62s

62s (six-deuce suited) wins 37.6% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 156th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 92.3% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 13.4% and its rank moves to 132; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 9.9% for rank 118. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin 62o runs at 34.1% (rank 167), a gap of 3.5 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 3.5 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 64o at 37.9%, and directly below is 83o at 37.3%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.6 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 62s is a favourite against 13 of them and an underdog against 155. Its best matchup is 42o at 64.6% and its worst is 66 at 13.5% — a spread of 51.1 points, which is why calling 62s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 54s at 50.8%.

62s dominates 6 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 42o at 64.6%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A6s, which leaves 62s with only 27.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 76 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 29.6 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 1.7 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 62s lands -13.4 points from the middle of the pack, and 155 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 37.6% against one opponent, 24.7% against two, 15.5% against four and 9.9% against eight. That last figure is 89% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 1 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 62s reads as 37.6% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.