169hands
MENU
pocket pair

88

69.2%
Equity vs one random hand — #7 of 169

A middle pair — frequently chased by two overcards.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
69.2% · #7
6-handed (5 opponents)
24.1% · #22
9-handed (8 opponents)
15.9% · #25
Chen score
8
Combos
6 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.45%
Favourite against
162 of 168 hands

88 (pocket eights) wins 69.2% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 7th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 4.1% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 24.1% and its rank moves to 22; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 15.9% for rank 25. A middle pair — frequently chased by two overcards.

As a pocket pair there is no suited twin; instead there are 6 combinations of it in the deck, so you are dealt it 0.45% of the time (6 of 1,326 two-card hands). The hand ranked one place above is 99 at 72.2% and one place below is AKs at 67.2%. Every pocket pair flops a set about 11.8% of the time, so the pecking order among pairs is decided almost entirely before the flop.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 88 is a favourite against 162 of them and an underdog against 6. Its best matchup is 83o at 93.3% and its worst is 99 at 18.1% — a spread of 75.2 points, which is why calling 88 simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 4 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being JTs at 50.3%.

88 shares a rank with relatively few hands, so it is rarely on the wrong side of a kicker problem. What does hurt it is running into a higher pair, where the number bottoms out at 18.1%. The table further down lists all 168 opponents individually.

Within the 13 pocket pairs it comes 7 of 13. The strongest hand in that group, AA, is 16 points away, and the weakest, 22, sits 19 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 88 lands +18.2 points from the middle of the pack, and 6 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 69.2% against one opponent, 50.2% against two, 29.2% against four and 15.9% against eight. That last figure is 143% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 8 points, and it arrives 0.45% of the time (6 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 88 reads as 69.2% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 69.2% against one opponent down to 15.9% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%35%70%69.2150.2237.7329.2424.1520.5617.9715.98opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
88 played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rank88 equityvs 50%Shape
AA119.5%-30.5PAIR VS PAIR
KK219.2%-30.8PAIR VS PAIR
QQ319.1%-30.9PAIR VS PAIR
JJ418.6%-31.4PAIR VS PAIR
TT518.3%-31.7PAIR VS PAIR
99618.1%-31.9PAIR VS PAIR
AKs852.5%+2.5PAIR VS CARDS
77981.8%+31.8PAIR VS PAIR
AQs1052.4%+2.4PAIR VS CARDS
AJs1152.5%+2.5PAIR VS CARDS
AKo1255.1%+5.1PAIR VS CARDS
ATs1352.7%+2.7PAIR VS CARDS
AQo1455.3%+5.3PAIR VS CARDS
AJo1555.2%+5.2PAIR VS CARDS
KQs1651.1%+1.1PAIR VS CARDS
661781.3%+31.3PAIR VS PAIR
A9s1854.2%+4.2PAIR VS CARDS
ATo1955.2%+5.2PAIR VS CARDS
KJs2051.5%+1.5PAIR VS CARDS
A8s2165.9%+15.9PAIR VS CARDS
KTs2251.6%+1.6PAIR VS CARDS
KQo2353.9%+3.9PAIR VS CARDS
A7s2467.3%+17.3PAIR VS CARDS
A9o2557.1%+7.1PAIR VS CARDS
KJo2653.9%+3.9PAIR VS CARDS
552781.1%+31.1PAIR VS PAIR
QJs2851.0%+1.0COINFLIP
A6s2967.5%+17.5PAIR VS CARDS
K9s3053.1%+3.1PAIR VS CARDS
A8o3170.0%+20.0PAIR VS CARDS
A5s3266.1%+16.1PAIR VS CARDS
KTo3354.0%+4.0PAIR VS CARDS
QTs3451.0%+1.0COINFLIP
A4s3566.2%+16.2PAIR VS CARDS
A7o3670.8%+20.8PAIR VS CARDS
K8s3766.0%+16.0PAIR VS CARDS
A3s3866.7%+16.7PAIR VS CARDS
QJo3953.5%+3.5PAIR VS CARDS
K9o4055.8%+5.8PAIR VS CARDS
Q9s4152.7%+2.7PAIR VS CARDS
A5o4269.4%+19.4PAIR VS CARDS
A2s4366.7%+16.7PAIR VS CARDS
K7s4467.3%+17.3PAIR VS CARDS
A6o4571.0%+21.0PAIR VS CARDS
JTs4650.3%+0.3COINFLIP
QTo4753.6%+3.6PAIR VS CARDS
444881.0%+31.0PAIR VS PAIR
K6s4967.4%+17.4PAIR VS CARDS
A4o5069.8%+19.8PAIR VS CARDS
Q8s5164.7%+14.7PAIR VS CARDS
K8o5270.0%+20.0PAIR VS CARDS
A3o5370.3%+20.3PAIR VS CARDS
K5s5466.9%+16.9PAIR VS CARDS
J9s5552.0%+2.0PAIR VS CARDS
Q9o5655.3%+5.3PAIR VS CARDS
JTo5752.8%+2.8PAIR VS CARDS
K7o5870.9%+20.9PAIR VS CARDS
K4s5967.2%+17.2PAIR VS CARDS
A2o6070.4%+20.4PAIR VS CARDS
Q7s6167.8%+17.8PAIR VS CARDS
K6o6270.9%+20.9PAIR VS CARDS
K3s6367.7%+17.7PAIR VS CARDS
J8s6463.3%+13.3PAIR VS CARDS
T9s6550.9%+0.9COINFLIP
Q8o6668.6%+18.6PAIR VS CARDS
336781.7%+31.7PAIR VS PAIR
Q6s6867.2%+17.2PAIR VS CARDS
K2s6967.9%+17.9PAIR VS CARDS
J9o7054.5%+4.5PAIR VS CARDS
K5o7170.5%+20.5PAIR VS CARDS
Q5s7267.0%+17.0PAIR VS CARDS
J7s7367.3%+17.3PAIR VS CARDS
T8s7462.1%+12.1PAIR VS CARDS
K4o7570.7%+20.7PAIR VS CARDS
Q7o7671.3%+21.3PAIR VS CARDS
Q4s7767.3%+17.3PAIR VS CARDS
J8o7867.1%+17.1PAIR VS CARDS
T9o7953.3%+3.3PAIR VS CARDS
K3o8071.5%+21.5PAIR VS CARDS
Q3s8167.6%+17.6PAIR VS CARDS
Q6o8270.8%+20.8PAIR VS CARDS
98s8360.8%+10.8PAIR VS CARDS
T7s8466.7%+16.7PAIR VS CARDS
J6s8567.6%+17.6PAIR VS CARDS
K2o8671.2%+21.2PAIR VS CARDS
Q5o8770.7%+20.7PAIR VS CARDS
228881.6%+31.6PAIR VS PAIR
Q2s8967.6%+17.6PAIR VS CARDS
J5s9067.2%+17.2PAIR VS CARDS
T8o9165.5%+15.5PAIR VS CARDS
J7o9270.8%+20.8PAIR VS CARDS
J4s9367.4%+17.4PAIR VS CARDS
97s9467.0%+17.0PAIR VS CARDS
Q4o9570.8%+20.8PAIR VS CARDS
T6s9667.0%+17.0PAIR VS CARDS
J3s9767.8%+17.8PAIR VS CARDS
98o9864.6%+14.6PAIR VS CARDS
T7o9970.3%+20.3PAIR VS CARDS
Q3o10071.4%+21.4PAIR VS CARDS
87s10182.0%+32.0PAIR VS CARDS
J6o10271.3%+21.3PAIR VS CARDS
J2s10368.1%+18.1PAIR VS CARDS
96s10467.5%+17.5PAIR VS CARDS
Q2o10571.6%+21.6PAIR VS CARDS
J5o10670.6%+20.6PAIR VS CARDS
T5s10767.7%+17.7PAIR VS CARDS
T4s10867.5%+17.5PAIR VS CARDS
97o10970.1%+20.1PAIR VS CARDS
86s11083.3%+33.3PAIR VS CARDS
J4o11171.1%+21.1PAIR VS CARDS
T6o11270.6%+20.6PAIR VS CARDS
T3s11368.0%+18.0PAIR VS CARDS
95s11467.5%+17.5PAIR VS CARDS
76s11581.6%+31.6PAIR VS CARDS
J3o11671.7%+21.7PAIR VS CARDS
87o11786.8%+36.8PAIR VS CARDS
T2s11868.2%+18.2PAIR VS CARDS
85s11984.6%+34.6PAIR VS CARDS
96o12070.7%+20.7PAIR VS CARDS
T5o12171.2%+21.2PAIR VS CARDS
J2o12271.6%+21.6PAIR VS CARDS
94s12368.5%+18.5PAIR VS CARDS
75s12481.6%+31.6PAIR VS CARDS
T4o12571.0%+21.0PAIR VS CARDS
93s12668.6%+18.6PAIR VS CARDS
86o12788.2%+38.2PAIR VS CARDS
65s12880.1%+30.1PAIR VS CARDS
95o12971.2%+21.2PAIR VS CARDS
84s13086.3%+36.3PAIR VS CARDS
T3o13171.6%+21.6PAIR VS CARDS
92s13268.8%+18.8PAIR VS CARDS
76o13385.5%+35.5PAIR VS CARDS
74s13482.1%+32.1PAIR VS CARDS
T2o13571.7%+21.7PAIR VS CARDS
64s13680.7%+30.7PAIR VS CARDS
85o13789.6%+39.6PAIR VS CARDS
54s13878.7%+28.7PAIR VS CARDS
83s13988.0%+38.0PAIR VS CARDS
94o14071.8%+21.8PAIR VS CARDS
75o14185.6%+35.6PAIR VS CARDS
82s14287.9%+37.9PAIR VS CARDS
73s14382.8%+32.8PAIR VS CARDS
65o14484.1%+34.1PAIR VS CARDS
93o14572.4%+22.4PAIR VS CARDS
53s14679.5%+29.5PAIR VS CARDS
63s14781.5%+31.5PAIR VS CARDS
84o14891.5%+41.5PAIR VS CARDS
92o14972.5%+22.5PAIR VS CARDS
43s15080.2%+30.2PAIR VS CARDS
74o15186.2%+36.2PAIR VS CARDS
54o15282.5%+32.5PAIR VS CARDS
72s15384.6%+34.6PAIR VS CARDS
52s15481.1%+31.1PAIR VS CARDS
64o15584.6%+34.6PAIR VS CARDS
62s15683.0%+33.0PAIR VS CARDS
83o15793.3%+43.3PAIR VS CARDS
42s15881.3%+31.3PAIR VS CARDS
82o15993.3%+43.3PAIR VS CARDS
73o16087.2%+37.2PAIR VS CARDS
53o16183.5%+33.5PAIR VS CARDS
63o16285.4%+35.4PAIR VS CARDS
32s16381.8%+31.8PAIR VS CARDS
43o16483.9%+33.9PAIR VS CARDS
72o16588.8%+38.8PAIR VS CARDS
52o16685.1%+35.1PAIR VS CARDS
62o16787.1%+37.1PAIR VS CARDS
42o16885.3%+35.3PAIR VS CARDS
32o16985.8%+35.8PAIR VS CARDS

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

FAQ

What is the equity of 88?

69.2% against one random opponent, which ranks it 7 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 24.1%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 15.9%.

Which hand is the worst matchup for 88?

99, which leaves 88 with 18.1%. Its best matchup is 83o at 93.3%.

How many of the 168 other hands does 88 beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 162 hands and an underdog against 6. 4 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

447 words / 35 distinct figures — Method