T2o

T2o (ten-deuce offsuit) wins 41.7% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 135th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 79.9% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 10.6% and its rank moves to 158; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 6.6% for rank 159. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin T2s runs at 44.8% (rank 118), a gap of 3.1 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.1 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 74s at 41.8%, and directly below is 64s at 41.4%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, T2o is a favourite against 56 of them and an underdog against 112. Its best matchup is 92o at 73.5% and its worst is TT at 6.4% — a spread of 67.1 points, which is why calling T2o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 3 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 87s at 50.8%.

T2o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 92o at 73.5%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them ATs, which leaves T2o with only 21.9%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 57 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 23.7 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 9.4 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, T2o lands -9.3 points from the middle of the pack, and 134 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 41.7% against one opponent, 24.5% against two, 13.5% against four and 6.6% against eight. That last figure is 59% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 0 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why T2o reads as 41.7% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.