65s

65s (six-five suited) wins 43.0% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 128th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 75.7% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 16.9% and its rank moves to 83; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 12.6% for rank 65. A suited connector — straight and flush draws in the same holding.

Its suited/offsuit twin 65o runs at 39.9% (rank 144), a gap of 3.1 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 3.1 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 86o at 43.2%, and directly below is 95o at 42.8%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 65s is a favourite against 22 of them and an underdog against 146. Its best matchup is 52o at 66.4% and its worst is 66 at 18.6% — a spread of 47.8 points, which is why calling 65s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 5 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 73o at 49.9%.

65s dominates 7 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 52o at 66.4%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A6s, which leaves 65s with only 32.3%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 62 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 24.2 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 7.1 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 65s lands -8 points from the middle of the pack, and 127 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 43.0% against one opponent, 30.1% against two, 19.5% against four and 12.6% against eight. That last figure is 114% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 6 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 65s reads as 43.0% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.