169hands
MENU
offsuitone gapper

97o

46.4%
Equity vs one random hand — #109 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
46.4% · #109
6-handed (5 opponents)
15.2% · #107
9-handed (8 opponents)
9.7% · #120
Chen score
4.5
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
53 of 168 hands

97o (nine-seven offsuit) wins 46.4% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 109th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 64.5% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 15.2% and its rank moves to 107; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 9.7% for rank 120. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin 97s runs at 49.2% (rank 94), a gap of 2.8 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.8 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is T4s at 46.7%, and directly below is 86s at 46.3%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 97o is a favourite against 53 of them and an underdog against 115. Its best matchup is 72o at 73.8% and its worst is 99 at 11.6% — a spread of 62.2 points, which is why calling 97o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 3 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 50.3%.

97o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 72o at 73.8%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them Q9s, which leaves 97o with only 26.2%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 44 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 19 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 14.1 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 97o lands -4.6 points from the middle of the pack, and 108 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 46.4% against one opponent, 30.7% against two, 18.2% against four and 9.7% against eight. That last figure is 87% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 4.5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 97o reads as 46.4% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 46.4% against one opponent down to 9.7% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%25%50%46.4130.7223.1318.2415.2512.7611.379.78opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
97o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rank97o equityvs 50%Shape
AA116.9%-33.1PAIR VS CARDS
KK217.0%-33.0PAIR VS CARDS
QQ316.7%-33.3PAIR VS CARDS
JJ415.6%-34.4PAIR VS CARDS
TT513.9%-36.1PAIR VS CARDS
99611.6%-38.4PAIR VS CARDS
88729.9%-20.1PAIR VS CARDS
AKs834.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
77934.6%-15.4PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1034.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
AJs1134.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
AKo1236.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
ATs1334.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
AQo1435.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
AJo1536.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
KQs1633.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
661746.1%-3.9PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1827.3%-22.7DOMINATED
ATo1935.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
KJs2033.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
A8s2137.2%-12.8HIGH CARD
KTs2233.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
KQo2335.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
A7s2427.6%-22.4DOMINATED
A9o2528.4%-21.6DOMINATED
KJo2635.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
552747.1%-2.9PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2832.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
A6s2940.6%-9.4HIGH CARD
K9s3027.6%-22.4DOMINATED
A8o3139.1%-10.9HIGH CARD
A5s3240.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
KTo3335.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
QTs3432.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
A4s3541.4%-8.6HIGH CARD
A7o3629.0%-21.0DOMINATED
K8s3737.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
A3s3841.4%-8.6HIGH CARD
QJo3934.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
K9o4029.0%-21.0DOMINATED
Q9s4126.2%-23.8DOMINATED
A5o4242.8%-7.2HIGH CARD
A2s4341.7%-8.3HIGH CARD
K7s4428.3%-21.7DOMINATED
A6o4542.7%-7.3HIGH CARD
JTs4631.8%-18.2HIGH CARD
QTo4734.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
444849.1%-0.9COINFLIP
K6s4940.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
A4o5043.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
Q8s5136.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
K8o5239.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
A3o5343.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
K5s5441.1%-8.9HIGH CARD
J9s5527.0%-23.0DOMINATED
Q9o5627.2%-22.8DOMINATED
JTo5733.0%-17.0HIGH CARD
K7o5829.6%-20.4DOMINATED
K4s5942.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
A2o6044.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
Q7s6128.7%-21.3DOMINATED
K6o6242.7%-7.3HIGH CARD
K3s6342.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
J8s6435.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
T9s6526.4%-23.6DOMINATED
Q8o6638.4%-11.6HIGH CARD
336749.4%-0.6COINFLIP
Q6s6840.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
K2s6942.4%-7.6HIGH CARD
J9o7028.0%-22.0DOMINATED
K5o7143.6%-6.4HIGH CARD
Q5s7240.9%-9.1HIGH CARD
J7s7328.0%-22.0DOMINATED
T8s7434.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
K4o7544.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
Q7o7630.2%-19.8DOMINATED
Q4s7742.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
J8o7837.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
T9o7927.3%-22.7DOMINATED
K3o8044.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
Q3s8142.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
Q6o8242.8%-7.2HIGH CARD
98s8331.7%-18.3DOMINATED
T7s8427.1%-22.9DOMINATED
J6s8541.0%-9.0HIGH CARD
K2o8644.8%-5.2HIGH CARD
Q5o8743.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
228850.3%+0.3COINFLIP
Q2s8942.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
J5s9041.3%-8.7HIGH CARD
T8o9136.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
J7o9229.1%-20.9DOMINATED
J4s9342.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
97s9447.6%-2.4HIGH CARD
Q4o9544.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
T6s9640.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
J3s9741.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
98o9833.0%-17.0DOMINATED
T7o9928.4%-21.6DOMINATED
Q3o10044.1%-5.9HIGH CARD
87s10166.5%+16.5DOMINATING
J6o10243.1%-6.9HIGH CARD
J2s10342.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
96s10460.1%+10.1DOMINATING
Q2o10544.7%-5.3HIGH CARD
J5o10643.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
T5s10741.4%-8.6HIGH CARD
T4s10842.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
86s11059.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
J4o11144.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
T6o11242.4%-7.6HIGH CARD
T3s11342.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
95s11460.4%+10.4DOMINATING
76s11565.6%+15.6DOMINATING
J3o11644.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
87o11770.5%+20.5DOMINATING
T2s11842.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
85s11960.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
96o12063.6%+13.6DOMINATING
T5o12143.7%-6.3HIGH CARD
J2o12244.8%-5.2HIGH CARD
94s12361.0%+11.0DOMINATING
75s12466.1%+16.1DOMINATING
T4o12544.5%-5.5HIGH CARD
93s12660.8%+10.8DOMINATING
86o12763.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
65s12860.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
95o12963.9%+13.9DOMINATING
84s13061.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
T3o13144.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
92s13261.3%+11.3DOMINATING
76o13369.7%+19.7DOMINATING
74s13467.8%+17.8DOMINATING
T2o13544.9%-5.1HIGH CARD
64s13661.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
85o13763.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
54s13860.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
83s13962.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
94o14064.6%+14.6DOMINATING
75o14170.0%+20.0DOMINATING
82s14262.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
73s14367.8%+17.8DOMINATING
65o14464.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
93o14564.5%+14.5DOMINATING
53s14660.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
63s14762.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
84o14865.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
92o14965.1%+15.1DOMINATING
43s15060.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
74o15172.0%+22.0DOMINATING
54o15263.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
72s15369.5%+19.5DOMINATING
52s15462.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
64o15565.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
62s15664.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
83o15766.5%+16.5HIGH CARD
42s15862.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
82o15966.7%+16.7HIGH CARD
73o16072.2%+22.2DOMINATING
53o16164.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
63o16266.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
32s16362.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
43o16465.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
72o16573.8%+23.8DOMINATING
52o16666.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
62o16768.0%+18.0HIGH CARD
42o16866.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
32o16966.4%+16.4HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
97s49.2%

FAQ

What is the equity of 97o?

46.4% against one random opponent, which ranks it 109 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 15.2%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 9.7%.

How much better is 97o than 97s?

97o is worth 46.4% and 97s 49.2%, a difference of 2.8 points — rank 109 versus rank 94.

How many of the 168 other hands does 97o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 53 hands and an underdog against 115. 3 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

440 words / 48 distinct figures — Method