Q2o

Q2o (queen-deuce offsuit) wins 47.3% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 105th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 62.1% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 12.4% and its rank moves to 143; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 7.8% for rank 146. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin Q2s runs at 50.1% (rank 89), a gap of 2.8 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.8 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 96s at 47.3%, and directly below is J5o at 47.2%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.1 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, Q2o is a favourite against 90 of them and an underdog against 78. Its best matchup is J2o at 74.8% and its worst is QQ at 5.6% — a spread of 69.2 points, which is why calling Q2o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being JTs at 50.8%.

Q2o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against J2o at 74.8%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AQs, which leaves Q2o with only 21.7%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 42 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 18.1 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 15 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, Q2o lands -3.7 points from the middle of the pack, and 104 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 47.3% against one opponent, 28.5% against two, 15.5% against four and 7.8% against eight. That last figure is 70% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 2 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why Q2o reads as 47.3% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.