169hands
MENU
offsuit

62o

34.1%
Equity vs one random hand — #167 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
34.1% · #167
6-handed (5 opponents)
9.1% · #166
9-handed (8 opponents)
6.0% · #166
Chen score
-1
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
9 of 168 hands

62o (six-deuce offsuit) wins 34.1% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 167th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 98.8% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 9.1% and its rank moves to 166; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 6.0% for rank 166. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin 62s runs at 37.6% (rank 156), a gap of 3.5 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.5 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 52o at 34.3%, and directly below is 42o at 33.3%, so three hands are packed into a band of 1 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 62o is a favourite against 9 of them and an underdog against 159. Its best matchup is 32o at 62.8% and its worst is 66 at 8.2% — a spread of 54.6 points, which is why calling 62o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 3 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 54o at 50.4%.

62o dominates 3 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 32o at 62.8%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A6s, which leaves 62o with only 23.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 76 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 31.3 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 1.8 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 62o lands -16.9 points from the middle of the pack, and 166 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 34.1% against one opponent, 21.0% against two, 11.5% against four and 6.0% against eight. That last figure is 54% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at -1 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 62o reads as 34.1% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 34.1% against one opponent down to 6.0% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%20%40%34.1121.0214.7311.549.157.866.876.08opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
62o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rank62o equityvs 50%Shape
AA113.5%-36.5PAIR VS CARDS
KK213.2%-36.8PAIR VS CARDS
QQ313.3%-36.7PAIR VS CARDS
JJ412.9%-37.1PAIR VS CARDS
TT513.1%-36.9PAIR VS CARDS
99613.0%-37.0PAIR VS CARDS
88712.9%-37.1PAIR VS CARDS
AKs831.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
77912.7%-37.3PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1032.0%-18.0HIGH CARD
AJs1131.6%-18.4HIGH CARD
AKo1233.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
ATs1331.7%-18.3HIGH CARD
AQo1433.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
AJo1533.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
KQs1631.6%-18.4HIGH CARD
66178.2%-41.8PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1831.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
ATo1933.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
KJs2031.2%-18.8HIGH CARD
A8s2131.5%-18.5HIGH CARD
KTs2231.3%-18.7HIGH CARD
KQo2333.1%-16.9HIGH CARD
A7s2431.5%-18.5HIGH CARD
A9o2533.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
KJo2632.8%-17.2HIGH CARD
552728.2%-21.8PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2831.0%-19.0HIGH CARD
A6s2923.8%-26.2DOMINATED
K9s3031.7%-18.3HIGH CARD
A8o3133.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
A5s3233.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
KTo3332.8%-17.2HIGH CARD
QTs3431.0%-19.0HIGH CARD
A4s3534.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
A7o3633.0%-17.0HIGH CARD
K8s3731.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
A3s3834.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
QJo3932.5%-17.5HIGH CARD
K9o4033.1%-16.9HIGH CARD
Q9s4131.2%-18.8HIGH CARD
A5o4235.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
A2s4325.4%-24.6DOMINATED
K7s4431.3%-18.7HIGH CARD
A6o4524.4%-25.6DOMINATED
JTs4630.2%-19.8HIGH CARD
QTo4732.5%-17.5HIGH CARD
444829.4%-20.6PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4924.1%-25.9DOMINATED
A4o5035.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
Q8s5131.5%-18.5HIGH CARD
K8o5233.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
A3o5336.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
K5s5434.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
J9s5531.0%-19.0HIGH CARD
Q9o5632.8%-17.2HIGH CARD
JTo5731.6%-18.4HIGH CARD
K7o5833.0%-17.0HIGH CARD
K4s5934.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
A2o6026.5%-23.5DOMINATED
Q7s6131.6%-18.4HIGH CARD
K6o6224.9%-25.1DOMINATED
K3s6335.1%-14.9HIGH CARD
J8s6431.0%-19.0HIGH CARD
T9s6530.3%-19.7HIGH CARD
Q8o6632.7%-17.3HIGH CARD
336730.3%-19.7PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6824.6%-25.4DOMINATED
K2s6925.7%-24.3DOMINATED
J9o7032.3%-17.7HIGH CARD
K5o7136.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
Q5s7234.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
J7s7331.2%-18.8HIGH CARD
T8s7430.7%-19.3HIGH CARD
K4o7536.9%-13.1HIGH CARD
Q7o7633.2%-16.8HIGH CARD
Q4s7734.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
J8o7832.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
T9o7931.7%-18.3HIGH CARD
K3o8037.2%-12.8HIGH CARD
Q3s8135.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
Q6o8225.5%-24.5DOMINATED
98s8330.3%-19.7HIGH CARD
T7s8430.6%-19.4HIGH CARD
J6s8525.2%-24.8DOMINATED
K2o8627.0%-23.0DOMINATED
Q5o8736.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
228833.6%-16.4PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8926.2%-23.8DOMINATED
J5s9034.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
T8o9132.0%-18.0HIGH CARD
J7o9232.7%-17.3HIGH CARD
J4s9334.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
97s9430.4%-19.6HIGH CARD
Q4o9536.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
T6s9625.7%-24.3DOMINATED
J3s9735.1%-14.9HIGH CARD
98o9831.7%-18.3HIGH CARD
T7o9932.3%-17.7HIGH CARD
Q3o10037.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
87s10130.1%-19.9HIGH CARD
J6o10226.0%-24.0DOMINATED
J2s10326.5%-23.5DOMINATED
96s10426.8%-23.2DOMINATED
Q2o10527.6%-22.4DOMINATED
J5o10636.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
T5s10735.1%-14.9HIGH CARD
T4s10835.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
97o10932.0%-18.0HIGH CARD
86s11028.3%-21.7DOMINATED
J4o11136.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
T6o11226.8%-23.2DOMINATED
T3s11335.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
95s11434.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
76s11528.8%-21.2DOMINATED
J3o11637.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
87o11731.5%-18.5HIGH CARD
T2s11827.3%-22.7DOMINATED
85s11934.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
96o12027.8%-22.2DOMINATED
T5o12136.9%-13.1HIGH CARD
J2o12227.6%-22.4DOMINATED
94s12335.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
75s12434.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
T4o12536.8%-13.2HIGH CARD
93s12635.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
86o12729.1%-20.9DOMINATED
65s12840.0%-10.0DOMINATED
95o12936.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
84s13035.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
T3o13137.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
92s13228.4%-21.6DOMINATED
76o13329.6%-20.4DOMINATED
74s13435.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
T2o13528.6%-21.4DOMINATED
64s13642.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
85o13736.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
54s13847.6%-2.4HIGH CARD
83s13936.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
94o14037.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
75o14136.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
82s14229.8%-20.2DOMINATED
73s14337.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
65o14442.2%-7.8HIGH CARD
93o14537.7%-12.3HIGH CARD
53s14649.1%-0.9COINFLIP
63s14744.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
84o14837.2%-12.8HIGH CARD
92o14929.8%-20.2DOMINATED
43s15049.2%-0.8COINFLIP
74o15137.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
54o15250.4%+0.4COINFLIP
72s15332.1%-17.9DOMINATED
52s15459.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
64o15545.2%-4.8HIGH CARD
62s15647.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
83o15738.3%-11.7HIGH CARD
42s15859.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
82o15931.2%-18.8DOMINATED
73o16039.1%-10.9HIGH CARD
53o16151.9%+1.9HIGH CARD
63o16246.2%-3.8HIGH CARD
32s16359.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
43o16452.1%+2.1HIGH CARD
72o16533.7%-16.3DOMINATED
52o16662.7%+12.7DOMINATING
42o16862.6%+12.6DOMINATING
32o16962.8%+12.8DOMINATING

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
62s37.6%

FAQ

What is the equity of 62o?

34.1% against one random opponent, which ranks it 167 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 9.1%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 6.0%.

How much better is 62o than 62s?

62o is worth 34.1% and 62s 37.6%, a difference of 3.5 points — rank 167 versus rank 156.

How many of the 168 other hands does 62o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 9 hands and an underdog against 159. 3 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

440 words / 42 distinct figures — Method