169hands
MENU
offsuitbroadwayconnector

KQo

61.5%
Equity vs one random hand — #23 of 169

A connector — straight potential, but nothing else to lean on.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
61.5% · #23
6-handed (5 opponents)
24.7% · #19
9-handed (8 opponents)
16.7% · #20
Chen score
8
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
130 of 168 hands

KQo (king-queen offsuit) wins 61.5% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 23th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 13.6% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 24.7% and its rank moves to 19; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 16.7% for rank 20. A connector — straight potential, but nothing else to lean on.

Its suited/offsuit twin KQs runs at 63.4% (rank 16), a gap of 1.9 points. Losing the shared suit costs 1.9 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is KTs at 61.8%, and directly below is A7s at 60.9%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.9 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, KQo is a favourite against 130 of them and an underdog against 38. Its best matchup is Q2o at 77.0% and its worst is KK at 8.8% — a spread of 68.2 points, which is why calling KQo simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.

KQo dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against Q2o at 77.0%. It is dominated by 4 hands in return, the worst of them AQs, which leaves KQo with only 24.3%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 5 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 3.9 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 29.2 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, KQo lands +10.5 points from the middle of the pack, and 22 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 61.5% against one opponent, 44.4% against two, 29.2% against four and 16.7% against eight. That last figure is 150% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 8 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why KQo reads as 61.5% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 61.5% against one opponent down to 16.7% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%35%70%61.5144.4235.3329.2424.7521.6619.5716.78opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
KQo played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankKQo equityvs 50%Shape
AA113.0%-37.0PAIR VS CARDS
KK28.8%-41.2PAIR VS CARDS
QQ331.4%-18.6PAIR VS CARDS
JJ443.5%-6.5PAIR VS CARDS
TT543.5%-6.5PAIR VS CARDS
99644.8%-5.2PAIR VS CARDS
88746.1%-3.9PAIR VS CARDS
AKs824.5%-25.5DOMINATED
77946.3%-3.7PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1024.3%-25.7DOMINATED
AJs1137.9%-12.1HIGH CARD
AKo1225.3%-24.7DOMINATED
ATs1338.2%-11.8HIGH CARD
AQo1425.4%-24.6DOMINATED
AJo1540.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
KQs1647.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
661746.6%-3.4PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1839.7%-10.3HIGH CARD
ATo1940.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
KJs2070.0%+20.0DOMINATING
A8s2140.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
KTs2269.5%+19.5DOMINATING
A7s2440.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
A9o2541.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
KJo2674.1%+24.1DOMINATING
552747.0%-3.0PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2869.8%+19.8DOMINATING
A6s2940.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
K9s3069.4%+19.4DOMINATING
A8o3142.7%-7.3HIGH CARD
A5s3239.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
KTo3373.6%+23.6DOMINATING
QTs3469.7%+19.7DOMINATING
A4s3539.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
A7o3642.5%-7.5HIGH CARD
K8s3769.9%+19.9DOMINATING
A3s3840.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
QJo3974.2%+24.2DOMINATING
K9o4073.7%+23.7DOMINATING
Q9s4169.9%+19.9DOMINATING
A5o4242.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
A2s4339.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
K7s4469.6%+19.6DOMINATING
A6o4542.5%-7.5HIGH CARD
JTs4660.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
QTo4773.8%+23.8DOMINATING
444847.5%-2.5PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4969.2%+19.2DOMINATING
A4o5042.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
Q8s5171.4%+21.4DOMINATING
K8o5274.0%+24.0DOMINATING
A3o5342.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
K5s5469.2%+19.2DOMINATING
J9s5561.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
Q9o5674.4%+24.4DOMINATING
JTo5764.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
K7o5873.7%+23.7DOMINATING
K4s5969.8%+19.8DOMINATING
A2o6042.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
Q7s6171.2%+21.2DOMINATING
K6o6273.5%+23.5DOMINATING
K3s6370.3%+20.3DOMINATING
J8s6462.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
T9s6560.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
Q8o6676.0%+26.0DOMINATING
336748.4%-1.6PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6871.0%+21.0DOMINATING
K2s6970.8%+20.8DOMINATING
J9o7065.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
K5o7173.7%+23.7DOMINATING
Q5s7271.0%+21.0DOMINATING
J7s7363.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
T8s7461.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
K4o7574.0%+24.0DOMINATING
Q7o7675.5%+25.5DOMINATING
Q4s7771.4%+21.4DOMINATING
J8o7866.7%+16.7HIGH CARD
T9o7964.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
K3o8074.5%+24.5DOMINATING
Q3s8171.9%+21.9DOMINATING
Q6o8275.3%+25.3DOMINATING
98s8360.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
T7s8462.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
J6s8564.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
K2o8674.9%+24.9DOMINATING
Q5o8775.4%+25.4DOMINATING
228848.7%-1.3PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8972.6%+22.6DOMINATING
J5s9064.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
T8o9165.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
J7o9267.5%+17.5HIGH CARD
J4s9364.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
97s9460.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
Q4o9576.0%+26.0DOMINATING
T6s9663.5%+13.5HIGH CARD
J3s9765.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
98o9864.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
T7o9966.3%+16.3HIGH CARD
Q3o10076.4%+26.4DOMINATING
87s10160.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
J6o10268.6%+18.6HIGH CARD
J2s10365.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
96s10461.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
Q2o10577.0%+27.0DOMINATING
J5o10668.2%+18.2HIGH CARD
T5s10764.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
T4s10864.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
97o10964.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
86s11060.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
J4o11168.8%+18.8HIGH CARD
T6o11267.3%+17.3HIGH CARD
T3s11364.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
95s11462.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
76s11559.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
J3o11669.1%+19.1HIGH CARD
87o11764.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
T2s11865.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
85s11961.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
96o12065.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
T5o12168.2%+18.2HIGH CARD
J2o12269.5%+19.5HIGH CARD
94s12363.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
75s12460.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
T4o12568.3%+18.3HIGH CARD
93s12663.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
86o12764.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
65s12858.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
95o12966.3%+16.3HIGH CARD
84s13062.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
T3o13168.7%+18.7HIGH CARD
92s13264.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
76o13362.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
74s13461.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
T2o13569.2%+19.2HIGH CARD
64s13660.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
85o13765.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
54s13859.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
83s13963.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
94o14067.9%+17.9HIGH CARD
75o14163.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
82s14264.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
73s14362.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
65o14462.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
93o14567.8%+17.8HIGH CARD
53s14660.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
63s14761.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
84o14866.5%+16.5HIGH CARD
92o14968.1%+18.1HIGH CARD
43s15060.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
74o15165.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
54o15262.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
72s15364.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
52s15461.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
64o15563.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
62s15663.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
83o15768.0%+18.0HIGH CARD
42s15862.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
82o15968.0%+18.0HIGH CARD
73o16066.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
53o16164.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
63o16265.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
32s16362.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
43o16464.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
72o16567.9%+17.9HIGH CARD
52o16665.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
62o16766.9%+16.9HIGH CARD
42o16865.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
32o16966.3%+16.3HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
KQs63.4%

FAQ

What is the equity of KQo?

61.5% against one random opponent, which ranks it 23 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 24.7%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 16.7%.

How much better is KQo than KQs?

KQo is worth 61.5% and KQs 63.4%, a difference of 1.9 points — rank 23 versus rank 16.

How many of the 168 other hands does KQo beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 130 hands and an underdog against 38. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

424 words / 39 distinct figures — Method