169hands
MENU
offsuit

T6o

46.0%
Equity vs one random hand — #112 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
46.0% · #112
6-handed (5 opponents)
13.4% · #131
9-handed (8 opponents)
8.2% · #138
Chen score
1
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
64 of 168 hands

T6o (ten-six offsuit) wins 46.0% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 112th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 66.3% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 13.4% and its rank moves to 131; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 8.2% for rank 138. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin T6s runs at 48.8% (rank 96), a gap of 2.8 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.8 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is J4o at 46.1%, and directly below is T3s at 45.7%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, T6o is a favourite against 64 of them and an underdog against 104. Its best matchup is 62o at 73.2% and its worst is TT at 8.5% — a spread of 64.7 points, which is why calling T6o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.

T6o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 62o at 73.2%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them JTs, which leaves T6o with only 23.7%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 46 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 19.4 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 13.7 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, T6o lands -5 points from the middle of the pack, and 111 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 46.0% against one opponent, 29.0% against two, 16.6% against four and 8.2% against eight. That last figure is 74% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 1 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why T6o reads as 46.0% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 46.0% against one opponent down to 8.2% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%25%50%46.0129.0221.0316.6413.4511.169.678.28opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
T6o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankT6o equityvs 50%Shape
AA114.4%-35.6PAIR VS CARDS
KK214.3%-35.7PAIR VS CARDS
QQ313.9%-36.1PAIR VS CARDS
JJ413.6%-36.4PAIR VS CARDS
TT58.5%-41.5PAIR VS CARDS
99628.5%-21.5PAIR VS CARDS
88729.4%-20.6PAIR VS CARDS
AKs832.5%-17.5HIGH CARD
77929.9%-20.1PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1032.0%-18.0HIGH CARD
AJs1131.8%-18.2HIGH CARD
AKo1234.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
ATs1324.6%-25.4DOMINATED
AQo1433.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
AJo1533.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
KQs1631.3%-18.7HIGH CARD
661732.8%-17.2PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1836.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
ATo1925.7%-24.3DOMINATED
KJs2031.1%-18.9HIGH CARD
A8s2135.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
KTs2224.8%-25.2DOMINATED
KQo2332.7%-17.3HIGH CARD
A7s2435.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
A9o2537.8%-12.2HIGH CARD
KJo2632.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
552746.2%-3.8PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2830.0%-20.0HIGH CARD
A6s2925.7%-24.3DOMINATED
K9s3034.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
A8o3137.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
A5s3239.4%-10.6HIGH CARD
KTo3325.9%-24.1DOMINATED
QTs3425.1%-24.9DOMINATED
A4s3539.4%-10.6HIGH CARD
A7o3637.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
K8s3735.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
A3s3839.7%-10.3HIGH CARD
QJo3931.4%-18.6HIGH CARD
K9o4036.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
Q9s4133.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
A5o4241.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
A2s4340.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
K7s4435.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
A6o4526.9%-23.1DOMINATED
JTs4623.7%-26.3DOMINATED
QTo4725.9%-24.1DOMINATED
444846.4%-3.6PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4925.9%-24.1DOMINATED
A4o5041.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
Q8s5134.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
K8o5237.5%-12.5HIGH CARD
A3o5341.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
K5s5439.4%-10.6HIGH CARD
J9s5532.9%-17.1HIGH CARD
Q9o5635.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
JTo5724.6%-25.4DOMINATED
K7o5837.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
K4s5939.3%-10.7HIGH CARD
A2o6042.4%-7.6HIGH CARD
Q7s6135.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
K6o6226.9%-23.1DOMINATED
K3s6339.7%-10.3HIGH CARD
J8s6433.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
T9s6528.7%-21.3DOMINATED
Q8o6636.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
336747.5%-2.5PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6825.9%-24.1DOMINATED
K2s6940.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
J9o7034.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
K5o7141.6%-8.4HIGH CARD
Q5s7239.4%-10.6HIGH CARD
J7s7334.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
T8s7431.4%-18.6DOMINATED
K4o7541.7%-8.3HIGH CARD
Q7o7637.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
Q4s7739.3%-10.7HIGH CARD
J8o7835.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
T9o7930.2%-19.8DOMINATED
K3o8042.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
Q3s8139.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
Q6o8227.1%-22.9DOMINATED
98s8353.0%+3.0HIGH CARD
T7s8434.5%-15.5DOMINATED
J6s8526.2%-23.8DOMINATED
K2o8642.4%-7.6HIGH CARD
Q5o8741.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
228848.3%-1.7PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8940.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
J5s9039.1%-10.9HIGH CARD
T8o9132.8%-17.2DOMINATED
J7o9236.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
J4s9339.2%-10.8HIGH CARD
97s9454.5%+4.5HIGH CARD
Q4o9541.3%-8.7HIGH CARD
T6s9647.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
J3s9739.3%-10.7HIGH CARD
98o9856.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
T7o9936.1%-13.9DOMINATED
Q3o10041.8%-8.2HIGH CARD
87s10153.5%+3.5HIGH CARD
J6o10227.6%-22.4DOMINATED
J2s10339.8%-10.2HIGH CARD
96s10467.7%+17.7DOMINATING
Q2o10542.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
J5o10641.3%-8.7HIGH CARD
T5s10756.8%+6.8HIGH CARD
T4s10856.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
97o10957.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
86s11066.3%+16.3DOMINATING
J4o11141.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
T3s11356.9%+6.9HIGH CARD
95s11459.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
76s11564.8%+14.8DOMINATING
J3o11641.6%-8.4HIGH CARD
87o11756.8%+6.8HIGH CARD
T2s11857.1%+7.1HIGH CARD
85s11958.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
96o12071.6%+21.6DOMINATING
T5o12159.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
J2o12242.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
94s12361.0%+11.0HIGH CARD
75s12457.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
T4o12560.1%+10.1DOMINATING
93s12661.0%+11.0HIGH CARD
86o12770.1%+20.1DOMINATING
65s12865.7%+15.7DOMINATING
95o12963.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
84s13060.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
T3o13160.0%+10.0DOMINATING
92s13261.0%+11.0HIGH CARD
76o13368.4%+18.4DOMINATING
74s13458.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
T2o13560.5%+10.5DOMINATING
64s13665.8%+15.8DOMINATING
85o13762.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
54s13859.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
83s13961.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
94o14064.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
75o14161.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
82s14260.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
73s14360.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
65o14469.8%+19.8DOMINATING
93o14564.7%+14.7HIGH CARD
53s14660.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
63s14767.5%+17.5DOMINATING
84o14863.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
92o14964.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
43s15060.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
74o15162.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
54o15262.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
72s15361.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
52s15461.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
64o15569.9%+19.9DOMINATING
62s15669.0%+19.0DOMINATING
83o15764.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
42s15861.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
82o15964.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
73o16064.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
53o16164.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
63o16271.6%+21.6DOMINATING
32s16362.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
43o16464.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
72o16565.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
52o16665.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
62o16773.2%+23.2DOMINATING
42o16865.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
32o16965.9%+15.9HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
T6s48.8%

FAQ

What is the equity of T6o?

46.0% against one random opponent, which ranks it 112 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 13.4%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 8.2%.

How much better is T6o than T6s?

T6o is worth 46.0% and T6s 48.8%, a difference of 2.8 points — rank 112 versus rank 96.

How many of the 168 other hands does T6o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 64 hands and an underdog against 104. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

425 words / 42 distinct figures — Method