T6s

T6s (ten-six suited) wins 48.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 96th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 56.8% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 17.3% and its rank moves to 75; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 12.2% for rank 74. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin T6o runs at 46.0% (rank 112), a gap of 2.8 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.8 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is Q4o at 49.1%, and directly below is J3s at 48.3%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.8 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, T6s is a favourite against 67 of them and an underdog against 101. Its best matchup is 62o at 74.3% and its worst is TT at 13.7% — a spread of 60.6 points, which is why calling T6s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 3 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 33 at 50.1%.

T6s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 62o at 74.3%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them JTs, which leaves T6s with only 28.0%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 46 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 18.4 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 12.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, T6s lands -2.2 points from the middle of the pack, and 95 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 48.8% against one opponent, 32.9% against two, 20.3% against four and 12.2% against eight. That last figure is 110% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why T6s reads as 48.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.