169hands
MENU
suitedace high

A9s

62.8%
Equity vs one random hand — #18 of 169

A suited ace — nut-flush potential on top of top-pair equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
62.8% · #18
6-handed (5 opponents)
24.3% · #20
9-handed (8 opponents)
16.8% · #19
Chen score
7
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
147 of 168 hands

A9s (ace-nine suited) wins 62.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 18th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 10.7% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 24.3% and its rank moves to 20; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 16.8% for rank 19. A suited ace — nut-flush potential on top of top-pair equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin A9o runs at 60.8% (rank 25), a gap of 2 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 66 at 63.3%, and directly below is ATo at 62.6%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.7 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, A9s is a favourite against 147 of them and an underdog against 21. Its best matchup is 92o at 77.8% and its worst is AA at 11.7% — a spread of 66.1 points, which is why calling A9s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.9%.

A9s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 92o at 77.8%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves A9s with only 28.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 6 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 4.4 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 26.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, A9s lands +11.8 points from the middle of the pack, and 17 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 62.8% against one opponent, 44.5% against two, 28.1% against four and 16.8% against eight. That last figure is 151% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 7 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why A9s reads as 62.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 62.8% against one opponent down to 16.8% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%35%70%62.8144.5234.4328.1424.3521.2618.2716.88opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
A9s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankA9s equityvs 50%Shape
AA111.7%-38.3PAIR VS CARDS
KK232.0%-18.0PAIR VS CARDS
QQ331.7%-18.3PAIR VS CARDS
JJ431.5%-18.5PAIR VS CARDS
TT531.4%-18.6PAIR VS CARDS
99633.6%-16.4PAIR VS CARDS
88745.8%-4.2PAIR VS CARDS
AKs828.8%-21.2DOMINATED
77946.5%-3.5PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1029.3%-20.7DOMINATED
AJs1130.0%-20.0DOMINATED
AKo1229.9%-20.1DOMINATED
ATs1330.9%-19.1DOMINATED
AQo1430.4%-19.6DOMINATED
AJo1531.2%-18.8DOMINATED
KQs1657.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
661746.6%-3.4PAIR VS CARDS
ATo1932.0%-18.0DOMINATED
KJs2057.2%+7.2HIGH CARD
A8s2166.8%+16.8DOMINATING
KTs2257.3%+7.3HIGH CARD
KQo2360.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
A7s2466.6%+16.6DOMINATING
A9o2552.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
KJo2660.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
552747.5%-2.5PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2856.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
A6s2966.5%+16.5DOMINATING
K9s3071.2%+21.2DOMINATING
A8o3170.6%+20.6DOMINATING
A5s3265.0%+15.0DOMINATING
KTo3360.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
QTs3456.3%+6.3HIGH CARD
A4s3565.7%+15.7DOMINATING
A7o3670.4%+20.4DOMINATING
K8s3762.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
A3s3865.8%+15.8DOMINATING
QJo3959.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
K9o4075.2%+25.2DOMINATING
Q9s4169.7%+19.7DOMINATING
A5o4268.9%+18.9DOMINATING
A2s4366.1%+16.1DOMINATING
K7s4462.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
A6o4570.3%+20.3DOMINATING
JTs4655.6%+5.6HIGH CARD
QTo4759.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
444848.3%-1.7PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4962.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
A4o5069.5%+19.5DOMINATING
Q8s5161.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
K8o5265.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
A3o5369.5%+19.5DOMINATING
K5s5462.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
J9s5568.2%+18.2DOMINATING
Q9o5673.9%+23.9DOMINATING
JTo5758.2%+8.2HIGH CARD
K7o5865.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
K4s5962.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
A2o6069.8%+19.8DOMINATING
Q7s6162.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
K6o6265.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
K3s6362.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
J8s6460.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
T9s6567.0%+17.0DOMINATING
Q8o6664.7%+14.7HIGH CARD
336748.9%-1.1PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6861.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
K2s6963.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
J9o7072.4%+22.4DOMINATING
K5o7165.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
Q5s7262.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
J7s7361.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
T8s7459.5%+9.5HIGH CARD
K4o7565.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
Q7o7665.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
Q4s7762.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
J8o7863.5%+13.5HIGH CARD
T9o7970.8%+20.8DOMINATING
K3o8065.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
Q3s8162.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
Q6o8264.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
98s8367.6%+17.6DOMINATING
T7s8460.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
J6s8562.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
K2o8666.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
Q5o8765.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
228849.9%-0.1COINFLIP
Q2s8963.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
J5s9062.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
T8o9162.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
J7o9264.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
J4s9362.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
97s9468.5%+18.5DOMINATING
Q4o9565.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
T6s9661.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
J3s9762.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
98o9871.3%+21.3DOMINATING
T7o9963.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
Q3o10065.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
87s10161.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
J6o10265.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
J2s10362.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
96s10469.9%+19.9DOMINATING
Q2o10565.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
J5o10665.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
T5s10762.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
T4s10862.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
97o10972.7%+22.7DOMINATING
86s11062.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
J4o11165.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
T6o11264.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
T3s11362.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
95s11471.2%+21.2DOMINATING
76s11561.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
J3o11665.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
87o11764.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
T2s11862.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
85s11963.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
96o12073.8%+23.8DOMINATING
T5o12165.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
J2o12265.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
94s12372.8%+22.8DOMINATING
75s12462.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
T4o12565.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
93s12673.0%+23.0DOMINATING
86o12765.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
65s12861.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
95o12975.5%+25.5DOMINATING
84s13065.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
T3o13165.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
92s13273.3%+23.3DOMINATING
76o13364.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
74s13463.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
T2o13565.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
64s13662.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
85o13766.5%+16.5HIGH CARD
54s13861.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
83s13966.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
94o14077.0%+27.0DOMINATING
75o14165.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
82s14266.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
73s14365.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
65o14464.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
93o14577.1%+27.1DOMINATING
53s14662.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
63s14763.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
84o14867.9%+17.9HIGH CARD
92o14977.8%+27.8DOMINATING
43s15063.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
74o15166.8%+16.8HIGH CARD
54o15264.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
72s15366.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
52s15463.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
64o15565.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
62s15665.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
83o15769.3%+19.3HIGH CARD
42s15864.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
82o15969.3%+19.3HIGH CARD
73o16068.2%+18.2HIGH CARD
53o16165.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
63o16266.8%+16.8HIGH CARD
32s16364.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
43o16465.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
72o16569.4%+19.4HIGH CARD
52o16666.8%+16.8HIGH CARD
62o16768.1%+18.1HIGH CARD
42o16867.3%+17.3HIGH CARD
32o16967.5%+17.5HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
A9o60.8%

FAQ

What is the equity of A9s?

62.8% against one random opponent, which ranks it 18 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 24.3%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 16.8%.

How much better is A9s than A9o?

A9s is worth 62.8% and A9o 60.8%, a difference of 2 points — rank 18 versus rank 25.

How many of the 168 other hands does A9s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 147 hands and an underdog against 21. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

445 words / 44 distinct figures — Method