169hands
MENU
offsuit

K6o

54.2%
Equity vs one random hand — #62 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
54.2% · #62
6-handed (5 opponents)
15.8% · #98
9-handed (8 opponents)
9.9% · #117
Chen score
3
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
118 of 168 hands

K6o (king-six offsuit) wins 54.2% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 62th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 36.7% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 15.8% and its rank moves to 98; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 9.9% for rank 117. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin K6s runs at 56.8% (rank 49), a gap of 2.6 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.6 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is Q7s at 54.4%, and directly below is K3s at 54.0%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, K6o is a favourite against 118 of them and an underdog against 50. Its best matchup is 62o at 75.1% and its worst is KK at 6.6% — a spread of 68.5 points, which is why calling K6o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.

K6o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 62o at 75.1%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves K6o with only 23.4%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 23 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 11.2 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 21.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, K6o lands +3.2 points from the middle of the pack, and 61 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 54.2% against one opponent, 35.1% against two, 19.3% against four and 9.9% against eight. That last figure is 89% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why K6o reads as 54.2% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 54.2% against one opponent down to 9.9% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%54.2135.1224.8319.3415.8513.3611.179.98opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
K6o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankK6o equityvs 50%Shape
AA112.3%-37.7PAIR VS CARDS
KK26.6%-43.4PAIR VS CARDS
QQ328.1%-21.9PAIR VS CARDS
JJ427.9%-22.1PAIR VS CARDS
TT528.1%-21.9PAIR VS CARDS
99628.6%-21.4PAIR VS CARDS
88729.1%-20.9PAIR VS CARDS
AKs823.4%-26.6DOMINATED
77929.4%-20.6PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1033.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
AJs1133.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
AKo1224.3%-25.7DOMINATED
ATs1333.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
AQo1435.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
AJo1535.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
KQs1625.3%-24.7DOMINATED
661730.9%-19.1PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1835.0%-15.0HIGH CARD
ATo1935.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
KJs2025.7%-24.3DOMINATED
A8s2134.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
KTs2227.0%-23.0DOMINATED
KQo2326.5%-23.5DOMINATED
A7s2434.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
A9o2536.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
KJo2627.1%-22.9DOMINATED
552744.1%-5.9PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2852.7%+2.7HIGH CARD
A6s2923.7%-26.3DOMINATED
K9s3029.1%-20.9DOMINATED
A8o3136.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
A5s3237.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
KTo3328.3%-21.7DOMINATED
QTs3452.6%+2.6HIGH CARD
A4s3537.8%-12.2HIGH CARD
A7o3636.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
K8s3732.1%-17.9DOMINATED
A3s3838.3%-11.7HIGH CARD
QJo3955.9%+5.9HIGH CARD
K9o4030.6%-19.4DOMINATED
Q9s4154.3%+4.3HIGH CARD
A5o4239.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
A2s4338.7%-11.3HIGH CARD
K7s4434.8%-15.2DOMINATED
A6o4524.7%-25.3DOMINATED
JTs4651.1%+1.1HIGH CARD
QTo4755.9%+5.9HIGH CARD
444845.3%-4.7PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4947.6%-2.4HIGH CARD
A4o5040.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
Q8s5155.7%+5.7HIGH CARD
K8o5233.6%-16.4DOMINATED
A3o5340.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
K5s5456.0%+6.0HIGH CARD
J9s5552.6%+2.6HIGH CARD
Q9o5657.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
JTo5754.2%+4.2HIGH CARD
K7o5836.7%-13.3DOMINATED
K4s5956.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
A2o6040.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
Q7s6157.0%+7.0HIGH CARD
K3s6356.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
J8s6454.2%+4.2HIGH CARD
T9s6552.0%+2.0HIGH CARD
Q8o6659.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
336746.5%-3.5PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6870.6%+20.6DOMINATING
K2s6956.5%+6.5HIGH CARD
J9o7056.0%+6.0HIGH CARD
K5o7159.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
Q5s7260.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
J7s7355.2%+5.2HIGH CARD
T8s7453.4%+3.4HIGH CARD
K4o7559.7%+9.7HIGH CARD
Q7o7660.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
Q4s7760.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
J8o7857.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
T9o7955.2%+5.2HIGH CARD
K3o8059.7%+9.7HIGH CARD
Q3s8160.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
Q6o8274.7%+24.7DOMINATING
98s8353.0%+3.0HIGH CARD
T7s8454.6%+4.6HIGH CARD
J6s8570.4%+20.4DOMINATING
K2o8659.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
Q5o8763.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
228847.3%-2.7PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8960.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
J5s9059.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
T8o9156.7%+6.7HIGH CARD
J7o9258.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
J4s9359.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
97s9453.9%+3.9HIGH CARD
Q4o9563.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
T6s9668.9%+18.9DOMINATING
J3s9759.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
98o9856.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
T7o9957.9%+7.9HIGH CARD
Q3o10064.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
87s10153.2%+3.2HIGH CARD
J6o10274.7%+24.7DOMINATING
J2s10359.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
96s10467.5%+17.5DOMINATING
Q2o10564.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
J5o10663.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
T5s10759.7%+9.7HIGH CARD
T4s10859.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
97o10957.3%+7.3HIGH CARD
86s11066.6%+16.6DOMINATING
J4o11163.5%+13.5HIGH CARD
T6o11273.1%+23.1DOMINATING
T3s11359.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
95s11459.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
76s11565.0%+15.0DOMINATING
J3o11663.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
87o11756.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
T2s11859.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
85s11958.2%+8.2HIGH CARD
96o12071.5%+21.5DOMINATING
T5o12163.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
J2o12263.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
94s12360.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
75s12456.9%+6.9HIGH CARD
T4o12563.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
93s12659.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
86o12770.2%+20.2DOMINATING
65s12865.8%+15.8DOMINATING
95o12962.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
84s13059.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
T3o13163.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
92s13260.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
76o13368.8%+18.8DOMINATING
74s13458.2%+8.2HIGH CARD
T2o13563.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
64s13667.5%+17.5DOMINATING
85o13761.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
54s13858.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
83s13960.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
94o14063.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
75o14160.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
82s14260.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
73s14359.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
65o14469.9%+19.9DOMINATING
93o14563.5%+13.5HIGH CARD
53s14660.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
63s14768.7%+18.7DOMINATING
84o14863.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
92o14963.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
43s15060.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
74o15162.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
54o15262.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
72s15360.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
52s15461.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
64o15571.6%+21.6DOMINATING
62s15670.6%+20.6DOMINATING
83o15764.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
42s15862.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
82o15964.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
73o16063.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
53o16164.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
63o16273.2%+23.2DOMINATING
32s16362.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
43o16464.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
72o16564.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
52o16665.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
62o16775.1%+25.1DOMINATING
42o16865.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
32o16966.0%+16.0HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
K6s56.8%

FAQ

What is the equity of K6o?

54.2% against one random opponent, which ranks it 62 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 15.8%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 9.9%.

How much better is K6o than K6s?

K6o is worth 54.2% and K6s 56.8%, a difference of 2.6 points — rank 62 versus rank 49.

How many of the 168 other hands does K6o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 118 hands and an underdog against 50. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

425 words / 41 distinct figures — Method