169hands
MENU
offsuitconnector

98o

48.1%
Equity vs one random hand — #98 of 169

A connector — straight potential, but nothing else to lean on.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
48.1% · #98
6-handed (5 opponents)
16.7% · #85
9-handed (8 opponents)
10.9% · #98
Chen score
5.5
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
57 of 168 hands

98o (nine-eight offsuit) wins 48.1% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 98th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 58% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 16.7% and its rank moves to 85; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 10.9% for rank 98. A connector — straight potential, but nothing else to lean on.

Its suited/offsuit twin 98s runs at 50.8% (rank 83), a gap of 2.7 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.7 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is J3s at 48.3%, and directly below is T7o at 48.1%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.2 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 98o is a favourite against 57 of them and an underdog against 111. Its best matchup is 82o at 73.9% and its worst is 99 at 13.1% — a spread of 60.8 points, which is why calling 98o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 44 at 50.4%.

98o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 82o at 73.9%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them T9s, which leaves 98o with only 26.7%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 38 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 17.3 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 15.8 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 98o lands -2.9 points from the middle of the pack, and 97 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 48.1% against one opponent, 32.3% against two, 20.0% against four and 10.9% against eight. That last figure is 98% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5.5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 98o reads as 48.1% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 48.1% against one opponent down to 10.9% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%25%50%48.1132.3224.9320.0416.7514.2612.3710.98opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
98o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rank98o equityvs 50%Shape
AA118.2%-31.8PAIR VS CARDS
KK218.1%-31.9PAIR VS CARDS
QQ317.3%-32.7PAIR VS CARDS
JJ415.7%-34.3PAIR VS CARDS
TT514.1%-35.9PAIR VS CARDS
99613.1%-36.9PAIR VS CARDS
88735.4%-14.6PAIR VS CARDS
AKs834.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
77946.5%-3.5PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1035.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
AJs1135.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
AKo1235.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
ATs1335.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
AQo1437.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
AJo1537.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
KQs1634.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
661747.4%-2.6PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1828.7%-21.3DOMINATED
ATo1937.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
KJs2034.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
A8s2128.9%-21.1DOMINATED
KTs2234.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
KQo2335.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
A7s2441.3%-8.7HIGH CARD
A9o2529.9%-20.1DOMINATED
KJo2636.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
552748.6%-1.4PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2833.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
A6s2941.7%-8.3HIGH CARD
K9s3027.2%-22.8DOMINATED
A8o3130.3%-19.7DOMINATED
A5s3241.7%-8.3HIGH CARD
KTo3336.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
QTs3433.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
A4s3542.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
A7o3643.5%-6.5HIGH CARD
K8s3729.5%-20.5DOMINATED
A3s3842.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
QJo3935.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
K9o4028.4%-21.6DOMINATED
Q9s4127.8%-22.2DOMINATED
A5o4244.1%-5.9HIGH CARD
A2s4342.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
K7s4441.0%-9.0HIGH CARD
A6o4544.1%-5.9HIGH CARD
JTs4632.3%-17.7HIGH CARD
QTo4735.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
444850.4%+0.4COINFLIP
K6s4941.6%-8.4HIGH CARD
A4o5045.1%-4.9HIGH CARD
Q8s5128.5%-21.5DOMINATED
K8o5230.7%-19.3DOMINATED
A3o5345.2%-4.8HIGH CARD
K5s5442.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
J9s5527.4%-22.6DOMINATED
Q9o5628.8%-21.2DOMINATED
JTo5733.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
K7o5843.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
K4s5943.0%-7.0HIGH CARD
A2o6045.1%-4.9HIGH CARD
Q7s6141.6%-8.4HIGH CARD
K6o6243.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
K3s6343.1%-6.9HIGH CARD
J8s6427.8%-22.2DOMINATED
T9s6526.7%-23.3DOMINATED
Q8o6630.1%-19.9DOMINATED
336750.6%+0.6COINFLIP
Q6s6842.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
K2s6943.0%-7.0HIGH CARD
J9o7028.4%-21.6DOMINATED
K5o7144.5%-5.5HIGH CARD
Q5s7242.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
J7s7340.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
T8s7427.3%-22.7DOMINATED
K4o7545.4%-4.6HIGH CARD
Q7o7643.9%-6.1HIGH CARD
Q4s7743.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
J8o7829.0%-21.0DOMINATED
T9o7927.5%-22.5DOMINATED
K3o8045.5%-4.5HIGH CARD
Q3s8143.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
Q6o8244.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
98s8347.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
T7s8440.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
J6s8542.2%-7.8HIGH CARD
K2o8645.3%-4.7HIGH CARD
Q5o8744.8%-5.2HIGH CARD
228851.1%+1.1PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8943.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
J5s9042.4%-7.6HIGH CARD
T8o9128.3%-21.7DOMINATED
J7o9243.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
J4s9343.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
97s9463.4%+13.4DOMINATING
Q4o9545.7%-4.3HIGH CARD
T6s9641.7%-8.3HIGH CARD
J3s9743.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
T7o9942.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
Q3o10045.6%-4.4HIGH CARD
87s10167.3%+17.3DOMINATING
J6o10244.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
J2s10343.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
96s10463.6%+13.6DOMINATING
Q2o10545.8%-4.2HIGH CARD
J5o10644.8%-5.2HIGH CARD
T5s10743.0%-7.0HIGH CARD
T4s10843.5%-6.5HIGH CARD
97o10967.0%+17.0DOMINATING
86s11067.2%+17.2DOMINATING
J4o11145.8%-4.2HIGH CARD
T6o11243.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
T3s11343.6%-6.4HIGH CARD
95s11463.4%+13.4DOMINATING
76s11561.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
J3o11645.6%-4.4HIGH CARD
87o11771.2%+21.2DOMINATING
T2s11843.5%-6.5HIGH CARD
85s11967.5%+17.5DOMINATING
96o12067.1%+17.1DOMINATING
T5o12145.3%-4.7HIGH CARD
J2o12245.8%-4.2HIGH CARD
94s12364.1%+14.1DOMINATING
75s12462.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
T4o12545.8%-4.2HIGH CARD
93s12664.2%+14.2DOMINATING
86o12771.3%+21.3DOMINATING
65s12860.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
95o12967.0%+17.0DOMINATING
84s13069.2%+19.2DOMINATING
T3o13145.8%-4.2HIGH CARD
92s13264.3%+14.3DOMINATING
76o13365.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
74s13463.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
T2o13545.9%-4.1HIGH CARD
64s13661.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
85o13771.6%+21.6DOMINATING
54s13860.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
83s13969.4%+19.4DOMINATING
94o14068.1%+18.1DOMINATING
75o14166.3%+16.3HIGH CARD
82s14269.5%+19.5DOMINATING
73s14365.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
65o14464.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
93o14568.1%+18.1DOMINATING
53s14661.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
63s14763.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
84o14873.8%+23.8DOMINATING
92o14968.2%+18.2DOMINATING
43s15062.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
74o15167.5%+17.5HIGH CARD
54o15264.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
72s15366.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
52s15462.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
64o15565.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
62s15664.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
83o15773.8%+23.8DOMINATING
42s15862.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
82o15973.9%+23.9DOMINATING
73o16068.9%+18.9HIGH CARD
53o16165.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
63o16267.0%+17.0HIGH CARD
32s16362.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
43o16466.5%+16.5HIGH CARD
72o16570.1%+20.1HIGH CARD
52o16666.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
62o16768.3%+18.3HIGH CARD
42o16866.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
32o16966.6%+16.6HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
98s50.8%

FAQ

What is the equity of 98o?

48.1% against one random opponent, which ranks it 98 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 16.7%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 10.9%.

How much better is 98o than 98s?

98o is worth 48.1% and 98s 50.8%, a difference of 2.7 points — rank 98 versus rank 83.

How many of the 168 other hands does 98o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 57 hands and an underdog against 111. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

439 words / 44 distinct figures — Method