169hands
MENU
suited

K2s

53.2%
Equity vs one random hand — #69 of 169

A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
53.2% · #69
6-handed (5 opponents)
18.5% · #64
9-handed (8 opponents)
13.1% · #59
Chen score
5
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
111 of 168 hands

K2s (king-deuce suited) wins 53.2% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 69th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 40.8% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 18.5% and its rank moves to 64; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 13.1% for rank 59. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin K2o runs at 50.4% (rank 86), a gap of 2.8 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.8 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is Q6s at 53.6%, and directly below is J9o at 53.2%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, K2s is a favourite against 111 of them and an underdog against 57. Its best matchup is Q2o at 76.3% and its worst is KK at 10.7% — a spread of 65.6 points, which is why calling K2s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being K3o at 49.6%.

K2s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against Q2o at 76.3%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves K2s with only 25.9%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 33 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 14 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 17.3 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, K2s lands +2.2 points from the middle of the pack, and 68 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 53.2% against one opponent, 34.8% against two, 21.0% against four and 13.1% against eight. That last figure is 118% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why K2s reads as 53.2% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 53.2% against one opponent down to 13.1% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%53.2134.8226.3321.0418.5515.8614.5713.18opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
K2s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankK2s equityvs 50%Shape
AA115.0%-35.0PAIR VS CARDS
KK210.7%-39.3PAIR VS CARDS
QQ330.8%-19.2PAIR VS CARDS
JJ430.8%-19.2PAIR VS CARDS
TT530.8%-19.2PAIR VS CARDS
99631.7%-18.3PAIR VS CARDS
88732.1%-17.9PAIR VS CARDS
AKs825.9%-24.1DOMINATED
77932.2%-17.8PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1035.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
AJs1135.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
AKo1226.7%-23.3DOMINATED
ATs1335.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
AQo1438.3%-11.7HIGH CARD
AJo1538.3%-11.7HIGH CARD
KQs1628.1%-21.9DOMINATED
661733.0%-17.0PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1837.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
ATo1938.4%-11.6HIGH CARD
KJs2028.9%-21.1DOMINATED
A8s2136.9%-13.1HIGH CARD
KTs2230.2%-19.8DOMINATED
KQo2329.2%-20.8DOMINATED
A7s2436.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
A9o2539.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
KJo2630.1%-19.9DOMINATED
552733.1%-16.9PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2855.3%+5.3HIGH CARD
A6s2936.9%-13.1HIGH CARD
K9s3032.3%-17.7DOMINATED
A8o3139.4%-10.6HIGH CARD
A5s3235.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
KTo3331.3%-18.7DOMINATED
QTs3454.9%+4.9HIGH CARD
A4s3535.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
A7o3639.0%-11.0HIGH CARD
K8s3735.3%-14.7DOMINATED
A3s3835.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
QJo3958.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
K9o4033.7%-16.3DOMINATED
Q9s4156.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
A5o4238.2%-11.8HIGH CARD
A2s4327.2%-22.8DOMINATED
K7s4437.8%-12.2DOMINATED
A6o4539.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
JTs4654.0%+4.0HIGH CARD
QTo4757.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
444833.5%-16.5PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4941.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
A4o5038.4%-11.6HIGH CARD
Q8s5157.4%+7.4HIGH CARD
K8o5237.2%-12.8DOMINATED
A3o5338.4%-11.6HIGH CARD
K5s5444.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
J9s5555.3%+5.3HIGH CARD
Q9o5659.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
JTo5756.3%+6.3HIGH CARD
K7o5839.7%-10.3DOMINATED
K4s5946.9%-3.1HIGH CARD
A2o6028.1%-21.9DOMINATED
Q7s6158.3%+8.3HIGH CARD
K6o6243.5%-6.5HIGH CARD
K3s6347.1%-2.9HIGH CARD
J8s6456.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
T9s6554.2%+4.2HIGH CARD
Q8o6660.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
336734.4%-15.6PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6858.3%+8.3HIGH CARD
J9o7058.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
K5o7146.9%-3.1HIGH CARD
Q5s7258.4%+8.4HIGH CARD
J7s7357.0%+7.0HIGH CARD
T8s7455.4%+5.4HIGH CARD
K4o7549.5%-0.5COINFLIP
Q7o7660.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
Q4s7758.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
J8o7858.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
T9o7956.8%+6.8HIGH CARD
K3o8049.6%-0.4COINFLIP
Q3s8159.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
Q6o8261.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
98s8354.3%+4.3HIGH CARD
T7s8455.9%+5.9HIGH CARD
J6s8558.4%+8.4HIGH CARD
K2o8652.6%+2.6HIGH CARD
Q5o8761.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
228836.6%-13.4PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8971.9%+21.9DOMINATING
J5s9058.2%+8.2HIGH CARD
T8o9157.8%+7.8HIGH CARD
J7o9259.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
J4s9358.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
97s9455.0%+5.0HIGH CARD
Q4o9561.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
T6s9657.3%+7.3HIGH CARD
J3s9758.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
98o9857.0%+7.0HIGH CARD
T7o9958.4%+8.4HIGH CARD
Q3o10062.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
87s10154.1%+4.1HIGH CARD
J6o10261.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
J2s10371.7%+21.7DOMINATING
96s10456.0%+6.0HIGH CARD
Q2o10576.3%+26.3DOMINATING
J5o10661.0%+11.0HIGH CARD
T5s10758.3%+8.3HIGH CARD
T4s10858.6%+8.6HIGH CARD
97o10957.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
86s11055.2%+5.2HIGH CARD
J4o11161.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
T6o11259.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
T3s11358.6%+8.6HIGH CARD
95s11457.2%+7.2HIGH CARD
76s11553.8%+3.8HIGH CARD
J3o11661.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
87o11756.9%+6.9HIGH CARD
T2s11871.6%+21.6DOMINATING
85s11956.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
96o12058.6%+8.6HIGH CARD
T5o12160.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
J2o12276.0%+26.0DOMINATING
94s12358.5%+8.5HIGH CARD
75s12455.1%+5.1HIGH CARD
T4o12561.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
93s12658.5%+8.5HIGH CARD
86o12758.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
65s12854.6%+4.6HIGH CARD
95o12960.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
84s13057.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
T3o13161.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
92s13271.1%+21.1DOMINATING
76o13356.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
74s13456.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
T2o13575.7%+25.7DOMINATING
64s13655.9%+5.9HIGH CARD
85o13759.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
54s13854.9%+4.9HIGH CARD
83s13959.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
94o14061.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
75o14157.9%+7.9HIGH CARD
82s14271.3%+21.3DOMINATING
73s14357.5%+7.5HIGH CARD
65o14457.4%+7.4HIGH CARD
93o14561.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
53s14656.1%+6.1HIGH CARD
63s14756.9%+6.9HIGH CARD
84o14860.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
92o14975.4%+25.4DOMINATING
43s15056.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
74o15159.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
54o15257.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
72s15371.0%+21.0DOMINATING
52s15469.0%+19.0DOMINATING
64o15558.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
62s15670.1%+20.1DOMINATING
83o15761.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
42s15869.2%+19.2DOMINATING
82o15975.5%+25.5DOMINATING
73o16060.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
53o16158.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
63o16259.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
32s16369.8%+19.8DOMINATING
43o16459.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
72o16575.3%+25.3DOMINATING
52o16672.9%+22.9DOMINATING
62o16774.3%+24.3DOMINATING
42o16873.1%+23.1DOMINATING
32o16973.7%+23.7DOMINATING

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
K2o50.4%

FAQ

What is the equity of K2s?

53.2% against one random opponent, which ranks it 69 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 18.5%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 13.1%.

How much better is K2s than K2o?

K2s is worth 53.2% and K2o 50.4%, a difference of 2.8 points — rank 69 versus rank 86.

How many of the 168 other hands does K2s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 111 hands and an underdog against 57. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

447 words / 43 distinct figures — Method