169hands
MENU
offsuit

Q8o

53.7%
Equity vs one random hand — #66 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
53.7% · #66
6-handed (5 opponents)
17.0% · #81
9-handed (8 opponents)
10.5% · #107
Chen score
3
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
102 of 168 hands

Q8o (queen-eight offsuit) wins 53.7% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 66th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 39.1% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 17.0% and its rank moves to 81; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 10.5% for rank 107. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin Q8s runs at 56.0% (rank 51), a gap of 2.3 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.3 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is T9s at 54.0%, and directly below is 33 at 53.7%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.3 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, Q8o is a favourite against 102 of them and an underdog against 66. Its best matchup is 82o at 75.8% and its worst is QQ at 7.8% — a spread of 68 points, which is why calling Q8o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.

Q8o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 82o at 75.8%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them KQs, which leaves Q8o with only 23.1%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 24 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 11.7 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 21.4 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, Q8o lands +2.7 points from the middle of the pack, and 65 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 53.7% against one opponent, 35.0% against two, 20.3% against four and 10.5% against eight. That last figure is 95% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why Q8o reads as 53.7% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 53.7% against one opponent down to 10.5% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%53.7135.0226.4320.3417.0514.4612.2710.58opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
Q8o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankQ8o equityvs 50%Shape
AA113.7%-36.3PAIR VS CARDS
KK213.4%-36.6PAIR VS CARDS
QQ37.8%-42.2PAIR VS CARDS
JJ428.1%-21.9PAIR VS CARDS
TT527.9%-22.1PAIR VS CARDS
99628.5%-21.5PAIR VS CARDS
88731.4%-18.6PAIR VS CARDS
AKs831.6%-18.4HIGH CARD
77944.9%-5.1PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1024.6%-25.4DOMINATED
AJs1134.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
AKo1233.2%-16.8HIGH CARD
ATs1334.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
AQo1425.3%-24.7DOMINATED
AJo1536.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
KQs1623.1%-26.9DOMINATED
661745.0%-5.0PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1835.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
ATo1935.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
KJs2033.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
A8s2124.8%-25.2DOMINATED
KTs2233.0%-17.0HIGH CARD
KQo2324.0%-26.0DOMINATED
A7s2438.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
A9o2537.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
KJo2635.1%-14.9HIGH CARD
552745.8%-4.2PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2825.9%-24.1DOMINATED
A6s2939.0%-11.0HIGH CARD
K9s3034.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
A8o3126.0%-24.0DOMINATED
A5s3238.7%-11.3HIGH CARD
KTo3334.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
QTs3426.8%-23.2DOMINATED
A4s3539.1%-10.9HIGH CARD
A7o3641.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
K8s3725.3%-24.7DOMINATED
A3s3839.4%-10.6HIGH CARD
QJo3926.8%-23.2DOMINATED
K9o4036.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
Q9s4128.9%-21.1DOMINATED
A5o4240.9%-9.1HIGH CARD
A2s4339.4%-10.6HIGH CARD
K7s4438.9%-11.1HIGH CARD
A6o4541.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
JTs4653.0%+3.0HIGH CARD
QTo4727.9%-22.1DOMINATED
444847.0%-3.0PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4938.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
A4o5041.1%-8.9HIGH CARD
Q8s5147.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
K8o5226.5%-23.5DOMINATED
A3o5341.6%-8.4HIGH CARD
K5s5439.1%-10.9HIGH CARD
J9s5554.7%+4.7HIGH CARD
Q9o5630.1%-19.9DOMINATED
JTo5756.1%+6.1HIGH CARD
K7o5841.1%-8.9HIGH CARD
K4s5939.4%-10.6HIGH CARD
A2o6041.8%-8.2HIGH CARD
Q7s6163.5%+13.5DOMINATING
K6o6240.9%-9.1HIGH CARD
K3s6340.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
J8s6469.2%+19.2DOMINATING
T9s6553.8%+3.8HIGH CARD
336748.0%-2.0PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6863.0%+13.0DOMINATING
K2s6939.8%-10.2HIGH CARD
J9o7058.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
K5o7141.1%-8.9HIGH CARD
Q5s7262.9%+12.9DOMINATING
J7s7360.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
T8s7467.6%+17.6DOMINATING
K4o7541.7%-8.3HIGH CARD
Q7o7667.5%+17.5DOMINATING
Q4s7762.9%+12.9DOMINATING
J8o7873.0%+23.0DOMINATING
T9o7957.1%+7.1HIGH CARD
K3o8042.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
Q3s8163.3%+13.3DOMINATING
Q6o8266.9%+16.9DOMINATING
98s8366.3%+16.3DOMINATING
T7s8458.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
J6s8560.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
K2o8642.2%-7.8HIGH CARD
Q5o8766.6%+16.6DOMINATING
228848.7%-1.3PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8963.6%+13.6DOMINATING
J5s9060.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
T8o9171.4%+21.4DOMINATING
J7o9263.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
J4s9360.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
97s9458.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
Q4o9566.8%+16.8DOMINATING
T6s9659.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
J3s9761.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
98o9869.9%+19.9DOMINATING
T7o9962.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
Q3o10067.4%+17.4DOMINATING
87s10167.0%+17.0DOMINATING
J6o10264.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
J2s10361.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
96s10458.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
Q2o10567.5%+17.5DOMINATING
J5o10664.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
T5s10760.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
T4s10860.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
97o10961.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
86s11067.0%+17.0DOMINATING
J4o11164.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
T6o11263.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
T3s11361.0%+11.0HIGH CARD
95s11459.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
76s11559.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
J3o11665.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
87o11771.1%+21.1DOMINATING
T2s11860.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
85s11967.9%+17.9DOMINATING
96o12062.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
T5o12164.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
J2o12264.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
94s12360.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
75s12460.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
T4o12564.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
93s12660.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
86o12770.8%+20.8DOMINATING
65s12859.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
95o12963.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
84s13069.6%+19.6DOMINATING
T3o13164.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
92s13261.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
76o13363.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
74s13461.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
T2o13564.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
64s13660.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
85o13772.2%+22.2DOMINATING
54s13858.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
83s13971.1%+21.1DOMINATING
94o14064.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
75o14164.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
82s14271.2%+21.2DOMINATING
73s14363.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
65o14462.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
93o14564.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
53s14660.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
63s14761.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
84o14873.9%+23.9DOMINATING
92o14964.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
43s15060.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
74o15165.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
54o15262.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
72s15364.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
52s15461.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
64o15564.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
62s15663.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
83o15775.5%+25.5DOMINATING
42s15861.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
82o15975.8%+25.8DOMINATING
73o16067.0%+17.0HIGH CARD
53o16164.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
63o16265.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
32s16362.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
43o16464.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
72o16568.3%+18.3HIGH CARD
52o16665.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
62o16767.3%+17.3HIGH CARD
42o16865.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
32o16966.3%+16.3HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
Q8s56.0%

FAQ

What is the equity of Q8o?

53.7% against one random opponent, which ranks it 66 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 17.0%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 10.5%.

How much better is Q8o than Q8s?

Q8o is worth 53.7% and Q8s 56.0%, a difference of 2.3 points — rank 66 versus rank 51.

How many of the 168 other hands does Q8o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 102 hands and an underdog against 66. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

425 words / 39 distinct figures — Method