169hands
MENU
offsuitone gapper

53o

36.3%
Equity vs one random hand — #161 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
36.3% · #161
6-handed (5 opponents)
11.6% · #150
9-handed (8 opponents)
8.1% · #142
Chen score
2.5
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
8 of 168 hands

53o (five-three offsuit) wins 36.3% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 161th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 95.3% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 11.6% and its rank moves to 150; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 8.1% for rank 142. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin 53s runs at 39.6% (rank 146), a gap of 3.3 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.3 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 73o at 36.6%, and directly below is 63o at 36.1%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.5 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 53o is a favourite against 8 of them and an underdog against 160. Its best matchup is 32o at 61.0% and its worst is 55 at 12.2% — a spread of 48.8 points, which is why calling 53o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 52s at 51.0%.

53o dominates 1 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 32o at 61.0%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A5s, which leaves 53o with only 25.2%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 71 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 29.1 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 4 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 53o lands -14.7 points from the middle of the pack, and 160 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 36.3% against one opponent, 23.5% against two, 13.8% against four and 8.1% against eight. That last figure is 73% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 2.5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 53o reads as 36.3% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 36.3% against one opponent down to 8.1% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%20%40%36.3123.5217.3313.8411.659.968.878.18opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
53o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rank53o equityvs 50%Shape
AA115.4%-34.6PAIR VS CARDS
KK217.0%-33.0PAIR VS CARDS
QQ316.9%-33.1PAIR VS CARDS
JJ416.9%-33.1PAIR VS CARDS
TT516.5%-33.5PAIR VS CARDS
99616.8%-33.2PAIR VS CARDS
88716.5%-33.5PAIR VS CARDS
AKs834.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
77915.5%-34.5PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1034.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
AJs1134.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
AKo1236.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
ATs1334.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
AQo1436.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
AJo1536.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
KQs1634.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
661714.4%-35.6PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1834.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
ATo1935.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
KJs2034.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
A8s2134.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
KTs2233.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
KQo2336.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
A7s2434.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
A9o2536.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
KJo2635.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
552712.2%-37.8PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2834.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
A6s2934.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
K9s3034.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
A8o3135.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
A5s3225.2%-24.8DOMINATED
KTo3335.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
QTs3433.1%-16.9HIGH CARD
A4s3536.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
A7o3635.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
K8s3734.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
A3s3826.4%-23.6DOMINATED
QJo3935.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
K9o4036.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
Q9s4134.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
A5o4226.2%-23.8DOMINATED
A2s4340.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
K7s4434.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
A6o4535.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
JTs4633.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
QTo4735.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
444830.5%-19.5PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4934.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
A4o5038.0%-12.0HIGH CARD
Q8s5134.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
K8o5236.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
A3o5327.6%-22.4DOMINATED
K5s5427.2%-22.8DOMINATED
J9s5533.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
Q9o5635.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
JTo5734.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
K7o5836.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
K4s5937.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
A2o6042.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
Q7s6134.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
K6o6236.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
K3s6328.4%-21.6DOMINATED
J8s6433.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
T9s6533.0%-17.0HIGH CARD
Q8o6635.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
336735.5%-14.5PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6834.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
K2s6941.1%-8.9HIGH CARD
J9o7035.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
K5o7128.3%-21.7DOMINATED
Q5s7227.9%-22.1DOMINATED
J7s7334.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
T8s7433.2%-16.8HIGH CARD
K4o7539.1%-10.9HIGH CARD
Q7o7636.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
Q4s7737.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
J8o7835.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
T9o7934.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
K3o8029.7%-20.3DOMINATED
Q3s8128.9%-21.1DOMINATED
Q6o8235.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
98s8333.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
T7s8433.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
J6s8534.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
K2o8643.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
Q5o8728.8%-21.2DOMINATED
228847.5%-2.5PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8941.0%-9.0HIGH CARD
J5s9028.2%-21.8DOMINATED
T8o9134.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
J7o9235.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
J4s9337.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
97s9433.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
Q4o9539.2%-10.8HIGH CARD
T6s9634.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
J3s9729.6%-20.4DOMINATED
98o9834.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
T7o9935.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
Q3o10030.4%-19.6DOMINATED
87s10133.5%-16.5HIGH CARD
J6o10236.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
J2s10341.3%-8.7HIGH CARD
96s10434.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
Q2o10543.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
J5o10629.5%-20.5DOMINATED
T5s10729.4%-20.6DOMINATED
T4s10837.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
97o10935.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
86s11034.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
J4o11139.3%-10.7HIGH CARD
T6o11235.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
T3s11329.9%-20.1DOMINATED
95s11430.4%-19.6DOMINATED
76s11534.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
J3o11630.8%-19.2DOMINATED
87o11734.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
T2s11841.1%-8.9HIGH CARD
85s11930.1%-19.9DOMINATED
96o12036.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
T5o12130.2%-19.8DOMINATED
J2o12243.6%-6.4HIGH CARD
94s12338.2%-11.8HIGH CARD
75s12432.6%-17.4DOMINATED
T4o12539.3%-10.7HIGH CARD
93s12631.3%-18.7DOMINATED
86o12735.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
65s12834.4%-15.6DOMINATED
95o12931.4%-18.6DOMINATED
84s13038.0%-12.0HIGH CARD
T3o13131.4%-18.6DOMINATED
92s13241.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
76o13335.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
74s13438.5%-11.5HIGH CARD
T2o13543.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
64s13639.8%-10.2HIGH CARD
85o13731.4%-18.6DOMINATED
54s13844.1%-5.9HIGH CARD
83s13932.9%-17.1DOMINATED
94o14040.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
75o14133.9%-16.1DOMINATED
82s14242.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
73s14334.0%-16.0DOMINATED
65o14435.9%-14.1DOMINATED
93o14532.7%-17.3DOMINATED
53s14647.6%-2.4HIGH CARD
63s14735.9%-14.1DOMINATED
84o14840.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
92o14944.1%-5.9HIGH CARD
43s15056.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
74o15140.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
54o15246.4%-3.6HIGH CARD
72s15344.1%-5.9HIGH CARD
52s15451.0%+1.0COINFLIP
64o15541.7%-8.3HIGH CARD
62s15645.6%-4.4HIGH CARD
83o15734.5%-15.5DOMINATED
42s15852.6%+2.6HIGH CARD
82o15944.7%-5.3HIGH CARD
73o16035.6%-14.4DOMINATED
63o16237.5%-12.5DOMINATED
32s16357.3%+7.3HIGH CARD
43o16459.5%+9.5HIGH CARD
72o16546.6%-3.4HIGH CARD
52o16653.7%+3.7HIGH CARD
62o16748.1%-1.9HIGH CARD
42o16855.6%+5.6HIGH CARD
32o16961.0%+11.0DOMINATING

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
53s39.6%

FAQ

What is the equity of 53o?

36.3% against one random opponent, which ranks it 161 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 11.6%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 8.1%.

How much better is 53o than 53s?

53o is worth 36.3% and 53s 39.6%, a difference of 3.3 points — rank 161 versus rank 146.

How many of the 168 other hands does 53o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 8 hands and an underdog against 160. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

440 words / 43 distinct figures — Method