169hands
MENU
offsuitone gapper

T8o

49.8%
Equity vs one random hand — #91 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
49.8% · #91
6-handed (5 opponents)
16.6% · #86
9-handed (8 opponents)
11.3% · #89
Chen score
5
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
70 of 168 hands

T8o (ten-eight offsuit) wins 49.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 91th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 53.8% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 16.6% and its rank moves to 86; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 11.3% for rank 89. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin T8s runs at 52.3% (rank 74), a gap of 2.5 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.5 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is J5s at 50.0%, and directly below is J7o at 49.7%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.3 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, T8o is a favourite against 70 of them and an underdog against 98. Its best matchup is 82o at 74.9% and its worst is TT at 11.4% — a spread of 63.5 points, which is why calling T8o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 3 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 33 at 50.1%.

T8o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 82o at 74.9%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them KTs, which leaves T8o with only 25.7%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 35 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 15.6 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 17.5 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, T8o lands -1.2 points from the middle of the pack, and 90 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 49.8% against one opponent, 33.5% against two, 20.2% against four and 11.3% against eight. That last figure is 102% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why T8o reads as 49.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 49.8% against one opponent down to 11.3% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%25%50%49.8133.5225.6320.2416.6514.6612.4711.38opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
T8o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankT8o equityvs 50%Shape
AA117.2%-32.8PAIR VS CARDS
KK217.0%-33.0PAIR VS CARDS
QQ315.6%-34.4PAIR VS CARDS
JJ414.2%-35.8PAIR VS CARDS
TT511.4%-38.6PAIR VS CARDS
99629.5%-20.5PAIR VS CARDS
88734.5%-15.5PAIR VS CARDS
AKs834.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
77945.8%-4.2PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1034.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
AJs1133.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
AKo1235.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
ATs1327.1%-22.9DOMINATED
AQo1435.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
AJo1535.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
KQs1633.0%-17.0HIGH CARD
661747.4%-2.6PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1837.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
ATo1928.2%-21.8DOMINATED
KJs2033.0%-17.0HIGH CARD
A8s2127.9%-22.1DOMINATED
KTs2225.7%-24.3DOMINATED
KQo2334.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
A7s2440.7%-9.3HIGH CARD
A9o2539.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
KJo2634.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
552748.6%-1.4PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2832.1%-17.9HIGH CARD
A6s2941.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
K9s3036.8%-13.2HIGH CARD
A8o3129.4%-20.6DOMINATED
A5s3241.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
KTo3326.9%-23.1DOMINATED
QTs3426.5%-23.5DOMINATED
A4s3541.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
A7o3642.9%-7.1HIGH CARD
K8s3728.1%-21.9DOMINATED
A3s3842.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
QJo3933.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
K9o4038.5%-11.5HIGH CARD
Q9s4135.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
A5o4243.9%-6.1HIGH CARD
A2s4341.8%-8.2HIGH CARD
K7s4440.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
A6o4543.6%-6.4HIGH CARD
JTs4625.9%-24.1DOMINATED
QTo4727.3%-22.7DOMINATED
444849.0%-1.0COINFLIP
K6s4941.1%-8.9HIGH CARD
A4o5043.7%-6.3HIGH CARD
Q8s5127.5%-22.5DOMINATED
K8o5229.6%-20.4DOMINATED
A3o5344.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
K5s5441.8%-8.2HIGH CARD
J9s5534.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
Q9o5637.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
JTo5726.6%-23.4DOMINATED
K7o5842.7%-7.3HIGH CARD
K4s5941.8%-8.2HIGH CARD
A2o6044.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
Q7s6140.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
K6o6243.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
K3s6342.4%-7.6HIGH CARD
J8s6426.7%-23.3DOMINATED
T9s6529.1%-20.9DOMINATED
Q8o6628.6%-21.4DOMINATED
336750.1%+0.1COINFLIP
Q6s6841.0%-9.0HIGH CARD
K2s6942.2%-7.8HIGH CARD
J9o7036.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
K5o7144.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
Q5s7241.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
J7s7340.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
T8s7447.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
K4o7544.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
Q7o7642.9%-7.1HIGH CARD
Q4s7741.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
J8o7827.6%-22.4DOMINATED
T9o7930.5%-19.5DOMINATED
K3o8044.5%-5.5HIGH CARD
Q3s8142.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
Q6o8243.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
98s8367.8%+17.8DOMINATING
T7s8463.2%+13.2DOMINATING
J6s8541.4%-8.6HIGH CARD
K2o8644.6%-5.4HIGH CARD
Q5o8744.1%-5.9HIGH CARD
228850.6%+0.6COINFLIP
Q2s8942.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
J5s9041.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
J7o9242.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
J4s9341.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
97s9459.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
Q4o9544.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
T6s9663.5%+13.5DOMINATING
J3s9742.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
98o9871.7%+21.7DOMINATING
T7o9966.9%+16.9DOMINATING
Q3o10044.5%-5.5HIGH CARD
87s10166.7%+16.7DOMINATING
J6o10243.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
J2s10342.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
96s10460.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
Q2o10544.7%-5.3HIGH CARD
J5o10644.1%-5.9HIGH CARD
T5s10763.6%+13.6DOMINATING
T4s10863.6%+13.6DOMINATING
97o10963.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
86s11067.4%+17.4DOMINATING
J4o11144.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
T6o11267.2%+17.2DOMINATING
T3s11364.1%+14.1DOMINATING
95s11461.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
76s11560.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
J3o11644.7%-5.3HIGH CARD
87o11771.0%+21.0DOMINATING
T2s11864.2%+14.2DOMINATING
85s11968.6%+18.6DOMINATING
96o12064.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
T5o12167.4%+17.4DOMINATING
J2o12244.5%-5.5HIGH CARD
94s12362.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
75s12461.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
T4o12567.4%+17.4DOMINATING
93s12663.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
86o12771.4%+21.4DOMINATING
65s12860.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
95o12965.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
84s13068.7%+18.7DOMINATING
T3o13167.9%+17.9DOMINATING
92s13263.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
76o13364.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
74s13462.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
T2o13568.1%+18.1DOMINATING
64s13661.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
85o13772.9%+22.9DOMINATING
54s13859.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
83s13970.5%+20.5DOMINATING
94o14066.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
75o14165.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
82s14270.5%+20.5DOMINATING
73s14364.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
65o14464.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
93o14566.8%+16.8HIGH CARD
53s14661.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
63s14762.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
84o14873.1%+23.1DOMINATING
92o14967.1%+17.1HIGH CARD
43s15061.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
74o15166.8%+16.8HIGH CARD
54o15263.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
72s15365.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
52s15462.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
64o15565.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
62s15663.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
83o15774.7%+24.7DOMINATING
42s15862.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
82o15974.9%+24.9DOMINATING
73o16068.2%+18.2HIGH CARD
53o16165.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
63o16266.5%+16.5HIGH CARD
32s16362.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
43o16465.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
72o16569.6%+19.6HIGH CARD
52o16666.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
62o16768.0%+18.0HIGH CARD
42o16866.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
32o16966.7%+16.7HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
T8s52.3%

FAQ

What is the equity of T8o?

49.8% against one random opponent, which ranks it 91 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 16.6%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 11.3%.

How much better is T8o than T8s?

T8o is worth 49.8% and T8s 52.3%, a difference of 2.5 points — rank 91 versus rank 74.

How many of the 168 other hands does T8o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 70 hands and an underdog against 98. 3 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

440 words / 44 distinct figures — Method