74s
A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 41.8% · #134
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 15.4% · #103
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 11.3% · #91
- Chen score
- 3.5
- Combos
- 4 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.3%
- Favourite against
- 26 of 168 hands
74s (seven-four suited) wins 41.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 134th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 79.3% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 15.4% and its rank moves to 103; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 11.3% for rank 91. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.
Its suited/offsuit twin 74o runs at 38.6% (rank 151), a gap of 3.2 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 3.2 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 76o at 42.3%, and directly below is T2o at 41.7%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.6 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 74s is a favourite against 26 of them and an underdog against 142. Its best matchup is 42o at 69.2% and its worst is 77 at 15.3% — a spread of 53.9 points, which is why calling 74s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 33 at 49.6%.
74s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 42o at 69.2%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A7s, which leaves 74s with only 29.5%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 suited hands it comes 65 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 25.4 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 5.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 74s lands -9.2 points from the middle of the pack, and 133 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 41.8% against one opponent, 28.3% against two, 17.7% against four and 11.3% against eight. That last figure is 102% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3.5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 74s reads as 41.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 41.8% against one opponent down to 11.3% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | 74s equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 19.5% | -30.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 19.3% | -30.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 19.2% | -30.8 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 19.4% | -30.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 19.1% | -30.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 18.9% | -31.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 17.9% | -32.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 36.5% | -13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 15.3% | -34.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 36.1% | -13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 36.0% | -14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 39.0% | -11.0 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 38.7% | -11.3 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 38.7% | -11.3 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 66 | 17 | 32.8% | -17.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 38.2% | -11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 36.1% | -13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A8s | 21 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| KQo | 23 | 38.5% | -11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A7s | 24 | 29.5% | -20.5 | DOMINATED |
| A9o | 25 | 38.7% | -11.3 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 38.5% | -11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 55 | 27 | 33.5% | -16.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 35.3% | -14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A6s | 29 | 39.1% | -10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 36.0% | -14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A8o | 31 | 38.4% | -11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 38.0% | -12.0 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 38.4% | -11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| QTs | 34 | 35.2% | -14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A4s | 35 | 30.4% | -19.6 | DOMINATED |
| A7o | 36 | 30.5% | -19.5 | DOMINATED |
| K8s | 37 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 41.7% | -8.3 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 37.8% | -12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 38.8% | -11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9s | 41 | 35.7% | -14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A5o | 42 | 40.7% | -9.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 42.6% | -7.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 30.2% | -19.8 | DOMINATED |
| A6o | 45 | 41.8% | -8.2 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| QTo | 47 | 37.9% | -12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 44 | 48 | 38.0% | -12.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 39.3% | -10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 31.9% | -18.1 | DOMINATED |
| Q8s | 51 | 36.0% | -14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 38.9% | -11.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 44.5% | -5.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 39.2% | -10.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 35.1% | -14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 37.9% | -12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| JTo | 57 | 37.2% | -12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K7o | 58 | 31.4% | -18.6 | DOMINATED |
| K4s | 59 | 31.3% | -18.7 | DOMINATED |
| A2o | 60 | 45.3% | -4.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 30.5% | -19.5 | DOMINATED |
| K6o | 62 | 41.8% | -8.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 43.0% | -7.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 35.4% | -14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8o | 66 | 38.5% | -11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 49.6% | -0.4 | COINFLIP |
| Q6s | 68 | 38.8% | -11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 43.8% | -6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 37.4% | -12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 41.8% | -8.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5s | 72 | 38.9% | -11.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J7s | 73 | 31.0% | -19.0 | DOMINATED |
| T8s | 74 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K4o | 75 | 32.5% | -17.5 | DOMINATED |
| Q7o | 76 | 31.9% | -18.1 | DOMINATED |
| Q4s | 77 | 31.6% | -18.4 | DOMINATED |
| J8o | 78 | 37.9% | -12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 36.8% | -13.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K3o | 80 | 45.9% | -4.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 42.6% | -7.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q6o | 82 | 41.6% | -8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 31.7% | -18.3 | DOMINATED |
| J6s | 85 | 39.3% | -10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 46.5% | -3.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 41.5% | -8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 22 | 88 | 51.0% | +1.0 | COINFLIP |
| Q2s | 89 | 43.5% | -6.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J5s | 90 | 39.1% | -10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 37.2% | -12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J7o | 92 | 32.4% | -17.6 | DOMINATED |
| J4s | 93 | 32.1% | -17.9 | DOMINATED |
| 97s | 94 | 31.2% | -18.8 | DOMINATED |
| Q4o | 95 | 32.8% | -17.2 | DOMINATED |
| T6s | 96 | 38.5% | -11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 42.9% | -7.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 32.7% | -17.3 | DOMINATED |
| Q3o | 100 | 45.3% | -4.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 87s | 101 | 32.5% | -17.5 | DOMINATED |
| J6o | 102 | 42.0% | -8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 43.7% | -6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 38.0% | -12.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 46.1% | -3.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 41.6% | -8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 39.5% | -10.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 32.6% | -17.4 | DOMINATED |
| 97o | 109 | 32.2% | -17.8 | DOMINATED |
| 86s | 110 | 37.8% | -12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 33.4% | -16.6 | DOMINATED |
| T6o | 112 | 41.3% | -8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 42.9% | -7.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 95s | 114 | 38.6% | -11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 40.9% | -9.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J3o | 116 | 45.8% | -4.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 87o | 117 | 33.6% | -16.4 | DOMINATED |
| T2s | 118 | 43.5% | -6.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 38.5% | -11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 40.5% | -9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 41.9% | -8.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 46.5% | -3.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 33.7% | -16.3 | DOMINATED |
| 75s | 124 | 44.3% | -5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 33.8% | -16.2 | DOMINATED |
| 93s | 126 | 43.3% | -6.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 40.2% | -9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 54.5% | +4.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 41.2% | -8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 34.2% | -15.8 | DOMINATED |
| T3o | 131 | 45.5% | -4.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 92s | 132 | 44.0% | -6.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 42.8% | -7.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 46.4% | -3.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 64s | 136 | 63.8% | +13.8 | DOMINATING |
| 85o | 137 | 41.2% | -8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 62.2% | +12.2 | DOMINATING |
| 83s | 139 | 44.0% | -6.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 35.1% | -14.9 | DOMINATED |
| 75o | 141 | 46.6% | -3.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 44.9% | -5.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 53.3% | +3.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 65o | 144 | 56.9% | +6.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 93o | 145 | 45.8% | -4.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 58.9% | +8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 59.9% | +9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 35.3% | -14.7 | DOMINATED |
| 92o | 149 | 46.8% | -3.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 63.3% | +13.3 | DOMINATING |
| 74o | 151 | 52.5% | +2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 65.8% | +15.8 | DOMINATING |
| 72s | 153 | 54.4% | +4.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 60.0% | +10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 64o | 155 | 67.3% | +17.3 | DOMINATING |
| 62s | 156 | 61.6% | +11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 46.8% | -3.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 65.4% | +15.4 | DOMINATING |
| 82o | 159 | 47.6% | -2.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 56.2% | +6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 53o | 161 | 61.5% | +11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 63o | 162 | 63.0% | +13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 63.2% | +13.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 67.1% | +17.1 | DOMINATING |
| 72o | 165 | 57.5% | +7.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 52o | 166 | 62.8% | +12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 64.2% | +14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 69.2% | +19.2 | DOMINATING |
| 32o | 169 | 65.9% | +15.9 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of 74s?
41.8% against one random opponent, which ranks it 134 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 15.4%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 11.3%.
How much better is 74s than 74o?
74s is worth 41.8% and 74o 38.6%, a difference of 3.2 points — rank 134 versus rank 151.
How many of the 168 other hands does 74s beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 26 hands and an underdog against 142. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
447 words / 47 distinct figures — Method
