A9s
A suited ace — nut-flush potential on top of top-pair equity.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 62.8% · #18
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 24.3% · #20
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 16.8% · #19
- Chen score
- 7
- Combos
- 4 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.3%
- Favourite against
- 147 of 168 hands
A9s (ace-nine suited) wins 62.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 18th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 10.7% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 24.3% and its rank moves to 20; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 16.8% for rank 19. A suited ace — nut-flush potential on top of top-pair equity.
Its suited/offsuit twin A9o runs at 60.8% (rank 25), a gap of 2 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 66 at 63.3%, and directly below is ATo at 62.6%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.7 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, A9s is a favourite against 147 of them and an underdog against 21. Its best matchup is 92o at 77.8% and its worst is AA at 11.7% — a spread of 66.1 points, which is why calling A9s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.9%.
A9s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 92o at 77.8%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves A9s with only 28.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 suited hands it comes 6 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 4.4 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 26.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, A9s lands +11.8 points from the middle of the pack, and 17 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 62.8% against one opponent, 44.5% against two, 28.1% against four and 16.8% against eight. That last figure is 151% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 7 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why A9s reads as 62.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 62.8% against one opponent down to 16.8% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | A9s equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 11.7% | -38.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 32.0% | -18.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 31.7% | -18.3 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 31.5% | -18.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 31.4% | -18.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 33.6% | -16.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 45.8% | -4.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 28.8% | -21.2 | DOMINATED |
| 77 | 9 | 46.5% | -3.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 29.3% | -20.7 | DOMINATED |
| AJs | 11 | 30.0% | -20.0 | DOMINATED |
| AKo | 12 | 29.9% | -20.1 | DOMINATED |
| ATs | 13 | 30.9% | -19.1 | DOMINATED |
| AQo | 14 | 30.4% | -19.6 | DOMINATED |
| AJo | 15 | 31.2% | -18.8 | DOMINATED |
| KQs | 16 | 57.7% | +7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 66 | 17 | 46.6% | -3.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| ATo | 19 | 32.0% | -18.0 | DOMINATED |
| KJs | 20 | 57.2% | +7.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A8s | 21 | 66.8% | +16.8 | DOMINATING |
| KTs | 22 | 57.3% | +7.3 | HIGH CARD |
| KQo | 23 | 60.3% | +10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A7s | 24 | 66.6% | +16.6 | DOMINATING |
| A9o | 25 | 52.5% | +2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 60.0% | +10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 55 | 27 | 47.5% | -2.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 56.4% | +6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A6s | 29 | 66.5% | +16.5 | DOMINATING |
| K9s | 30 | 71.2% | +21.2 | DOMINATING |
| A8o | 31 | 70.6% | +20.6 | DOMINATING |
| A5s | 32 | 65.0% | +15.0 | DOMINATING |
| KTo | 33 | 60.3% | +10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| QTs | 34 | 56.3% | +6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A4s | 35 | 65.7% | +15.7 | DOMINATING |
| A7o | 36 | 70.4% | +20.4 | DOMINATING |
| K8s | 37 | 62.8% | +12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 65.8% | +15.8 | DOMINATING |
| QJo | 39 | 59.1% | +9.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 75.2% | +25.2 | DOMINATING |
| Q9s | 41 | 69.7% | +19.7 | DOMINATING |
| A5o | 42 | 68.9% | +18.9 | DOMINATING |
| A2s | 43 | 66.1% | +16.1 | DOMINATING |
| K7s | 44 | 62.3% | +12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A6o | 45 | 70.3% | +20.3 | DOMINATING |
| JTs | 46 | 55.6% | +5.6 | HIGH CARD |
| QTo | 47 | 59.0% | +9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 44 | 48 | 48.3% | -1.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 62.2% | +12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 69.5% | +19.5 | DOMINATING |
| Q8s | 51 | 61.9% | +11.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 65.9% | +15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 69.5% | +19.5 | DOMINATING |
| K5s | 54 | 62.4% | +12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 68.2% | +18.2 | DOMINATING |
| Q9o | 56 | 73.9% | +23.9 | DOMINATING |
| JTo | 57 | 58.2% | +8.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K7o | 58 | 65.4% | +15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K4s | 59 | 62.8% | +12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 69.8% | +19.8 | DOMINATING |
| Q7s | 61 | 62.7% | +12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K6o | 62 | 65.0% | +15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 62.8% | +12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 60.8% | +10.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 67.0% | +17.0 | DOMINATING |
| Q8o | 66 | 64.7% | +14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 48.9% | -1.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6s | 68 | 61.9% | +11.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 63.0% | +13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 72.4% | +22.4 | DOMINATING |
| K5o | 71 | 65.1% | +15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5s | 72 | 62.1% | +12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J7s | 73 | 61.4% | +11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T8s | 74 | 59.5% | +9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K4o | 75 | 65.6% | +15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7o | 76 | 65.6% | +15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4s | 77 | 62.5% | +12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J8o | 78 | 63.5% | +13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 70.8% | +20.8 | DOMINATING |
| K3o | 80 | 65.8% | +15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 62.6% | +12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q6o | 82 | 64.9% | +14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 67.6% | +17.6 | DOMINATING |
| T7s | 84 | 60.4% | +10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J6s | 85 | 62.3% | +12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 66.2% | +16.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 65.1% | +15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 22 | 88 | 49.9% | -0.1 | COINFLIP |
| Q2s | 89 | 63.0% | +13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J5s | 90 | 62.1% | +12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 62.4% | +12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J7o | 92 | 64.4% | +14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J4s | 93 | 62.5% | +12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 68.5% | +18.5 | DOMINATING |
| Q4o | 95 | 65.4% | +15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T6s | 96 | 61.3% | +11.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 62.7% | +12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 71.3% | +21.3 | DOMINATING |
| T7o | 99 | 63.0% | +13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3o | 100 | 65.6% | +15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 87s | 101 | 61.4% | +11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J6o | 102 | 65.3% | +15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 62.9% | +12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 69.9% | +19.9 | DOMINATING |
| Q2o | 105 | 65.9% | +15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 65.0% | +15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 62.3% | +12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 62.4% | +12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 97o | 109 | 72.7% | +22.7 | DOMINATING |
| 86s | 110 | 62.3% | +12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 65.5% | +15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 64.0% | +14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 62.5% | +12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 95s | 114 | 71.2% | +21.2 | DOMINATING |
| 76s | 115 | 61.2% | +11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J3o | 116 | 65.6% | +15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 87o | 117 | 64.2% | +14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T2s | 118 | 62.8% | +12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 63.4% | +13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 73.8% | +23.8 | DOMINATING |
| T5o | 121 | 65.3% | +15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 65.9% | +15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 72.8% | +22.8 | DOMINATING |
| 75s | 124 | 62.6% | +12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 65.1% | +15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 93s | 126 | 73.0% | +23.0 | DOMINATING |
| 86o | 127 | 65.3% | +15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 61.1% | +11.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 75.5% | +25.5 | DOMINATING |
| 84s | 130 | 65.3% | +15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 65.6% | +15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 92s | 132 | 73.3% | +23.3 | DOMINATING |
| 76o | 133 | 64.2% | +14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 74s | 134 | 63.7% | +13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 65.9% | +15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 64s | 136 | 62.6% | +12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 66.5% | +16.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 61.6% | +11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 66.2% | +16.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 77.0% | +27.0 | DOMINATING |
| 75o | 141 | 65.5% | +15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 66.2% | +16.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 65.2% | +15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 65o | 144 | 64.2% | +14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 93o | 145 | 77.1% | +27.1 | DOMINATING |
| 53s | 146 | 62.7% | +12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 63.6% | +13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 67.9% | +17.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 77.8% | +27.8 | DOMINATING |
| 43s | 150 | 63.2% | +13.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 66.8% | +16.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 64.6% | +14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 66.4% | +16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 63.9% | +13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 64o | 155 | 65.5% | +15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 65.1% | +15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 69.3% | +19.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 64.3% | +14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 69.3% | +19.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 68.2% | +18.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 53o | 161 | 65.4% | +15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 63o | 162 | 66.8% | +16.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 64.5% | +14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 65.9% | +15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 69.4% | +19.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 52o | 166 | 66.8% | +16.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 68.1% | +18.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 67.3% | +17.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 67.5% | +17.5 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of A9s?
62.8% against one random opponent, which ranks it 18 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 24.3%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 16.8%.
How much better is A9s than A9o?
A9s is worth 62.8% and A9o 60.8%, a difference of 2 points — rank 18 versus rank 25.
How many of the 168 other hands does A9s beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 147 hands and an underdog against 21. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
445 words / 44 distinct figures — Method
