94s

94s (nine-four suited) wins 43.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 123th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 72.8% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 14.6% and its rank moves to 116; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 10.6% for rank 105. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin 94o runs at 40.7% (rank 140), a gap of 3.1 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 3.1 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is J2o at 44.4%, and directly below is 75s at 43.7%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.7 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 94s is a favourite against 47 of them and an underdog against 121. Its best matchup is 84o at 71.5% and its worst is 99 at 12.3% — a spread of 59.2 points, which is why calling 94s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.0%.

94s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 84o at 71.5%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A9s, which leaves 94s with only 27.2%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 59 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 23.4 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 7.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 94s lands -7.2 points from the middle of the pack, and 122 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 43.8% against one opponent, 28.6% against two, 17.0% against four and 10.6% against eight. That last figure is 95% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 1.5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 94s reads as 43.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.