KQo
A connector — straight potential, but nothing else to lean on.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 61.5% · #23
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 24.7% · #19
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 16.7% · #20
- Chen score
- 8
- Combos
- 12 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.9%
- Favourite against
- 130 of 168 hands
KQo (king-queen offsuit) wins 61.5% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 23th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 13.6% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 24.7% and its rank moves to 19; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 16.7% for rank 20. A connector — straight potential, but nothing else to lean on.
Its suited/offsuit twin KQs runs at 63.4% (rank 16), a gap of 1.9 points. Losing the shared suit costs 1.9 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is KTs at 61.8%, and directly below is A7s at 60.9%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.9 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, KQo is a favourite against 130 of them and an underdog against 38. Its best matchup is Q2o at 77.0% and its worst is KK at 8.8% — a spread of 68.2 points, which is why calling KQo simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.
KQo dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against Q2o at 77.0%. It is dominated by 4 hands in return, the worst of them AQs, which leaves KQo with only 24.3%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 5 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 3.9 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 29.2 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, KQo lands +10.5 points from the middle of the pack, and 22 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 61.5% against one opponent, 44.4% against two, 29.2% against four and 16.7% against eight. That last figure is 150% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 8 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why KQo reads as 61.5% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 61.5% against one opponent down to 16.7% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | KQo equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 13.0% | -37.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 8.8% | -41.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 31.4% | -18.6 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 43.5% | -6.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 43.5% | -6.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 44.8% | -5.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 46.1% | -3.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 24.5% | -25.5 | DOMINATED |
| 77 | 9 | 46.3% | -3.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 24.3% | -25.7 | DOMINATED |
| AJs | 11 | 37.9% | -12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 25.3% | -24.7 | DOMINATED |
| ATs | 13 | 38.2% | -11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 25.4% | -24.6 | DOMINATED |
| AJo | 15 | 40.2% | -9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 47.5% | -2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 66 | 17 | 46.6% | -3.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 39.7% | -10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 40.0% | -10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 70.0% | +20.0 | DOMINATING |
| A8s | 21 | 40.3% | -9.7 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 69.5% | +19.5 | DOMINATING |
| A7s | 24 | 40.4% | -9.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A9o | 25 | 41.9% | -8.1 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 74.1% | +24.1 | DOMINATING |
| 55 | 27 | 47.0% | -3.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 69.8% | +19.8 | DOMINATING |
| A6s | 29 | 40.2% | -9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 69.4% | +19.4 | DOMINATING |
| A8o | 31 | 42.7% | -7.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 39.6% | -10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 73.6% | +23.6 | DOMINATING |
| QTs | 34 | 69.7% | +19.7 | DOMINATING |
| A4s | 35 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 42.5% | -7.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K8s | 37 | 69.9% | +19.9 | DOMINATING |
| A3s | 38 | 40.0% | -10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 74.2% | +24.2 | DOMINATING |
| K9o | 40 | 73.7% | +23.7 | DOMINATING |
| Q9s | 41 | 69.9% | +19.9 | DOMINATING |
| A5o | 42 | 42.1% | -7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 69.6% | +19.6 | DOMINATING |
| A6o | 45 | 42.5% | -7.5 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| QTo | 47 | 73.8% | +23.8 | DOMINATING |
| 44 | 48 | 47.5% | -2.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 69.2% | +19.2 | DOMINATING |
| A4o | 50 | 42.0% | -8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 71.4% | +21.4 | DOMINATING |
| K8o | 52 | 74.0% | +24.0 | DOMINATING |
| A3o | 53 | 42.3% | -7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 69.2% | +19.2 | DOMINATING |
| J9s | 55 | 61.8% | +11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 74.4% | +24.4 | DOMINATING |
| JTo | 57 | 64.6% | +14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K7o | 58 | 73.7% | +23.7 | DOMINATING |
| K4s | 59 | 69.8% | +19.8 | DOMINATING |
| A2o | 60 | 42.3% | -7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 71.2% | +21.2 | DOMINATING |
| K6o | 62 | 73.5% | +23.5 | DOMINATING |
| K3s | 63 | 70.3% | +20.3 | DOMINATING |
| J8s | 64 | 62.7% | +12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 60.8% | +10.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8o | 66 | 76.0% | +26.0 | DOMINATING |
| 33 | 67 | 48.4% | -1.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6s | 68 | 71.0% | +21.0 | DOMINATING |
| K2s | 69 | 70.8% | +20.8 | DOMINATING |
| J9o | 70 | 65.6% | +15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 73.7% | +23.7 | DOMINATING |
| Q5s | 72 | 71.0% | +21.0 | DOMINATING |
| J7s | 73 | 63.8% | +13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T8s | 74 | 61.7% | +11.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K4o | 75 | 74.0% | +24.0 | DOMINATING |
| Q7o | 76 | 75.5% | +25.5 | DOMINATING |
| Q4s | 77 | 71.4% | +21.4 | DOMINATING |
| J8o | 78 | 66.7% | +16.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 64.3% | +14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K3o | 80 | 74.5% | +24.5 | DOMINATING |
| Q3s | 81 | 71.9% | +21.9 | DOMINATING |
| Q6o | 82 | 75.3% | +25.3 | DOMINATING |
| 98s | 83 | 60.1% | +10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 62.6% | +12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J6s | 85 | 64.5% | +14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 74.9% | +24.9 | DOMINATING |
| Q5o | 87 | 75.4% | +25.4 | DOMINATING |
| 22 | 88 | 48.7% | -1.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q2s | 89 | 72.6% | +22.6 | DOMINATING |
| J5s | 90 | 64.6% | +14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 65.4% | +15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J7o | 92 | 67.5% | +17.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J4s | 93 | 64.6% | +14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4o | 95 | 76.0% | +26.0 | DOMINATING |
| T6s | 96 | 63.5% | +13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 65.0% | +15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 64.1% | +14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 66.3% | +16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3o | 100 | 76.4% | +26.4 | DOMINATING |
| 87s | 101 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J6o | 102 | 68.6% | +18.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 65.3% | +15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 61.5% | +11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 77.0% | +27.0 | DOMINATING |
| J5o | 106 | 68.2% | +18.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 64.3% | +14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 64.5% | +14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 97o | 109 | 64.5% | +14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 86s | 110 | 60.4% | +10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 68.8% | +18.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 67.3% | +17.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 95s | 114 | 62.4% | +12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 59.0% | +9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J3o | 116 | 69.1% | +19.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 87o | 117 | 64.5% | +14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T2s | 118 | 65.1% | +15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 61.2% | +11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 65.5% | +15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 68.2% | +18.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 69.5% | +19.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 63.7% | +13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 60.3% | +10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 68.3% | +18.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 93s | 126 | 63.7% | +13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 64.2% | +14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 58.9% | +8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 66.3% | +16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 62.7% | +12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 68.7% | +18.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 92s | 132 | 64.4% | +14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 62.9% | +12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 74s | 134 | 61.5% | +11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 69.2% | +19.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 64s | 136 | 60.2% | +10.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 65.2% | +15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 59.1% | +9.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 63.9% | +13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 67.9% | +17.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 63.9% | +13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 64.0% | +14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 62.7% | +12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 65o | 144 | 62.6% | +12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 93o | 145 | 67.8% | +17.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 60.3% | +10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 61.5% | +11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 66.5% | +16.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 68.1% | +18.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 60.7% | +10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 65.2% | +15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 62.5% | +12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 64.2% | +14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 61.5% | +11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 64o | 155 | 63.9% | +13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 63.1% | +13.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 68.0% | +18.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 62.1% | +12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 68.0% | +18.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 66.6% | +16.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 53o | 161 | 64.0% | +14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 63o | 162 | 65.3% | +15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 62.4% | +12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 64.5% | +14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 67.9% | +17.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 52o | 166 | 65.5% | +15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 66.9% | +16.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 65.8% | +15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 66.3% | +16.3 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of KQo?
61.5% against one random opponent, which ranks it 23 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 24.7%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 16.7%.
How much better is KQo than KQs?
KQo is worth 61.5% and KQs 63.4%, a difference of 1.9 points — rank 23 versus rank 16.
How many of the 168 other hands does KQo beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 130 hands and an underdog against 38. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
424 words / 39 distinct figures — Method
