Q2s
A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 50.1% · #89
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 16.9% · #82
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 11.9% · #79
- Chen score
- 4
- Combos
- 4 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.3%
- Favourite against
- 91 of 168 hands
Q2s (queen-deuce suited) wins 50.1% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 89th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 52.7% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 16.9% and its rank moves to 82; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 11.9% for rank 79. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.
Its suited/offsuit twin Q2o runs at 47.3% (rank 105), a gap of 2.8 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.8 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 22 at 50.2%, and directly below is J5s at 50.0%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.2 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, Q2s is a favourite against 91 of them and an underdog against 77. Its best matchup is J2o at 75.9% and its worst is QQ at 11.1% — a spread of 64.8 points, which is why calling Q2s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being Q3o at 49.7%.
Q2s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against J2o at 75.9%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AQs, which leaves Q2s with only 26.1%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 suited hands it comes 42 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 17.1 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 14.2 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, Q2s lands -0.9 points from the middle of the pack, and 88 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 50.1% against one opponent, 32.5% against two, 19.9% against four and 11.9% against eight. That last figure is 107% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 4 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why Q2s reads as 50.1% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 50.1% against one opponent down to 11.9% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
How often Q2s hits the flop
Exact counts over all 19,600 flops and 2,118,760 five-card boards from the 50 cards left once your two are out — no simulation.
Q2s pairs the board on the flop — at least one of its two ranks hits — 32.4% of the time, and flops top pair or better (the paired card is the highest on the board, or two pair and up) 13.1%. By the river it has made a pair or better 48.7% of the time.
For straights, the flop completes one 0.0000% of the time (zero flops — the two cards are too far apart), gives an eight-out draw 0.980% and a four-out gutshot 4.57%. By the river a straight using a hole card completes 2.09% of the time. For flushes, two or more of its suit land on the flop 11.8% of the time (a made flush 0.842%), and a flush is complete by the river 6.40%.
Put together, Q2s flops a pair or better or a strong draw (a flush draw or an eight-out straight draw) 43.4% of the time — rank 72 of the 156 unpaired hands (tied with 3 others). The highest is JTs, T9s, 98s and 4 others at 50.6% and the lowest AKo, A2o at 32.8%.
| Outcome | Probability | Count / total | Frequency | Odds against |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flop a pair or better (either card hits) | 32.4% | 6,356 / 19,600 | 1 in 3.1 | 2.1 to 1 |
| top pair or better (highest card on board, or two pair and up) | 13.1% | 2,570 / 19,600 | 1 in 7.6 | 6.6 to 1 |
| two pair (both cards hit) | 2.02% | 396 / 19,600 | 1 in 49.5 | 48.5 to 1 |
| trips (one card hits twice) | 1.35% | 264 / 19,600 | 1 in 74.2 | 73.2 to 1 |
| Flop a made straight | 0.0000% | 0 / 19,600 | 1 in ∞ | ∞ to 1 |
| Flop an eight-out straight draw | 0.980% | 192 / 19,600 | 1 in 102 | 101 to 1 |
| Flop a four-out gutshot | 4.57% | 896 / 19,600 | 1 in 21.9 | 20.9 to 1 |
| Flop a made flush (three of your suit) | 0.842% | 165 / 19,600 | 1 in 119 | 118 to 1 |
| Flop a flush draw (two of your suit) | 10.9% | 2,145 / 19,600 | 1 in 9.1 | 8.1 to 1 |
| Pair or better, or a strong draw (flush draw or eight-out straight draw) or better | 43.4% | 8,498 / 19,600 | 1 in 2.3 | 1.3 to 1 |
| Pair or better by the river | 48.7% | 1,032,752 / 2,118,760 | 1 in 2.1 | 1.1 to 1 |
| Straight by the river (using a hole card) | 2.09% | 44,288 / 2,118,760 | 1 in 47.8 | 46.8 to 1 |
| Flush by the river (both hole cards) | 6.40% | 135,597 / 2,118,760 | 1 in 15.6 | 14.6 to 1 |
How the flop moves Q2s's equity
Equity against one random hand with the flop out and the turn and river to come. Exact counts over every deal of the opponent's two cards and the board — no simulation.
Against one random hand, Q2s goes from 50.2% before the flop up to 68.9% when either card pairs, and down to 41.2% when both miss. It connects 32.4% of the time (6,356 of 19,600 flops). Missing with a card above Q on board leaves 44.3%; missing with nothing above Q leaves 38.5%.
By board shape: rainbow 49.3%, two-tone 50.8%, monotone 49.7%. Two of your suit (a flush draw) gives 62.2% (10.9% of flops), and three of your suit (a made flush) 95.7% (0.842%). A paired board gives 52.2%, and a connected board (three ranks within five) 45.9%. The best row in the table is "Three of your suit (made flush)" at 95.7%, the worst "and nothing above Q" at 38.5%.
The 50.1% at the top of the page is a 400,000-hand simulation; this table counts every deal of the opponent's two cards and the five-card board (2,097,572,400 per starting hand), which puts the pre-flop figure at 50.17% (a gap of 0.07 points). Each equity is taken with the flop out and the turn and river still to come.
| Flop | How often | Flops (of 19,600) | Q2s equity | vs before the flop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before the flop (average of every flop) | 100.0% | 19,600 | 50.2% | — |
| Either card hits (a matching rank on the flop) | 32.4% | 6,356 | 68.9% | +18.8pt |
| Neither card hits | 67.6% | 13,244 | 41.2% | −9.0pt |
| and nothing above Q | 36.4% | 7,140 | 38.5% | −11.7pt |
| and at least one card above Q | 31.1% | 6,104 | 44.3% | −5.9pt |
| Rainbow (three different suits) | 39.7% | 7,774 | 49.3% | −0.9pt |
| Two-tone (two cards share a suit) | 55.1% | 10,803 | 50.8% | +0.7pt |
| Monotone (all three one suit) | 5.22% | 1,023 | 49.7% | −0.5pt |
| Three of your suit (made flush) | 0.842% | 165 | 95.7% | +45.5pt |
| Exactly two of your suit (flush draw) | 10.9% | 2,145 | 62.2% | +12.0pt |
| Paired board (two or more of a rank) | 17.2% | 3,364 | 52.2% | +2.1pt |
| Connected board (three ranks within five, A can play low) | 19.2% | 3,760 | 45.9% | −4.3pt |
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | Q2s equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 15.6% | -34.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 15.3% | -34.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 11.1% | -38.9 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 30.7% | -19.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 30.9% | -19.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 31.4% | -18.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 32.4% | -17.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 32.9% | -17.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 32.6% | -17.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 26.1% | -23.9 | DOMINATED |
| AJs | 11 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 35.3% | -14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 35.7% | -14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 27.1% | -22.9 | DOMINATED |
| AJo | 15 | 38.1% | -11.9 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 26.8% | -23.2 | DOMINATED |
| 66 | 17 | 33.1% | -16.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 37.0% | -13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 38.3% | -11.7 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 34.9% | -15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A8s | 21 | 36.9% | -13.1 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 34.9% | -15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| KQo | 23 | 27.4% | -22.6 | DOMINATED |
| A7s | 24 | 37.1% | -12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A9o | 25 | 39.6% | -10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 55 | 27 | 33.4% | -16.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 28.8% | -21.2 | DOMINATED |
| A6s | 29 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A8o | 31 | 39.8% | -10.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 37.4% | -12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| QTs | 34 | 29.8% | -20.2 | DOMINATED |
| A4s | 35 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 39.7% | -10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K8s | 37 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 36.0% | -14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 30.0% | -20.0 | DOMINATED |
| K9o | 40 | 38.9% | -11.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9s | 41 | 32.2% | -17.8 | DOMINATED |
| A5o | 42 | 38.5% | -11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 27.6% | -22.4 | DOMINATED |
| K7s | 44 | 37.2% | -12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A6o | 45 | 39.8% | -10.2 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 53.7% | +3.7 | HIGH CARD |
| QTo | 47 | 31.3% | -18.7 | DOMINATED |
| 44 | 48 | 34.0% | -16.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 37.0% | -13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 38.5% | -11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 35.1% | -14.9 | DOMINATED |
| K8o | 52 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 38.7% | -11.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 36.9% | -13.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 55.3% | +5.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 33.4% | -16.6 | DOMINATED |
| JTo | 57 | 56.5% | +6.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K7o | 58 | 39.7% | -10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K4s | 59 | 36.9% | -13.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 28.6% | -21.4 | DOMINATED |
| Q7s | 61 | 38.2% | -11.8 | DOMINATED |
| K6o | 62 | 39.7% | -10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 36.8% | -13.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 56.3% | +6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 54.0% | +4.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8o | 66 | 36.4% | -13.6 | DOMINATED |
| 33 | 67 | 34.8% | -15.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6s | 68 | 41.4% | -8.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 28.1% | -21.9 | DOMINATED |
| J9o | 70 | 57.9% | +7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 39.4% | -10.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5s | 72 | 44.4% | -5.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J7s | 73 | 57.3% | +7.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T8s | 74 | 55.2% | +5.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K4o | 75 | 39.5% | -10.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7o | 76 | 40.0% | -10.0 | DOMINATED |
| Q4s | 77 | 46.9% | -3.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J8o | 78 | 58.9% | +8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 56.7% | +6.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K3o | 80 | 39.5% | -10.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 47.3% | -2.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q6o | 82 | 43.6% | -6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 54.1% | +4.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 56.1% | +6.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J6s | 85 | 58.4% | +8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 29.1% | -20.9 | DOMINATED |
| Q5o | 87 | 46.8% | -3.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 22 | 88 | 36.9% | -13.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J5s | 90 | 58.5% | +8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 57.9% | +7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J7o | 92 | 59.9% | +9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J4s | 93 | 58.8% | +8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 55.0% | +5.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4o | 95 | 49.5% | -0.5 | COINFLIP |
| T6s | 96 | 57.3% | +7.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 59.1% | +9.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 56.6% | +6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 58.8% | +8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3o | 100 | 49.7% | -0.3 | COINFLIP |
| 87s | 101 | 54.4% | +4.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J6o | 102 | 61.4% | +11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 71.5% | +21.5 | DOMINATING |
| 96s | 104 | 56.3% | +6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 52.4% | +2.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 61.2% | +11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 58.6% | +8.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 58.7% | +8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 97o | 109 | 57.7% | +7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 86s | 110 | 55.3% | +5.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 61.7% | +11.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 60.0% | +10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 58.8% | +8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 95s | 114 | 57.5% | +7.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 54.2% | +4.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J3o | 116 | 62.2% | +12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 87o | 117 | 57.0% | +7.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T2s | 118 | 71.3% | +21.3 | DOMINATING |
| 85s | 119 | 56.5% | +6.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 59.0% | +9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 61.4% | +11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 75.9% | +25.9 | DOMINATING |
| 94s | 123 | 58.8% | +8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 55.3% | +5.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 61.2% | +11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 93s | 126 | 58.7% | +8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 57.8% | +7.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 54.6% | +4.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 60.3% | +10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 57.5% | +7.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 61.8% | +11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 92s | 132 | 71.1% | +21.1 | DOMINATING |
| 76o | 133 | 56.7% | +6.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 74s | 134 | 56.5% | +6.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 75.4% | +25.4 | DOMINATING |
| 64s | 136 | 55.9% | +5.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 59.1% | +9.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 55.0% | +5.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 58.8% | +8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 61.4% | +11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 57.9% | +7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 70.7% | +20.7 | DOMINATING |
| 73s | 143 | 57.6% | +7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 65o | 144 | 57.4% | +7.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 93o | 145 | 61.4% | +11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 56.4% | +6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 56.9% | +6.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 60.3% | +10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 75.2% | +25.2 | DOMINATING |
| 43s | 150 | 56.7% | +6.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 59.3% | +9.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 57.6% | +7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 71.1% | +21.1 | DOMINATING |
| 52s | 154 | 68.5% | +18.5 | DOMINATING |
| 64o | 155 | 58.6% | +8.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 69.6% | +19.6 | DOMINATING |
| 83o | 157 | 61.5% | +11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 68.9% | +18.9 | DOMINATING |
| 82o | 159 | 75.0% | +25.0 | DOMINATING |
| 73o | 160 | 60.6% | +10.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 53o | 161 | 59.0% | +9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 63o | 162 | 59.7% | +9.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 69.5% | +19.5 | DOMINATING |
| 43o | 164 | 59.3% | +9.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 75.3% | +25.3 | DOMINATING |
| 52o | 166 | 72.5% | +22.5 | DOMINATING |
| 62o | 167 | 73.8% | +23.8 | DOMINATING |
| 42o | 168 | 72.9% | +22.9 | DOMINATING |
| 32o | 169 | 73.3% | +23.3 | DOMINATING |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of Q2s?
50.1% against one random opponent, which ranks it 89 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 16.9%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 11.9%.
How much better is Q2s than Q2o?
Q2s is worth 50.1% and Q2o 47.3%, a difference of 2.8 points — rank 89 versus rank 105.
How many of the 168 other hands does Q2s beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 91 hands and an underdog against 77. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
How often does Q2s hit the flop?
A pair or better 32.4%, top pair or better 13.1%. A made straight 0.0000% and an eight-out straight draw 0.980%, a flush draw or better 11.8%. One of those happens 43.4% of the time (all 19,600 flops counted).
What is Q2s worth when it misses the flop?
Against one random hand, 41.2% on a flop where neither card pairs (50.2% before the flop, 68.9% when it connects). Exact counts over every deal of the opponent's cards and the board.
447 words / 42 distinct figures — Method
