T6o
Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 46.0% · #112
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 13.4% · #131
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 8.2% · #138
- Chen score
- 1
- Combos
- 12 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.9%
- Favourite against
- 64 of 168 hands
T6o (ten-six offsuit) wins 46.0% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 112th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 66.3% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 13.4% and its rank moves to 131; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 8.2% for rank 138. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
Its suited/offsuit twin T6s runs at 48.8% (rank 96), a gap of 2.8 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.8 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is J4o at 46.1%, and directly below is T3s at 45.7%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, T6o is a favourite against 64 of them and an underdog against 104. Its best matchup is 62o at 73.2% and its worst is TT at 8.5% — a spread of 64.7 points, which is why calling T6o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.
T6o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 62o at 73.2%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them JTs, which leaves T6o with only 23.7%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 46 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 19.4 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 13.7 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, T6o lands -5 points from the middle of the pack, and 111 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 46.0% against one opponent, 29.0% against two, 16.6% against four and 8.2% against eight. That last figure is 74% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 1 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why T6o reads as 46.0% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 46.0% against one opponent down to 8.2% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | T6o equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 14.4% | -35.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 14.3% | -35.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 13.9% | -36.1 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 13.6% | -36.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 8.5% | -41.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 28.5% | -21.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 29.4% | -20.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 32.5% | -17.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 29.9% | -20.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 32.0% | -18.0 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 31.8% | -18.2 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 34.1% | -15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 24.6% | -25.4 | DOMINATED |
| AQo | 14 | 33.7% | -16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 33.4% | -16.6 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 31.3% | -18.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 66 | 17 | 32.8% | -17.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 36.0% | -14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 25.7% | -24.3 | DOMINATED |
| KJs | 20 | 31.1% | -18.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A8s | 21 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 24.8% | -25.2 | DOMINATED |
| KQo | 23 | 32.7% | -17.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A7s | 24 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A9o | 25 | 37.8% | -12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 32.4% | -17.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 55 | 27 | 46.2% | -3.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 30.0% | -20.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A6s | 29 | 25.7% | -24.3 | DOMINATED |
| K9s | 30 | 34.8% | -15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A8o | 31 | 37.4% | -12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 39.4% | -10.6 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 25.9% | -24.1 | DOMINATED |
| QTs | 34 | 25.1% | -24.9 | DOMINATED |
| A4s | 35 | 39.4% | -10.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 37.4% | -12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K8s | 37 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 39.7% | -10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 31.4% | -18.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 36.5% | -13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9s | 41 | 33.8% | -16.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A5o | 42 | 41.5% | -8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 40.2% | -9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 35.4% | -14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A6o | 45 | 26.9% | -23.1 | DOMINATED |
| JTs | 46 | 23.7% | -26.3 | DOMINATED |
| QTo | 47 | 25.9% | -24.1 | DOMINATED |
| 44 | 48 | 46.4% | -3.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 25.9% | -24.1 | DOMINATED |
| A4o | 50 | 41.5% | -8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 34.7% | -15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 37.5% | -12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 41.9% | -8.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 39.4% | -10.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 32.9% | -17.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 35.4% | -14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| JTo | 57 | 24.6% | -25.4 | DOMINATED |
| K7o | 58 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K4s | 59 | 39.3% | -10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 42.4% | -7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 35.7% | -14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K6o | 62 | 26.9% | -23.1 | DOMINATED |
| K3s | 63 | 39.7% | -10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 33.6% | -16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 28.7% | -21.3 | DOMINATED |
| Q8o | 66 | 36.4% | -13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 47.5% | -2.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6s | 68 | 25.9% | -24.1 | DOMINATED |
| K2s | 69 | 40.1% | -9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 41.6% | -8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5s | 72 | 39.4% | -10.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J7s | 73 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T8s | 74 | 31.4% | -18.6 | DOMINATED |
| K4o | 75 | 41.7% | -8.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7o | 76 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4s | 77 | 39.3% | -10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J8o | 78 | 35.2% | -14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 30.2% | -19.8 | DOMINATED |
| K3o | 80 | 42.0% | -8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 39.6% | -10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q6o | 82 | 27.1% | -22.9 | DOMINATED |
| 98s | 83 | 53.0% | +3.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 34.5% | -15.5 | DOMINATED |
| J6s | 85 | 26.2% | -23.8 | DOMINATED |
| K2o | 86 | 42.4% | -7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 41.5% | -8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 22 | 88 | 48.3% | -1.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q2s | 89 | 40.0% | -10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J5s | 90 | 39.1% | -10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 32.8% | -17.2 | DOMINATED |
| J7o | 92 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J4s | 93 | 39.2% | -10.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 54.5% | +4.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4o | 95 | 41.3% | -8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T6s | 96 | 47.5% | -2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 39.3% | -10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 56.2% | +6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 36.1% | -13.9 | DOMINATED |
| Q3o | 100 | 41.8% | -8.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 87s | 101 | 53.5% | +3.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J6o | 102 | 27.6% | -22.4 | DOMINATED |
| J2s | 103 | 39.8% | -10.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 67.7% | +17.7 | DOMINATING |
| Q2o | 105 | 42.1% | -7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 41.3% | -8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 56.8% | +6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 56.6% | +6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 97o | 109 | 57.6% | +7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 86s | 110 | 66.3% | +16.3 | DOMINATING |
| J4o | 111 | 41.2% | -8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 56.9% | +6.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 95s | 114 | 59.9% | +9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 64.8% | +14.8 | DOMINATING |
| J3o | 116 | 41.6% | -8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 87o | 117 | 56.8% | +6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T2s | 118 | 57.1% | +7.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 58.8% | +8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 71.6% | +21.6 | DOMINATING |
| T5o | 121 | 59.9% | +9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 42.0% | -8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 61.0% | +11.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 57.7% | +7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 60.1% | +10.1 | DOMINATING |
| 93s | 126 | 61.0% | +11.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 70.1% | +20.1 | DOMINATING |
| 65s | 128 | 65.7% | +15.7 | DOMINATING |
| 95o | 129 | 63.6% | +13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 60.1% | +10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 60.0% | +10.0 | DOMINATING |
| 92s | 132 | 61.0% | +11.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 68.4% | +18.4 | DOMINATING |
| 74s | 134 | 58.7% | +8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 60.5% | +10.5 | DOMINATING |
| 64s | 136 | 65.8% | +15.8 | DOMINATING |
| 85o | 137 | 62.2% | +12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 59.2% | +9.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 61.2% | +11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 64.6% | +14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 61.4% | +11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 60.2% | +10.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 65o | 144 | 69.8% | +19.8 | DOMINATING |
| 93o | 145 | 64.7% | +14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 60.2% | +10.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 67.5% | +17.5 | DOMINATING |
| 84o | 148 | 63.7% | +13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 60.5% | +10.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 62.4% | +12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 62.6% | +12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 61.3% | +11.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 61.7% | +11.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 64o | 155 | 69.9% | +19.9 | DOMINATING |
| 62s | 156 | 69.0% | +19.0 | DOMINATING |
| 83o | 157 | 64.9% | +14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 61.7% | +11.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 64.9% | +14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 64.0% | +14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 53o | 161 | 64.1% | +14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 63o | 162 | 71.6% | +21.6 | DOMINATING |
| 32s | 163 | 62.1% | +12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 64.2% | +14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 65.1% | +15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 52o | 166 | 65.6% | +15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 73.2% | +23.2 | DOMINATING |
| 42o | 168 | 65.7% | +15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 65.9% | +15.9 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of T6o?
46.0% against one random opponent, which ranks it 112 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 13.4%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 8.2%.
How much better is T6o than T6s?
T6o is worth 46.0% and T6s 48.8%, a difference of 2.8 points — rank 112 versus rank 96.
How many of the 168 other hands does T6o beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 64 hands and an underdog against 104. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
425 words / 42 distinct figures — Method
