J4s
A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 49.2% · #93
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 16.5% · #90
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 11.7% · #83
- Chen score
- 3
- Combos
- 4 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.3%
- Favourite against
- 77 of 168 hands
J4s (jack-four suited) wins 49.2% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 93th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 55% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 16.5% and its rank moves to 90; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 11.7% for rank 83. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.
Its suited/offsuit twin J4o runs at 46.1% (rank 111), a gap of 3.1 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 3.1 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is J7o at 49.7%, and directly below is 97s at 49.2%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.5 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, J4s is a favourite against 77 of them and an underdog against 91. Its best matchup is T4o at 74.8% and its worst is JJ at 12.1% — a spread of 62.7 points, which is why calling J4s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.4%.
J4s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against T4o at 74.8%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AJs, which leaves J4s with only 27.2%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 suited hands it comes 44 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 18 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 13.3 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, J4s lands -1.8 points from the middle of the pack, and 92 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 49.2% against one opponent, 31.8% against two, 19.8% against four and 11.7% against eight. That last figure is 105% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why J4s reads as 49.2% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 49.2% against one opponent down to 11.7% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | J4s equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 16.7% | -33.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 16.6% | -33.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 16.5% | -33.5 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 12.1% | -37.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 31.4% | -18.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 31.8% | -18.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 32.6% | -17.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 33.9% | -16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 33.1% | -16.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 33.5% | -16.5 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 27.2% | -22.8 | DOMINATED |
| AKo | 12 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 36.1% | -13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 28.2% | -21.8 | DOMINATED |
| KQs | 16 | 33.0% | -17.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 66 | 17 | 33.7% | -16.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 37.5% | -12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 38.9% | -11.1 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 27.9% | -22.1 | DOMINATED |
| A8s | 21 | 37.6% | -12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 35.7% | -14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| KQo | 23 | 35.4% | -14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A7s | 24 | 37.8% | -12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A9o | 25 | 40.2% | -9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 28.6% | -21.4 | DOMINATED |
| 55 | 27 | 34.2% | -15.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 27.7% | -22.3 | DOMINATED |
| A6s | 29 | 37.9% | -12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 36.6% | -13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A8o | 31 | 40.1% | -9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 36.5% | -13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 38.2% | -11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| QTs | 34 | 34.4% | -15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A4s | 35 | 28.0% | -22.0 | DOMINATED |
| A7o | 36 | 40.3% | -9.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K8s | 37 | 37.8% | -12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 40.1% | -9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 28.9% | -21.1 | DOMINATED |
| K9o | 40 | 39.2% | -10.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9s | 41 | 35.7% | -14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A5o | 42 | 39.1% | -10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 40.5% | -9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 37.7% | -12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A6o | 45 | 40.5% | -9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 30.7% | -19.3 | DOMINATED |
| QTo | 47 | 36.9% | -13.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 44 | 48 | 36.1% | -13.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 37.7% | -12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 29.1% | -20.9 | DOMINATED |
| Q8s | 51 | 36.8% | -13.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 40.4% | -9.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 42.9% | -7.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 37.5% | -12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 32.3% | -17.7 | DOMINATED |
| Q9o | 56 | 38.2% | -11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| JTo | 57 | 31.9% | -18.1 | DOMINATED |
| K7o | 58 | 40.3% | -9.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K4s | 59 | 28.5% | -21.5 | DOMINATED |
| A2o | 60 | 43.2% | -6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 37.7% | -12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K6o | 62 | 40.2% | -9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 41.0% | -9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 35.1% | -14.9 | DOMINATED |
| T9s | 65 | 54.1% | +4.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8o | 66 | 39.1% | -10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 48.5% | -1.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6s | 68 | 37.4% | -12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 41.3% | -8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 34.0% | -16.0 | DOMINATED |
| K5o | 71 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5s | 72 | 37.1% | -12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J7s | 73 | 38.2% | -11.8 | DOMINATED |
| T8s | 74 | 55.6% | +5.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K4o | 75 | 29.7% | -20.3 | DOMINATED |
| Q7o | 76 | 40.4% | -9.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4s | 77 | 29.0% | -21.0 | DOMINATED |
| J8o | 78 | 36.8% | -13.2 | DOMINATED |
| T9o | 79 | 56.8% | +6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K3o | 80 | 43.8% | -6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 40.7% | -9.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q6o | 82 | 40.0% | -10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 54.1% | +4.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 56.8% | +6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J6s | 85 | 41.8% | -8.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 44.3% | -5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 39.8% | -10.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 22 | 88 | 49.4% | -0.6 | COINFLIP |
| Q2s | 89 | 41.2% | -8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J5s | 90 | 44.7% | -5.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 58.1% | +8.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J7o | 92 | 39.8% | -10.2 | DOMINATED |
| 97s | 94 | 55.1% | +5.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4o | 95 | 29.7% | -20.3 | DOMINATED |
| T6s | 96 | 58.0% | +8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 53.0% | +3.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 56.7% | +6.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 59.6% | +9.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3o | 100 | 43.4% | -6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 87s | 101 | 54.9% | +4.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J6o | 102 | 43.8% | -6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 53.1% | +3.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 56.8% | +6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 44.0% | -6.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 47.2% | -2.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 59.2% | +9.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 70.7% | +20.7 | DOMINATING |
| 97o | 109 | 57.9% | +7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 86s | 110 | 56.1% | +6.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 52.5% | +2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 60.8% | +10.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 62.7% | +12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 95s | 114 | 58.0% | +8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 55.4% | +5.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J3o | 116 | 55.8% | +5.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 87o | 117 | 57.4% | +7.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T2s | 118 | 63.1% | +13.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 57.2% | +7.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 59.4% | +9.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 61.9% | +11.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 55.9% | +5.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 70.5% | +20.5 | DOMINATING |
| 75s | 124 | 56.3% | +6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 74.8% | +24.8 | DOMINATING |
| 93s | 126 | 62.5% | +12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 59.0% | +9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 56.0% | +6.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 60.7% | +10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 69.1% | +19.1 | DOMINATING |
| T3o | 131 | 65.7% | +15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 92s | 132 | 62.6% | +12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 58.4% | +8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 74s | 134 | 67.9% | +17.9 | DOMINATING |
| T2o | 135 | 65.8% | +15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 64s | 136 | 67.1% | +17.1 | DOMINATING |
| 85o | 137 | 60.0% | +10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 65.5% | +15.5 | DOMINATING |
| 83s | 139 | 62.8% | +12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 74.8% | +24.8 | DOMINATING |
| 75o | 141 | 59.0% | +9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 62.8% | +12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 61.9% | +11.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 65o | 144 | 58.4% | +8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 93o | 145 | 65.3% | +15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 59.6% | +9.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 61.0% | +11.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 73.3% | +23.3 | DOMINATING |
| 92o | 149 | 65.5% | +15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 67.8% | +17.8 | DOMINATING |
| 74o | 151 | 72.0% | +22.0 | DOMINATING |
| 54o | 152 | 69.3% | +19.3 | DOMINATING |
| 72s | 153 | 63.0% | +13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 60.8% | +10.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 64o | 155 | 71.0% | +21.0 | DOMINATING |
| 62s | 156 | 62.3% | +12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 65.7% | +15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 69.4% | +19.4 | DOMINATING |
| 82o | 159 | 65.6% | +15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 53o | 161 | 62.4% | +12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 63o | 162 | 64.1% | +14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 64.4% | +14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 71.8% | +21.8 | DOMINATING |
| 72o | 165 | 66.2% | +16.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 52o | 166 | 63.7% | +13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 65.2% | +15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 73.3% | +23.3 | DOMINATING |
| 32o | 169 | 67.3% | +17.3 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of J4s?
49.2% against one random opponent, which ranks it 93 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 16.5%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 11.7%.
How much better is J4s than J4o?
J4s is worth 49.2% and J4o 46.1%, a difference of 3.1 points — rank 93 versus rank 111.
How many of the 168 other hands does J4s beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 77 hands and an underdog against 91. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
447 words / 42 distinct figures — Method
