169hands
MENU
offsuit

T7o

48.1%
Equity vs one random hand — #99 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
48.1% · #99
6-handed (5 opponents)
15.1% · #109
9-handed (8 opponents)
9.7% · #119
Chen score
3
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
66 of 168 hands

T7o (ten-seven offsuit) wins 48.1% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 99th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 58.6% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 15.1% and its rank moves to 109; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 9.7% for rank 119. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin T7s runs at 50.7% (rank 84), a gap of 2.6 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.6 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 98o at 48.1%, and directly below is Q3o at 48.1%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, T7o is a favourite against 66 of them and an underdog against 102. Its best matchup is 72o at 75.0% and its worst is TT at 10.0% — a spread of 65 points, which is why calling T7o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.7%.

T7o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 72o at 75.0%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them QTs, which leaves T7o with only 24.9%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 39 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 17.3 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 15.8 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, T7o lands -2.9 points from the middle of the pack, and 98 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 48.1% against one opponent, 31.3% against two, 18.3% against four and 9.7% against eight. That last figure is 87% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why T7o reads as 48.1% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 48.1% against one opponent down to 9.7% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%25%50%48.1131.3223.0318.3415.1512.4610.979.78opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
T7o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankT7o equityvs 50%Shape
AA115.8%-34.2PAIR VS CARDS
KK215.4%-34.6PAIR VS CARDS
QQ315.1%-34.9PAIR VS CARDS
JJ414.0%-36.0PAIR VS CARDS
TT510.0%-40.0PAIR VS CARDS
99629.0%-21.0PAIR VS CARDS
88729.7%-20.3PAIR VS CARDS
AKs833.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
77933.6%-16.4PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1032.8%-17.2HIGH CARD
AJs1132.8%-17.2HIGH CARD
AKo1235.0%-15.0HIGH CARD
ATs1326.0%-24.0DOMINATED
AQo1434.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
AJo1534.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
KQs1632.3%-17.7HIGH CARD
661745.8%-4.2PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1837.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
ATo1926.8%-23.2DOMINATED
KJs2032.0%-18.0HIGH CARD
A8s2136.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
KTs2226.2%-23.8DOMINATED
KQo2333.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
A7s2426.7%-23.3DOMINATED
A9o2538.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
KJo2633.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
552747.4%-2.6PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2831.0%-19.0HIGH CARD
A6s2939.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
K9s3035.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
A8o3138.3%-11.7HIGH CARD
A5s3240.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
KTo3327.0%-23.0DOMINATED
QTs3424.9%-25.1DOMINATED
A4s3540.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
A7o3628.1%-21.9DOMINATED
K8s3736.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
A3s3840.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
QJo3932.3%-17.7HIGH CARD
K9o4037.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
Q9s4134.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
A5o4242.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
A2s4341.1%-8.9HIGH CARD
K7s4426.9%-23.1DOMINATED
A6o4542.2%-7.8HIGH CARD
JTs4625.2%-24.8DOMINATED
QTo4725.5%-24.5DOMINATED
444848.0%-2.0PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4940.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
A4o5042.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
Q8s5135.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
K8o5238.6%-11.4HIGH CARD
A3o5342.9%-7.1HIGH CARD
K5s5440.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
J9s5533.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
Q9o5636.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
JTo5726.2%-23.8DOMINATED
K7o5828.1%-21.9DOMINATED
K4s5940.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
A2o6043.6%-6.4HIGH CARD
Q7s6127.3%-22.7DOMINATED
K6o6242.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
K3s6341.0%-9.0HIGH CARD
J8s6434.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
T9s6528.9%-21.1DOMINATED
Q8o6637.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
336748.8%-1.2PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6839.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
K2s6941.6%-8.4HIGH CARD
J9o7035.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
K5o7142.9%-7.1HIGH CARD
Q5s7240.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
J7s7326.3%-23.7DOMINATED
T8s7431.5%-18.5DOMINATED
K4o7543.0%-7.0HIGH CARD
Q7o7628.5%-21.5DOMINATED
Q4s7740.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
J8o7836.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
T9o7930.1%-19.9DOMINATED
K3o8043.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
Q3s8140.9%-9.1HIGH CARD
Q6o8241.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
98s8354.5%+4.5HIGH CARD
T7s8447.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
J6s8540.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
K2o8643.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
Q5o8742.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
228849.7%-0.3COINFLIP
Q2s8941.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
J5s9040.7%-9.3HIGH CARD
T8o9133.1%-16.9DOMINATED
J7o9227.7%-22.3DOMINATED
J4s9340.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
97s9467.8%+17.8DOMINATING
Q4o9542.8%-7.2HIGH CARD
T6s9660.2%+10.2DOMINATING
J3s9740.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
98o9857.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
Q3o10043.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
87s10166.4%+16.4DOMINATING
J6o10242.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
J2s10341.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
96s10459.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
Q2o10543.6%-6.4HIGH CARD
J5o10642.8%-7.2HIGH CARD
T5s10760.4%+10.4DOMINATING
T4s10860.4%+10.4DOMINATING
97o10971.6%+21.6DOMINATING
86s11058.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
J4o11142.7%-7.3HIGH CARD
T6o11263.9%+13.9DOMINATING
T3s11360.7%+10.7DOMINATING
95s11460.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
76s11565.8%+15.8DOMINATING
J3o11643.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
87o11770.0%+20.0DOMINATING
T2s11861.1%+11.1DOMINATING
85s11959.7%+9.7HIGH CARD
96o12063.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
T5o12164.1%+14.1DOMINATING
J2o12243.6%-6.4HIGH CARD
94s12361.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
75s12467.2%+17.2DOMINATING
T4o12564.0%+14.0DOMINATING
93s12661.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
86o12762.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
65s12860.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
95o12964.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
84s13061.0%+11.0HIGH CARD
T3o13164.2%+14.2DOMINATING
92s13262.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
76o13369.9%+19.9DOMINATING
74s13467.3%+17.3DOMINATING
T2o13564.9%+14.9DOMINATING
64s13661.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
85o13763.5%+13.5HIGH CARD
54s13859.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
83s13962.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
94o14065.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
75o14171.3%+21.3DOMINATING
82s14262.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
73s14368.7%+18.7DOMINATING
65o14463.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
93o14565.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
53s14660.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
63s14762.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
84o14864.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
92o14966.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
43s15060.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
74o15171.6%+21.6DOMINATING
54o15262.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
72s15370.5%+20.5DOMINATING
52s15462.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
64o15564.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
62s15664.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
83o15765.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
42s15862.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
82o15966.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
73o16073.2%+23.2DOMINATING
53o16164.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
63o16266.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
32s16362.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
43o16464.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
72o16575.0%+25.0DOMINATING
52o16666.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
62o16767.7%+17.7HIGH CARD
42o16865.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
32o16966.5%+16.5HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
T7s50.7%

FAQ

What is the equity of T7o?

48.1% against one random opponent, which ranks it 99 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 15.1%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 9.7%.

How much better is T7o than T7s?

T7o is worth 48.1% and T7s 50.7%, a difference of 2.6 points — rank 99 versus rank 84.

How many of the 168 other hands does T7o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 66 hands and an underdog against 102. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

440 words / 41 distinct figures — Method