169hands
MENU
offsuitbroadwayace high

ATo

62.6%
Equity vs one random hand — #19 of 169

An ace-high hand — watch out for kicker trouble and domination.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
62.6% · #19
6-handed (5 opponents)
23.0% · #26
9-handed (8 opponents)
15.2% · #35
Chen score
6
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
148 of 168 hands

ATo (ace-ten offsuit) wins 62.6% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 19th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 11.2% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 23.0% and its rank moves to 26; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 15.2% for rank 35. An ace-high hand — watch out for kicker trouble and domination.

Its suited/offsuit twin ATs runs at 64.6% (rank 13), a gap of 2 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is A9s at 62.8%, and directly below is KJs at 62.5%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.3 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, ATo is a favourite against 148 of them and an underdog against 20. Its best matchup is T2o at 77.1% and its worst is AA at 8.2% — a spread of 68.9 points, which is why calling ATo simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.

ATo dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against T2o at 77.1%. It is dominated by 6 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves ATo with only 25.2%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 4 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 2.8 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 30.3 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, ATo lands +11.6 points from the middle of the pack, and 18 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 62.6% against one opponent, 44.4% against two, 27.8% against four and 15.2% against eight. That last figure is 137% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 6 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why ATo reads as 62.6% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 62.6% against one opponent down to 15.2% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%35%70%62.6144.4234.0327.8423.0520.0617.4715.28opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
ATo played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankATo equityvs 50%Shape
AA18.2%-41.8PAIR VS CARDS
KK228.9%-21.1PAIR VS CARDS
QQ328.6%-21.4PAIR VS CARDS
JJ428.6%-21.4PAIR VS CARDS
TT530.8%-19.2PAIR VS CARDS
99644.5%-5.5PAIR VS CARDS
88744.8%-5.2PAIR VS CARDS
AKs825.2%-24.8DOMINATED
77945.1%-4.9PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1025.5%-24.5DOMINATED
AJs1126.0%-24.0DOMINATED
AKo1226.3%-23.7DOMINATED
ATs1347.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
AQo1426.5%-23.5DOMINATED
AJo1527.1%-22.9DOMINATED
KQs1656.5%+6.5HIGH CARD
661745.7%-4.3PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1868.0%+18.0DOMINATING
KJs2056.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
A8s2167.6%+17.6DOMINATING
KTs2270.1%+20.1DOMINATING
KQo2360.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
A7s2467.5%+17.5DOMINATING
A9o2572.0%+22.0DOMINATING
KJo2659.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
552746.4%-3.6PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2855.4%+5.4HIGH CARD
A6s2967.3%+17.3DOMINATING
K9s3060.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
A8o3171.7%+21.7DOMINATING
A5s3266.2%+16.2DOMINATING
KTo3374.1%+24.1DOMINATING
QTs3468.7%+18.7DOMINATING
A4s3566.3%+16.3DOMINATING
A7o3671.4%+21.4DOMINATING
K8s3761.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
A3s3866.6%+16.6DOMINATING
QJo3958.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
K9o4064.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
Q9s4159.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
A5o4270.1%+20.1DOMINATING
A2s4367.0%+17.0DOMINATING
K7s4461.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
A6o4571.5%+21.5DOMINATING
JTs4667.2%+17.2DOMINATING
QTo4772.6%+22.6DOMINATING
444847.1%-2.9PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4960.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
A4o5070.1%+20.1DOMINATING
Q8s5160.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
K8o5265.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
A3o5370.8%+20.8DOMINATING
K5s5461.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
J9s5558.5%+8.5HIGH CARD
Q9o5663.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
JTo5770.9%+20.9DOMINATING
K7o5864.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
K4s5961.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
A2o6071.1%+21.1DOMINATING
Q7s6161.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
K6o6264.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
K3s6361.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
J8s6459.5%+9.5HIGH CARD
T9s6567.9%+17.9DOMINATING
Q8o6664.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
336747.7%-2.3PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6860.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
K2s6961.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
J9o7062.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
K5o7165.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
Q5s7261.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
J7s7360.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
T8s7467.6%+17.6DOMINATING
K4o7564.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
Q7o7665.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
Q4s7761.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
J8o7863.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
T9o7972.2%+22.2DOMINATING
K3o8065.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
Q3s8161.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
Q6o8264.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
98s8359.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
T7s8468.9%+18.9DOMINATING
J6s8560.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
K2o8665.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
Q5o8764.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
228848.5%-1.5PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8961.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
J5s9061.0%+11.0HIGH CARD
T8o9171.8%+21.8DOMINATING
J7o9264.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
J4s9361.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
97s9460.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
Q4o9564.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
T6s9670.0%+20.0DOMINATING
J3s9761.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
98o9863.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
T7o9973.2%+23.2DOMINATING
Q3o10065.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
87s10159.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
J6o10264.7%+14.7HIGH CARD
J2s10361.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
96s10461.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
Q2o10565.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
J5o10664.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
T5s10771.6%+21.6DOMINATING
T4s10871.9%+21.9DOMINATING
97o10964.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
86s11060.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
J4o11165.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
T6o11274.3%+24.3DOMINATING
T3s11372.3%+22.3DOMINATING
95s11462.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
76s11558.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
J3o11665.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
87o11762.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
T2s11872.7%+22.7DOMINATING
85s11961.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
96o12065.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
T5o12176.0%+26.0DOMINATING
J2o12265.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
94s12364.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
75s12460.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
T4o12576.2%+26.2DOMINATING
93s12664.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
86o12763.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
65s12859.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
95o12966.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
84s13062.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
T3o13176.7%+26.7DOMINATING
92s13264.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
76o13362.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
74s13461.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
T2o13577.1%+27.1DOMINATING
64s13660.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
85o13765.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
54s13859.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
83s13963.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
94o14068.1%+18.1HIGH CARD
75o14164.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
82s14264.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
73s14362.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
65o14462.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
93o14568.1%+18.1HIGH CARD
53s14660.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
63s14761.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
84o14866.7%+16.7HIGH CARD
92o14968.3%+18.3HIGH CARD
43s15060.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
74o15165.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
54o15262.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
72s15364.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
52s15462.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
64o15564.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
62s15662.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
83o15768.2%+18.2HIGH CARD
42s15862.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
82o15968.0%+18.0HIGH CARD
73o16066.8%+16.8HIGH CARD
53o16164.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
63o16265.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
32s16362.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
43o16464.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
72o16568.3%+18.3HIGH CARD
52o16666.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
62o16766.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
42o16865.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
32o16966.2%+16.2HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
ATs64.6%

FAQ

What is the equity of ATo?

62.6% against one random opponent, which ranks it 19 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 23.0%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 15.2%.

How much better is ATo than ATs?

ATo is worth 62.6% and ATs 64.6%, a difference of 2 points — rank 19 versus rank 13.

How many of the 168 other hands does ATo beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 148 hands and an underdog against 20. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

424 words / 40 distinct figures — Method