T4s

T4s (ten-four suited) wins 46.7% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 108th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 63.9% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 15.7% and its rank moves to 100; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 10.8% for rank 100. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin T4o runs at 43.4% (rank 125), a gap of 3.3 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 3.3 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is T5s at 47.1%, and directly below is 97o at 46.4%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.7 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, T4s is a favourite against 61 of them and an underdog against 107. Its best matchup is 94o at 74.2% and its worst is TT at 12.5% — a spread of 61.7 points, which is why calling T4s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.7%.

T4s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 94o at 74.2%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them ATs, which leaves T4s with only 27.2%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 52 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 20.5 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 10.8 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, T4s lands -4.3 points from the middle of the pack, and 107 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 46.7% against one opponent, 30.5% against two, 18.3% against four and 10.8% against eight. That last figure is 97% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 2 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why T4s reads as 46.7% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.