169hands
MENU
offsuitconnector

32o

32.3%
Equity vs one random hand — #169 of 169

A connector — straight potential, but nothing else to lean on.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
32.3% · #169
6-handed (5 opponents)
9.0% · #168
9-handed (8 opponents)
6.2% · #163
Chen score
2.5
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
0 of 168 hands

32o (three-deuce offsuit) wins 32.3% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 169th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 100% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 9.0% and its rank moves to 168; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 6.2% for rank 163. A connector — straight potential, but nothing else to lean on.

Its suited/offsuit twin 32s runs at 35.9% (rank 163), a gap of 3.6 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.6 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 42o at 33.3%, and directly below is —, so three hands are packed into a band of 0 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 32o is a favourite against 0 of them and an underdog against 168. Its best matchup is 32s at 47.5% and its worst is 33 at 10.8% — a spread of 36.7 points, which is why calling 32o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.

It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A3s, which leaves 32o with only 23.4%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 78 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 33.1 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 0 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 32o lands -18.7 points from the middle of the pack, and 168 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 32.3% against one opponent, 19.3% against two, 11.1% against four and 6.2% against eight. That last figure is 56% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 2.5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 32o reads as 32.3% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 32.3% against one opponent down to 6.2% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%20%40%32.3119.3213.9311.149.058.066.976.28opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
32o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rank32o equityvs 50%Shape
AA112.9%-37.1PAIR VS CARDS
KK214.3%-35.7PAIR VS CARDS
QQ314.2%-35.8PAIR VS CARDS
JJ414.3%-35.7PAIR VS CARDS
TT514.5%-35.5PAIR VS CARDS
99614.6%-35.4PAIR VS CARDS
88714.2%-35.8PAIR VS CARDS
AKs832.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
77914.0%-36.0PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1032.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
AJs1132.2%-17.8HIGH CARD
AKo1234.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
ATs1332.2%-17.8HIGH CARD
AQo1434.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
AJo1534.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
KQs1632.0%-18.0HIGH CARD
661713.4%-36.6PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1832.5%-17.5HIGH CARD
ATo1933.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
KJs2032.2%-17.8HIGH CARD
A8s2132.3%-17.7HIGH CARD
KTs2231.8%-18.2HIGH CARD
KQo2333.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
A7s2431.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
A9o2534.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
KJo2633.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
552712.1%-37.9PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2831.7%-18.3HIGH CARD
A6s2932.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
K9s3032.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
A8o3133.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
A5s3231.0%-19.0HIGH CARD
KTo3333.5%-16.5HIGH CARD
QTs3431.6%-18.4HIGH CARD
A4s3531.2%-18.8HIGH CARD
A7o3633.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
K8s3732.5%-17.5HIGH CARD
A3s3823.4%-26.6DOMINATED
QJo3933.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
K9o4034.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
Q9s4132.2%-17.8HIGH CARD
A5o4232.5%-17.5HIGH CARD
A2s4324.2%-25.8DOMINATED
K7s4432.1%-17.9HIGH CARD
A6o4534.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
JTs4631.3%-18.7HIGH CARD
QTo4733.2%-16.8HIGH CARD
444812.6%-37.4PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4932.5%-17.5HIGH CARD
A4o5032.3%-17.7HIGH CARD
Q8s5132.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
K8o5234.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
A3o5324.3%-25.7DOMINATED
K5s5432.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
J9s5531.8%-18.2HIGH CARD
Q9o5633.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
JTo5732.7%-17.3HIGH CARD
K7o5833.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
K4s5932.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
A2o6025.3%-24.7DOMINATED
Q7s6132.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
K6o6234.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
K3s6325.4%-24.6DOMINATED
J8s6431.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
T9s6531.7%-18.3HIGH CARD
Q8o6633.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
336710.8%-39.2PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6832.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
K2s6926.3%-23.7DOMINATED
J9o7033.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
K5o7134.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
Q5s7232.5%-17.5HIGH CARD
J7s7332.1%-17.9HIGH CARD
T8s7431.8%-18.2HIGH CARD
K4o7534.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
Q7o7633.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
Q4s7732.5%-17.5HIGH CARD
J8o7833.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
T9o7933.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
K3o8026.4%-23.6DOMINATED
Q3s8125.8%-24.2DOMINATED
Q6o8234.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
98s8331.6%-18.4HIGH CARD
T7s8431.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
J6s8532.9%-17.1HIGH CARD
K2o8627.4%-22.6DOMINATED
Q5o8733.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
228833.4%-16.6PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8926.7%-23.3DOMINATED
J5s9032.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
T8o9133.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
J7o9233.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
J4s9332.7%-17.3HIGH CARD
97s9432.2%-17.8HIGH CARD
Q4o9534.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
T6s9632.3%-17.7HIGH CARD
J3s9726.4%-23.6DOMINATED
98o9833.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
T7o9933.5%-16.5HIGH CARD
Q3o10026.9%-23.1DOMINATED
87s10130.9%-19.1HIGH CARD
J6o10234.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
J2s10327.2%-22.8DOMINATED
96s10432.9%-17.1HIGH CARD
Q2o10527.9%-22.1DOMINATED
J5o10634.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
T5s10732.9%-17.1HIGH CARD
T4s10833.0%-17.0HIGH CARD
97o10933.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
86s11032.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
J4o11134.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
T6o11234.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
T3s11327.2%-22.8DOMINATED
95s11433.1%-16.9HIGH CARD
76s11532.9%-17.1HIGH CARD
J3o11627.5%-22.5DOMINATED
87o11732.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
T2s11828.2%-21.8DOMINATED
85s11933.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
96o12034.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
T5o12134.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
J2o12228.7%-21.3DOMINATED
94s12333.5%-16.5HIGH CARD
75s12433.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
T4o12534.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
93s12628.8%-21.2DOMINATED
86o12734.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
65s12834.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
95o12934.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
84s13033.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
T3o13128.4%-21.6DOMINATED
92s13229.5%-20.5DOMINATED
76o13334.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
74s13434.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
T2o13529.5%-20.5DOMINATED
64s13635.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
85o13734.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
54s13837.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
83s13930.3%-19.7DOMINATED
94o14035.0%-15.0HIGH CARD
75o14135.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
82s14230.8%-19.2DOMINATED
73s14331.2%-18.8DOMINATED
65o14436.8%-13.2HIGH CARD
93o14529.8%-20.2DOMINATED
53s14637.6%-12.4DOMINATED
63s14734.6%-15.4DOMINATED
84o14835.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
92o14930.8%-19.2DOMINATED
43s15043.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
74o15135.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
54o15239.4%-10.6HIGH CARD
72s15333.5%-16.5DOMINATED
52s15438.3%-11.7DOMINATED
64o15537.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
62s15635.5%-14.5DOMINATED
83o15731.4%-18.6DOMINATED
42s15844.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
82o15932.5%-17.5DOMINATED
73o16032.2%-17.8DOMINATED
53o16139.0%-11.0DOMINATED
63o16235.8%-14.2DOMINATED
32s16347.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
43o16445.2%-4.8HIGH CARD
72o16534.7%-15.3DOMINATED
52o16640.0%-10.0DOMINATED
62o16737.2%-12.8DOMINATED
42o16847.0%-3.0HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
32s35.9%

FAQ

What is the equity of 32o?

32.3% against one random opponent, which ranks it 169 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 9.0%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 6.2%.

How much better is 32o than 32s?

32o is worth 32.3% and 32s 35.9%, a difference of 3.6 points — rank 169 versus rank 163.

How many of the 168 other hands does 32o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 0 hands and an underdog against 168. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

406 words / 32 distinct figures — Method