.1% — a spread of 54.1 points, which is why calling 63o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 62s at 51.0%.

63o dominates 4 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 32o at 64.2%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A6s, which leaves 63o with only 25.2%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 72 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 29.3 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 3.8 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 63o lands -14.9 points from the middle of the pack, and 161 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 36.1% against one opponent, 22.9% against two, 12.8% against four and 7.1% against eight. That last figure is 64% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 1 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 63o reads as 36.1% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.