Q8o
Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 53.7% · #66
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 17.0% · #81
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 10.5% · #107
- Chen score
- 3
- Combos
- 12 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.9%
- Favourite against
- 102 of 168 hands
Q8o (queen-eight offsuit) wins 53.7% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 66th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 39.1% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 17.0% and its rank moves to 81; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 10.5% for rank 107. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
Its suited/offsuit twin Q8s runs at 56.0% (rank 51), a gap of 2.3 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.3 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is T9s at 54.0%, and directly below is 33 at 53.7%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.3 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, Q8o is a favourite against 102 of them and an underdog against 66. Its best matchup is 82o at 75.8% and its worst is QQ at 7.8% — a spread of 68 points, which is why calling Q8o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.
Q8o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 82o at 75.8%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them KQs, which leaves Q8o with only 23.1%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 24 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 11.7 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 21.4 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, Q8o lands +2.7 points from the middle of the pack, and 65 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 53.7% against one opponent, 35.0% against two, 20.3% against four and 10.5% against eight. That last figure is 95% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why Q8o reads as 53.7% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 53.7% against one opponent down to 10.5% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | Q8o equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 13.7% | -36.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 13.4% | -36.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 7.8% | -42.2 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 28.1% | -21.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 27.9% | -22.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 28.5% | -21.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 31.4% | -18.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 31.6% | -18.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 44.9% | -5.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 24.6% | -25.4 | DOMINATED |
| AJs | 11 | 34.4% | -15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 33.2% | -16.8 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 25.3% | -24.7 | DOMINATED |
| AJo | 15 | 36.1% | -13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 23.1% | -26.9 | DOMINATED |
| 66 | 17 | 45.0% | -5.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 35.3% | -14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 35.7% | -14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 33.4% | -16.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A8s | 21 | 24.8% | -25.2 | DOMINATED |
| KTs | 22 | 33.0% | -17.0 | HIGH CARD |
| KQo | 23 | 24.0% | -26.0 | DOMINATED |
| A7s | 24 | 38.8% | -11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A9o | 25 | 37.1% | -12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 35.1% | -14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 55 | 27 | 45.8% | -4.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 25.9% | -24.1 | DOMINATED |
| A6s | 29 | 39.0% | -11.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A8o | 31 | 26.0% | -24.0 | DOMINATED |
| A5s | 32 | 38.7% | -11.3 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| QTs | 34 | 26.8% | -23.2 | DOMINATED |
| A4s | 35 | 39.1% | -10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 41.2% | -8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K8s | 37 | 25.3% | -24.7 | DOMINATED |
| A3s | 38 | 39.4% | -10.6 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 26.8% | -23.2 | DOMINATED |
| K9o | 40 | 36.0% | -14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9s | 41 | 28.9% | -21.1 | DOMINATED |
| A5o | 42 | 40.9% | -9.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 39.4% | -10.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 38.9% | -11.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A6o | 45 | 41.2% | -8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 53.0% | +3.0 | HIGH CARD |
| QTo | 47 | 27.9% | -22.1 | DOMINATED |
| 44 | 48 | 47.0% | -3.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 38.8% | -11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 41.1% | -8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 47.5% | -2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 26.5% | -23.5 | DOMINATED |
| A3o | 53 | 41.6% | -8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 39.1% | -10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 54.7% | +4.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 30.1% | -19.9 | DOMINATED |
| JTo | 57 | 56.1% | +6.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K7o | 58 | 41.1% | -8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K4s | 59 | 39.4% | -10.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 41.8% | -8.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 63.5% | +13.5 | DOMINATING |
| K6o | 62 | 40.9% | -9.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 40.0% | -10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 69.2% | +19.2 | DOMINATING |
| T9s | 65 | 53.8% | +3.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 48.0% | -2.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6s | 68 | 63.0% | +13.0 | DOMINATING |
| K2s | 69 | 39.8% | -10.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 58.0% | +8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 41.1% | -8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5s | 72 | 62.9% | +12.9 | DOMINATING |
| J7s | 73 | 60.2% | +10.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T8s | 74 | 67.6% | +17.6 | DOMINATING |
| K4o | 75 | 41.7% | -8.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7o | 76 | 67.5% | +17.5 | DOMINATING |
| Q4s | 77 | 62.9% | +12.9 | DOMINATING |
| J8o | 78 | 73.0% | +23.0 | DOMINATING |
| T9o | 79 | 57.1% | +7.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K3o | 80 | 42.0% | -8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 63.3% | +13.3 | DOMINATING |
| Q6o | 82 | 66.9% | +16.9 | DOMINATING |
| 98s | 83 | 66.3% | +16.3 | DOMINATING |
| T7s | 84 | 58.9% | +8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J6s | 85 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 42.2% | -7.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 66.6% | +16.6 | DOMINATING |
| 22 | 88 | 48.7% | -1.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q2s | 89 | 63.6% | +13.6 | DOMINATING |
| J5s | 90 | 60.5% | +10.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 71.4% | +21.4 | DOMINATING |
| J7o | 92 | 63.9% | +13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J4s | 93 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 58.0% | +8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4o | 95 | 66.8% | +16.8 | DOMINATING |
| T6s | 96 | 59.8% | +9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 61.1% | +11.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 69.9% | +19.9 | DOMINATING |
| T7o | 99 | 62.7% | +12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3o | 100 | 67.4% | +17.4 | DOMINATING |
| 87s | 101 | 67.0% | +17.0 | DOMINATING |
| J6o | 102 | 64.9% | +14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 61.2% | +11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 58.9% | +8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 67.5% | +17.5 | DOMINATING |
| J5o | 106 | 64.2% | +14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 60.6% | +10.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 60.6% | +10.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 97o | 109 | 61.6% | +11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 86s | 110 | 67.0% | +17.0 | DOMINATING |
| J4o | 111 | 64.5% | +14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 63.6% | +13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 61.0% | +11.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 95s | 114 | 59.8% | +9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 59.0% | +9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J3o | 116 | 65.0% | +15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 87o | 117 | 71.1% | +21.1 | DOMINATING |
| T2s | 118 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 67.9% | +17.9 | DOMINATING |
| 96o | 120 | 62.4% | +12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 64.4% | +14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 64.9% | +14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 60.7% | +10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 60.1% | +10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 64.3% | +14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 93s | 126 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 70.8% | +20.8 | DOMINATING |
| 65s | 128 | 59.0% | +9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 63.4% | +13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 69.6% | +19.6 | DOMINATING |
| T3o | 131 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 92s | 132 | 61.2% | +11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 63.1% | +13.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 74s | 134 | 61.5% | +11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 64s | 136 | 60.4% | +10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 72.2% | +22.2 | DOMINATING |
| 54s | 138 | 58.9% | +8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 71.1% | +21.1 | DOMINATING |
| 94o | 140 | 64.5% | +14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 64.0% | +14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 71.2% | +21.2 | DOMINATING |
| 73s | 143 | 63.0% | +13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 65o | 144 | 62.6% | +12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 93o | 145 | 64.9% | +14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 60.5% | +10.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 61.9% | +11.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 73.9% | +23.9 | DOMINATING |
| 92o | 149 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 65.5% | +15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 62.6% | +12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 64.4% | +14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 61.5% | +11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 64o | 155 | 64.2% | +14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 63.2% | +13.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 75.5% | +25.5 | DOMINATING |
| 42s | 158 | 61.9% | +11.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 75.8% | +25.8 | DOMINATING |
| 73o | 160 | 67.0% | +17.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 53o | 161 | 64.2% | +14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 63o | 162 | 65.6% | +15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 62.6% | +12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 64.6% | +14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 68.3% | +18.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 52o | 166 | 65.6% | +15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 67.3% | +17.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 65.6% | +15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 66.3% | +16.3 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of Q8o?
53.7% against one random opponent, which ranks it 66 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 17.0%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 10.5%.
How much better is Q8o than Q8s?
Q8o is worth 53.7% and Q8s 56.0%, a difference of 2.3 points — rank 66 versus rank 51.
How many of the 168 other hands does Q8o beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 102 hands and an underdog against 66. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
425 words / 39 distinct figures — Method
