169hands
MENU
offsuit

J5o

47.2%
Equity vs one random hand — #106 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
47.2% · #106
6-handed (5 opponents)
12.8% · #140
9-handed (8 opponents)
7.8% · #145
Chen score
1
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
78 of 168 hands

J5o (jack-five offsuit) wins 47.2% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 106th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 62.7% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 12.8% and its rank moves to 140; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 7.8% for rank 145. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin J5s runs at 50.0% (rank 90), a gap of 2.8 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.8 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is Q2o at 47.3%, and directly below is T5s at 47.1%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.2 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, J5o is a favourite against 78 of them and an underdog against 90. Its best matchup is T5o at 73.9% and its worst is JJ at 7.3% — a spread of 66.6 points, which is why calling J5o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.

J5o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against T5o at 73.9%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AJs, which leaves J5o with only 23.3%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 43 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 18.2 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 14.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, J5o lands -3.8 points from the middle of the pack, and 105 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 47.2% against one opponent, 29.2% against two, 15.9% against four and 7.8% against eight. That last figure is 70% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 1 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why J5o reads as 47.2% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 47.2% against one opponent down to 7.8% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%25%50%47.2129.2221.0315.9412.8510.468.977.88opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
J5o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankJ5o equityvs 50%Shape
AA112.9%-37.1PAIR VS CARDS
KK212.9%-37.1PAIR VS CARDS
QQ312.5%-37.5PAIR VS CARDS
JJ47.3%-42.7PAIR VS CARDS
TT527.7%-22.3PAIR VS CARDS
99628.8%-21.2PAIR VS CARDS
88729.4%-20.6PAIR VS CARDS
AKs831.3%-18.7HIGH CARD
77929.8%-20.2PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1031.0%-19.0HIGH CARD
AJs1123.3%-26.7DOMINATED
AKo1232.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
ATs1333.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
AQo1432.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
AJo1524.3%-25.7DOMINATED
KQs1630.2%-19.8HIGH CARD
661730.6%-19.4PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1835.0%-15.0HIGH CARD
ATo1935.1%-14.9HIGH CARD
KJs2023.8%-26.2DOMINATED
A8s2134.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
KTs2232.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
KQo2331.8%-18.2HIGH CARD
A7s2434.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
A9o2536.9%-13.1HIGH CARD
KJo2624.8%-25.2DOMINATED
552731.8%-18.2PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2824.1%-25.9DOMINATED
A6s2935.1%-14.9HIGH CARD
K9s3034.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
A8o3136.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
A5s3223.9%-26.1DOMINATED
KTo3334.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
QTs3431.8%-18.2HIGH CARD
A4s3537.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
A7o3636.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
K8s3735.1%-14.9HIGH CARD
A3s3837.7%-12.3HIGH CARD
QJo3925.0%-25.0DOMINATED
K9o4036.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
Q9s4133.1%-16.9HIGH CARD
A5o4225.1%-24.9DOMINATED
A2s4338.0%-12.0HIGH CARD
K7s4434.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
A6o4536.8%-13.2HIGH CARD
JTs4626.7%-23.3DOMINATED
QTo4733.2%-16.8HIGH CARD
444845.4%-4.6PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4934.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
A4o5039.3%-10.7HIGH CARD
Q8s5134.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
K8o5237.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
A3o5339.7%-10.3HIGH CARD
K5s5424.6%-25.4DOMINATED
J9s5528.8%-21.2DOMINATED
Q9o5634.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
JTo5727.9%-22.1DOMINATED
K7o5836.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
K4s5938.1%-11.9HIGH CARD
A2o6040.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
Q7s6135.0%-15.0HIGH CARD
K6o6236.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
K3s6338.6%-11.4HIGH CARD
J8s6431.3%-18.7DOMINATED
T9s6551.4%+1.4HIGH CARD
Q8o6635.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
336746.2%-3.8PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6834.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
K2s6939.0%-11.0HIGH CARD
J9o7030.5%-19.5DOMINATED
K5o7125.6%-24.4DOMINATED
Q5s7224.5%-25.5DOMINATED
J7s7334.8%-15.2DOMINATED
T8s7452.6%+2.6HIGH CARD
K4o7540.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
Q7o7636.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
Q4s7738.0%-12.0HIGH CARD
J8o7833.1%-16.9DOMINATED
T9o7954.4%+4.4HIGH CARD
K3o8040.9%-9.1HIGH CARD
Q3s8138.3%-11.7HIGH CARD
Q6o8236.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
98s8352.2%+2.2HIGH CARD
T7s8454.2%+4.2HIGH CARD
J6s8538.9%-11.1DOMINATED
K2o8641.1%-8.9HIGH CARD
Q5o8725.9%-24.1DOMINATED
228847.4%-2.6PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8938.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
J5s9047.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
T8o9155.9%+5.9HIGH CARD
J7o9236.4%-13.6DOMINATED
J4s9352.8%+2.8HIGH CARD
97s9453.3%+3.3HIGH CARD
Q4o9540.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
T6s9655.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
J3s9753.2%+3.2HIGH CARD
98o9855.2%+5.2HIGH CARD
T7o9957.2%+7.2HIGH CARD
Q3o10040.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
87s10152.6%+2.6HIGH CARD
J6o10241.0%-9.0HIGH CARD
J2s10353.2%+3.2HIGH CARD
96s10454.6%+4.6HIGH CARD
Q2o10540.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
T5s10769.4%+19.4DOMINATING
T4s10860.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
97o10956.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
86s11054.0%+4.0HIGH CARD
J4o11155.9%+5.9HIGH CARD
T6o11258.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
T3s11360.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
95s11468.2%+18.2DOMINATING
76s11553.4%+3.4HIGH CARD
J3o11656.1%+6.1HIGH CARD
87o11755.7%+5.7HIGH CARD
T2s11860.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
85s11966.7%+16.7DOMINATING
96o12058.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
T5o12173.9%+23.9DOMINATING
J2o12256.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
94s12360.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
75s12465.4%+15.4DOMINATING
T4o12563.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
93s12660.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
86o12757.3%+7.3HIGH CARD
65s12864.3%+14.3DOMINATING
95o12972.1%+22.1DOMINATING
84s13059.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
T3o13163.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
92s13260.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
76o13356.7%+6.7HIGH CARD
74s13458.4%+8.4HIGH CARD
T2o13564.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
64s13657.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
85o13770.6%+20.6DOMINATING
54s13864.7%+14.7DOMINATING
83s13960.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
94o14064.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
75o14169.3%+19.3DOMINATING
82s14260.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
73s14359.7%+9.7HIGH CARD
65o14468.2%+18.2DOMINATING
93o14564.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
53s14666.3%+16.3DOMINATING
63s14758.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
84o14862.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
92o14964.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
43s15060.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
74o15161.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
54o15268.8%+18.8DOMINATING
72s15360.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
52s15467.8%+17.8DOMINATING
64o15561.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
62s15660.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
83o15764.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
42s15861.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
82o15964.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
73o16063.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
53o16170.5%+20.5DOMINATING
63o16262.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
32s16362.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
43o16464.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
72o16564.7%+14.7HIGH CARD
52o16672.1%+22.1DOMINATING
62o16763.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
42o16865.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
32o16966.0%+16.0HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
J5s50.0%

FAQ

What is the equity of J5o?

47.2% against one random opponent, which ranks it 106 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 12.8%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 7.8%.

How much better is J5o than J5s?

J5o is worth 47.2% and J5s 50.0%, a difference of 2.8 points — rank 106 versus rank 90.

How many of the 168 other hands does J5o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 78 hands and an underdog against 90. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

425 words / 38 distinct figures — Method