88
A middle pair — frequently chased by two overcards.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 69.2% · #7
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 24.1% · #22
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 15.9% · #25
- Chen score
- 8
- Combos
- 6 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.45%
- Favourite against
- 162 of 168 hands
88 (pocket eights) wins 69.2% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 7th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 4.1% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 24.1% and its rank moves to 22; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 15.9% for rank 25. A middle pair — frequently chased by two overcards.
As a pocket pair there is no suited twin; instead there are 6 combinations of it in the deck, so you are dealt it 0.45% of the time (6 of 1,326 two-card hands). The hand ranked one place above is 99 at 72.2% and one place below is AKs at 67.2%. Every pocket pair flops a set about 11.8% of the time, so the pecking order among pairs is decided almost entirely before the flop.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 88 is a favourite against 162 of them and an underdog against 6. Its best matchup is 83o at 93.3% and its worst is 99 at 18.1% — a spread of 75.2 points, which is why calling 88 simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 4 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being JTs at 50.3%.
88 shares a rank with relatively few hands, so it is rarely on the wrong side of a kicker problem. What does hurt it is running into a higher pair, where the number bottoms out at 18.1%. The table further down lists all 168 opponents individually.
Within the 13 pocket pairs it comes 7 of 13. The strongest hand in that group, AA, is 16 points away, and the weakest, 22, sits 19 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 88 lands +18.2 points from the middle of the pack, and 6 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 69.2% against one opponent, 50.2% against two, 29.2% against four and 15.9% against eight. That last figure is 143% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 8 points, and it arrives 0.45% of the time (6 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 88 reads as 69.2% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 69.2% against one opponent down to 15.9% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | 88 equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 19.5% | -30.5 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| KK | 2 | 19.2% | -30.8 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| 3 | 19.1% | -30.9 | PAIR VS PAIR | |
| JJ | 4 | 18.6% | -31.4 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| TT | 5 | 18.3% | -31.7 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| 99 | 6 | 18.1% | -31.9 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| AKs | 8 | 52.5% | +2.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 77 | 9 | 81.8% | +31.8 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| AQs | 10 | 52.4% | +2.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AJs | 11 | 52.5% | +2.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKo | 12 | 55.1% | +5.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| ATs | 13 | 52.7% | +2.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQo | 14 | 55.3% | +5.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AJo | 15 | 55.2% | +5.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KQs | 16 | 51.1% | +1.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 66 | 17 | 81.3% | +31.3 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| A9s | 18 | 54.2% | +4.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| ATo | 19 | 55.2% | +5.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KJs | 20 | 51.5% | +1.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A8s | 21 | 65.9% | +15.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KTs | 22 | 51.6% | +1.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KQo | 23 | 53.9% | +3.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A7s | 24 | 67.3% | +17.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9o | 25 | 57.1% | +7.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KJo | 26 | 53.9% | +3.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 55 | 27 | 81.1% | +31.1 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| QJs | 28 | 51.0% | +1.0 | COINFLIP |
| A6s | 29 | 67.5% | +17.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K9s | 30 | 53.1% | +3.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A8o | 31 | 70.0% | +20.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A5s | 32 | 66.1% | +16.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KTo | 33 | 54.0% | +4.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QTs | 34 | 51.0% | +1.0 | COINFLIP |
| A4s | 35 | 66.2% | +16.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A7o | 36 | 70.8% | +20.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K8s | 37 | 66.0% | +16.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A3s | 38 | 66.7% | +16.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJo | 39 | 53.5% | +3.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K9o | 40 | 55.8% | +5.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q9s | 41 | 52.7% | +2.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A5o | 42 | 69.4% | +19.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A2s | 43 | 66.7% | +16.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K7s | 44 | 67.3% | +17.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A6o | 45 | 71.0% | +21.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| JTs | 46 | 50.3% | +0.3 | COINFLIP |
| QTo | 47 | 53.6% | +3.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 44 | 48 | 81.0% | +31.0 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| K6s | 49 | 67.4% | +17.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A4o | 50 | 69.8% | +19.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q8s | 51 | 64.7% | +14.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K8o | 52 | 70.0% | +20.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A3o | 53 | 70.3% | +20.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K5s | 54 | 66.9% | +16.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J9s | 55 | 52.0% | +2.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q9o | 56 | 55.3% | +5.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| JTo | 57 | 52.8% | +2.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K7o | 58 | 70.9% | +20.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K4s | 59 | 67.2% | +17.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A2o | 60 | 70.4% | +20.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q7s | 61 | 67.8% | +17.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6o | 62 | 70.9% | +20.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K3s | 63 | 67.7% | +17.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J8s | 64 | 63.3% | +13.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T9s | 65 | 50.9% | +0.9 | COINFLIP |
| Q8o | 66 | 68.6% | +18.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 33 | 67 | 81.7% | +31.7 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| Q6s | 68 | 67.2% | +17.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K2s | 69 | 67.9% | +17.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J9o | 70 | 54.5% | +4.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K5o | 71 | 70.5% | +20.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q5s | 72 | 67.0% | +17.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J7s | 73 | 67.3% | +17.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T8s | 74 | 62.1% | +12.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K4o | 75 | 70.7% | +20.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q7o | 76 | 71.3% | +21.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q4s | 77 | 67.3% | +17.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J8o | 78 | 67.1% | +17.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T9o | 79 | 53.3% | +3.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K3o | 80 | 71.5% | +21.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q3s | 81 | 67.6% | +17.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6o | 82 | 70.8% | +20.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 98s | 83 | 60.8% | +10.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T7s | 84 | 66.7% | +16.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J6s | 85 | 67.6% | +17.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K2o | 86 | 71.2% | +21.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q5o | 87 | 70.7% | +20.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 22 | 88 | 81.6% | +31.6 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| Q2s | 89 | 67.6% | +17.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J5s | 90 | 67.2% | +17.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T8o | 91 | 65.5% | +15.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J7o | 92 | 70.8% | +20.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J4s | 93 | 67.4% | +17.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 97s | 94 | 67.0% | +17.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q4o | 95 | 70.8% | +20.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T6s | 96 | 67.0% | +17.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J3s | 97 | 67.8% | +17.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 98o | 98 | 64.6% | +14.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T7o | 99 | 70.3% | +20.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q3o | 100 | 71.4% | +21.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 87s | 101 | 82.0% | +32.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J6o | 102 | 71.3% | +21.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J2s | 103 | 68.1% | +18.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 96s | 104 | 67.5% | +17.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q2o | 105 | 71.6% | +21.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J5o | 106 | 70.6% | +20.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T5s | 107 | 67.7% | +17.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T4s | 108 | 67.5% | +17.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 97o | 109 | 70.1% | +20.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 86s | 110 | 83.3% | +33.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J4o | 111 | 71.1% | +21.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T6o | 112 | 70.6% | +20.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T3s | 113 | 68.0% | +18.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 95s | 114 | 67.5% | +17.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 76s | 115 | 81.6% | +31.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J3o | 116 | 71.7% | +21.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 87o | 117 | 86.8% | +36.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T2s | 118 | 68.2% | +18.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 85s | 119 | 84.6% | +34.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 96o | 120 | 70.7% | +20.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T5o | 121 | 71.2% | +21.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J2o | 122 | 71.6% | +21.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 94s | 123 | 68.5% | +18.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 75s | 124 | 81.6% | +31.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T4o | 125 | 71.0% | +21.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 93s | 126 | 68.6% | +18.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 86o | 127 | 88.2% | +38.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 65s | 128 | 80.1% | +30.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 95o | 129 | 71.2% | +21.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 84s | 130 | 86.3% | +36.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T3o | 131 | 71.6% | +21.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 92s | 132 | 68.8% | +18.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 76o | 133 | 85.5% | +35.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 74s | 134 | 82.1% | +32.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T2o | 135 | 71.7% | +21.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 64s | 136 | 80.7% | +30.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 85o | 137 | 89.6% | +39.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 54s | 138 | 78.7% | +28.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 83s | 139 | 88.0% | +38.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 94o | 140 | 71.8% | +21.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 75o | 141 | 85.6% | +35.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 82s | 142 | 87.9% | +37.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 73s | 143 | 82.8% | +32.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 65o | 144 | 84.1% | +34.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 93o | 145 | 72.4% | +22.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 53s | 146 | 79.5% | +29.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 63s | 147 | 81.5% | +31.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 84o | 148 | 91.5% | +41.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 92o | 149 | 72.5% | +22.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 43s | 150 | 80.2% | +30.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 74o | 151 | 86.2% | +36.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 54o | 152 | 82.5% | +32.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 72s | 153 | 84.6% | +34.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 52s | 154 | 81.1% | +31.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 64o | 155 | 84.6% | +34.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 62s | 156 | 83.0% | +33.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 83o | 157 | 93.3% | +43.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 42s | 158 | 81.3% | +31.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 82o | 159 | 93.3% | +43.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 73o | 160 | 87.2% | +37.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 53o | 161 | 83.5% | +33.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 63o | 162 | 85.4% | +35.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 32s | 163 | 81.8% | +31.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 43o | 164 | 83.9% | +33.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 72o | 165 | 88.8% | +38.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 52o | 166 | 85.1% | +35.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 62o | 167 | 87.1% | +37.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 42o | 168 | 85.3% | +35.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 32o | 169 | 85.8% | +35.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of 88?
69.2% against one random opponent, which ranks it 7 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 24.1%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 15.9%.
Which hand is the worst matchup for 88?
99, which leaves 88 with 18.1%. Its best matchup is 83o at 93.3%.
How many of the 168 other hands does 88 beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 162 hands and an underdog against 6. 4 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
447 words / 35 distinct figures — Method
