87o
A connector — straight potential, but nothing else to lean on.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 45.1% · #117
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 14.9% · #111
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 10.1% · #113
- Chen score
- 5
- Combos
- 12 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.9%
- Favourite against
- 42 of 168 hands
87o (eight-seven offsuit) wins 45.1% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 117th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 69.2% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 14.9% and its rank moves to 111; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 10.1% for rank 113. A connector — straight potential, but nothing else to lean on.
Its suited/offsuit twin 87s runs at 47.9% (rank 101), a gap of 2.8 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.8 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is J3o at 45.3%, and directly below is T2s at 44.8%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.5 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 87o is a favourite against 42 of them and an underdog against 126. Its best matchup is 72o at 72.5% and its worst is 88 at 13.2% — a spread of 59.3 points, which is why calling 87o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 33 at 50.8%.
87o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 72o at 72.5%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them 98s, which leaves 87o with only 27.9%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 48 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 20.3 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 12.8 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 87o lands -5.9 points from the middle of the pack, and 116 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 45.1% against one opponent, 30.3% against two, 18.4% against four and 10.1% against eight. That last figure is 91% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 87o reads as 45.1% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 45.1% against one opponent down to 10.1% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | 87o equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 18.7% | -31.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 18.1% | -31.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 17.9% | -32.1 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 17.1% | -32.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 15.6% | -34.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 14.2% | -35.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 13.2% | -36.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 35.6% | -14.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 35.4% | -14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 35.4% | -14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 37.6% | -12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 35.5% | -14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 37.4% | -12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 37.6% | -12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 33.7% | -16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 66 | 17 | 46.7% | -3.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 37.2% | -12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 34.7% | -15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A8s | 21 | 28.6% | -21.4 | DOMINATED |
| KTs | 22 | 34.9% | -15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| KQo | 23 | 35.5% | -14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A7s | 24 | 29.4% | -20.6 | DOMINATED |
| A9o | 25 | 37.4% | -12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 36.7% | -13.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 55 | 27 | 47.7% | -2.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 33.6% | -16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A6s | 29 | 41.5% | -8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 35.5% | -14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A8o | 31 | 29.8% | -20.2 | DOMINATED |
| A5s | 32 | 41.5% | -8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 36.5% | -13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| QTs | 34 | 33.8% | -16.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A4s | 35 | 42.1% | -7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 30.8% | -19.2 | DOMINATED |
| K8s | 37 | 29.0% | -21.0 | DOMINATED |
| A3s | 38 | 43.0% | -7.0 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 35.5% | -14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 37.1% | -12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9s | 41 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A5o | 42 | 43.8% | -6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 43.0% | -7.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 29.4% | -20.6 | DOMINATED |
| A6o | 45 | 43.7% | -6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 33.2% | -16.8 | HIGH CARD |
| QTo | 47 | 35.5% | -14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 44 | 48 | 49.1% | -0.9 | COINFLIP |
| K6s | 49 | 41.0% | -9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 44.5% | -5.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 28.0% | -22.0 | DOMINATED |
| K8o | 52 | 30.2% | -19.8 | DOMINATED |
| A3o | 53 | 45.4% | -4.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 41.5% | -8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 33.6% | -16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 36.0% | -14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| JTo | 57 | 34.8% | -15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K7o | 58 | 30.9% | -19.1 | DOMINATED |
| K4s | 59 | 42.5% | -7.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 45.5% | -4.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 29.5% | -20.5 | DOMINATED |
| K6o | 62 | 43.6% | -6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 43.3% | -6.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 28.1% | -21.9 | DOMINATED |
| T9s | 65 | 32.6% | -17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8o | 66 | 28.9% | -21.1 | DOMINATED |
| 33 | 67 | 50.8% | +0.8 | COINFLIP |
| Q6s | 68 | 41.1% | -8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 43.1% | -6.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 35.2% | -14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 43.9% | -6.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5s | 72 | 41.6% | -8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J7s | 73 | 29.1% | -20.9 | DOMINATED |
| T8s | 74 | 28.0% | -22.0 | DOMINATED |
| K4o | 75 | 44.8% | -5.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7o | 76 | 31.2% | -18.8 | DOMINATED |
| Q4s | 77 | 42.3% | -7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J8o | 78 | 29.2% | -20.8 | DOMINATED |
| T9o | 79 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K3o | 80 | 45.6% | -4.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 43.1% | -6.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q6o | 82 | 43.2% | -6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 27.9% | -22.1 | DOMINATED |
| T7s | 84 | 28.6% | -21.4 | DOMINATED |
| J6s | 85 | 41.8% | -8.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 45.8% | -4.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 44.1% | -5.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 22 | 88 | 51.1% | +1.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q2s | 89 | 43.0% | -7.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J5s | 90 | 42.1% | -7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 29.0% | -21.0 | DOMINATED |
| J7o | 92 | 30.5% | -19.5 | DOMINATED |
| J4s | 93 | 42.6% | -7.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 28.5% | -21.5 | DOMINATED |
| Q4o | 95 | 44.6% | -5.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T6s | 96 | 41.4% | -8.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 43.3% | -6.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 28.8% | -21.2 | DOMINATED |
| T7o | 99 | 30.0% | -20.0 | DOMINATED |
| Q3o | 100 | 45.5% | -4.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 87s | 101 | 47.5% | -2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J6o | 102 | 43.9% | -6.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 43.4% | -6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 40.9% | -9.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 45.5% | -4.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 44.3% | -5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 42.5% | -7.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 42.8% | -7.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 97o | 109 | 29.5% | -20.5 | DOMINATED |
| 86s | 110 | 60.0% | +10.0 | DOMINATING |
| J4o | 111 | 44.8% | -5.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 43.2% | -6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 43.8% | -6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 95s | 114 | 42.4% | -7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 65.2% | +15.2 | DOMINATING |
| J3o | 116 | 45.8% | -4.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T2s | 118 | 43.8% | -6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 60.3% | +10.3 | DOMINATING |
| 96o | 120 | 42.8% | -7.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 44.6% | -5.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 45.8% | -4.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 43.4% | -6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 65.5% | +15.5 | DOMINATING |
| T4o | 125 | 45.0% | -5.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 93s | 126 | 44.1% | -5.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 63.5% | +13.5 | DOMINATING |
| 65s | 128 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 44.3% | -5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 60.5% | +10.5 | DOMINATING |
| T3o | 131 | 46.0% | -4.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 92s | 132 | 44.2% | -5.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 69.5% | +19.5 | DOMINATING |
| 74s | 134 | 66.4% | +16.4 | DOMINATING |
| T2o | 135 | 46.0% | -4.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 64s | 136 | 62.0% | +12.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 63.7% | +13.7 | DOMINATING |
| 54s | 138 | 60.0% | +10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 61.3% | +11.3 | DOMINATING |
| 94o | 140 | 45.7% | -4.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 69.5% | +19.5 | DOMINATING |
| 82s | 142 | 61.6% | +11.6 | DOMINATING |
| 73s | 143 | 68.0% | +18.0 | DOMINATING |
| 65o | 144 | 64.5% | +14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 93o | 145 | 46.6% | -3.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 61.4% | +11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 63.4% | +13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 64.3% | +14.3 | DOMINATING |
| 92o | 149 | 46.4% | -3.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 61.8% | +11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 70.4% | +20.4 | DOMINATING |
| 54o | 152 | 63.6% | +13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 68.4% | +18.4 | DOMINATING |
| 52s | 154 | 62.5% | +12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 64o | 155 | 65.7% | +15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 64.4% | +14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 65.2% | +15.2 | DOMINATING |
| 42s | 158 | 62.5% | +12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 65.1% | +15.1 | DOMINATING |
| 73o | 160 | 72.4% | +22.4 | DOMINATING |
| 53o | 161 | 65.1% | +15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 63o | 162 | 66.8% | +16.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 63.5% | +13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 65.2% | +15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 72.5% | +22.5 | DOMINATING |
| 52o | 166 | 66.4% | +16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 68.5% | +18.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 66.2% | +16.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 67.4% | +17.4 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of 87o?
45.1% against one random opponent, which ranks it 117 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 14.9%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 10.1%.
How much better is 87o than 87s?
87o is worth 45.1% and 87s 47.9%, a difference of 2.8 points — rank 117 versus rank 101.
How many of the 168 other hands does 87o beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 42 hands and an underdog against 126. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
439 words / 47 distinct figures — Method
