75o
Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 40.5% · #141
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 13.1% · #137
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 8.5% · #135
- Chen score
- 3.5
- Combos
- 12 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.9%
- Favourite against
- 26 of 168 hands
75o (seven-five offsuit) wins 40.5% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 141th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 83.4% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 13.1% and its rank moves to 137; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 8.5% for rank 135. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
Its suited/offsuit twin 75s runs at 43.7% (rank 124), a gap of 3.2 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.2 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 94o at 40.7%, and directly below is 82s at 40.3%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 75o is a favourite against 26 of them and an underdog against 142. Its best matchup is 52o at 68.2% and its worst is 77 at 12.2% — a spread of 56 points, which is why calling 75o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.6%.
75o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 52o at 68.2%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A7s, which leaves 75o with only 27.2%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 60 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 24.9 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 8.2 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 75o lands -10.5 points from the middle of the pack, and 140 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 40.5% against one opponent, 27.1% against two, 15.4% against four and 8.5% against eight. That last figure is 77% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3.5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 75o reads as 40.5% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 40.5% against one opponent down to 8.5% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | 75o equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 17.0% | -33.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 17.4% | -32.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 17.0% | -33.0 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 17.0% | -33.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 16.9% | -33.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 15.6% | -34.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 14.4% | -35.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 35.0% | -15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 12.2% | -37.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 34.5% | -15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 34.4% | -15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 36.6% | -13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 36.1% | -13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 66 | 17 | 30.2% | -19.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 34.5% | -15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 34.4% | -15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A8s | 21 | 34.5% | -15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 34.1% | -15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| KQo | 23 | 36.1% | -13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A7s | 24 | 27.2% | -22.8 | DOMINATED |
| A9o | 25 | 36.5% | -13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 55 | 27 | 35.0% | -15.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 33.6% | -16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A6s | 29 | 37.6% | -12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 34.5% | -15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A8o | 31 | 36.1% | -13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 27.8% | -22.2 | DOMINATED |
| KTo | 33 | 35.7% | -14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| QTs | 34 | 33.3% | -16.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A4s | 35 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 28.0% | -22.0 | DOMINATED |
| K8s | 37 | 34.7% | -15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 40.1% | -9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 35.5% | -14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9s | 41 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A5o | 42 | 29.3% | -20.7 | DOMINATED |
| A2s | 43 | 41.1% | -8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 27.8% | -22.2 | DOMINATED |
| A6o | 45 | 39.2% | -10.8 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 32.9% | -17.1 | HIGH CARD |
| QTo | 47 | 35.0% | -15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 44 | 48 | 46.9% | -3.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 41.7% | -8.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 36.6% | -13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 42.5% | -7.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 28.6% | -21.4 | DOMINATED |
| J9s | 55 | 33.4% | -16.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| JTo | 57 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K7o | 58 | 29.1% | -20.9 | DOMINATED |
| K4s | 59 | 40.9% | -9.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 43.5% | -6.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 28.1% | -21.9 | DOMINATED |
| K6o | 62 | 39.5% | -10.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 41.6% | -8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 33.8% | -16.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 32.5% | -17.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8o | 66 | 36.0% | -14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 48.2% | -1.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6s | 68 | 37.0% | -13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 42.1% | -7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 35.1% | -14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 30.1% | -19.9 | DOMINATED |
| Q5s | 72 | 28.6% | -21.4 | DOMINATED |
| J7s | 73 | 28.4% | -21.6 | DOMINATED |
| T8s | 74 | 32.9% | -17.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K4o | 75 | 43.1% | -6.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7o | 76 | 29.2% | -20.8 | DOMINATED |
| Q4s | 77 | 40.6% | -9.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J8o | 78 | 35.3% | -14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K3o | 80 | 43.8% | -6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 41.2% | -8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q6o | 82 | 39.1% | -10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 32.6% | -17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 27.7% | -22.3 | DOMINATED |
| J6s | 85 | 37.7% | -12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 44.7% | -5.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 30.1% | -19.9 | DOMINATED |
| 22 | 88 | 49.6% | -0.4 | COINFLIP |
| Q2s | 89 | 42.1% | -7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J5s | 90 | 29.2% | -20.8 | DOMINATED |
| T8o | 91 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J7o | 92 | 29.8% | -20.2 | DOMINATED |
| J4s | 93 | 41.0% | -9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 28.9% | -21.1 | DOMINATED |
| Q4o | 95 | 42.8% | -7.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T6s | 96 | 36.8% | -13.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 41.3% | -8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 33.7% | -16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 28.7% | -21.3 | DOMINATED |
| Q3o | 100 | 43.6% | -6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 87s | 101 | 29.5% | -20.5 | DOMINATED |
| J6o | 102 | 39.6% | -10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 42.0% | -8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 36.5% | -13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 44.4% | -5.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 30.7% | -19.3 | DOMINATED |
| T5s | 107 | 30.1% | -19.9 | DOMINATED |
| T4s | 108 | 40.7% | -9.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 97o | 109 | 30.0% | -20.0 | DOMINATED |
| 86s | 110 | 36.1% | -13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 43.1% | -6.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 38.6% | -11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 41.2% | -8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 95s | 114 | 29.8% | -20.2 | DOMINATED |
| 76s | 115 | 38.4% | -11.6 | DOMINATED |
| J3o | 116 | 43.7% | -6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 87o | 117 | 30.5% | -19.5 | DOMINATED |
| T2s | 118 | 42.1% | -7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 30.3% | -19.7 | DOMINATED |
| 96o | 120 | 38.2% | -11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 31.3% | -18.7 | DOMINATED |
| J2o | 122 | 44.6% | -5.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 41.6% | -8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 47.5% | -2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 43.1% | -6.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 93s | 126 | 41.7% | -8.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 38.1% | -11.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 62.4% | +12.4 | DOMINATING |
| 95o | 129 | 31.5% | -18.5 | DOMINATED |
| 84s | 130 | 41.7% | -8.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 43.6% | -6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 92s | 132 | 42.6% | -7.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 40.2% | -9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 74s | 134 | 53.4% | +3.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 44.6% | -5.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 64s | 136 | 57.3% | +7.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 31.8% | -18.2 | DOMINATED |
| 54s | 138 | 61.5% | +11.5 | DOMINATING |
| 83s | 139 | 42.9% | -7.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 43.7% | -6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 43.6% | -6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 54.3% | +4.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 65o | 144 | 65.9% | +15.9 | DOMINATING |
| 93o | 145 | 44.3% | -5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 62.3% | +12.3 | DOMINATING |
| 63s | 147 | 58.8% | +8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 43.8% | -6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 45.2% | -4.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 59.9% | +9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 56.5% | +6.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 65.3% | +15.3 | DOMINATING |
| 72s | 153 | 54.6% | +4.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 64.1% | +14.1 | DOMINATING |
| 64o | 155 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 60.0% | +10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 45.2% | -4.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 61.2% | +11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 46.1% | -3.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 57.5% | +7.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 53o | 161 | 66.1% | +16.1 | DOMINATING |
| 63o | 162 | 62.3% | +12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 61.3% | +11.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 63.5% | +13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 57.9% | +7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 52o | 166 | 68.2% | +18.2 | DOMINATING |
| 62o | 167 | 63.5% | +13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 64.6% | +14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of 75o?
40.5% against one random opponent, which ranks it 141 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 13.1%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 8.5%.
How much better is 75o than 75s?
75o is worth 40.5% and 75s 43.7%, a difference of 3.2 points — rank 141 versus rank 124.
How many of the 168 other hands does 75o beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 26 hands and an underdog against 142. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
440 words / 46 distinct figures — Method
