95s

95s (nine-five suited) wins 45.7% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 114th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 67.5% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 15.6% and its rank moves to 101; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 11.2% for rank 93. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin 95o runs at 42.8% (rank 129), a gap of 2.9 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.9 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is T3s at 45.7%, and directly below is 76s at 45.5%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.2 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 95s is a favourite against 50 of them and an underdog against 118. Its best matchup is 52o at 71.6% and its worst is 99 at 13.9% — a spread of 57.7 points, which is why calling 95s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 50.3%.

95s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 52o at 71.6%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A9s, which leaves 95s with only 28.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 55 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 21.5 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 9.8 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 95s lands -5.3 points from the middle of the pack, and 113 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 45.7% against one opponent, 30.3% against two, 18.5% against four and 11.2% against eight. That last figure is 101% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 2.5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 95s reads as 45.7% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.