169hands
MENU
suitedbroadway

KTs

61.8%
Equity vs one random hand — #22 of 169

A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
61.8% · #22
6-handed (5 opponents)
25.9% · #16
9-handed (8 opponents)
18.5% · #14
Chen score
8
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
131 of 168 hands

KTs (king-ten suited) wins 61.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 22th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 13% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 25.9% and its rank moves to 16; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 18.5% for rank 14. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin KTo runs at 59.8% (rank 33), a gap of 2 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is A8s at 61.9%, and directly below is KQo at 61.5%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, KTs is a favourite against 131 of them and an underdog against 37. Its best matchup is T2o at 77.5% and its worst is KK at 14.6% — a spread of 62.9 points, which is why calling KTs simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 4 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 55 at 50.2%.

KTs dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against T2o at 77.5%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them ATs, which leaves KTs with only 28.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 9 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 5.4 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 25.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, KTs lands +10.8 points from the middle of the pack, and 21 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 61.8% against one opponent, 44.9% against two, 29.7% against four and 18.5% against eight. That last figure is 167% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 8 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why KTs reads as 61.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 61.8% against one opponent down to 18.5% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%35%70%61.8144.9235.8329.7425.9522.7620.4718.58opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
KTs played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankKTs equityvs 50%Shape
AA117.6%-32.4PAIR VS CARDS
KK214.6%-35.4PAIR VS CARDS
QQ332.5%-17.5PAIR VS CARDS
JJ432.2%-17.8PAIR VS CARDS
TT535.8%-14.2PAIR VS CARDS
99647.4%-2.6PAIR VS CARDS
88748.4%-1.6PAIR VS CARDS
AKs829.2%-20.8DOMINATED
77948.5%-1.5PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1038.4%-11.6HIGH CARD
AJs1138.0%-12.0HIGH CARD
AKo1230.0%-20.0DOMINATED
ATs1328.8%-21.2DOMINATED
AQo1441.1%-8.9HIGH CARD
AJo1540.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
KQs1629.3%-20.7DOMINATED
661749.2%-0.8COINFLIP
A9s1842.7%-7.3HIGH CARD
ATo1929.9%-20.1DOMINATED
KJs2030.1%-19.9DOMINATED
A8s2143.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
KQo2330.5%-19.5DOMINATED
A7s2443.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
A9o2545.3%-4.7HIGH CARD
KJo2631.3%-18.7DOMINATED
552750.2%+0.2COINFLIP
QJs2858.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
A6s2943.5%-6.5HIGH CARD
K9s3069.2%+19.2DOMINATING
A8o3145.8%-4.2HIGH CARD
A5s3243.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
KTo3352.4%+2.4HIGH CARD
QTs3470.6%+20.6DOMINATING
A4s3543.0%-7.0HIGH CARD
A7o3645.7%-4.3HIGH CARD
K8s3769.4%+19.4DOMINATING
A3s3843.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
QJo3961.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
K9o4073.1%+23.1DOMINATING
Q9s4163.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
A5o4245.9%-4.1HIGH CARD
A2s4343.6%-6.4HIGH CARD
K7s4469.2%+19.2DOMINATING
A6o4546.2%-3.8HIGH CARD
JTs4669.0%+19.0DOMINATING
QTo4774.6%+24.6DOMINATING
444850.6%+0.6COINFLIP
K6s4968.9%+18.9DOMINATING
A4o5046.0%-4.0HIGH CARD
Q8s5163.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
K8o5273.5%+23.5DOMINATING
A3o5346.1%-3.9HIGH CARD
K5s5469.0%+19.0DOMINATING
J9s5562.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
Q9o5665.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
JTo5773.2%+23.2DOMINATING
K7o5873.1%+23.1DOMINATING
K4s5969.1%+19.1DOMINATING
A2o6046.1%-3.9HIGH CARD
Q7s6164.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
K6o6273.0%+23.0DOMINATING
K3s6369.7%+19.7DOMINATING
J8s6462.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
T9s6568.7%+18.7DOMINATING
Q8o6667.0%+17.0HIGH CARD
336751.0%+1.0COINFLIP
Q6s6864.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
K2s6969.8%+19.8DOMINATING
J9o7064.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
K5o7173.0%+23.0DOMINATING
Q5s7264.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
J7s7363.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
T8s7470.0%+20.0DOMINATING
K4o7573.1%+23.1DOMINATING
Q7o7667.8%+17.8HIGH CARD
Q4s7764.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
J8o7865.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
T9o7972.5%+22.5DOMINATING
K3o8073.7%+23.7DOMINATING
Q3s8164.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
Q6o8267.2%+17.2HIGH CARD
98s8362.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
T7s8469.8%+19.8DOMINATING
J6s8564.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
K2o8673.9%+23.9DOMINATING
Q5o8767.4%+17.4HIGH CARD
228851.9%+1.9PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8965.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
J5s9064.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
T8o9174.3%+24.3DOMINATING
J7o9266.3%+16.3HIGH CARD
J4s9364.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
97s9463.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
Q4o9567.3%+17.3HIGH CARD
T6s9670.9%+20.9DOMINATING
J3s9764.7%+14.7HIGH CARD
98o9865.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
T7o9973.8%+23.8DOMINATING
Q3o10068.2%+18.2HIGH CARD
87s10162.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
J6o10267.4%+17.4HIGH CARD
J2s10365.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
96s10464.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
Q2o10568.2%+18.2HIGH CARD
J5o10667.4%+17.4HIGH CARD
T5s10772.2%+22.2DOMINATING
T4s10872.2%+22.2DOMINATING
97o10966.3%+16.3HIGH CARD
86s11063.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
J4o11167.0%+17.0HIGH CARD
T6o11275.2%+25.2DOMINATING
T3s11372.6%+22.6DOMINATING
95s11465.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
76s11562.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
J3o11667.8%+17.8HIGH CARD
87o11765.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
T2s11873.1%+23.1DOMINATING
85s11964.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
96o12067.4%+17.4HIGH CARD
T5o12176.3%+26.3DOMINATING
J2o12268.3%+18.3HIGH CARD
94s12366.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
75s12463.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
T4o12576.4%+26.4DOMINATING
93s12666.9%+16.9HIGH CARD
86o12766.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
65s12862.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
95o12968.5%+18.5HIGH CARD
84s13065.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
T3o13176.9%+26.9DOMINATING
92s13267.0%+17.0HIGH CARD
76o13364.7%+14.7HIGH CARD
74s13464.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
T2o13577.5%+27.5DOMINATING
64s13663.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
85o13767.4%+17.4HIGH CARD
54s13861.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
83s13966.7%+16.7HIGH CARD
94o14069.6%+19.6HIGH CARD
75o14165.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
82s14266.9%+16.9HIGH CARD
73s14365.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
65o14465.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
93o14569.8%+19.8HIGH CARD
53s14663.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
63s14764.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
84o14868.4%+18.4HIGH CARD
92o14970.0%+20.0HIGH CARD
43s15063.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
74o15167.1%+17.1HIGH CARD
54o15264.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
72s15366.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
52s15464.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
64o15566.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
62s15665.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
83o15769.8%+19.8HIGH CARD
42s15864.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
82o15969.7%+19.7HIGH CARD
73o16068.4%+18.4HIGH CARD
53o16166.3%+16.3HIGH CARD
63o16267.4%+17.4HIGH CARD
32s16365.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
43o16466.3%+16.3HIGH CARD
72o16569.9%+19.9HIGH CARD
52o16667.6%+17.6HIGH CARD
62o16768.7%+18.7HIGH CARD
42o16867.5%+17.5HIGH CARD
32o16968.2%+18.2HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
KTo59.8%

FAQ

What is the equity of KTs?

61.8% against one random opponent, which ranks it 22 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 25.9%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 18.5%.

How much better is KTs than KTo?

KTs is worth 61.8% and KTo 59.8%, a difference of 2 points — rank 22 versus rank 33.

How many of the 168 other hands does KTs beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 131 hands and an underdog against 37. 4 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

447 words / 39 distinct figures — Method