169hands
MENU
suited

J4s

49.2%
Equity vs one random hand — #93 of 169

A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
49.2% · #93
6-handed (5 opponents)
16.5% · #90
9-handed (8 opponents)
11.7% · #83
Chen score
3
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
77 of 168 hands

J4s (jack-four suited) wins 49.2% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 93th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 55% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 16.5% and its rank moves to 90; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 11.7% for rank 83. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin J4o runs at 46.1% (rank 111), a gap of 3.1 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 3.1 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is J7o at 49.7%, and directly below is 97s at 49.2%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.5 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, J4s is a favourite against 77 of them and an underdog against 91. Its best matchup is T4o at 74.8% and its worst is JJ at 12.1% — a spread of 62.7 points, which is why calling J4s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.4%.

J4s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against T4o at 74.8%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AJs, which leaves J4s with only 27.2%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 44 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 18 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 13.3 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, J4s lands -1.8 points from the middle of the pack, and 92 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 49.2% against one opponent, 31.8% against two, 19.8% against four and 11.7% against eight. That last figure is 105% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why J4s reads as 49.2% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 49.2% against one opponent down to 11.7% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%25%50%49.2131.8224.0319.8416.5514.4612.8711.78opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
J4s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankJ4s equityvs 50%Shape
AA116.7%-33.3PAIR VS CARDS
KK216.6%-33.4PAIR VS CARDS
QQ316.5%-33.5PAIR VS CARDS
JJ412.1%-37.9PAIR VS CARDS
TT531.4%-18.6PAIR VS CARDS
99631.8%-18.2PAIR VS CARDS
88732.6%-17.4PAIR VS CARDS
AKs833.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
77933.1%-16.9PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1033.5%-16.5HIGH CARD
AJs1127.2%-22.8DOMINATED
AKo1236.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
ATs1336.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
AQo1436.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
AJo1528.2%-21.8DOMINATED
KQs1633.0%-17.0HIGH CARD
661733.7%-16.3PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1837.5%-12.5HIGH CARD
ATo1938.9%-11.1HIGH CARD
KJs2027.9%-22.1DOMINATED
A8s2137.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
KTs2235.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
KQo2335.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
A7s2437.8%-12.2HIGH CARD
A9o2540.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
KJo2628.6%-21.4DOMINATED
552734.2%-15.8PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2827.7%-22.3DOMINATED
A6s2937.9%-12.1HIGH CARD
K9s3036.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
A8o3140.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
A5s3236.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
KTo3338.2%-11.8HIGH CARD
QTs3434.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
A4s3528.0%-22.0DOMINATED
A7o3640.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
K8s3737.8%-12.2HIGH CARD
A3s3840.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
QJo3928.9%-21.1DOMINATED
K9o4039.2%-10.8HIGH CARD
Q9s4135.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
A5o4239.1%-10.9HIGH CARD
A2s4340.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
K7s4437.7%-12.3HIGH CARD
A6o4540.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
JTs4630.7%-19.3DOMINATED
QTo4736.9%-13.1HIGH CARD
444836.1%-13.9PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4937.7%-12.3HIGH CARD
A4o5029.1%-20.9DOMINATED
Q8s5136.8%-13.2HIGH CARD
K8o5240.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
A3o5342.9%-7.1HIGH CARD
K5s5437.5%-12.5HIGH CARD
J9s5532.3%-17.7DOMINATED
Q9o5638.2%-11.8HIGH CARD
JTo5731.9%-18.1DOMINATED
K7o5840.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
K4s5928.5%-21.5DOMINATED
A2o6043.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
Q7s6137.7%-12.3HIGH CARD
K6o6240.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
K3s6341.0%-9.0HIGH CARD
J8s6435.1%-14.9DOMINATED
T9s6554.1%+4.1HIGH CARD
Q8o6639.1%-10.9HIGH CARD
336748.5%-1.5PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6837.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
K2s6941.3%-8.7HIGH CARD
J9o7034.0%-16.0DOMINATED
K5o7139.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
Q5s7237.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
J7s7338.2%-11.8DOMINATED
T8s7455.6%+5.6HIGH CARD
K4o7529.7%-20.3DOMINATED
Q7o7640.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
Q4s7729.0%-21.0DOMINATED
J8o7836.8%-13.2DOMINATED
T9o7956.8%+6.8HIGH CARD
K3o8043.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
Q3s8140.7%-9.3HIGH CARD
Q6o8240.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
98s8354.1%+4.1HIGH CARD
T7s8456.8%+6.8HIGH CARD
J6s8541.8%-8.2HIGH CARD
K2o8644.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
Q5o8739.8%-10.2HIGH CARD
228849.4%-0.6COINFLIP
Q2s8941.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
J5s9044.7%-5.3HIGH CARD
T8o9158.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
J7o9239.8%-10.2DOMINATED
97s9455.1%+5.1HIGH CARD
Q4o9529.7%-20.3DOMINATED
T6s9658.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
J3s9753.0%+3.0HIGH CARD
98o9856.7%+6.7HIGH CARD
T7o9959.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
Q3o10043.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
87s10154.9%+4.9HIGH CARD
J6o10243.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
J2s10353.1%+3.1HIGH CARD
96s10456.8%+6.8HIGH CARD
Q2o10544.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
J5o10647.2%-2.8HIGH CARD
T5s10759.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
T4s10870.7%+20.7DOMINATING
97o10957.9%+7.9HIGH CARD
86s11056.1%+6.1HIGH CARD
J4o11152.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
T6o11260.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
T3s11362.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
95s11458.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
76s11555.4%+5.4HIGH CARD
J3o11655.8%+5.8HIGH CARD
87o11757.4%+7.4HIGH CARD
T2s11863.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
85s11957.2%+7.2HIGH CARD
96o12059.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
T5o12161.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
J2o12255.9%+5.9HIGH CARD
94s12370.5%+20.5DOMINATING
75s12456.3%+6.3HIGH CARD
T4o12574.8%+24.8DOMINATING
93s12662.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
86o12759.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
65s12856.0%+6.0HIGH CARD
95o12960.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
84s13069.1%+19.1DOMINATING
T3o13165.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
92s13262.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
76o13358.4%+8.4HIGH CARD
74s13467.9%+17.9DOMINATING
T2o13565.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
64s13667.1%+17.1DOMINATING
85o13760.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
54s13865.5%+15.5DOMINATING
83s13962.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
94o14074.8%+24.8DOMINATING
75o14159.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
82s14262.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
73s14361.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
65o14458.4%+8.4HIGH CARD
93o14565.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
53s14659.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
63s14761.0%+11.0HIGH CARD
84o14873.3%+23.3DOMINATING
92o14965.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
43s15067.8%+17.8DOMINATING
74o15172.0%+22.0DOMINATING
54o15269.3%+19.3DOMINATING
72s15363.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
52s15460.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
64o15571.0%+21.0DOMINATING
62s15662.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
83o15765.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
42s15869.4%+19.4DOMINATING
82o15965.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
73o16064.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
53o16162.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
63o16264.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
32s16364.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
43o16471.8%+21.8DOMINATING
72o16566.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
52o16663.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
62o16765.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
42o16873.3%+23.3DOMINATING
32o16967.3%+17.3HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
J4o46.1%

FAQ

What is the equity of J4s?

49.2% against one random opponent, which ranks it 93 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 16.5%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 11.7%.

How much better is J4s than J4o?

J4s is worth 49.2% and J4o 46.1%, a difference of 3.1 points — rank 93 versus rank 111.

How many of the 168 other hands does J4s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 77 hands and an underdog against 91. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

447 words / 42 distinct figures — Method