169hands
MENU
offsuit

K9o

57.8%
Equity vs one random hand — #40 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
57.8% · #40
6-handed (5 opponents)
19.6% · #51
9-handed (8 opponents)
12.4% · #71
Chen score
4
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
124 of 168 hands

K9o (king-nine offsuit) wins 57.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 40th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 23.7% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 19.6% and its rank moves to 51; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 12.4% for rank 71. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin K9s runs at 59.9% (rank 30), a gap of 2.1 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.1 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is QJo at 58.0%, and directly below is Q9s at 57.7%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.3 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, K9o is a favourite against 124 of them and an underdog against 44. Its best matchup is 92o at 76.2% and its worst is KK at 7.6% — a spread of 68.6 points, which is why calling K9o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.

K9o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 92o at 76.2%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves K9o with only 22.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 12 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 7.6 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 25.5 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, K9o lands +6.8 points from the middle of the pack, and 39 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 57.8% against one opponent, 39.6% against two, 23.5% against four and 12.4% against eight. That last figure is 112% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 4 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why K9o reads as 57.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 57.8% against one opponent down to 12.4% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%57.8139.6229.8323.5419.6516.5614.1712.48opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
K9o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankK9o equityvs 50%Shape
AA113.2%-36.8PAIR VS CARDS
KK27.6%-42.4PAIR VS CARDS
QQ328.4%-21.6PAIR VS CARDS
JJ428.0%-22.0PAIR VS CARDS
TT528.1%-21.9PAIR VS CARDS
99630.9%-19.1PAIR VS CARDS
88744.2%-5.8PAIR VS CARDS
AKs822.8%-27.2DOMINATED
77944.4%-5.6PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1034.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
AJs1133.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
AKo1223.8%-26.2DOMINATED
ATs1333.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
AQo1436.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
AJo1535.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
KQs1625.1%-24.9DOMINATED
661745.1%-4.9PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1824.8%-25.2DOMINATED
ATo1935.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
KJs2025.7%-24.3DOMINATED
A8s2138.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
KTs2226.9%-23.1DOMINATED
KQo2326.3%-23.7DOMINATED
A7s2438.5%-11.5HIGH CARD
A9o2525.8%-24.2DOMINATED
KJo2627.0%-23.0DOMINATED
552746.2%-3.8PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2854.4%+4.4HIGH CARD
A6s2938.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
K9s3047.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
A8o3140.7%-9.3HIGH CARD
A5s3238.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
KTo3327.9%-22.1DOMINATED
QTs3454.5%+4.5HIGH CARD
A4s3538.9%-11.1HIGH CARD
A7o3640.6%-9.4HIGH CARD
K8s3765.9%+15.9DOMINATING
A3s3838.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
QJo3957.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
Q9s4169.5%+19.5DOMINATING
A5o4240.9%-9.1HIGH CARD
A2s4339.1%-10.9HIGH CARD
K7s4465.8%+15.8DOMINATING
A6o4541.1%-8.9HIGH CARD
JTs4653.7%+3.7HIGH CARD
QTo4757.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
444847.0%-3.0PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4965.3%+15.3DOMINATING
A4o5041.3%-8.7HIGH CARD
Q8s5160.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
K8o5270.1%+20.1DOMINATING
A3o5341.4%-8.6HIGH CARD
K5s5465.3%+15.3DOMINATING
J9s5568.0%+18.0DOMINATING
Q9o5673.6%+23.6DOMINATING
JTo5756.8%+6.8HIGH CARD
K7o5869.7%+19.7DOMINATING
K4s5965.7%+15.7DOMINATING
A2o6041.3%-8.7HIGH CARD
Q7s6161.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
K6o6269.4%+19.4DOMINATING
K3s6365.8%+15.8DOMINATING
J8s6459.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
T9s6566.4%+16.4DOMINATING
Q8o6664.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
336747.7%-2.3PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6860.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
K2s6966.3%+16.3DOMINATING
J9o7072.1%+22.1DOMINATING
K5o7169.3%+19.3DOMINATING
Q5s7260.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
J7s7360.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
T8s7457.9%+7.9HIGH CARD
K4o7569.7%+19.7DOMINATING
Q7o7665.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
Q4s7760.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
J8o7862.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
T9o7970.4%+20.4DOMINATING
K3o8069.9%+19.9DOMINATING
Q3s8160.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
Q6o8264.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
98s8367.6%+17.6DOMINATING
T7s8458.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
J6s8560.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
K2o8670.3%+20.3DOMINATING
Q5o8764.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
228848.1%-1.9PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8961.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
J5s9060.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
T8o9161.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
J7o9263.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
J4s9360.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
97s9467.0%+17.0DOMINATING
Q4o9564.7%+14.7HIGH CARD
T6s9659.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
J3s9760.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
98o9871.6%+21.6DOMINATING
T7o9962.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
Q3o10064.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
87s10159.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
J6o10264.7%+14.7HIGH CARD
J2s10361.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
96s10468.5%+18.5DOMINATING
Q2o10565.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
J5o10664.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
T5s10760.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
T4s10860.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
97o10971.0%+21.0DOMINATING
86s11060.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
J4o11164.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
T6o11263.5%+13.5HIGH CARD
T3s11360.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
95s11469.4%+19.4DOMINATING
76s11558.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
J3o11664.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
87o11762.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
T2s11861.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
85s11961.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
96o12072.5%+22.5DOMINATING
T5o12164.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
J2o12264.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
94s12371.2%+21.2DOMINATING
75s12460.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
T4o12564.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
93s12671.5%+21.5DOMINATING
86o12764.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
65s12859.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
95o12973.8%+23.8DOMINATING
84s13062.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
T3o13164.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
92s13271.9%+21.9DOMINATING
76o13362.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
74s13461.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
T2o13564.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
64s13660.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
85o13765.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
54s13859.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
83s13964.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
94o14075.6%+25.6DOMINATING
75o14163.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
82s14264.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
73s14362.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
65o14462.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
93o14575.7%+25.7DOMINATING
53s14660.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
63s14761.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
84o14866.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
92o14976.2%+26.2DOMINATING
43s15060.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
74o15165.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
54o15262.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
72s15363.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
52s15461.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
64o15564.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
62s15662.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
83o15768.0%+18.0HIGH CARD
42s15861.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
82o15968.0%+18.0HIGH CARD
73o16066.7%+16.7HIGH CARD
53o16163.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
63o16265.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
32s16362.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
43o16464.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
72o16568.1%+18.1HIGH CARD
52o16665.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
62o16766.9%+16.9HIGH CARD
42o16865.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
32o16965.8%+15.8HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
K9s59.9%

FAQ

What is the equity of K9o?

57.8% against one random opponent, which ranks it 40 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 19.6%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 12.4%.

How much better is K9o than K9s?

K9o is worth 57.8% and K9s 59.9%, a difference of 2.1 points — rank 40 versus rank 30.

How many of the 168 other hands does K9o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 124 hands and an underdog against 44. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

425 words / 38 distinct figures — Method