K4o

K4o (king-four offsuit) wins 52.2% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 75th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 44.4% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 14.9% and its rank moves to 112; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 9.2% for rank 129. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin K4s runs at 54.9% (rank 59), a gap of 2.7 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.7 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is T8s at 52.3%, and directly below is Q7o at 51.9%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, K4o is a favourite against 114 of them and an underdog against 54. Its best matchup is Q4o at 75.1% and its worst is KK at 6.3% — a spread of 68.8 points, which is why calling K4o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being K3s at 50.3%.

K4o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against Q4o at 75.1%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves K4o with only 22.5%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 27 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 13.2 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 19.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, K4o lands +1.2 points from the middle of the pack, and 74 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 52.2% against one opponent, 32.9% against two, 18.2% against four and 9.2% against eight. That last figure is 83% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why K4o reads as 52.2% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.