169hands
MENU
pocket pair

TT

75.1%
Equity vs one random hand — #5 of 169

A middle pair — frequently chased by two overcards.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
75.1% · #5
6-handed (5 opponents)
29.9% · #6
9-handed (8 opponents)
19.3% · #9
Chen score
10
Combos
6 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.45%
Favourite against
164 of 168 hands

TT (pocket tens) wins 75.1% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 5th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 3% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 29.9% and its rank moves to 6; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 19.3% for rank 9. A middle pair — frequently chased by two overcards.

As a pocket pair there is no suited twin; instead there are 6 combinations of it in the deck, so you are dealt it 0.45% of the time (6 of 1,326 two-card hands). The hand ranked one place above is JJ at 77.5% and one place below is 99 at 72.2%. Every pocket pair flops a set about 11.8% of the time, so the pecking order among pairs is decided almost entirely before the flop.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, TT is a favourite against 164 of them and an underdog against 4. Its best matchup is T2o at 93.6% and its worst is JJ at 18.1% — a spread of 75.5 points, which is why calling TT simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.

TT shares a rank with relatively few hands, so it is rarely on the wrong side of a kicker problem. What does hurt it is running into a higher pair, where the number bottoms out at 18.1%. The table further down lists all 168 opponents individually.

Within the 13 pocket pairs it comes 5 of 13. The strongest hand in that group, AA, is 10.1 points away, and the weakest, 22, sits 24.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, TT lands +24.1 points from the middle of the pack, and 4 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 75.1% against one opponent, 57.8% against two, 36.1% against four and 19.3% against eight. That last figure is 174% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 10 points, and it arrives 0.45% of the time (6 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why TT reads as 75.1% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 75.1% against one opponent down to 19.3% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%40%80%75.1157.8245.3336.1429.9525.1621.9719.38opponents
Flop odds

How often TT hits the flop

Exact counts over all 19,600 flops and 2,118,760 five-card boards from the 50 cards left once your two are out — no simulation.

TT flops a set or better (set, full house or quads) 11.8% of the time — 2,304 of 19,600 flops, or 1 in 8.5 — and exactly a set 10.8%. By the river that rises to 19.2%. Those figures are identical for every pocket pair; what differs from pair to pair is what the flop looks like when the set misses.

When the set misses, all three flop cards come in below T — leaving an overpair — 25.3% of the time, while at least one higher card lands 62.9% of the time (1 in 1.6). The chance of staying an overpair is 36.4% for JJ (one pair up), and 16.7% for 99 (one pair down).

OutcomeProbabilityCount / totalFrequencyOdds against
Flop a set or better (set, full house or quads)11.8%2,304 / 19,6001 in 8.57.5 to 1
of which: exactly a set10.8%2,112 / 19,6001 in 9.38.3 to 1
of which: full house0.735%144 / 19,6001 in 136135 to 1
of which: quads0.245%48 / 19,6001 in 408407 to 1
No set, all three cards below T (still an overpair)25.3%4,960 / 19,6001 in 4.03.0 to 1
No set, at least one card above T62.9%12,336 / 19,6001 in 1.60.6 to 1
Set or better by the river (five-card board)19.2%406,456 / 2,118,7601 in 5.24.2 to 1
By flop texture

How the flop moves TT's equity

Equity against one random hand with the flop out and the turn and river to come. Exact counts over every deal of the opponent's two cards and the board — no simulation.

Against one random hand, TT goes from 75.0% before the flop to 92.1% when it flops a set or better (11.8% of flops). Without a set, it holds 75.2% when all three cards are below T (still an overpair) and drops to 71.8% when a card above T lands (62.9%, 12,336 of 19,600 flops).

By board shape: rainbow 76.1%, two-tone 74.7%, monotone 70.2%. A monotone flop in one of your suits gives 77.0%. A paired board gives 77.7%, and a connected board (three ranks within five) 73.7%. The best row in the table is "Set or better (at least one T on the flop)" at 92.1%, the worst "Monotone (all three one suit)" at 70.2%.

The 75.1% at the top of the page is a 400,000-hand simulation; this table counts every deal of the opponent's two cards and the five-card board (2,097,572,400 per starting hand), which puts the pre-flop figure at 75.01% (a gap of 0.09 points). Each equity is taken with the flop out and the turn and river still to come.

FlopHow oftenFlops (of 19,600)TT equityvs before the flop
Before the flop (average of every flop)100.0%19,60075.0%—
Set or better (at least one T on the flop)11.8%2,30492.1%+17.1pt
No set, all three cards below T (still an overpair)25.3%4,96075.2%+0.2pt
No set, at least one card above T62.9%12,33671.8%−3.3pt
Rainbow (three different suits)39.8%7,80076.1%+1.1pt
Two-tone (two cards share a suit)55.0%10,78874.7%−0.3pt
Monotone (all three one suit)5.16%1,01270.2%−4.8pt
Monotone in one of your suits2.24%44077.0%+2.0pt
Paired board (two or more of a rank)17.4%3,40877.7%+2.7pt
Connected board (three ranks within five, A can play low)18.0%3,52073.7%−1.3pt
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
TT played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankTT equityvs 50%Shape
AA119.2%-30.8PAIR VS PAIR
KK218.8%-31.2PAIR VS PAIR
QQ318.3%-31.7PAIR VS PAIR
JJ418.1%-31.9PAIR VS PAIR
99682.2%+32.2PAIR VS PAIR
88781.7%+31.7PAIR VS PAIR
AKs854.1%+4.1PAIR VS CARDS
77981.4%+31.4PAIR VS PAIR
AQs1054.2%+4.2PAIR VS CARDS
AJs1153.9%+3.9PAIR VS CARDS
AKo1256.8%+6.8PAIR VS CARDS
ATs1365.1%+15.1PAIR VS CARDS
AQo1457.1%+7.1PAIR VS CARDS
AJo1557.0%+7.0PAIR VS CARDS
KQs1653.5%+3.5PAIR VS CARDS
661781.0%+31.0PAIR VS PAIR
A9s1868.6%+18.6PAIR VS CARDS
ATo1969.2%+19.2PAIR VS CARDS
KJs2053.8%+3.8PAIR VS CARDS
A8s2168.2%+18.2PAIR VS CARDS
KTs2264.2%+14.2PAIR VS CARDS
KQo2356.5%+6.5PAIR VS CARDS
A7s2467.8%+17.8PAIR VS CARDS
A9o2572.4%+22.4PAIR VS CARDS
KJo2656.6%+6.6PAIR VS CARDS
552780.7%+30.7PAIR VS PAIR
QJs2852.9%+2.9PAIR VS CARDS
A6s2968.2%+18.2PAIR VS CARDS
K9s3068.4%+18.4PAIR VS CARDS
A8o3171.8%+21.8PAIR VS CARDS
A5s3267.0%+17.0PAIR VS CARDS
KTo3368.1%+18.1PAIR VS CARDS
QTs3462.8%+12.8PAIR VS CARDS
A4s3567.1%+17.1PAIR VS CARDS
A7o3671.6%+21.6PAIR VS CARDS
K8s3769.0%+19.0PAIR VS CARDS
A3s3867.3%+17.3PAIR VS CARDS
QJo3955.6%+5.6PAIR VS CARDS
K9o4071.9%+21.9PAIR VS CARDS
Q9s4168.0%+18.0PAIR VS CARDS
A5o4270.4%+20.4PAIR VS CARDS
A2s4367.7%+17.7PAIR VS CARDS
K7s4468.7%+18.7PAIR VS CARDS
A6o4571.8%+21.8PAIR VS CARDS
JTs4661.4%+11.4PAIR VS CARDS
QTo4766.3%+16.3PAIR VS CARDS
444881.0%+31.0PAIR VS PAIR
K6s4968.3%+18.3PAIR VS CARDS
A4o5070.5%+20.5PAIR VS CARDS
Q8s5168.3%+18.3PAIR VS CARDS
K8o5272.5%+22.5PAIR VS CARDS
A3o5370.8%+20.8PAIR VS CARDS
K5s5468.3%+18.3PAIR VS CARDS
J9s5567.6%+17.6PAIR VS CARDS
Q9o5671.6%+21.6PAIR VS CARDS
JTo5765.0%+15.0PAIR VS CARDS
K7o5872.3%+22.3PAIR VS CARDS
K4s5968.2%+18.2PAIR VS CARDS
A2o6071.2%+21.2PAIR VS CARDS
Q7s6168.6%+18.6PAIR VS CARDS
K6o6271.9%+21.9PAIR VS CARDS
K3s6368.9%+18.9PAIR VS CARDS
J8s6468.0%+18.0PAIR VS CARDS
T9s6582.5%+32.5PAIR VS CARDS
Q8o6672.1%+22.1PAIR VS CARDS
336781.4%+31.4PAIR VS PAIR
Q6s6868.6%+18.6PAIR VS CARDS
K2s6969.2%+19.2PAIR VS CARDS
J9o7071.2%+21.2PAIR VS CARDS
K5o7171.9%+21.9PAIR VS CARDS
Q5s7268.6%+18.6PAIR VS CARDS
J7s7368.3%+18.3PAIR VS CARDS
T8s7483.5%+33.5PAIR VS CARDS
K4o7572.2%+22.2PAIR VS CARDS
Q7o7672.2%+22.2PAIR VS CARDS
Q4s7768.4%+18.4PAIR VS CARDS
J8o7871.3%+21.3PAIR VS CARDS
T9o7987.1%+37.1PAIR VS CARDS
K3o8072.5%+22.5PAIR VS CARDS
Q3s8169.0%+19.0PAIR VS CARDS
Q6o8272.0%+22.0PAIR VS CARDS
98s8381.7%+31.7PAIR VS CARDS
T7s8484.9%+34.9PAIR VS CARDS
J6s8568.7%+18.7PAIR VS CARDS
K2o8673.0%+23.0PAIR VS CARDS
Q5o8772.2%+22.2PAIR VS CARDS
228881.9%+31.9PAIR VS PAIR
Q2s8969.1%+19.1PAIR VS CARDS
J5s9068.8%+18.8PAIR VS CARDS
T8o9188.6%+38.6PAIR VS CARDS
J7o9271.8%+21.8PAIR VS CARDS
J4s9368.6%+18.6PAIR VS CARDS
97s9481.9%+31.9PAIR VS CARDS
Q4o9572.2%+22.2PAIR VS CARDS
T6s9686.3%+36.3PAIR VS CARDS
J3s9769.1%+19.1PAIR VS CARDS
98o9885.9%+35.9PAIR VS CARDS
T7o9990.0%+40.0PAIR VS CARDS
Q3o10072.6%+22.6PAIR VS CARDS
87s10180.2%+30.2PAIR VS CARDS
J6o10272.3%+22.3PAIR VS CARDS
J2s10369.4%+19.4PAIR VS CARDS
96s10481.9%+31.9PAIR VS CARDS
Q2o10573.1%+23.1PAIR VS CARDS
J5o10672.3%+22.3PAIR VS CARDS
T5s10787.6%+37.6PAIR VS CARDS
T4s10887.5%+37.5PAIR VS CARDS
97o10986.1%+36.1PAIR VS CARDS
86s11080.4%+30.4PAIR VS CARDS
J4o11172.2%+22.2PAIR VS CARDS
T6o11291.5%+41.5PAIR VS CARDS
T3s11387.9%+37.9PAIR VS CARDS
95s11482.4%+32.4PAIR VS CARDS
76s11579.0%+29.0PAIR VS CARDS
J3o11672.8%+22.8PAIR VS CARDS
87o11784.4%+34.4PAIR VS CARDS
T2s11888.3%+38.3PAIR VS CARDS
85s11980.8%+30.8PAIR VS CARDS
96o12086.0%+36.0PAIR VS CARDS
T5o12192.7%+42.7PAIR VS CARDS
J2o12273.3%+23.3PAIR VS CARDS
94s12383.8%+33.8PAIR VS CARDS
75s12479.2%+29.2PAIR VS CARDS
T4o12592.8%+42.8PAIR VS CARDS
93s12683.9%+33.9PAIR VS CARDS
86o12784.4%+34.4PAIR VS CARDS
65s12878.1%+28.1PAIR VS CARDS
95o12986.3%+36.3PAIR VS CARDS
84s13082.3%+32.3PAIR VS CARDS
T3o13193.1%+43.1PAIR VS CARDS
92s13284.5%+34.5PAIR VS CARDS
76o13382.9%+32.9PAIR VS CARDS
74s13480.9%+30.9PAIR VS CARDS
T2o13593.6%+43.6PAIR VS CARDS
64s13679.4%+29.4PAIR VS CARDS
85o13784.8%+34.8PAIR VS CARDS
54s13877.9%+27.9PAIR VS CARDS
83s13983.9%+33.9PAIR VS CARDS
94o14088.1%+38.1PAIR VS CARDS
75o14183.1%+33.1PAIR VS CARDS
82s14284.0%+34.0PAIR VS CARDS
73s14382.5%+32.5PAIR VS CARDS
65o14482.0%+32.0PAIR VS CARDS
93o14588.2%+38.2PAIR VS CARDS
53s14679.5%+29.5PAIR VS CARDS
63s14781.0%+31.0PAIR VS CARDS
84o14886.5%+36.5PAIR VS CARDS
92o14988.5%+38.5PAIR VS CARDS
43s15079.4%+29.4PAIR VS CARDS
74o15185.0%+35.0PAIR VS CARDS
54o15281.8%+31.8PAIR VS CARDS
72s15384.1%+34.1PAIR VS CARDS
52s15481.1%+31.1PAIR VS CARDS
64o15583.3%+33.3PAIR VS CARDS
62s15682.6%+32.6PAIR VS CARDS
83o15788.3%+38.3PAIR VS CARDS
42s15881.2%+31.2PAIR VS CARDS
82o15988.1%+38.1PAIR VS CARDS
73o16086.6%+36.6PAIR VS CARDS
53o16183.5%+33.5PAIR VS CARDS
63o16285.2%+35.2PAIR VS CARDS
32s16381.5%+31.5PAIR VS CARDS
43o16483.3%+33.3PAIR VS CARDS
72o16588.5%+38.5PAIR VS CARDS
52o16685.3%+35.3PAIR VS CARDS
62o16786.9%+36.9PAIR VS CARDS
42o16885.3%+35.3PAIR VS CARDS
32o16985.5%+35.5PAIR VS CARDS

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

FAQ

What is the equity of TT?

75.1% against one random opponent, which ranks it 5 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 29.9%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 19.3%.

Which hand is the worst matchup for TT?

JJ, which leaves TT with 18.1%. Its best matchup is T2o at 93.6%.

How many of the 168 other hands does TT beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 164 hands and an underdog against 4. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

How often does TT flop a set?

A set or better (set, full house or quads) comes 11.8% of the time — 1 in 8.5, 7.5 to 1 against — and exactly a set 10.8%. By the river it is 19.2%. Exact counts over all 19,600 flops.

What is TT worth when it misses its set on the flop?

Against one random hand, 72.7% on a flop without a set (75.0% before the flop, 92.1% with a set or better). Exact counts over every deal of the opponent's cards and the board.

432 words / 33 distinct figures — Method