32o
A connector — straight potential, but nothing else to lean on.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 32.3% · #169
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 9.0% · #168
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 6.2% · #163
- Chen score
- 2.5
- Combos
- 12 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.9%
- Favourite against
- 0 of 168 hands
32o (three-deuce offsuit) wins 32.3% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 169th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 100% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 9.0% and its rank moves to 168; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 6.2% for rank 163. A connector — straight potential, but nothing else to lean on.
Its suited/offsuit twin 32s runs at 35.9% (rank 163), a gap of 3.6 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.6 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 42o at 33.3%, and directly below is —, so three hands are packed into a band of 0 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 32o is a favourite against 0 of them and an underdog against 168. Its best matchup is 32s at 47.5% and its worst is 33 at 10.8% — a spread of 36.7 points, which is why calling 32o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.
It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A3s, which leaves 32o with only 23.4%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 78 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 33.1 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 0 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 32o lands -18.7 points from the middle of the pack, and 168 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 32.3% against one opponent, 19.3% against two, 11.1% against four and 6.2% against eight. That last figure is 56% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 2.5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 32o reads as 32.3% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 32.3% against one opponent down to 6.2% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | 32o equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 12.9% | -37.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 14.3% | -35.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 14.2% | -35.8 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 14.3% | -35.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 14.5% | -35.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 14.6% | -35.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 14.2% | -35.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 32.4% | -17.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 14.0% | -36.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 32.4% | -17.6 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 32.2% | -17.8 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 32.2% | -17.8 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 32.0% | -18.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 66 | 17 | 13.4% | -36.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 32.5% | -17.5 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 33.8% | -16.2 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 32.2% | -17.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A8s | 21 | 32.3% | -17.7 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 31.8% | -18.2 | HIGH CARD |
| KQo | 23 | 33.7% | -16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A7s | 24 | 31.9% | -18.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A9o | 25 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 33.8% | -16.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 55 | 27 | 12.1% | -37.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 31.7% | -18.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A6s | 29 | 32.6% | -17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 32.4% | -17.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A8o | 31 | 33.9% | -16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 31.0% | -19.0 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 33.5% | -16.5 | HIGH CARD |
| QTs | 34 | 31.6% | -18.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A4s | 35 | 31.2% | -18.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 33.6% | -16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K8s | 37 | 32.5% | -17.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 23.4% | -26.6 | DOMINATED |
| QJo | 39 | 33.3% | -16.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9s | 41 | 32.2% | -17.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A5o | 42 | 32.5% | -17.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 24.2% | -25.8 | DOMINATED |
| K7s | 44 | 32.1% | -17.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A6o | 45 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 31.3% | -18.7 | HIGH CARD |
| QTo | 47 | 33.2% | -16.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 44 | 48 | 12.6% | -37.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 32.5% | -17.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 32.3% | -17.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 32.4% | -17.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 24.3% | -25.7 | DOMINATED |
| K5s | 54 | 32.4% | -17.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 31.8% | -18.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 33.7% | -16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| JTo | 57 | 32.7% | -17.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K7o | 58 | 33.9% | -16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K4s | 59 | 32.4% | -17.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 25.3% | -24.7 | DOMINATED |
| Q7s | 61 | 32.4% | -17.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K6o | 62 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 25.4% | -24.6 | DOMINATED |
| J8s | 64 | 31.9% | -18.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 31.7% | -18.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8o | 66 | 33.7% | -16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 10.8% | -39.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6s | 68 | 32.6% | -17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 26.3% | -23.7 | DOMINATED |
| J9o | 70 | 33.3% | -16.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5s | 72 | 32.5% | -17.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J7s | 73 | 32.1% | -17.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T8s | 74 | 31.8% | -18.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K4o | 75 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7o | 76 | 33.9% | -16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4s | 77 | 32.5% | -17.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J8o | 78 | 33.4% | -16.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 33.3% | -16.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K3o | 80 | 26.4% | -23.6 | DOMINATED |
| Q3s | 81 | 25.8% | -24.2 | DOMINATED |
| Q6o | 82 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 31.6% | -18.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 31.9% | -18.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J6s | 85 | 32.9% | -17.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 27.4% | -22.6 | DOMINATED |
| Q5o | 87 | 33.9% | -16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 22 | 88 | 33.4% | -16.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q2s | 89 | 26.7% | -23.3 | DOMINATED |
| J5s | 90 | 32.6% | -17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 33.3% | -16.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J7o | 92 | 33.8% | -16.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J4s | 93 | 32.7% | -17.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 32.2% | -17.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4o | 95 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T6s | 96 | 32.3% | -17.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 26.4% | -23.6 | DOMINATED |
| 98o | 98 | 33.4% | -16.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 33.5% | -16.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3o | 100 | 26.9% | -23.1 | DOMINATED |
| 87s | 101 | 30.9% | -19.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J6o | 102 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 27.2% | -22.8 | DOMINATED |
| 96s | 104 | 32.9% | -17.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 27.9% | -22.1 | DOMINATED |
| J5o | 106 | 34.0% | -16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 32.9% | -17.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 33.0% | -17.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 97o | 109 | 33.6% | -16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 86s | 110 | 32.6% | -17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 34.1% | -15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 34.1% | -15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 27.2% | -22.8 | DOMINATED |
| 95s | 114 | 33.1% | -16.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 32.9% | -17.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J3o | 116 | 27.5% | -22.5 | DOMINATED |
| 87o | 117 | 32.6% | -17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T2s | 118 | 28.2% | -21.8 | DOMINATED |
| 85s | 119 | 33.3% | -16.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 34.4% | -15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 28.7% | -21.3 | DOMINATED |
| 94s | 123 | 33.5% | -16.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 33.8% | -16.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 93s | 126 | 28.8% | -21.2 | DOMINATED |
| 86o | 127 | 34.4% | -15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 34.9% | -15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 34.7% | -15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 33.8% | -16.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 28.4% | -21.6 | DOMINATED |
| 92s | 132 | 29.5% | -20.5 | DOMINATED |
| 76o | 133 | 34.4% | -15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 74s | 134 | 34.1% | -15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 29.5% | -20.5 | DOMINATED |
| 64s | 136 | 35.7% | -14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 34.8% | -15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 37.4% | -12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 30.3% | -19.7 | DOMINATED |
| 94o | 140 | 35.0% | -15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 35.2% | -14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 30.8% | -19.2 | DOMINATED |
| 73s | 143 | 31.2% | -18.8 | DOMINATED |
| 65o | 144 | 36.8% | -13.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 93o | 145 | 29.8% | -20.2 | DOMINATED |
| 53s | 146 | 37.6% | -12.4 | DOMINATED |
| 63s | 147 | 34.6% | -15.4 | DOMINATED |
| 84o | 148 | 35.5% | -14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 30.8% | -19.2 | DOMINATED |
| 43s | 150 | 43.2% | -6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 39.4% | -10.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 33.5% | -16.5 | DOMINATED |
| 52s | 154 | 38.3% | -11.7 | DOMINATED |
| 64o | 155 | 37.6% | -12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 35.5% | -14.5 | DOMINATED |
| 83o | 157 | 31.4% | -18.6 | DOMINATED |
| 42s | 158 | 44.3% | -5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 32.5% | -17.5 | DOMINATED |
| 73o | 160 | 32.2% | -17.8 | DOMINATED |
| 53o | 161 | 39.0% | -11.0 | DOMINATED |
| 63o | 162 | 35.8% | -14.2 | DOMINATED |
| 32s | 163 | 47.5% | -2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 45.2% | -4.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 34.7% | -15.3 | DOMINATED |
| 52o | 166 | 40.0% | -10.0 | DOMINATED |
| 62o | 167 | 37.2% | -12.8 | DOMINATED |
| 42o | 168 | 47.0% | -3.0 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of 32o?
32.3% against one random opponent, which ranks it 169 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 9.0%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 6.2%.
How much better is 32o than 32s?
32o is worth 32.3% and 32s 35.9%, a difference of 3.6 points — rank 169 versus rank 163.
How many of the 168 other hands does 32o beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 0 hands and an underdog against 168. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
406 words / 32 distinct figures — Method
