169hands
MENU
offsuitconnector

87o

45.1%
Equity vs one random hand — #117 of 169

A connector — straight potential, but nothing else to lean on.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
45.1% · #117
6-handed (5 opponents)
14.9% · #111
9-handed (8 opponents)
10.1% · #113
Chen score
5
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
42 of 168 hands

87o (eight-seven offsuit) wins 45.1% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 117th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 69.2% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 14.9% and its rank moves to 111; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 10.1% for rank 113. A connector — straight potential, but nothing else to lean on.

Its suited/offsuit twin 87s runs at 47.9% (rank 101), a gap of 2.8 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.8 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is J3o at 45.3%, and directly below is T2s at 44.8%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.5 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 87o is a favourite against 42 of them and an underdog against 126. Its best matchup is 72o at 72.5% and its worst is 88 at 13.2% — a spread of 59.3 points, which is why calling 87o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 33 at 50.8%.

87o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 72o at 72.5%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them 98s, which leaves 87o with only 27.9%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 48 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 20.3 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 12.8 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 87o lands -5.9 points from the middle of the pack, and 116 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 45.1% against one opponent, 30.3% against two, 18.4% against four and 10.1% against eight. That last figure is 91% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 87o reads as 45.1% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 45.1% against one opponent down to 10.1% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%25%50%45.1130.3223.1318.4414.9513.4611.6710.18opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
87o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rank87o equityvs 50%Shape
AA118.7%-31.3PAIR VS CARDS
KK218.1%-31.9PAIR VS CARDS
QQ317.9%-32.1PAIR VS CARDS
JJ417.1%-32.9PAIR VS CARDS
TT515.6%-34.4PAIR VS CARDS
99614.2%-35.8PAIR VS CARDS
88713.2%-36.8PAIR VS CARDS
AKs835.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
77935.6%-14.4PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1035.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
AJs1135.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
AKo1237.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
ATs1335.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
AQo1437.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
AJo1537.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
KQs1633.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
661746.7%-3.3PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1835.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
ATo1937.2%-12.8HIGH CARD
KJs2034.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
A8s2128.6%-21.4DOMINATED
KTs2234.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
KQo2335.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
A7s2429.4%-20.6DOMINATED
A9o2537.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
KJo2636.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
552747.7%-2.3PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2833.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
A6s2941.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
K9s3035.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
A8o3129.8%-20.2DOMINATED
A5s3241.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
KTo3336.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
QTs3433.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
A4s3542.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
A7o3630.8%-19.2DOMINATED
K8s3729.0%-21.0DOMINATED
A3s3843.0%-7.0HIGH CARD
QJo3935.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
K9o4037.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
Q9s4134.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
A5o4243.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
A2s4343.0%-7.0HIGH CARD
K7s4429.4%-20.6DOMINATED
A6o4543.7%-6.3HIGH CARD
JTs4633.2%-16.8HIGH CARD
QTo4735.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
444849.1%-0.9COINFLIP
K6s4941.0%-9.0HIGH CARD
A4o5044.5%-5.5HIGH CARD
Q8s5128.0%-22.0DOMINATED
K8o5230.2%-19.8DOMINATED
A3o5345.4%-4.6HIGH CARD
K5s5441.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
J9s5533.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
Q9o5636.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
JTo5734.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
K7o5830.9%-19.1DOMINATED
K4s5942.5%-7.5HIGH CARD
A2o6045.5%-4.5HIGH CARD
Q7s6129.5%-20.5DOMINATED
K6o6243.6%-6.4HIGH CARD
K3s6343.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
J8s6428.1%-21.9DOMINATED
T9s6532.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
Q8o6628.9%-21.1DOMINATED
336750.8%+0.8COINFLIP
Q6s6841.1%-8.9HIGH CARD
K2s6943.1%-6.9HIGH CARD
J9o7035.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
K5o7143.9%-6.1HIGH CARD
Q5s7241.6%-8.4HIGH CARD
J7s7329.1%-20.9DOMINATED
T8s7428.0%-22.0DOMINATED
K4o7544.8%-5.2HIGH CARD
Q7o7631.2%-18.8DOMINATED
Q4s7742.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
J8o7829.2%-20.8DOMINATED
T9o7934.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
K3o8045.6%-4.4HIGH CARD
Q3s8143.1%-6.9HIGH CARD
Q6o8243.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
98s8327.9%-22.1DOMINATED
T7s8428.6%-21.4DOMINATED
J6s8541.8%-8.2HIGH CARD
K2o8645.8%-4.2HIGH CARD
Q5o8744.1%-5.9HIGH CARD
228851.1%+1.1PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8943.0%-7.0HIGH CARD
J5s9042.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
T8o9129.0%-21.0DOMINATED
J7o9230.5%-19.5DOMINATED
J4s9342.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
97s9428.5%-21.5DOMINATED
Q4o9544.6%-5.4HIGH CARD
T6s9641.4%-8.6HIGH CARD
J3s9743.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
98o9828.8%-21.2DOMINATED
T7o9930.0%-20.0DOMINATED
Q3o10045.5%-4.5HIGH CARD
87s10147.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
J6o10243.9%-6.1HIGH CARD
J2s10343.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
96s10440.9%-9.1HIGH CARD
Q2o10545.5%-4.5HIGH CARD
J5o10644.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
T5s10742.5%-7.5HIGH CARD
T4s10842.8%-7.2HIGH CARD
97o10929.5%-20.5DOMINATED
86s11060.0%+10.0DOMINATING
J4o11144.8%-5.2HIGH CARD
T6o11243.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
T3s11343.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
95s11442.4%-7.6HIGH CARD
76s11565.2%+15.2DOMINATING
J3o11645.8%-4.2HIGH CARD
T2s11843.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
85s11960.3%+10.3DOMINATING
96o12042.8%-7.2HIGH CARD
T5o12144.6%-5.4HIGH CARD
J2o12245.8%-4.2HIGH CARD
94s12343.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
75s12465.5%+15.5DOMINATING
T4o12545.0%-5.0HIGH CARD
93s12644.1%-5.9HIGH CARD
86o12763.5%+13.5DOMINATING
65s12860.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
95o12944.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
84s13060.5%+10.5DOMINATING
T3o13146.0%-4.0HIGH CARD
92s13244.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
76o13369.5%+19.5DOMINATING
74s13466.4%+16.4DOMINATING
T2o13546.0%-4.0HIGH CARD
64s13662.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
85o13763.7%+13.7DOMINATING
54s13860.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
83s13961.3%+11.3DOMINATING
94o14045.7%-4.3HIGH CARD
75o14169.5%+19.5DOMINATING
82s14261.6%+11.6DOMINATING
73s14368.0%+18.0DOMINATING
65o14464.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
93o14546.6%-3.4HIGH CARD
53s14661.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
63s14763.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
84o14864.3%+14.3DOMINATING
92o14946.4%-3.6HIGH CARD
43s15061.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
74o15170.4%+20.4DOMINATING
54o15263.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
72s15368.4%+18.4DOMINATING
52s15462.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
64o15565.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
62s15664.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
83o15765.2%+15.2DOMINATING
42s15862.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
82o15965.1%+15.1DOMINATING
73o16072.4%+22.4DOMINATING
53o16165.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
63o16266.8%+16.8HIGH CARD
32s16363.5%+13.5HIGH CARD
43o16465.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
72o16572.5%+22.5DOMINATING
52o16666.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
62o16768.5%+18.5HIGH CARD
42o16866.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
32o16967.4%+17.4HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
87s47.9%

FAQ

What is the equity of 87o?

45.1% against one random opponent, which ranks it 117 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 14.9%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 10.1%.

How much better is 87o than 87s?

87o is worth 45.1% and 87s 47.9%, a difference of 2.8 points — rank 117 versus rank 101.

How many of the 168 other hands does 87o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 42 hands and an underdog against 126. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

439 words / 47 distinct figures — Method