169hands
MENU
offsuit

73o

36.6%
Equity vs one random hand — #160 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
36.6% · #160
6-handed (5 opponents)
10.1% · #161
9-handed (8 opponents)
6.4% · #160
Chen score
-0.5
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
22 of 168 hands

73o (seven-three offsuit) wins 36.6% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 160th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 94.7% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 10.1% and its rank moves to 161; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 6.4% for rank 160. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin 73s runs at 40.1% (rank 143), a gap of 3.5 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.5 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 82o at 36.8%, and directly below is 53o at 36.3%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.5 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 73o is a favourite against 22 of them and an underdog against 146. Its best matchup is 32o at 67.8% and its worst is 77 at 8.4% — a spread of 59.4 points, which is why calling 73o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 65s at 50.1%.

73o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 32o at 67.8%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A7s, which leaves 73o with only 23.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 70 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 28.8 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 4.3 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 73o lands -14.4 points from the middle of the pack, and 159 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 36.6% against one opponent, 22.3% against two, 12.2% against four and 6.4% against eight. That last figure is 58% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at -0.5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 73o reads as 36.6% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 36.6% against one opponent down to 6.4% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%20%40%36.6122.3216.1312.2410.158.367.476.48opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
73o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rank73o equityvs 50%Shape
AA113.6%-36.4PAIR VS CARDS
KK214.0%-36.0PAIR VS CARDS
QQ313.5%-36.5PAIR VS CARDS
JJ413.6%-36.4PAIR VS CARDS
TT513.4%-36.6PAIR VS CARDS
99613.2%-36.8PAIR VS CARDS
88712.8%-37.2PAIR VS CARDS
AKs832.1%-17.9HIGH CARD
7798.4%-41.6PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1031.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
AJs1131.7%-18.3HIGH CARD
AKo1234.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
ATs1331.4%-18.6HIGH CARD
AQo1433.5%-16.5HIGH CARD
AJo1533.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
KQs1632.0%-18.0HIGH CARD
661728.6%-21.4PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1831.8%-18.2HIGH CARD
ATo1933.2%-16.8HIGH CARD
KJs2031.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
A8s2131.4%-18.6HIGH CARD
KTs2231.6%-18.4HIGH CARD
KQo2333.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
A7s2423.8%-26.2DOMINATED
A9o2533.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
KJo2633.5%-16.5HIGH CARD
552729.1%-20.9PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2831.0%-19.0HIGH CARD
A6s2935.1%-14.9HIGH CARD
K9s3031.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
A8o3133.1%-16.9HIGH CARD
A5s3234.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
KTo3333.0%-17.0HIGH CARD
QTs3431.0%-19.0HIGH CARD
A4s3534.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
A7o3624.8%-25.2DOMINATED
K8s3731.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
A3s3825.1%-24.9DOMINATED
QJo3932.5%-17.5HIGH CARD
K9o4033.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
Q9s4131.4%-18.6HIGH CARD
A5o4235.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
A2s4338.5%-11.5HIGH CARD
K7s4424.7%-25.3DOMINATED
A6o4536.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
JTs4630.6%-19.4HIGH CARD
QTo4732.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
444830.2%-19.8PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4935.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
A4o5036.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
Q8s5131.7%-18.3HIGH CARD
K8o5233.5%-16.5HIGH CARD
A3o5326.2%-23.8DOMINATED
K5s5435.0%-15.0HIGH CARD
J9s5530.9%-19.1HIGH CARD
Q9o5632.8%-17.2HIGH CARD
JTo5732.1%-17.9HIGH CARD
K7o5825.4%-24.6DOMINATED
K4s5935.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
A2o6040.7%-9.3HIGH CARD
Q7s6124.9%-25.1DOMINATED
K6o6237.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
K3s6326.0%-24.0DOMINATED
J8s6430.9%-19.1HIGH CARD
T9s6530.0%-20.0HIGH CARD
Q8o6633.0%-17.0HIGH CARD
336733.5%-16.5PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6834.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
K2s6939.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
J9o7032.2%-17.8HIGH CARD
K5o7136.9%-13.1HIGH CARD
Q5s7234.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
J7s7325.4%-24.6DOMINATED
T8s7430.2%-19.8HIGH CARD
K4o7537.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
Q7o7625.9%-24.1DOMINATED
Q4s7735.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
J8o7832.5%-17.5HIGH CARD
T9o7931.5%-18.5HIGH CARD
K3o8027.2%-22.8DOMINATED
Q3s8126.2%-23.8DOMINATED
Q6o8236.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
98s8329.9%-20.1HIGH CARD
T7s8426.0%-24.0DOMINATED
J6s8535.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
K2o8642.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
Q5o8736.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
228847.3%-2.7PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8939.4%-10.6HIGH CARD
J5s9035.0%-15.0HIGH CARD
T8o9131.8%-18.2HIGH CARD
J7o9226.2%-23.8DOMINATED
J4s9335.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
97s9426.9%-23.1DOMINATED
Q4o9536.9%-13.1HIGH CARD
T6s9634.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
J3s9726.6%-23.4DOMINATED
98o9831.1%-18.9HIGH CARD
T7o9926.8%-23.2DOMINATED
Q3o10027.4%-22.6DOMINATED
87s10126.6%-23.4DOMINATED
J6o10237.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
J2s10339.5%-10.5HIGH CARD
96s10433.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
Q2o10541.6%-8.4HIGH CARD
J5o10636.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
T5s10735.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
T4s10835.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
97o10927.8%-22.2DOMINATED
86s11033.5%-16.5HIGH CARD
J4o11137.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
T6o11236.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
T3s11327.2%-22.8DOMINATED
95s11434.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
76s11537.1%-12.9DOMINATED
J3o11628.1%-21.9DOMINATED
87o11727.6%-22.4DOMINATED
T2s11839.8%-10.2HIGH CARD
85s11934.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
96o12035.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
T5o12137.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
J2o12241.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
94s12335.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
75s12440.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
T4o12537.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
93s12628.4%-21.6DOMINATED
86o12735.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
65s12850.1%+0.1COINFLIP
95o12936.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
84s13035.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
T3o13128.5%-21.5DOMINATED
92s13240.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
76o13339.1%-10.9DOMINATED
74s13443.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
T2o13542.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
64s13651.7%+1.7HIGH CARD
85o13736.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
54s13850.6%+0.6COINFLIP
83s13930.0%-20.0DOMINATED
94o14037.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
75o14142.5%-7.5HIGH CARD
82s14240.6%-9.4HIGH CARD
73s14347.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
65o14453.3%+3.3HIGH CARD
93o14529.7%-20.3DOMINATED
53s14660.8%+10.8DOMINATING
63s14762.4%+12.4DOMINATING
84o14837.5%-12.5HIGH CARD
92o14942.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
43s15061.1%+11.1DOMINATING
74o15146.0%-4.0HIGH CARD
54o15253.3%+3.3HIGH CARD
72s15351.1%+1.1HIGH CARD
52s15456.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
64o15554.7%+4.7HIGH CARD
62s15657.3%+7.3HIGH CARD
83o15731.6%-18.4DOMINATED
42s15856.3%+6.3HIGH CARD
82o15943.0%-7.0HIGH CARD
53o16164.4%+14.4DOMINATING
63o16266.0%+16.0DOMINATING
32s16363.7%+13.7DOMINATING
43o16464.7%+14.7DOMINATING
72o16553.9%+3.9HIGH CARD
52o16659.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
62o16760.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
42o16859.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
32o16967.8%+17.8DOMINATING

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
73s40.1%

FAQ

What is the equity of 73o?

36.6% against one random opponent, which ranks it 160 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 10.1%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 6.4%.

How much better is 73o than 73s?

73o is worth 36.6% and 73s 40.1%, a difference of 3.5 points — rank 160 versus rank 143.

How many of the 168 other hands does 73o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 22 hands and an underdog against 146. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

440 words / 45 distinct figures — Method