169hands
MENU
suited

J2s

47.3%
Equity vs one random hand — #103 of 169

A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
47.3% · #103
6-handed (5 opponents)
16.0% · #96
9-handed (8 opponents)
11.4% · #86
Chen score
3
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
73 of 168 hands

J2s (jack-deuce suited) wins 47.3% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 103th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 60.9% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 16.0% and its rank moves to 96; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 11.4% for rank 86. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin J2o runs at 44.4% (rank 122), a gap of 2.9 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.9 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is J6o at 47.8%, and directly below is 96s at 47.3%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.5 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, J2s is a favourite against 73 of them and an underdog against 95. Its best matchup is T2o at 75.2% and its worst is JJ at 11.3% — a spread of 63.9 points, which is why calling J2s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being J3o at 49.7%.

J2s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against T2o at 75.2%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AJs, which leaves J2s with only 26.2%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 49 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 19.9 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 11.4 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, J2s lands -3.7 points from the middle of the pack, and 102 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 47.3% against one opponent, 30.4% against two, 18.6% against four and 11.4% against eight. That last figure is 103% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why J2s reads as 47.3% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 47.3% against one opponent down to 11.4% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%25%50%47.3130.4222.9318.6416.0513.7612.5711.48opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
J2s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankJ2s equityvs 50%Shape
AA115.8%-34.2PAIR VS CARDS
KK215.8%-34.2PAIR VS CARDS
QQ315.6%-34.4PAIR VS CARDS
JJ411.3%-38.7PAIR VS CARDS
TT530.6%-19.4PAIR VS CARDS
99631.3%-18.7PAIR VS CARDS
88731.9%-18.1PAIR VS CARDS
AKs833.1%-16.9HIGH CARD
77932.6%-17.4PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1032.8%-17.2HIGH CARD
AJs1126.2%-23.8DOMINATED
AKo1235.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
ATs1335.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
AQo1435.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
AJo1527.2%-22.8DOMINATED
KQs1632.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
661733.5%-16.5PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1837.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
ATo1938.1%-11.9HIGH CARD
KJs2026.9%-23.1DOMINATED
A8s2137.2%-12.8HIGH CARD
KTs2234.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
KQo2334.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
A7s2437.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
A9o2539.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
KJo2627.8%-22.2DOMINATED
552733.6%-16.4PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2827.2%-22.8DOMINATED
A6s2937.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
K9s3036.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
A8o3139.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
A5s3236.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
KTo3337.5%-12.5HIGH CARD
QTs3433.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
A4s3536.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
A7o3639.4%-10.6HIGH CARD
K8s3737.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
A3s3836.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
QJo3927.8%-22.2DOMINATED
K9o4038.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
Q9s4135.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
A5o4238.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
A2s4327.8%-22.2DOMINATED
K7s4437.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
A6o4540.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
JTs4629.9%-20.1DOMINATED
QTo4736.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
444834.4%-15.6PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4937.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
A4o5039.0%-11.0HIGH CARD
Q8s5136.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
K8o5239.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
A3o5339.0%-11.0HIGH CARD
K5s5437.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
J9s5531.9%-18.1DOMINATED
Q9o5637.7%-12.3HIGH CARD
JTo5731.2%-18.8DOMINATED
K7o5839.5%-10.5HIGH CARD
K4s5937.2%-12.8HIGH CARD
A2o6028.8%-21.2DOMINATED
Q7s6137.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
K6o6240.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
K3s6337.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
J8s6434.4%-15.6DOMINATED
T9s6554.2%+4.2HIGH CARD
Q8o6638.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
336734.8%-15.2PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6837.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
K2s6928.3%-21.7DOMINATED
J9o7033.4%-16.6DOMINATED
K5o7139.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
Q5s7236.9%-13.1HIGH CARD
J7s7337.5%-12.5DOMINATED
T8s7455.2%+5.2HIGH CARD
K4o7539.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
Q7o7639.8%-10.2HIGH CARD
Q4s7736.9%-13.1HIGH CARD
J8o7836.1%-13.9DOMINATED
T9o7956.7%+6.7HIGH CARD
K3o8040.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
Q3s8137.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
Q6o8239.7%-10.3HIGH CARD
98s8353.8%+3.8HIGH CARD
T7s8456.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
J6s8541.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
K2o8629.3%-20.7DOMINATED
Q5o8739.4%-10.6HIGH CARD
228837.1%-12.9PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8928.5%-21.5DOMINATED
J5s9044.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
T8o9157.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
J7o9239.4%-10.6DOMINATED
J4s9346.9%-3.1HIGH CARD
97s9454.8%+4.8HIGH CARD
Q4o9539.3%-10.7HIGH CARD
T6s9657.5%+7.5HIGH CARD
J3s9747.3%-2.7HIGH CARD
98o9856.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
T7o9958.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
Q3o10039.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
87s10153.9%+3.9HIGH CARD
J6o10243.7%-6.3HIGH CARD
96s10456.3%+6.3HIGH CARD
Q2o10529.4%-20.6DOMINATED
J5o10646.8%-3.2HIGH CARD
T5s10758.5%+8.5HIGH CARD
T4s10858.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
97o10957.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
86s11055.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
J4o11149.4%-0.6COINFLIP
T6o11260.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
T3s11358.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
95s11457.5%+7.5HIGH CARD
76s11554.3%+4.3HIGH CARD
J3o11649.7%-0.3COINFLIP
87o11756.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
T2s11870.9%+20.9DOMINATING
85s11956.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
96o12059.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
T5o12161.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
J2o12252.6%+2.6HIGH CARD
94s12358.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
75s12455.1%+5.1HIGH CARD
T4o12561.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
93s12658.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
86o12757.8%+7.8HIGH CARD
65s12854.8%+4.8HIGH CARD
95o12960.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
84s13057.8%+7.8HIGH CARD
T3o13161.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
92s13270.8%+20.8DOMINATING
76o13356.9%+6.9HIGH CARD
74s13456.3%+6.3HIGH CARD
T2o13575.2%+25.2DOMINATING
64s13656.1%+6.1HIGH CARD
85o13759.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
54s13854.8%+4.8HIGH CARD
83s13958.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
94o14061.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
75o14158.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
82s14270.5%+20.5DOMINATING
73s14357.5%+7.5HIGH CARD
65o14457.5%+7.5HIGH CARD
93o14561.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
53s14656.1%+6.1HIGH CARD
63s14757.1%+7.1HIGH CARD
84o14860.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
92o14975.1%+25.1DOMINATING
43s15056.3%+6.3HIGH CARD
74o15159.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
54o15257.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
72s15370.3%+20.3DOMINATING
52s15467.7%+17.7DOMINATING
64o15558.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
62s15669.4%+19.4DOMINATING
83o15761.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
42s15868.1%+18.1DOMINATING
82o15974.8%+24.8DOMINATING
73o16060.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
53o16158.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
63o16259.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
32s16368.5%+18.5DOMINATING
43o16459.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
72o16574.7%+24.7DOMINATING
52o16672.0%+22.0DOMINATING
62o16773.5%+23.5DOMINATING
42o16872.2%+22.2DOMINATING
32o16972.8%+22.8DOMINATING

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
J2o44.4%

FAQ

What is the equity of J2s?

47.3% against one random opponent, which ranks it 103 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 16.0%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 11.4%.

How much better is J2s than J2o?

J2s is worth 47.3% and J2o 44.4%, a difference of 2.9 points — rank 103 versus rank 122.

How many of the 168 other hands does J2s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 73 hands and an underdog against 95. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

447 words / 39 distinct figures — Method