ATs

ATs (ace-ten suited) wins 64.6% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 13th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 7.7% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 26.8% and its rank moves to 12; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 18.9% for rank 12. A suited ace — nut-flush potential on top of top-pair equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin ATo runs at 62.6% (rank 19), a gap of 2 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is AKo at 65.4%, and directly below is AQo at 64.4%, so three hands are packed into a band of 1 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, ATs is a favourite against 151 of them and an underdog against 17. Its best matchup is T2o at 78.1% and its worst is AA at 13.3% — a spread of 64.8 points, which is why calling ATs simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 4 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 33 at 50.4%.

ATs dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against T2o at 78.1%. It is dominated by 6 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves ATs with only 29.4%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 4 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 2.6 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 28.7 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, ATs lands +13.6 points from the middle of the pack, and 12 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 64.6% against one opponent, 47.0% against two, 31.0% against four and 18.9% against eight. That last figure is 170% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 8 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why ATs reads as 64.6% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.