169hands
MENU
suitedace high

A7s

60.9%
Equity vs one random hand — #24 of 169

A suited ace — nut-flush potential on top of top-pair equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
60.9% · #24
6-handed (5 opponents)
22.5% · #29
9-handed (8 opponents)
15.8% · #26
Chen score
7
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
144 of 168 hands

A7s (ace-seven suited) wins 60.9% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 24th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 14.2% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 22.5% and its rank moves to 29; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 15.8% for rank 26. A suited ace — nut-flush potential on top of top-pair equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin A7o runs at 58.7% (rank 36), a gap of 2.2 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.2 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is KQo at 61.5%, and directly below is A9o at 60.8%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.7 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, A7s is a favourite against 144 of them and an underdog against 24. Its best matchup is 72o at 78.0% and its worst is AA at 12.0% — a spread of 66 points, which is why calling A7s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 50.1%.

A7s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 72o at 78.0%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves A7s with only 29.3%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 10 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 6.3 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 25 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, A7s lands +9.9 points from the middle of the pack, and 23 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 60.9% against one opponent, 42.7% against two, 26.3% against four and 15.8% against eight. That last figure is 142% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 7 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why A7s reads as 60.9% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 60.9% against one opponent down to 15.8% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%35%70%60.9142.7232.3326.3422.5519.1617.3715.88opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
A7s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankA7s equityvs 50%Shape
AA112.0%-38.0PAIR VS CARDS
KK232.3%-17.7PAIR VS CARDS
QQ332.0%-18.0PAIR VS CARDS
JJ432.1%-17.9PAIR VS CARDS
TT532.2%-17.8PAIR VS CARDS
99632.4%-17.6PAIR VS CARDS
88732.7%-17.3PAIR VS CARDS
AKs829.3%-20.7DOMINATED
77934.5%-15.5PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1029.4%-20.6DOMINATED
AJs1130.5%-19.5DOMINATED
AKo1230.6%-19.4DOMINATED
ATs1331.3%-18.7DOMINATED
AQo1430.7%-19.3DOMINATED
AJo1531.6%-18.4DOMINATED
KQs1657.0%+7.0HIGH CARD
661746.3%-3.7PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1833.4%-16.6DOMINATED
ATo1932.5%-17.5DOMINATED
KJs2056.8%+6.8HIGH CARD
A8s2135.5%-14.5DOMINATED
KTs2256.8%+6.8HIGH CARD
KQo2359.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
A9o2535.0%-15.0DOMINATED
KJo2659.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
552747.1%-2.9PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2855.3%+5.3HIGH CARD
A6s2961.5%+11.5DOMINATING
K9s3058.5%+8.5HIGH CARD
A8o3137.1%-12.9DOMINATED
A5s3260.3%+10.3DOMINATING
KTo3359.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
QTs3455.3%+5.3HIGH CARD
A4s3560.1%+10.1DOMINATING
A7o3652.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
K8s3759.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
A3s3860.4%+10.4DOMINATING
QJo3958.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
K9o4061.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
Q9s4157.0%+7.0HIGH CARD
A5o4263.7%+13.7DOMINATING
A2s4361.0%+11.0DOMINATING
K7s4472.3%+22.3DOMINATING
A6o4565.0%+15.0DOMINATING
JTs4654.7%+4.7HIGH CARD
QTo4758.3%+8.3HIGH CARD
444848.0%-2.0PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4962.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
A4o5063.7%+13.7DOMINATING
Q8s5158.2%+8.2HIGH CARD
K8o5262.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
A3o5364.0%+14.0DOMINATING
K5s5462.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
J9s5556.5%+6.5HIGH CARD
Q9o5659.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
JTo5757.4%+7.4HIGH CARD
K7o5876.3%+26.3DOMINATING
K4s5962.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
A2o6064.5%+14.5DOMINATING
Q7s6171.9%+21.9DOMINATING
K6o6265.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
K3s6362.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
J8s6457.8%+7.8HIGH CARD
T9s6555.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
Q8o6661.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
336748.9%-1.1PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6862.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
K2s6963.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
J9o7059.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
K5o7165.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
Q5s7262.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
J7s7370.5%+20.5DOMINATING
T8s7456.5%+6.5HIGH CARD
K4o7565.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
Q7o7676.3%+26.3DOMINATING
Q4s7762.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
J8o7860.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
T9o7958.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
K3o8065.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
Q3s8162.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
Q6o8265.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
98s8356.1%+6.1HIGH CARD
T7s8469.2%+19.2DOMINATING
J6s8562.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
K2o8666.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
Q5o8765.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
228850.1%+0.1COINFLIP
Q2s8962.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
J5s9062.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
T8o9159.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
J7o9274.7%+24.7DOMINATING
J4s9362.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
97s9468.3%+18.3DOMINATING
Q4o9565.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
T6s9661.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
J3s9762.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
98o9858.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
T7o9973.3%+23.3DOMINATING
Q3o10065.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
87s10167.0%+17.0DOMINATING
J6o10265.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
J2s10362.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
96s10460.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
Q2o10565.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
J5o10665.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
T5s10762.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
T4s10862.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
97o10972.4%+22.4DOMINATING
86s11059.7%+9.7HIGH CARD
J4o11165.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
T6o11264.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
T3s11362.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
95s11461.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
76s11567.6%+17.6DOMINATING
J3o11665.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
87o11770.6%+20.6DOMINATING
T2s11863.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
85s11960.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
96o12063.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
T5o12165.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
J2o12266.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
94s12363.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
75s12469.2%+19.2DOMINATING
T4o12565.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
93s12662.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
86o12762.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
65s12861.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
95o12964.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
84s13061.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
T3o13165.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
92s13263.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
76o13371.2%+21.2DOMINATING
74s13470.5%+20.5DOMINATING
T2o13565.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
64s13662.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
85o13763.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
54s13861.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
83s13963.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
94o14066.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
75o14172.8%+22.8DOMINATING
82s14263.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
73s14372.1%+22.1DOMINATING
65o14464.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
93o14566.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
53s14662.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
63s14764.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
84o14864.7%+14.7HIGH CARD
92o14966.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
43s15063.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
74o15174.5%+24.5DOMINATING
54o15264.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
72s15373.7%+23.7DOMINATING
52s15464.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
64o15565.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
62s15665.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
83o15766.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
42s15864.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
82o15966.3%+16.3HIGH CARD
73o16076.2%+26.2DOMINATING
53o16165.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
63o16267.1%+17.1HIGH CARD
32s16365.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
43o16466.3%+16.3HIGH CARD
72o16578.0%+28.0DOMINATING
52o16667.5%+17.5HIGH CARD
62o16768.5%+18.5HIGH CARD
42o16867.6%+17.6HIGH CARD
32o16968.1%+18.1HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
A7o58.7%

FAQ

What is the equity of A7s?

60.9% against one random opponent, which ranks it 24 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 22.5%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 15.8%.

How much better is A7s than A7o?

A7s is worth 60.9% and A7o 58.7%, a difference of 2.2 points — rank 24 versus rank 36.

How many of the 168 other hands does A7s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 144 hands and an underdog against 24. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

445 words / 42 distinct figures — Method