64o

64o (six-four offsuit) wins 37.9% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 155th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 91.7% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 12.0% and its rank moves to 146; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 8.2% for rank 140. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin 64s runs at 41.4% (rank 136), a gap of 3.5 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.5 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 52s at 37.9%, and directly below is 62s at 37.6%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.3 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 64o is a favourite against 16 of them and an underdog against 152. Its best matchup is 42o at 64.4% and its worst is 66 at 11.8% — a spread of 52.6 points, which is why calling 64o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 63s at 50.9%.

64o dominates 5 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 42o at 64.4%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A6s, which leaves 64o with only 26.7%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 67 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 27.5 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 5.6 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 64o lands -13.1 points from the middle of the pack, and 154 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 37.9% against one opponent, 24.4% against two, 14.3% against four and 8.2% against eight. That last figure is 74% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 64o reads as 37.9% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.