169hands
MENU
suited

J7s

52.4%
Equity vs one random hand — #73 of 169

A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
52.4% · #73
6-handed (5 opponents)
19.0% · #56
9-handed (8 opponents)
13.2% · #57
Chen score
4
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
85 of 168 hands

J7s (jack-seven suited) wins 52.4% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 73th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 43.2% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 19.0% and its rank moves to 56; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 13.2% for rank 57. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin J7o runs at 49.7% (rank 92), a gap of 2.7 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.7 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is Q5s at 52.8%, and directly below is T8s at 52.3%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.5 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, J7s is a favourite against 85 of them and an underdog against 83. Its best matchup is 72o at 76.4% and its worst is JJ at 13.7% — a spread of 62.7 points, which is why calling J7s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 33 at 50.2%.

J7s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 72o at 76.4%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them QJs, which leaves J7s with only 27.9%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 35 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 14.8 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 16.5 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, J7s lands +1.4 points from the middle of the pack, and 72 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 52.4% against one opponent, 35.6% against two, 22.3% against four and 13.2% against eight. That last figure is 119% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 4 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why J7s reads as 52.4% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 52.4% against one opponent down to 13.2% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%52.4135.6226.9322.3419.0516.4614.8713.28opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
J7s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankJ7s equityvs 50%Shape
AA118.2%-31.8PAIR VS CARDS
KK217.8%-32.2PAIR VS CARDS
QQ317.5%-32.5PAIR VS CARDS
JJ413.7%-36.3PAIR VS CARDS
TT531.7%-18.3PAIR VS CARDS
99632.2%-17.8PAIR VS CARDS
88732.7%-17.3PAIR VS CARDS
AKs835.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
77935.8%-14.2PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1034.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
AJs1128.6%-21.4DOMINATED
AKo1237.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
ATs1337.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
AQo1437.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
AJo1529.8%-20.2DOMINATED
KQs1634.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
661748.1%-1.9PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1838.6%-11.4HIGH CARD
ATo1939.8%-10.2HIGH CARD
KJs2029.0%-21.0DOMINATED
A8s2138.2%-11.8HIGH CARD
KTs2236.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
KQo2336.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
A7s2429.5%-20.5DOMINATED
A9o2541.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
KJo2630.2%-19.8DOMINATED
552748.3%-1.7PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2827.9%-22.1DOMINATED
A6s2942.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
K9s3037.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
A8o3140.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
A5s3241.8%-8.2HIGH CARD
KTo3338.9%-11.1HIGH CARD
QTs3435.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
A4s3541.8%-8.2HIGH CARD
A7o3630.6%-19.4DOMINATED
K8s3738.4%-11.6HIGH CARD
A3s3842.2%-7.8HIGH CARD
QJo3928.8%-21.2DOMINATED
K9o4039.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
Q9s4136.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
A5o4244.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
A2s4342.8%-7.2HIGH CARD
K7s4429.5%-20.5DOMINATED
A6o4544.8%-5.2HIGH CARD
JTs4630.9%-19.1DOMINATED
QTo4737.7%-12.3HIGH CARD
444849.0%-1.0COINFLIP
K6s4941.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
A4o5044.7%-5.3HIGH CARD
Q8s5137.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
K8o5240.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
A3o5345.2%-4.8HIGH CARD
K5s5442.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
J9s5532.8%-17.2DOMINATED
Q9o5638.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
JTo5732.2%-17.8DOMINATED
K7o5830.6%-19.4DOMINATED
K4s5942.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
A2o6045.3%-4.7HIGH CARD
Q7s6129.8%-20.2DOMINATED
K6o6244.8%-5.2HIGH CARD
K3s6342.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
J8s6435.1%-14.9DOMINATED
T9s6555.9%+5.9HIGH CARD
Q8o6639.8%-10.2HIGH CARD
336750.2%+0.2COINFLIP
Q6s6841.8%-8.2HIGH CARD
K2s6943.0%-7.0HIGH CARD
J9o7034.1%-15.9DOMINATED
K5o7144.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
Q5s7241.8%-8.2HIGH CARD
T8s7457.3%+7.3HIGH CARD
K4o7545.0%-5.0HIGH CARD
Q7o7631.0%-19.0DOMINATED
Q4s7742.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
J8o7836.7%-13.3DOMINATED
T9o7958.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
K3o8045.3%-4.7HIGH CARD
Q3s8142.4%-7.6HIGH CARD
Q6o8244.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
98s8356.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
T7s8469.3%+19.3DOMINATING
J6s8562.3%+12.3DOMINATING
K2o8645.7%-4.3HIGH CARD
Q5o8744.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
228851.3%+1.3PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8942.7%-7.3HIGH CARD
J5s9061.9%+11.9DOMINATING
T8o9159.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
J7o9252.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
J4s9361.8%+11.8DOMINATING
97s9468.4%+18.4DOMINATING
Q4o9544.7%-5.3HIGH CARD
T6s9662.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
J3s9762.1%+12.1DOMINATING
98o9859.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
T7o9973.7%+23.7DOMINATING
Q3o10045.1%-4.9HIGH CARD
87s10166.9%+16.9DOMINATING
J6o10265.4%+15.4DOMINATING
J2s10362.5%+12.5DOMINATING
96s10461.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
Q2o10545.4%-4.6HIGH CARD
J5o10665.2%+15.2DOMINATING
T5s10763.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
T4s10863.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
97o10972.0%+22.0DOMINATING
86s11060.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
J4o11165.3%+15.3DOMINATING
T6o11265.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
T3s11363.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
95s11462.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
76s11567.6%+17.6DOMINATING
J3o11665.5%+15.5DOMINATING
87o11770.9%+20.9DOMINATING
T2s11863.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
85s11961.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
96o12064.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
T5o12166.3%+16.3HIGH CARD
J2o12266.1%+16.1DOMINATING
94s12363.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
75s12467.6%+17.6DOMINATING
T4o12566.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
93s12663.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
86o12763.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
65s12861.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
95o12965.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
84s13062.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
T3o13166.3%+16.3HIGH CARD
92s13264.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
76o13371.8%+21.8DOMINATING
74s13469.0%+19.0DOMINATING
T2o13566.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
64s13663.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
85o13764.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
54s13861.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
83s13963.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
94o14066.5%+16.5HIGH CARD
75o14171.6%+21.6DOMINATING
82s14263.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
73s14370.4%+20.4DOMINATING
65o14464.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
93o14566.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
53s14663.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
63s14764.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
84o14865.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
92o14966.7%+16.7HIGH CARD
43s15062.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
74o15173.1%+23.1DOMINATING
54o15264.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
72s15372.0%+22.0DOMINATING
52s15464.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
64o15565.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
62s15665.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
83o15766.7%+16.7HIGH CARD
42s15864.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
82o15966.7%+16.7HIGH CARD
73o16074.6%+24.6DOMINATING
53o16165.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
63o16267.3%+17.3HIGH CARD
32s16364.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
43o16466.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
72o16576.4%+26.4DOMINATING
52o16667.2%+17.2HIGH CARD
62o16768.8%+18.8HIGH CARD
42o16867.5%+17.5HIGH CARD
32o16967.9%+17.9HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
J7o49.7%

FAQ

What is the equity of J7s?

52.4% against one random opponent, which ranks it 73 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 19.0%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 13.2%.

How much better is J7s than J7o?

J7s is worth 52.4% and J7o 49.7%, a difference of 2.7 points — rank 73 versus rank 92.

How many of the 168 other hands does J7s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 85 hands and an underdog against 83. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

447 words / 43 distinct figures — Method