97o
Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 46.4% · #109
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 15.2% · #107
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 9.7% · #120
- Chen score
- 4.5
- Combos
- 12 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.9%
- Favourite against
- 53 of 168 hands
97o (nine-seven offsuit) wins 46.4% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 109th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 64.5% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 15.2% and its rank moves to 107; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 9.7% for rank 120. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
Its suited/offsuit twin 97s runs at 49.2% (rank 94), a gap of 2.8 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.8 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is T4s at 46.7%, and directly below is 86s at 46.3%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 97o is a favourite against 53 of them and an underdog against 115. Its best matchup is 72o at 73.8% and its worst is 99 at 11.6% — a spread of 62.2 points, which is why calling 97o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 3 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 50.3%.
97o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 72o at 73.8%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them Q9s, which leaves 97o with only 26.2%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 44 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 19 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 14.1 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 97o lands -4.6 points from the middle of the pack, and 108 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 46.4% against one opponent, 30.7% against two, 18.2% against four and 9.7% against eight. That last figure is 87% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 4.5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 97o reads as 46.4% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 46.4% against one opponent down to 9.7% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | 97o equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 16.9% | -33.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 17.0% | -33.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 16.7% | -33.3 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 15.6% | -34.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 13.9% | -36.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 11.6% | -38.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 29.9% | -20.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 34.6% | -15.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 34.4% | -15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 33.6% | -16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 66 | 17 | 46.1% | -3.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 27.3% | -22.7 | DOMINATED |
| ATo | 19 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 33.6% | -16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A8s | 21 | 37.2% | -12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 33.7% | -16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| KQo | 23 | 35.5% | -14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A7s | 24 | 27.6% | -22.4 | DOMINATED |
| A9o | 25 | 28.4% | -21.6 | DOMINATED |
| KJo | 26 | 35.5% | -14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 55 | 27 | 47.1% | -2.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 32.6% | -17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A6s | 29 | 40.6% | -9.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 27.6% | -22.4 | DOMINATED |
| A8o | 31 | 39.1% | -10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 40.5% | -9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 35.3% | -14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| QTs | 34 | 32.6% | -17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A4s | 35 | 41.4% | -8.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 29.0% | -21.0 | DOMINATED |
| K8s | 37 | 37.6% | -12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 41.4% | -8.6 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 34.4% | -15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 29.0% | -21.0 | DOMINATED |
| Q9s | 41 | 26.2% | -23.8 | DOMINATED |
| A5o | 42 | 42.8% | -7.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 41.7% | -8.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 28.3% | -21.7 | DOMINATED |
| A6o | 45 | 42.7% | -7.3 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 31.8% | -18.2 | HIGH CARD |
| QTo | 47 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 44 | 48 | 49.1% | -0.9 | COINFLIP |
| K6s | 49 | 40.5% | -9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 43.8% | -6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 36.6% | -13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 39.6% | -10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 43.8% | -6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 41.1% | -8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 27.0% | -23.0 | DOMINATED |
| Q9o | 56 | 27.2% | -22.8 | DOMINATED |
| JTo | 57 | 33.0% | -17.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K7o | 58 | 29.6% | -20.4 | DOMINATED |
| K4s | 59 | 42.0% | -8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 44.2% | -5.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 28.7% | -21.3 | DOMINATED |
| K6o | 62 | 42.7% | -7.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 42.0% | -8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 35.5% | -14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 26.4% | -23.6 | DOMINATED |
| Q8o | 66 | 38.4% | -11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 49.4% | -0.6 | COINFLIP |
| Q6s | 68 | 40.5% | -9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 42.4% | -7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 28.0% | -22.0 | DOMINATED |
| K5o | 71 | 43.6% | -6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5s | 72 | 40.9% | -9.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J7s | 73 | 28.0% | -22.0 | DOMINATED |
| T8s | 74 | 34.9% | -15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K4o | 75 | 44.4% | -5.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7o | 76 | 30.2% | -19.8 | DOMINATED |
| Q4s | 77 | 42.1% | -7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J8o | 78 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 27.3% | -22.7 | DOMINATED |
| K3o | 80 | 44.4% | -5.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 42.0% | -8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q6o | 82 | 42.8% | -7.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 31.7% | -18.3 | DOMINATED |
| T7s | 84 | 27.1% | -22.9 | DOMINATED |
| J6s | 85 | 41.0% | -9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 44.8% | -5.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 43.3% | -6.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 22 | 88 | 50.3% | +0.3 | COINFLIP |
| Q2s | 89 | 42.3% | -7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J5s | 90 | 41.3% | -8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 36.6% | -13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J7o | 92 | 29.1% | -20.9 | DOMINATED |
| J4s | 93 | 42.1% | -7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 47.6% | -2.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4o | 95 | 44.2% | -5.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T6s | 96 | 40.1% | -9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 41.9% | -8.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 33.0% | -17.0 | DOMINATED |
| T7o | 99 | 28.4% | -21.6 | DOMINATED |
| Q3o | 100 | 44.1% | -5.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 87s | 101 | 66.5% | +16.5 | DOMINATING |
| J6o | 102 | 43.1% | -6.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 42.3% | -7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 60.1% | +10.1 | DOMINATING |
| Q2o | 105 | 44.7% | -5.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 43.4% | -6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 41.4% | -8.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 42.3% | -7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 86s | 110 | 59.4% | +9.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 44.3% | -5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 42.4% | -7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 42.0% | -8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 95s | 114 | 60.4% | +10.4 | DOMINATING |
| 76s | 115 | 65.6% | +15.6 | DOMINATING |
| J3o | 116 | 44.3% | -5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 87o | 117 | 70.5% | +20.5 | DOMINATING |
| T2s | 118 | 42.6% | -7.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 60.3% | +10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 63.6% | +13.6 | DOMINATING |
| T5o | 121 | 43.7% | -6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 44.8% | -5.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 61.0% | +11.0 | DOMINATING |
| 75s | 124 | 66.1% | +16.1 | DOMINATING |
| T4o | 125 | 44.5% | -5.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 93s | 126 | 60.8% | +10.8 | DOMINATING |
| 86o | 127 | 63.0% | +13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 60.4% | +10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 63.9% | +13.9 | DOMINATING |
| 84s | 130 | 61.4% | +11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 44.3% | -5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 92s | 132 | 61.3% | +11.3 | DOMINATING |
| 76o | 133 | 69.7% | +19.7 | DOMINATING |
| 74s | 134 | 67.8% | +17.8 | DOMINATING |
| T2o | 135 | 44.9% | -5.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 64s | 136 | 61.6% | +11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 63.9% | +13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 60.0% | +10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 62.5% | +12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 64.6% | +14.6 | DOMINATING |
| 75o | 141 | 70.0% | +20.0 | DOMINATING |
| 82s | 142 | 62.9% | +12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 67.8% | +17.8 | DOMINATING |
| 65o | 144 | 64.0% | +14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 93o | 145 | 64.5% | +14.5 | DOMINATING |
| 53s | 146 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 62.8% | +12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 65.1% | +15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 65.1% | +15.1 | DOMINATING |
| 43s | 150 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 72.0% | +22.0 | DOMINATING |
| 54o | 152 | 63.6% | +13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 69.5% | +19.5 | DOMINATING |
| 52s | 154 | 62.2% | +12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 64o | 155 | 65.4% | +15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 64.3% | +14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 66.5% | +16.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 62.6% | +12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 66.7% | +16.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 72.2% | +22.2 | DOMINATING |
| 53o | 161 | 64.6% | +14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 63o | 162 | 66.6% | +16.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 62.5% | +12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 65.0% | +15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 73.8% | +23.8 | DOMINATING |
| 52o | 166 | 66.1% | +16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 68.0% | +18.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 66.4% | +16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 66.4% | +16.4 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of 97o?
46.4% against one random opponent, which ranks it 109 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 15.2%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 9.7%.
How much better is 97o than 97s?
97o is worth 46.4% and 97s 49.2%, a difference of 2.8 points — rank 109 versus rank 94.
How many of the 168 other hands does 97o beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 53 hands and an underdog against 115. 3 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
440 words / 48 distinct figures — Method
