Q7o

Q7o (queen-seven offsuit) wins 51.9% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 76th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 45% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 15.2% and its rank moves to 106; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 9.1% for rank 130. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin Q7s runs at 54.4% (rank 61), a gap of 2.5 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.5 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is K4o at 52.2%, and directly below is Q4s at 51.8%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, Q7o is a favourite against 100 of them and an underdog against 68. Its best matchup is 72o at 76.0% and its worst is QQ at 6.6% — a spread of 69.4 points, which is why calling Q7o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.

Q7o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 72o at 76.0%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AQs, which leaves Q7o with only 23.3%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 28 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 13.5 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 19.6 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, Q7o lands +0.9 points from the middle of the pack, and 75 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 51.9% against one opponent, 33.2% against two, 18.6% against four and 9.1% against eight. That last figure is 82% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 2 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why Q7o reads as 51.9% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.