J2s
A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 47.3% · #103
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 16.0% · #96
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 11.4% · #86
- Chen score
- 3
- Combos
- 4 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.3%
- Favourite against
- 73 of 168 hands
J2s (jack-deuce suited) wins 47.3% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 103th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 60.9% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 16.0% and its rank moves to 96; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 11.4% for rank 86. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.
Its suited/offsuit twin J2o runs at 44.4% (rank 122), a gap of 2.9 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.9 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is J6o at 47.8%, and directly below is 96s at 47.3%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.5 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, J2s is a favourite against 73 of them and an underdog against 95. Its best matchup is T2o at 75.2% and its worst is JJ at 11.3% — a spread of 63.9 points, which is why calling J2s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being J3o at 49.7%.
J2s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against T2o at 75.2%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AJs, which leaves J2s with only 26.2%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 suited hands it comes 49 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 19.9 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 11.4 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, J2s lands -3.7 points from the middle of the pack, and 102 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 47.3% against one opponent, 30.4% against two, 18.6% against four and 11.4% against eight. That last figure is 103% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why J2s reads as 47.3% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 47.3% against one opponent down to 11.4% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | J2s equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 15.8% | -34.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 15.8% | -34.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 15.6% | -34.4 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 11.3% | -38.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 30.6% | -19.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 31.3% | -18.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 31.9% | -18.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 33.1% | -16.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 32.6% | -17.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 32.8% | -17.2 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 26.2% | -23.8 | DOMINATED |
| AKo | 12 | 35.7% | -14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 35.3% | -14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 27.2% | -22.8 | DOMINATED |
| KQs | 16 | 32.4% | -17.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 66 | 17 | 33.5% | -16.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 37.1% | -12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 38.1% | -11.9 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 26.9% | -23.1 | DOMINATED |
| A8s | 21 | 37.2% | -12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 34.9% | -15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| KQo | 23 | 34.7% | -15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A7s | 24 | 37.1% | -12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A9o | 25 | 39.6% | -10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 27.8% | -22.2 | DOMINATED |
| 55 | 27 | 33.6% | -16.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 27.2% | -22.8 | DOMINATED |
| A6s | 29 | 37.6% | -12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A8o | 31 | 39.6% | -10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 36.4% | -13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 37.5% | -12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| QTs | 34 | 33.9% | -16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A4s | 35 | 36.4% | -13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 39.4% | -10.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K8s | 37 | 37.4% | -12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 27.8% | -22.2 | DOMINATED |
| K9o | 40 | 38.8% | -11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9s | 41 | 35.2% | -14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A5o | 42 | 38.8% | -11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 27.8% | -22.2 | DOMINATED |
| K7s | 44 | 37.0% | -13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A6o | 45 | 40.2% | -9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 29.9% | -20.1 | DOMINATED |
| QTo | 47 | 36.4% | -13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 44 | 48 | 34.4% | -15.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 39.0% | -11.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 39.0% | -11.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 37.1% | -12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 31.9% | -18.1 | DOMINATED |
| Q9o | 56 | 37.7% | -12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| JTo | 57 | 31.2% | -18.8 | DOMINATED |
| K7o | 58 | 39.5% | -10.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K4s | 59 | 37.2% | -12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 28.8% | -21.2 | DOMINATED |
| Q7s | 61 | 37.4% | -12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K6o | 62 | 40.2% | -9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 34.4% | -15.6 | DOMINATED |
| T9s | 65 | 54.2% | +4.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8o | 66 | 38.8% | -11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 34.8% | -15.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6s | 68 | 37.1% | -12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 28.3% | -21.7 | DOMINATED |
| J9o | 70 | 33.4% | -16.6 | DOMINATED |
| K5o | 71 | 39.6% | -10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5s | 72 | 36.9% | -13.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J7s | 73 | 37.5% | -12.5 | DOMINATED |
| T8s | 74 | 55.2% | +5.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K4o | 75 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7o | 76 | 39.8% | -10.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4s | 77 | 36.9% | -13.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J8o | 78 | 36.1% | -13.9 | DOMINATED |
| T9o | 79 | 56.7% | +6.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K3o | 80 | 40.0% | -10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q6o | 82 | 39.7% | -10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 53.8% | +3.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 56.2% | +6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J6s | 85 | 41.5% | -8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 29.3% | -20.7 | DOMINATED |
| Q5o | 87 | 39.4% | -10.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 22 | 88 | 37.1% | -12.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q2s | 89 | 28.5% | -21.5 | DOMINATED |
| J5s | 90 | 44.3% | -5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 57.7% | +7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J7o | 92 | 39.4% | -10.6 | DOMINATED |
| J4s | 93 | 46.9% | -3.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 54.8% | +4.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4o | 95 | 39.3% | -10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T6s | 96 | 57.5% | +7.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 47.3% | -2.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 56.6% | +6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 58.8% | +8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3o | 100 | 39.6% | -10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 87s | 101 | 53.9% | +3.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J6o | 102 | 43.7% | -6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 56.3% | +6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 29.4% | -20.6 | DOMINATED |
| J5o | 106 | 46.8% | -3.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 58.5% | +8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 58.7% | +8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 97o | 109 | 57.7% | +7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 86s | 110 | 55.5% | +5.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 49.4% | -0.6 | COINFLIP |
| T6o | 112 | 60.2% | +10.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 58.8% | +8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 95s | 114 | 57.5% | +7.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 54.3% | +4.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J3o | 116 | 49.7% | -0.3 | COINFLIP |
| 87o | 117 | 56.6% | +6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T2s | 118 | 70.9% | +20.9 | DOMINATING |
| 85s | 119 | 56.6% | +6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 59.0% | +9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 61.2% | +11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 52.6% | +2.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 58.7% | +8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 55.1% | +5.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 61.5% | +11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 93s | 126 | 58.7% | +8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 57.8% | +7.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 54.8% | +4.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 60.3% | +10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 57.8% | +7.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 61.7% | +11.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 92s | 132 | 70.8% | +20.8 | DOMINATING |
| 76o | 133 | 56.9% | +6.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 74s | 134 | 56.3% | +6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 75.2% | +25.2 | DOMINATING |
| 64s | 136 | 56.1% | +6.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 59.4% | +9.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 54.8% | +4.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 58.9% | +8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 61.4% | +11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 58.0% | +8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 70.5% | +20.5 | DOMINATING |
| 73s | 143 | 57.5% | +7.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 65o | 144 | 57.5% | +7.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 93o | 145 | 61.5% | +11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 56.1% | +6.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 57.1% | +7.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 60.5% | +10.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 75.1% | +25.1 | DOMINATING |
| 43s | 150 | 56.3% | +6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 59.2% | +9.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 57.6% | +7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 70.3% | +20.3 | DOMINATING |
| 52s | 154 | 67.7% | +17.7 | DOMINATING |
| 64o | 155 | 58.8% | +8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 69.4% | +19.4 | DOMINATING |
| 83o | 157 | 61.6% | +11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 68.1% | +18.1 | DOMINATING |
| 82o | 159 | 74.8% | +24.8 | DOMINATING |
| 73o | 160 | 60.5% | +10.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 53o | 161 | 58.7% | +8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 63o | 162 | 59.8% | +9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 68.5% | +18.5 | DOMINATING |
| 43o | 164 | 59.2% | +9.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 74.7% | +24.7 | DOMINATING |
| 52o | 166 | 72.0% | +22.0 | DOMINATING |
| 62o | 167 | 73.5% | +23.5 | DOMINATING |
| 42o | 168 | 72.2% | +22.2 | DOMINATING |
| 32o | 169 | 72.8% | +22.8 | DOMINATING |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of J2s?
47.3% against one random opponent, which ranks it 103 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 16.0%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 11.4%.
How much better is J2s than J2o?
J2s is worth 47.3% and J2o 44.4%, a difference of 2.9 points — rank 103 versus rank 122.
How many of the 168 other hands does J2s beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 73 hands and an underdog against 95. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
447 words / 39 distinct figures — Method
