169hands
MENU
offsuit

82o

36.8%
Equity vs one random hand — #159 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
36.8% · #159
6-handed (5 opponents)
9.0% · #167
9-handed (8 opponents)
5.6% · #168
Chen score
-1
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
29 of 168 hands

82o (eight-deuce offsuit) wins 36.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 159th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 94.1% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 9.0% and its rank moves to 167; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 5.6% for rank 168. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin 82s runs at 40.3% (rank 142), a gap of 3.5 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.5 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 42s at 36.9%, and directly below is 73o at 36.6%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.3 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 82o is a favourite against 29 of them and an underdog against 139. Its best matchup is 72o at 70.2% and its worst is 88 at 6.7% — a spread of 63.5 points, which is why calling 82o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 4 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 76s at 49.6%.

82o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 72o at 70.2%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A8s, which leaves 82o with only 22.5%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 69 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 28.6 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 4.5 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 82o lands -14.2 points from the middle of the pack, and 158 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 36.8% against one opponent, 21.8% against two, 11.5% against four and 5.6% against eight. That last figure is 50% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at -1 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 82o reads as 36.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 36.8% against one opponent down to 5.6% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%20%40%36.8121.8215.0311.549.057.666.475.68opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
82o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rank82o equityvs 50%Shape
AA112.2%-37.8PAIR VS CARDS
KK212.1%-37.9PAIR VS CARDS
QQ312.2%-37.8PAIR VS CARDS
JJ412.0%-38.0PAIR VS CARDS
TT511.9%-38.1PAIR VS CARDS
99611.5%-38.5PAIR VS CARDS
8876.7%-43.3PAIR VS CARDS
AKs830.9%-19.1HIGH CARD
77927.5%-22.5PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1031.0%-19.0HIGH CARD
AJs1130.6%-19.4HIGH CARD
AKo1232.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
ATs1330.2%-19.8HIGH CARD
AQo1432.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
AJo1532.3%-17.7HIGH CARD
KQs1630.3%-19.7HIGH CARD
661728.4%-21.6PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1830.7%-19.3HIGH CARD
ATo1932.0%-18.0HIGH CARD
KJs2030.6%-19.4HIGH CARD
A8s2122.5%-27.5DOMINATED
KTs2230.3%-19.7HIGH CARD
KQo2332.0%-18.0HIGH CARD
A7s2433.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
A9o2532.1%-17.9HIGH CARD
KJo2632.0%-18.0HIGH CARD
552729.1%-20.9PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2829.8%-20.2HIGH CARD
A6s2934.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
K9s3030.6%-19.4HIGH CARD
A8o3123.2%-26.8DOMINATED
A5s3233.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
KTo3331.7%-18.3HIGH CARD
QTs3429.7%-20.3HIGH CARD
A4s3533.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
A7o3635.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
K8s3723.0%-27.0DOMINATED
A3s3833.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
QJo3931.3%-18.7HIGH CARD
K9o4032.0%-18.0HIGH CARD
Q9s4130.0%-20.0HIGH CARD
A5o4235.0%-15.0HIGH CARD
A2s4324.0%-26.0DOMINATED
K7s4433.5%-16.5HIGH CARD
A6o4536.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
JTs4628.8%-21.2HIGH CARD
QTo4731.1%-18.9HIGH CARD
444830.2%-19.8PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4934.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
A4o5035.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
Q8s5123.4%-26.6DOMINATED
K8o5224.0%-26.0DOMINATED
A3o5335.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
K5s5434.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
J9s5529.1%-20.9HIGH CARD
Q9o5631.2%-18.8HIGH CARD
JTo5730.2%-19.8HIGH CARD
K7o5835.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
K4s5934.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
A2o6025.3%-24.7DOMINATED
Q7s6134.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
K6o6235.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
K3s6334.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
J8s6423.8%-26.2DOMINATED
T9s6528.5%-21.5HIGH CARD
Q8o6624.2%-25.8DOMINATED
336731.4%-18.6PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6834.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
K2s6924.5%-25.5DOMINATED
J9o7030.4%-19.6HIGH CARD
K5o7135.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
Q5s7234.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
J7s7333.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
T8s7424.3%-25.7DOMINATED
K4o7536.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
Q7o7635.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
Q4s7734.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
J8o7824.7%-25.3DOMINATED
T9o7929.6%-20.4HIGH CARD
K3o8036.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
Q3s8135.1%-14.9HIGH CARD
Q6o8235.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
98s8325.3%-24.7DOMINATED
T7s8432.3%-17.7HIGH CARD
J6s8534.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
K2o8625.6%-24.4DOMINATED
Q5o8735.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
228833.1%-16.9PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8925.0%-25.0DOMINATED
J5s9034.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
T8o9125.1%-24.9DOMINATED
J7o9234.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
J4s9334.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
97s9431.7%-18.3HIGH CARD
Q4o9536.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
T6s9633.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
J3s9734.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
98o9826.1%-23.9DOMINATED
T7o9934.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
Q3o10036.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
87s10133.1%-16.9DOMINATED
J6o10236.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
J2s10325.2%-24.8DOMINATED
96s10432.8%-17.2HIGH CARD
Q2o10526.2%-23.8DOMINATED
J5o10635.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
T5s10734.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
T4s10834.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
97o10933.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
86s11036.8%-13.2DOMINATED
J4o11136.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
T6o11235.1%-14.9HIGH CARD
T3s11334.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
95s11433.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
76s11549.6%-0.4COINFLIP
J3o11636.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
87o11734.9%-15.1DOMINATED
T2s11826.0%-24.0DOMINATED
85s11940.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
96o12034.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
T5o12136.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
J2o12226.5%-23.5DOMINATED
94s12335.0%-15.0HIGH CARD
75s12450.9%+0.9COINFLIP
T4o12536.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
93s12635.0%-15.0HIGH CARD
86o12738.8%-11.2DOMINATED
65s12850.5%+0.5COINFLIP
95o12935.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
84s13043.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
T3o13136.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
92s13226.8%-23.2DOMINATED
76o13352.6%+2.6HIGH CARD
74s13452.4%+2.4HIGH CARD
T2o13527.1%-22.9DOMINATED
64s13651.8%+1.8HIGH CARD
85o13742.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
54s13850.9%+0.9COINFLIP
83s13944.6%-5.4HIGH CARD
94o14036.8%-13.2HIGH CARD
75o14153.9%+3.9HIGH CARD
82s14247.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
73s14353.7%+3.7HIGH CARD
65o14453.3%+3.3HIGH CARD
93o14536.9%-13.1HIGH CARD
53s14652.2%+2.2HIGH CARD
63s14753.2%+3.2HIGH CARD
84o14845.9%-4.1HIGH CARD
92o14928.1%-21.9DOMINATED
43s15052.6%+2.6HIGH CARD
74o15155.7%+5.7HIGH CARD
54o15253.7%+3.7HIGH CARD
72s15366.3%+16.3DOMINATING
52s15463.2%+13.2DOMINATING
64o15554.9%+4.9HIGH CARD
62s15664.7%+14.7DOMINATING
83o15747.2%-2.8HIGH CARD
42s15863.5%+13.5DOMINATING
73o16057.0%+7.0HIGH CARD
53o16155.3%+5.3HIGH CARD
63o16256.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
32s16363.8%+13.8DOMINATING
43o16455.8%+5.8HIGH CARD
72o16570.2%+20.2DOMINATING
52o16667.0%+17.0DOMINATING
62o16768.8%+18.8DOMINATING
42o16867.2%+17.2DOMINATING
32o16967.5%+17.5DOMINATING

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
82s40.3%

FAQ

What is the equity of 82o?

36.8% against one random opponent, which ranks it 159 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 9.0%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 5.6%.

How much better is 82o than 82s?

82o is worth 36.8% and 82s 40.3%, a difference of 3.5 points — rank 159 versus rank 142.

How many of the 168 other hands does 82o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 29 hands and an underdog against 139. 4 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

440 words / 45 distinct figures — Method