169hands
MENU
suited

K7s

57.6%
Equity vs one random hand — #44 of 169

A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
57.6% · #44
6-handed (5 opponents)
20.8% · #41
9-handed (8 opponents)
14.3% · #43
Chen score
5
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
122 of 168 hands

K7s (king-seven suited) wins 57.6% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 44th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 26% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 20.8% and its rank moves to 41; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 14.3% for rank 43. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin K7o runs at 55.3% (rank 58), a gap of 2.3 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.3 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is A2s at 57.6%, and directly below is A6o at 57.6%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, K7s is a favourite against 122 of them and an underdog against 46. Its best matchup is 72o at 76.9% and its worst is KK at 12.0% — a spread of 64.9 points, which is why calling K7s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 50.5%.

K7s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 72o at 76.9%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves K7s with only 27.7%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 21 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 9.6 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 21.7 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, K7s lands +6.6 points from the middle of the pack, and 43 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 57.6% against one opponent, 39.0% against two, 24.4% against four and 14.3% against eight. That last figure is 129% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why K7s reads as 57.6% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 57.6% against one opponent down to 14.3% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%57.6139.0229.9324.4420.8517.9616.1714.38opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
K7s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankK7s equityvs 50%Shape
AA116.5%-33.5PAIR VS CARDS
KK212.0%-38.0PAIR VS CARDS
QQ331.4%-18.6PAIR VS CARDS
JJ431.5%-18.5PAIR VS CARDS
TT531.3%-18.7PAIR VS CARDS
99632.1%-17.9PAIR VS CARDS
88732.7%-17.3PAIR VS CARDS
AKs827.7%-22.3DOMINATED
77934.5%-15.5PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1036.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
AJs1136.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
AKo1228.9%-21.1DOMINATED
ATs1336.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
AQo1439.3%-10.7HIGH CARD
AJo1539.3%-10.7HIGH CARD
KQs1629.3%-20.7DOMINATED
661746.7%-3.3PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1837.7%-12.3HIGH CARD
ATo1938.9%-11.1HIGH CARD
KJs2030.1%-19.9DOMINATED
A8s2137.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
KTs2230.8%-19.2DOMINATED
KQo2330.4%-19.6DOMINATED
A7s2427.7%-22.3DOMINATED
A9o2540.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
KJo2631.3%-18.7DOMINATED
552747.6%-2.4PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2855.3%+5.3HIGH CARD
A6s2940.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
K9s3033.1%-16.9DOMINATED
A8o3139.8%-10.2HIGH CARD
A5s3240.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
KTo3332.3%-17.7DOMINATED
QTs3455.3%+5.3HIGH CARD
A4s3540.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
A7o3628.8%-21.2DOMINATED
K8s3735.4%-14.6DOMINATED
A3s3841.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
QJo3958.2%+8.2HIGH CARD
K9o4034.2%-15.8DOMINATED
Q9s4157.0%+7.0HIGH CARD
A5o4243.1%-6.9HIGH CARD
A2s4341.4%-8.6HIGH CARD
A6o4543.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
JTs4654.6%+4.6HIGH CARD
QTo4758.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
444848.3%-1.7PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4961.6%+11.6DOMINATING
A4o5043.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
Q8s5158.5%+8.5HIGH CARD
K8o5237.2%-12.8DOMINATED
A3o5344.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
K5s5461.4%+11.4DOMINATING
J9s5556.1%+6.1HIGH CARD
Q9o5659.7%+9.7HIGH CARD
JTo5757.1%+7.1HIGH CARD
K7o5852.6%+2.6HIGH CARD
K4s5961.5%+11.5DOMINATING
A2o6044.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
Q7s6171.7%+21.7DOMINATING
K6o6265.2%+15.2DOMINATING
K3s6361.5%+11.5DOMINATING
J8s6457.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
T9s6555.6%+5.6HIGH CARD
Q8o6661.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
336749.3%-0.7COINFLIP
Q6s6862.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
K2s6962.2%+12.2DOMINATING
J9o7059.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
K5o7164.7%+14.7DOMINATING
Q5s7262.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
J7s7370.5%+20.5DOMINATING
T8s7456.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
K4o7565.0%+15.0DOMINATING
Q7o7676.0%+26.0DOMINATING
Q4s7762.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
J8o7860.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
T9o7958.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
K3o8065.3%+15.3DOMINATING
Q3s8162.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
Q6o8265.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
98s8356.1%+6.1HIGH CARD
T7s8469.2%+19.2DOMINATING
J6s8562.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
K2o8665.6%+15.6DOMINATING
Q5o8765.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
228850.5%+0.5COINFLIP
Q2s8962.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
J5s9062.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
T8o9159.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
J7o9274.6%+24.6DOMINATING
J4s9362.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
97s9467.8%+17.8DOMINATING
Q4o9565.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
T6s9661.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
J3s9762.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
98o9859.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
T7o9973.1%+23.1DOMINATING
Q3o10065.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
87s10166.9%+16.9DOMINATING
J6o10265.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
J2s10363.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
96s10460.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
Q2o10566.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
J5o10665.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
T5s10762.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
T4s10862.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
97o10971.7%+21.7DOMINATING
86s11060.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
J4o11165.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
T6o11264.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
T3s11362.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
95s11461.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
76s11567.0%+17.0DOMINATING
J3o11665.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
87o11770.6%+20.6DOMINATING
T2s11862.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
85s11960.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
96o12063.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
T5o12165.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
J2o12266.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
94s12362.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
75s12468.0%+18.0DOMINATING
T4o12565.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
93s12662.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
86o12762.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
65s12861.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
95o12964.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
84s13062.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
T3o13165.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
92s13263.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
76o13370.9%+20.9DOMINATING
74s13469.8%+19.8DOMINATING
T2o13566.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
64s13662.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
85o13763.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
54s13861.0%+11.0HIGH CARD
83s13963.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
94o14065.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
75o14172.2%+22.2DOMINATING
82s14263.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
73s14371.3%+21.3DOMINATING
65o14464.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
93o14565.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
53s14662.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
63s14764.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
84o14865.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
92o14965.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
43s15062.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
74o15173.8%+23.8DOMINATING
54o15263.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
72s15372.9%+22.9DOMINATING
52s15464.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
64o15565.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
62s15665.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
83o15766.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
42s15864.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
82o15966.5%+16.5HIGH CARD
73o16075.3%+25.3DOMINATING
53o16165.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
63o16267.1%+17.1HIGH CARD
32s16364.7%+14.7HIGH CARD
43o16465.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
72o16576.9%+26.9DOMINATING
52o16667.1%+17.1HIGH CARD
62o16768.7%+18.7HIGH CARD
42o16867.3%+17.3HIGH CARD
32o16967.9%+17.9HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
K7o55.3%

FAQ

What is the equity of K7s?

57.6% against one random opponent, which ranks it 44 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 20.8%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 14.3%.

How much better is K7s than K7o?

K7s is worth 57.6% and K7o 55.3%, a difference of 2.3 points — rank 44 versus rank 58.

How many of the 168 other hands does K7s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 122 hands and an underdog against 46. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

447 words / 42 distinct figures — Method