53o
Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 36.3% · #161
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 11.6% · #150
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 8.1% · #142
- Chen score
- 2.5
- Combos
- 12 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.9%
- Favourite against
- 8 of 168 hands
53o (five-three offsuit) wins 36.3% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 161th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 95.3% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 11.6% and its rank moves to 150; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 8.1% for rank 142. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
Its suited/offsuit twin 53s runs at 39.6% (rank 146), a gap of 3.3 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.3 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 73o at 36.6%, and directly below is 63o at 36.1%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.5 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 53o is a favourite against 8 of them and an underdog against 160. Its best matchup is 32o at 61.0% and its worst is 55 at 12.2% — a spread of 48.8 points, which is why calling 53o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 52s at 51.0%.
53o dominates 1 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 32o at 61.0%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A5s, which leaves 53o with only 25.2%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 71 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 29.1 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 4 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 53o lands -14.7 points from the middle of the pack, and 160 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 36.3% against one opponent, 23.5% against two, 13.8% against four and 8.1% against eight. That last figure is 73% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 2.5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 53o reads as 36.3% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 36.3% against one opponent down to 8.1% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | 53o equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 15.4% | -34.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 17.0% | -33.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 16.9% | -33.1 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 16.9% | -33.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 16.5% | -33.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 16.8% | -33.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 16.5% | -33.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 15.5% | -34.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 34.4% | -15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 36.1% | -13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 34.1% | -15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 66 | 17 | 14.4% | -35.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A8s | 21 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 33.7% | -16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| KQo | 23 | 36.0% | -14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A7s | 24 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A9o | 25 | 36.1% | -13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 55 | 27 | 12.2% | -37.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A6s | 29 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 34.5% | -15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A8o | 31 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 25.2% | -24.8 | DOMINATED |
| KTo | 33 | 35.5% | -14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| QTs | 34 | 33.1% | -16.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A4s | 35 | 36.1% | -13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K8s | 37 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 26.4% | -23.6 | DOMINATED |
| QJo | 39 | 35.5% | -14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9s | 41 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A5o | 42 | 26.2% | -23.8 | DOMINATED |
| A2s | 43 | 40.0% | -10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 34.5% | -15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A6o | 45 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 33.3% | -16.7 | HIGH CARD |
| QTo | 47 | 35.2% | -14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 44 | 48 | 30.5% | -19.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 38.0% | -12.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 34.1% | -15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 27.6% | -22.4 | DOMINATED |
| K5s | 54 | 27.2% | -22.8 | DOMINATED |
| J9s | 55 | 33.7% | -16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 35.7% | -14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| JTo | 57 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K7o | 58 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K4s | 59 | 37.4% | -12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 42.1% | -7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K6o | 62 | 36.0% | -14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 28.4% | -21.6 | DOMINATED |
| J8s | 64 | 33.9% | -16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 33.0% | -17.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8o | 66 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 35.5% | -14.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6s | 68 | 34.1% | -15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 41.1% | -8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 35.3% | -14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 28.3% | -21.7 | DOMINATED |
| Q5s | 72 | 27.9% | -22.1 | DOMINATED |
| J7s | 73 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T8s | 74 | 33.2% | -16.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K4o | 75 | 39.1% | -10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7o | 76 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4s | 77 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J8o | 78 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 34.7% | -15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K3o | 80 | 29.7% | -20.3 | DOMINATED |
| Q3s | 81 | 28.9% | -21.1 | DOMINATED |
| Q6o | 82 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 33.4% | -16.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 33.7% | -16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J6s | 85 | 34.5% | -15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 43.4% | -6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 28.8% | -21.2 | DOMINATED |
| 22 | 88 | 47.5% | -2.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q2s | 89 | 41.0% | -9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J5s | 90 | 28.2% | -21.8 | DOMINATED |
| T8o | 91 | 34.9% | -15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J7o | 92 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J4s | 93 | 37.6% | -12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 33.8% | -16.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4o | 95 | 39.2% | -10.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T6s | 96 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 29.6% | -20.4 | DOMINATED |
| 98o | 98 | 34.9% | -15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 35.6% | -14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3o | 100 | 30.4% | -19.6 | DOMINATED |
| 87s | 101 | 33.5% | -16.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J6o | 102 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 41.3% | -8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 43.3% | -6.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 29.5% | -20.5 | DOMINATED |
| T5s | 107 | 29.4% | -20.6 | DOMINATED |
| T4s | 108 | 37.4% | -12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 97o | 109 | 35.4% | -14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 86s | 110 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 39.3% | -10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 29.9% | -20.1 | DOMINATED |
| 95s | 114 | 30.4% | -19.6 | DOMINATED |
| 76s | 115 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J3o | 116 | 30.8% | -19.2 | DOMINATED |
| 87o | 117 | 34.9% | -15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T2s | 118 | 41.1% | -8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 30.1% | -19.9 | DOMINATED |
| 96o | 120 | 36.0% | -14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 30.2% | -19.8 | DOMINATED |
| J2o | 122 | 43.6% | -6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 38.2% | -11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 32.6% | -17.4 | DOMINATED |
| T4o | 125 | 39.3% | -10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 93s | 126 | 31.3% | -18.7 | DOMINATED |
| 86o | 127 | 35.5% | -14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 34.4% | -15.6 | DOMINATED |
| 95o | 129 | 31.4% | -18.6 | DOMINATED |
| 84s | 130 | 38.0% | -12.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 31.4% | -18.6 | DOMINATED |
| 92s | 132 | 41.9% | -8.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 35.7% | -14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 74s | 134 | 38.5% | -11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 43.4% | -6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 64s | 136 | 39.8% | -10.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 31.4% | -18.6 | DOMINATED |
| 54s | 138 | 44.1% | -5.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 32.9% | -17.1 | DOMINATED |
| 94o | 140 | 40.3% | -9.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 33.9% | -16.1 | DOMINATED |
| 82s | 142 | 42.1% | -7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 34.0% | -16.0 | DOMINATED |
| 65o | 144 | 35.9% | -14.1 | DOMINATED |
| 93o | 145 | 32.7% | -17.3 | DOMINATED |
| 53s | 146 | 47.6% | -2.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 35.9% | -14.1 | DOMINATED |
| 84o | 148 | 40.1% | -9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 44.1% | -5.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 56.4% | +6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 40.5% | -9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 46.4% | -3.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 44.1% | -5.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 51.0% | +1.0 | COINFLIP |
| 64o | 155 | 41.7% | -8.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 45.6% | -4.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 34.5% | -15.5 | DOMINATED |
| 42s | 158 | 52.6% | +2.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 44.7% | -5.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 35.6% | -14.4 | DOMINATED |
| 63o | 162 | 37.5% | -12.5 | DOMINATED |
| 32s | 163 | 57.3% | +7.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 59.5% | +9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 46.6% | -3.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 52o | 166 | 53.7% | +3.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 48.1% | -1.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 55.6% | +5.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 61.0% | +11.0 | DOMINATING |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of 53o?
36.3% against one random opponent, which ranks it 161 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 11.6%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 8.1%.
How much better is 53o than 53s?
53o is worth 36.3% and 53s 39.6%, a difference of 3.3 points — rank 161 versus rank 146.
How many of the 168 other hands does 53o beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 8 hands and an underdog against 160. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
440 words / 43 distinct figures — Method
