KTs
A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 61.8% · #22
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 25.9% · #16
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 18.5% · #14
- Chen score
- 8
- Combos
- 4 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.3%
- Favourite against
- 131 of 168 hands
KTs (king-ten suited) wins 61.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 22th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 13% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 25.9% and its rank moves to 16; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 18.5% for rank 14. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.
Its suited/offsuit twin KTo runs at 59.8% (rank 33), a gap of 2 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is A8s at 61.9%, and directly below is KQo at 61.5%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, KTs is a favourite against 131 of them and an underdog against 37. Its best matchup is T2o at 77.5% and its worst is KK at 14.6% — a spread of 62.9 points, which is why calling KTs simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 4 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 55 at 50.2%.
KTs dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against T2o at 77.5%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them ATs, which leaves KTs with only 28.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 suited hands it comes 9 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 5.4 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 25.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, KTs lands +10.8 points from the middle of the pack, and 21 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 61.8% against one opponent, 44.9% against two, 29.7% against four and 18.5% against eight. That last figure is 167% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 8 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why KTs reads as 61.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 61.8% against one opponent down to 18.5% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | KTs equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 17.6% | -32.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 14.6% | -35.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 32.5% | -17.5 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 32.2% | -17.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 35.8% | -14.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 47.4% | -2.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 48.4% | -1.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 29.2% | -20.8 | DOMINATED |
| 77 | 9 | 48.5% | -1.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 38.4% | -11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 38.0% | -12.0 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 30.0% | -20.0 | DOMINATED |
| ATs | 13 | 28.8% | -21.2 | DOMINATED |
| AQo | 14 | 41.1% | -8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 40.8% | -9.2 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 29.3% | -20.7 | DOMINATED |
| 66 | 17 | 49.2% | -0.8 | COINFLIP |
| A9s | 18 | 42.7% | -7.3 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 29.9% | -20.1 | DOMINATED |
| KJs | 20 | 30.1% | -19.9 | DOMINATED |
| A8s | 21 | 43.2% | -6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| KQo | 23 | 30.5% | -19.5 | DOMINATED |
| A7s | 24 | 43.2% | -6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A9o | 25 | 45.3% | -4.7 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 31.3% | -18.7 | DOMINATED |
| 55 | 27 | 50.2% | +0.2 | COINFLIP |
| QJs | 28 | 58.8% | +8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A6s | 29 | 43.5% | -6.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 69.2% | +19.2 | DOMINATING |
| A8o | 31 | 45.8% | -4.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 43.2% | -6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 52.4% | +2.4 | HIGH CARD |
| QTs | 34 | 70.6% | +20.6 | DOMINATING |
| A4s | 35 | 43.0% | -7.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 45.7% | -4.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K8s | 37 | 69.4% | +19.4 | DOMINATING |
| A3s | 38 | 43.2% | -6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 61.6% | +11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 73.1% | +23.1 | DOMINATING |
| Q9s | 41 | 63.2% | +13.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A5o | 42 | 45.9% | -4.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 43.6% | -6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 69.2% | +19.2 | DOMINATING |
| A6o | 45 | 46.2% | -3.8 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 69.0% | +19.0 | DOMINATING |
| QTo | 47 | 74.6% | +24.6 | DOMINATING |
| 44 | 48 | 50.6% | +0.6 | COINFLIP |
| K6s | 49 | 68.9% | +18.9 | DOMINATING |
| A4o | 50 | 46.0% | -4.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 63.9% | +13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 73.5% | +23.5 | DOMINATING |
| A3o | 53 | 46.1% | -3.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 69.0% | +19.0 | DOMINATING |
| J9s | 55 | 62.1% | +12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 65.9% | +15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| JTo | 57 | 73.2% | +23.2 | DOMINATING |
| K7o | 58 | 73.1% | +23.1 | DOMINATING |
| K4s | 59 | 69.1% | +19.1 | DOMINATING |
| A2o | 60 | 46.1% | -3.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 64.9% | +14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K6o | 62 | 73.0% | +23.0 | DOMINATING |
| K3s | 63 | 69.7% | +19.7 | DOMINATING |
| J8s | 64 | 62.7% | +12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 68.7% | +18.7 | DOMINATING |
| Q8o | 66 | 67.0% | +17.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 51.0% | +1.0 | COINFLIP |
| Q6s | 68 | 64.4% | +14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 69.8% | +19.8 | DOMINATING |
| J9o | 70 | 64.6% | +14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 73.0% | +23.0 | DOMINATING |
| Q5s | 72 | 64.5% | +14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J7s | 73 | 63.8% | +13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T8s | 74 | 70.0% | +20.0 | DOMINATING |
| K4o | 75 | 73.1% | +23.1 | DOMINATING |
| Q7o | 76 | 67.8% | +17.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4s | 77 | 64.2% | +14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J8o | 78 | 65.8% | +15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 72.5% | +22.5 | DOMINATING |
| K3o | 80 | 73.7% | +23.7 | DOMINATING |
| Q3s | 81 | 64.9% | +14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q6o | 82 | 67.2% | +17.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 62.8% | +12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 69.8% | +19.8 | DOMINATING |
| J6s | 85 | 64.3% | +14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 73.9% | +23.9 | DOMINATING |
| Q5o | 87 | 67.4% | +17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 22 | 88 | 51.9% | +1.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q2s | 89 | 65.1% | +15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J5s | 90 | 64.3% | +14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 74.3% | +24.3 | DOMINATING |
| J7o | 92 | 66.3% | +16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J4s | 93 | 64.3% | +14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 63.3% | +13.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4o | 95 | 67.3% | +17.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T6s | 96 | 70.9% | +20.9 | DOMINATING |
| J3s | 97 | 64.7% | +14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 65.5% | +15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 73.8% | +23.8 | DOMINATING |
| Q3o | 100 | 68.2% | +18.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 87s | 101 | 62.1% | +12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J6o | 102 | 67.4% | +17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 65.1% | +15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 64.4% | +14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 68.2% | +18.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 67.4% | +17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 72.2% | +22.2 | DOMINATING |
| T4s | 108 | 72.2% | +22.2 | DOMINATING |
| 97o | 109 | 66.3% | +16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 86s | 110 | 63.3% | +13.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 67.0% | +17.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 75.2% | +25.2 | DOMINATING |
| T3s | 113 | 72.6% | +22.6 | DOMINATING |
| 95s | 114 | 65.4% | +15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 62.0% | +12.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J3o | 116 | 67.8% | +17.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 87o | 117 | 65.1% | +15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T2s | 118 | 73.1% | +23.1 | DOMINATING |
| 85s | 119 | 64.0% | +14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 67.4% | +17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 76.3% | +26.3 | DOMINATING |
| J2o | 122 | 68.3% | +18.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 66.6% | +16.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 63.0% | +13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 76.4% | +26.4 | DOMINATING |
| 93s | 126 | 66.9% | +16.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 66.1% | +16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 62.3% | +12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 68.5% | +18.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 65.2% | +15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 76.9% | +26.9 | DOMINATING |
| 92s | 132 | 67.0% | +17.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 64.7% | +14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 74s | 134 | 64.2% | +14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 77.5% | +27.5 | DOMINATING |
| 64s | 136 | 63.0% | +13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 67.4% | +17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 61.8% | +11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 66.7% | +16.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 69.6% | +19.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 65.9% | +15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 66.9% | +16.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 65.3% | +15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 65o | 144 | 65.0% | +15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 93o | 145 | 69.8% | +19.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 63.2% | +13.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 64.3% | +14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 68.4% | +18.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 70.0% | +20.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 63.2% | +13.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 67.1% | +17.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 66.6% | +16.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 64.6% | +14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 64o | 155 | 66.1% | +16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 65.6% | +15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 69.8% | +19.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 69.7% | +19.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 68.4% | +18.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 53o | 161 | 66.3% | +16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 63o | 162 | 67.4% | +17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 65.0% | +15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 66.3% | +16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 69.9% | +19.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 52o | 166 | 67.6% | +17.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 68.7% | +18.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 67.5% | +17.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 68.2% | +18.2 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of KTs?
61.8% against one random opponent, which ranks it 22 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 25.9%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 18.5%.
How much better is KTs than KTo?
KTs is worth 61.8% and KTo 59.8%, a difference of 2 points — rank 22 versus rank 33.
How many of the 168 other hands does KTs beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 131 hands and an underdog against 37. 4 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
447 words / 39 distinct figures — Method
