169hands
MENU
offsuitone gapper

86o

43.2%
Equity vs one random hand — #127 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
43.2% · #127
6-handed (5 opponents)
13.9% · #125
9-handed (8 opponents)
9.2% · #127
Chen score
4
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
38 of 168 hands

86o (eight-six offsuit) wins 43.2% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 127th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 75.1% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 13.9% and its rank moves to 125; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 9.2% for rank 127. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin 86s runs at 46.3% (rank 110), a gap of 3.1 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.1 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 93s at 43.2%, and directly below is 65s at 43.0%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.2 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 86o is a favourite against 38 of them and an underdog against 130. Its best matchup is 62o at 70.9% and its worst is 88 at 11.8% — a spread of 59.1 points, which is why calling 86o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 50.0%.

86o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 62o at 70.9%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them J8s, which leaves 86o with only 26.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 53 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 22.2 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 10.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 86o lands -7.8 points from the middle of the pack, and 126 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 43.2% against one opponent, 28.6% against two, 17.0% against four and 9.2% against eight. That last figure is 83% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 4 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 86o reads as 43.2% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 43.2% against one opponent down to 9.2% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%25%50%43.2128.6221.2317.0413.9511.8610.279.28opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
86o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rank86o equityvs 50%Shape
AA117.4%-32.6PAIR VS CARDS
KK217.0%-33.0PAIR VS CARDS
QQ317.0%-33.0PAIR VS CARDS
JJ416.6%-33.4PAIR VS CARDS
TT515.6%-34.4PAIR VS CARDS
99614.2%-35.8PAIR VS CARDS
88711.8%-38.2PAIR VS CARDS
AKs834.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
77930.3%-19.7PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1035.0%-15.0HIGH CARD
AJs1134.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
AKo1236.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
ATs1334.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
AQo1436.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
AJo1536.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
KQs1633.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
661735.0%-15.0PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1834.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
ATo1936.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
KJs2033.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
A8s2127.4%-22.6DOMINATED
KTs2233.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
KQo2335.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
A7s2437.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
A9o2536.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
KJo2635.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
552746.6%-3.4PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2833.2%-16.8HIGH CARD
A6s2928.2%-21.8DOMINATED
K9s3034.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
A8o3128.6%-21.4DOMINATED
A5s3240.7%-9.3HIGH CARD
KTo3335.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
QTs3433.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
A4s3541.1%-8.9HIGH CARD
A7o3639.3%-10.7HIGH CARD
K8s3727.7%-22.3DOMINATED
A3s3842.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
QJo3934.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
K9o4036.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
Q9s4133.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
A5o4242.9%-7.1HIGH CARD
A2s4342.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
K7s4437.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
A6o4529.7%-20.3DOMINATED
JTs4632.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
QTo4735.0%-15.0HIGH CARD
444847.7%-2.3PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4928.2%-21.8DOMINATED
A4o5043.5%-6.5HIGH CARD
Q8s5127.8%-22.2DOMINATED
K8o5228.9%-21.1DOMINATED
A3o5344.5%-5.5HIGH CARD
K5s5440.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
J9s5532.7%-17.3HIGH CARD
Q9o5635.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
JTo5733.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
K7o5839.1%-10.9HIGH CARD
K4s5941.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
A2o6044.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
Q7s6137.9%-12.1HIGH CARD
K6o6229.8%-20.2DOMINATED
K3s6341.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
J8s6426.8%-23.2DOMINATED
T9s6532.0%-18.0HIGH CARD
Q8o6629.2%-20.8DOMINATED
336749.4%-0.6COINFLIP
Q6s6828.7%-21.3DOMINATED
K2s6942.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
J9o7034.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
K5o7142.7%-7.3HIGH CARD
Q5s7240.6%-9.4HIGH CARD
J7s7336.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
T8s7427.7%-22.3DOMINATED
K4o7543.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
Q7o7639.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
Q4s7741.3%-8.7HIGH CARD
J8o7827.7%-22.3DOMINATED
T9o7933.5%-16.5HIGH CARD
K3o8044.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
Q3s8142.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
Q6o8230.1%-19.9DOMINATED
98s8327.8%-22.2DOMINATED
T7s8435.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
J6s8529.3%-20.7DOMINATED
K2o8644.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
Q5o8743.0%-7.0HIGH CARD
228850.0%+0.0COINFLIP
Q2s8942.2%-7.8HIGH CARD
J5s9040.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
T8o9128.6%-21.4DOMINATED
J7o9238.6%-11.4HIGH CARD
J4s9341.0%-9.0HIGH CARD
97s9435.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
Q4o9543.7%-6.3HIGH CARD
T6s9628.7%-21.3DOMINATED
J3s9742.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
98o9828.7%-21.3DOMINATED
T7o9937.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
Q3o10044.6%-5.4HIGH CARD
87s10134.8%-15.2DOMINATED
J6o10230.8%-19.2DOMINATED
J2s10342.2%-7.8HIGH CARD
96s10428.7%-21.3DOMINATED
Q2o10544.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
J5o10642.7%-7.3HIGH CARD
T5s10741.0%-9.0HIGH CARD
T4s10841.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
97o10937.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
86s11047.3%-2.7HIGH CARD
J4o11143.5%-6.5HIGH CARD
T6o11229.9%-20.1DOMINATED
T3s11342.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
95s11440.7%-9.3HIGH CARD
76s11564.9%+14.9DOMINATING
J3o11644.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
87o11736.5%-13.5DOMINATED
T2s11842.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
85s11956.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
96o12029.8%-20.2DOMINATED
T5o12143.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
J2o12244.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
94s12342.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
75s12458.5%+8.5HIGH CARD
T4o12543.7%-6.3HIGH CARD
93s12642.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
65s12864.0%+14.0DOMINATING
95o12942.9%-7.1HIGH CARD
84s13057.4%+7.4HIGH CARD
T3o13144.6%-5.4HIGH CARD
92s13242.8%-7.2HIGH CARD
76o13368.3%+18.3DOMINATING
74s13459.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
T2o13544.6%-5.4HIGH CARD
64s13664.7%+14.7DOMINATING
85o13759.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
54s13859.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
83s13957.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
94o14044.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
75o14161.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
82s14257.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
73s14360.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
65o14467.8%+17.8DOMINATING
93o14545.2%-4.8HIGH CARD
53s14660.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
63s14766.5%+16.5DOMINATING
84o14860.4%+10.4DOMINATING
92o14945.0%-5.0HIGH CARD
43s15060.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
74o15163.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
54o15263.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
72s15362.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
52s15461.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
64o15568.7%+18.7DOMINATING
62s15666.6%+16.6DOMINATING
83o15761.2%+11.2DOMINATING
42s15861.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
82o15961.2%+11.2DOMINATING
73o16064.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
53o16164.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
63o16270.5%+20.5DOMINATING
32s16361.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
43o16464.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
72o16566.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
52o16665.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
62o16770.9%+20.9DOMINATING
42o16865.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
32o16965.6%+15.6HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
86s46.3%

FAQ

What is the equity of 86o?

43.2% against one random opponent, which ranks it 127 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 13.9%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 9.2%.

How much better is 86o than 86s?

86o is worth 43.2% and 86s 46.3%, a difference of 3.1 points — rank 127 versus rank 110.

How many of the 168 other hands does 86o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 38 hands and an underdog against 130. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

440 words / 45 distinct figures — Method