T7o
Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 48.1% · #99
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 15.1% · #109
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 9.7% · #119
- Chen score
- 3
- Combos
- 12 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.9%
- Favourite against
- 66 of 168 hands
T7o (ten-seven offsuit) wins 48.1% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 99th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 58.6% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 15.1% and its rank moves to 109; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 9.7% for rank 119. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
Its suited/offsuit twin T7s runs at 50.7% (rank 84), a gap of 2.6 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.6 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 98o at 48.1%, and directly below is Q3o at 48.1%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, T7o is a favourite against 66 of them and an underdog against 102. Its best matchup is 72o at 75.0% and its worst is TT at 10.0% — a spread of 65 points, which is why calling T7o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.7%.
T7o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 72o at 75.0%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them QTs, which leaves T7o with only 24.9%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 39 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 17.3 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 15.8 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, T7o lands -2.9 points from the middle of the pack, and 98 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 48.1% against one opponent, 31.3% against two, 18.3% against four and 9.7% against eight. That last figure is 87% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why T7o reads as 48.1% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 48.1% against one opponent down to 9.7% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | T7o equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 15.8% | -34.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 15.4% | -34.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 15.1% | -34.9 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 14.0% | -36.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 10.0% | -40.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 29.0% | -21.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 29.7% | -20.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 33.4% | -16.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 33.6% | -16.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 32.8% | -17.2 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 32.8% | -17.2 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 35.0% | -15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 26.0% | -24.0 | DOMINATED |
| AQo | 14 | 34.7% | -15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 34.4% | -15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 32.3% | -17.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 66 | 17 | 45.8% | -4.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 37.0% | -13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 26.8% | -23.2 | DOMINATED |
| KJs | 20 | 32.0% | -18.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A8s | 21 | 36.6% | -13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 26.2% | -23.8 | DOMINATED |
| KQo | 23 | 33.7% | -16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A7s | 24 | 26.7% | -23.3 | DOMINATED |
| A9o | 25 | 38.8% | -11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 33.6% | -16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 55 | 27 | 47.4% | -2.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 31.0% | -19.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A6s | 29 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A8o | 31 | 38.3% | -11.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 40.3% | -9.7 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 27.0% | -23.0 | DOMINATED |
| QTs | 34 | 24.9% | -25.1 | DOMINATED |
| A4s | 35 | 40.4% | -9.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 28.1% | -21.9 | DOMINATED |
| K8s | 37 | 36.6% | -13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 40.5% | -9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 32.3% | -17.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 37.6% | -12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9s | 41 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A5o | 42 | 42.6% | -7.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 41.1% | -8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 26.9% | -23.1 | DOMINATED |
| A6o | 45 | 42.2% | -7.8 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 25.2% | -24.8 | DOMINATED |
| QTo | 47 | 25.5% | -24.5 | DOMINATED |
| 44 | 48 | 48.0% | -2.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 40.0% | -10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 42.6% | -7.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 35.6% | -14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 38.6% | -11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 42.9% | -7.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 40.8% | -9.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 33.9% | -16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 36.4% | -13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| JTo | 57 | 26.2% | -23.8 | DOMINATED |
| K7o | 58 | 28.1% | -21.9 | DOMINATED |
| K4s | 59 | 40.5% | -9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 43.6% | -6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 27.3% | -22.7 | DOMINATED |
| K6o | 62 | 42.1% | -7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 41.0% | -9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 34.7% | -15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 28.9% | -21.1 | DOMINATED |
| Q8o | 66 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 48.8% | -1.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6s | 68 | 39.6% | -10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 41.6% | -8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 35.4% | -14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 42.9% | -7.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5s | 72 | 40.5% | -9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J7s | 73 | 26.3% | -23.7 | DOMINATED |
| T8s | 74 | 31.5% | -18.5 | DOMINATED |
| K4o | 75 | 43.0% | -7.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7o | 76 | 28.5% | -21.5 | DOMINATED |
| Q4s | 77 | 40.4% | -9.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J8o | 78 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 30.1% | -19.9 | DOMINATED |
| K3o | 80 | 43.4% | -6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 40.9% | -9.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q6o | 82 | 41.9% | -8.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 54.5% | +4.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 47.5% | -2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J6s | 85 | 40.0% | -10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 43.8% | -6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 42.6% | -7.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 22 | 88 | 49.7% | -0.3 | COINFLIP |
| Q2s | 89 | 41.2% | -8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J5s | 90 | 40.7% | -9.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 33.1% | -16.9 | DOMINATED |
| J7o | 92 | 27.7% | -22.3 | DOMINATED |
| J4s | 93 | 40.4% | -9.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 67.8% | +17.8 | DOMINATING |
| Q4o | 95 | 42.8% | -7.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T6s | 96 | 60.2% | +10.2 | DOMINATING |
| J3s | 97 | 40.8% | -9.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 57.7% | +7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3o | 100 | 43.2% | -6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 87s | 101 | 66.4% | +16.4 | DOMINATING |
| J6o | 102 | 42.0% | -8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 41.2% | -8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 59.9% | +9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 43.6% | -6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 42.8% | -7.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 60.4% | +10.4 | DOMINATING |
| T4s | 108 | 60.4% | +10.4 | DOMINATING |
| 97o | 109 | 71.6% | +21.6 | DOMINATING |
| 86s | 110 | 58.8% | +8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 42.7% | -7.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 63.9% | +13.9 | DOMINATING |
| T3s | 113 | 60.7% | +10.7 | DOMINATING |
| 95s | 114 | 60.7% | +10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 65.8% | +15.8 | DOMINATING |
| J3o | 116 | 43.3% | -6.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 87o | 117 | 70.0% | +20.0 | DOMINATING |
| T2s | 118 | 61.1% | +11.1 | DOMINATING |
| 85s | 119 | 59.7% | +9.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 63.4% | +13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 64.1% | +14.1 | DOMINATING |
| J2o | 122 | 43.6% | -6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 61.8% | +11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 67.2% | +17.2 | DOMINATING |
| T4o | 125 | 64.0% | +14.0 | DOMINATING |
| 93s | 126 | 61.7% | +11.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 62.4% | +12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 60.0% | +10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 64.4% | +14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 61.0% | +11.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 64.2% | +14.2 | DOMINATING |
| 92s | 132 | 62.2% | +12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 69.9% | +19.9 | DOMINATING |
| 74s | 134 | 67.3% | +17.3 | DOMINATING |
| T2o | 135 | 64.9% | +14.9 | DOMINATING |
| 64s | 136 | 61.1% | +11.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 63.5% | +13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 59.4% | +9.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 62.1% | +12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 65.7% | +15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 71.3% | +21.3 | DOMINATING |
| 82s | 142 | 62.2% | +12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 68.7% | +18.7 | DOMINATING |
| 65o | 144 | 63.9% | +13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 93o | 145 | 65.5% | +15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 60.8% | +10.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 62.6% | +12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 66.1% | +16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 71.6% | +21.6 | DOMINATING |
| 54o | 152 | 62.9% | +12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 70.5% | +20.5 | DOMINATING |
| 52s | 154 | 62.2% | +12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 64o | 155 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 64.1% | +14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 65.8% | +15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 62.1% | +12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 66.0% | +16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 73.2% | +23.2 | DOMINATING |
| 53o | 161 | 64.4% | +14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 63o | 162 | 66.1% | +16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 62.5% | +12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 64.6% | +14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 75.0% | +25.0 | DOMINATING |
| 52o | 166 | 66.1% | +16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 67.7% | +17.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 65.9% | +15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 66.5% | +16.5 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of T7o?
48.1% against one random opponent, which ranks it 99 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 15.1%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 9.7%.
How much better is T7o than T7s?
T7o is worth 48.1% and T7s 50.7%, a difference of 2.6 points — rank 99 versus rank 84.
How many of the 168 other hands does T7o beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 66 hands and an underdog against 102. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
440 words / 41 distinct figures — Method
