169hands
MENU
suited

74s

41.8%
Equity vs one random hand — #134 of 169

A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
41.8% · #134
6-handed (5 opponents)
15.4% · #103
9-handed (8 opponents)
11.3% · #91
Chen score
3.5
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
26 of 168 hands

74s (seven-four suited) wins 41.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 134th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 79.3% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 15.4% and its rank moves to 103; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 11.3% for rank 91. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin 74o runs at 38.6% (rank 151), a gap of 3.2 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 3.2 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 76o at 42.3%, and directly below is T2o at 41.7%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.6 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 74s is a favourite against 26 of them and an underdog against 142. Its best matchup is 42o at 69.2% and its worst is 77 at 15.3% — a spread of 53.9 points, which is why calling 74s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 33 at 49.6%.

74s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 42o at 69.2%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A7s, which leaves 74s with only 29.5%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 65 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 25.4 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 5.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 74s lands -9.2 points from the middle of the pack, and 133 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 41.8% against one opponent, 28.3% against two, 17.7% against four and 11.3% against eight. That last figure is 102% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3.5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 74s reads as 41.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 41.8% against one opponent down to 11.3% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%25%50%41.8128.3221.6317.7415.4513.4612.3711.38opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
74s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rank74s equityvs 50%Shape
AA119.5%-30.5PAIR VS CARDS
KK219.3%-30.7PAIR VS CARDS
QQ319.2%-30.8PAIR VS CARDS
JJ419.4%-30.6PAIR VS CARDS
TT519.1%-30.9PAIR VS CARDS
99618.9%-31.1PAIR VS CARDS
88717.9%-32.1PAIR VS CARDS
AKs836.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
77915.3%-34.7PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1036.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
AJs1136.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
AKo1239.0%-11.0HIGH CARD
ATs1335.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
AQo1438.7%-11.3HIGH CARD
AJo1538.7%-11.3HIGH CARD
KQs1635.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
661732.8%-17.2PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1836.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
ATo1938.2%-11.8HIGH CARD
KJs2036.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
A8s2135.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
KTs2235.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
KQo2338.5%-11.5HIGH CARD
A7s2429.5%-20.5DOMINATED
A9o2538.7%-11.3HIGH CARD
KJo2638.5%-11.5HIGH CARD
552733.5%-16.5PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2835.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
A6s2939.1%-10.9HIGH CARD
K9s3036.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
A8o3138.4%-11.6HIGH CARD
A5s3238.0%-12.0HIGH CARD
KTo3338.4%-11.6HIGH CARD
QTs3435.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
A4s3530.4%-19.6DOMINATED
A7o3630.5%-19.5DOMINATED
K8s3736.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
A3s3841.7%-8.3HIGH CARD
QJo3937.8%-12.2HIGH CARD
K9o4038.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
Q9s4135.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
A5o4240.7%-9.3HIGH CARD
A2s4342.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
K7s4430.2%-19.8DOMINATED
A6o4541.8%-8.2HIGH CARD
JTs4634.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
QTo4737.9%-12.1HIGH CARD
444838.0%-12.0PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4939.3%-10.7HIGH CARD
A4o5031.9%-18.1DOMINATED
Q8s5136.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
K8o5238.9%-11.1HIGH CARD
A3o5344.5%-5.5HIGH CARD
K5s5439.2%-10.8HIGH CARD
J9s5535.1%-14.9HIGH CARD
Q9o5637.9%-12.1HIGH CARD
JTo5737.2%-12.8HIGH CARD
K7o5831.4%-18.6DOMINATED
K4s5931.3%-18.7DOMINATED
A2o6045.3%-4.7HIGH CARD
Q7s6130.5%-19.5DOMINATED
K6o6241.8%-8.2HIGH CARD
K3s6343.0%-7.0HIGH CARD
J8s6435.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
T9s6534.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
Q8o6638.5%-11.5HIGH CARD
336749.6%-0.4COINFLIP
Q6s6838.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
K2s6943.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
J9o7037.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
K5o7141.8%-8.2HIGH CARD
Q5s7238.9%-11.1HIGH CARD
J7s7331.0%-19.0DOMINATED
T8s7434.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
K4o7532.5%-17.5DOMINATED
Q7o7631.9%-18.1DOMINATED
Q4s7731.6%-18.4DOMINATED
J8o7837.9%-12.1HIGH CARD
T9o7936.8%-13.2HIGH CARD
K3o8045.9%-4.1HIGH CARD
Q3s8142.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
Q6o8241.6%-8.4HIGH CARD
98s8334.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
T7s8431.7%-18.3DOMINATED
J6s8539.3%-10.7HIGH CARD
K2o8646.5%-3.5HIGH CARD
Q5o8741.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
228851.0%+1.0COINFLIP
Q2s8943.5%-6.5HIGH CARD
J5s9039.1%-10.9HIGH CARD
T8o9137.2%-12.8HIGH CARD
J7o9232.4%-17.6DOMINATED
J4s9332.1%-17.9DOMINATED
97s9431.2%-18.8DOMINATED
Q4o9532.8%-17.2DOMINATED
T6s9638.5%-11.5HIGH CARD
J3s9742.9%-7.1HIGH CARD
98o9836.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
T7o9932.7%-17.3DOMINATED
Q3o10045.3%-4.7HIGH CARD
87s10132.5%-17.5DOMINATED
J6o10242.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
J2s10343.7%-6.3HIGH CARD
96s10438.0%-12.0HIGH CARD
Q2o10546.1%-3.9HIGH CARD
J5o10641.6%-8.4HIGH CARD
T5s10739.5%-10.5HIGH CARD
T4s10832.6%-17.4DOMINATED
97o10932.2%-17.8DOMINATED
86s11037.8%-12.2HIGH CARD
J4o11133.4%-16.6DOMINATED
T6o11241.3%-8.7HIGH CARD
T3s11342.9%-7.1HIGH CARD
95s11438.6%-11.4HIGH CARD
76s11540.9%-9.1HIGH CARD
J3o11645.8%-4.2HIGH CARD
87o11733.6%-16.4DOMINATED
T2s11843.5%-6.5HIGH CARD
85s11938.5%-11.5HIGH CARD
96o12040.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
T5o12141.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
J2o12246.5%-3.5HIGH CARD
94s12333.7%-16.3DOMINATED
75s12444.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
T4o12533.8%-16.2DOMINATED
93s12643.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
86o12740.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
65s12854.5%+4.5HIGH CARD
95o12941.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
84s13034.2%-15.8DOMINATED
T3o13145.5%-4.5HIGH CARD
92s13244.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
76o13342.8%-7.2HIGH CARD
T2o13546.4%-3.6HIGH CARD
64s13663.8%+13.8DOMINATING
85o13741.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
54s13862.2%+12.2DOMINATING
83s13944.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
94o14035.1%-14.9DOMINATED
75o14146.6%-3.4HIGH CARD
82s14244.9%-5.1HIGH CARD
73s14353.3%+3.3HIGH CARD
65o14456.9%+6.9HIGH CARD
93o14545.8%-4.2HIGH CARD
53s14658.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
63s14759.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
84o14835.3%-14.7DOMINATED
92o14946.8%-3.2HIGH CARD
43s15063.3%+13.3DOMINATING
74o15152.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
54o15265.8%+15.8DOMINATING
72s15354.4%+4.4HIGH CARD
52s15460.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
64o15567.3%+17.3DOMINATING
62s15661.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
83o15746.8%-3.2HIGH CARD
42s15865.4%+15.4DOMINATING
82o15947.6%-2.4HIGH CARD
73o16056.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
53o16161.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
63o16263.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
32s16363.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
43o16467.1%+17.1DOMINATING
72o16557.5%+7.5HIGH CARD
52o16662.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
62o16764.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
42o16869.2%+19.2DOMINATING
32o16965.9%+15.9HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
74o38.6%

FAQ

What is the equity of 74s?

41.8% against one random opponent, which ranks it 134 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 15.4%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 11.3%.

How much better is 74s than 74o?

74s is worth 41.8% and 74o 38.6%, a difference of 3.2 points — rank 134 versus rank 151.

How many of the 168 other hands does 74s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 26 hands and an underdog against 142. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

447 words / 47 distinct figures — Method