QTo
Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 57.1% · #47
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 21.5% · #38
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 14.3% · #46
- Chen score
- 6
- Combos
- 12 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.9%
- Favourite against
- 107 of 168 hands
QTo (queen-ten offsuit) wins 57.1% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 47th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 27.8% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 21.5% and its rank moves to 38; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 14.3% for rank 46. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
Its suited/offsuit twin QTs runs at 59.5% (rank 34), a gap of 2.4 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.4 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is JTs at 57.5%, and directly below is 44 at 57.0%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.5 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, QTo is a favourite against 107 of them and an underdog against 61. Its best matchup is T2o at 76.7% and its worst is QQ at 11.2% — a spread of 65.5 points, which is why calling QTo simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 4 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 33 at 50.0%.
QTo dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against T2o at 76.7%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them KTs, which leaves QTo with only 25.4%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 15 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 8.3 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 24.8 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, QTo lands +6.1 points from the middle of the pack, and 46 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 57.1% against one opponent, 40.4% against two, 25.4% against four and 14.3% against eight. That last figure is 129% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 6 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why QTo reads as 57.1% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 57.1% against one opponent down to 14.3% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
How often QTo hits the flop
Exact counts over all 19,600 flops and 2,118,760 five-card boards from the 50 cards left once your two are out — no simulation.
QTo pairs the board on the flop — at least one of its two ranks hits — 32.4% of the time, and flops top pair or better (the paired card is the highest on the board, or two pair and up) 20.7%. By the river it has made a pair or better 48.7% of the time.
For straights, the flop completes one 0.980% of the time (192 flops), gives an eight-out draw 7.02% and a four-out gutshot 14.8%. By the river a straight using a hole card completes 7.36% of the time.
Put together, QTo flops a pair or better or a strong draw (an eight-out straight draw) 39.4% of the time — rank 90 of the 156 unpaired hands (tied with 3 others). The highest is JTs, T9s, 98s and 4 others at 50.6% and the lowest AKo, A2o at 32.8%.
| Outcome | Probability | Count / total | Frequency | Odds against |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flop a pair or better (either card hits) | 32.4% | 6,356 / 19,600 | 1 in 3.1 | 2.1 to 1 |
| top pair or better (highest card on board, or two pair and up) | 20.7% | 4,058 / 19,600 | 1 in 4.8 | 3.8 to 1 |
| two pair (both cards hit) | 2.02% | 396 / 19,600 | 1 in 49.5 | 48.5 to 1 |
| trips (one card hits twice) | 1.35% | 264 / 19,600 | 1 in 74.2 | 73.2 to 1 |
| Flop a made straight | 0.980% | 192 / 19,600 | 1 in 102 | 101 to 1 |
| Flop an eight-out straight draw | 7.02% | 1,376 / 19,600 | 1 in 14.2 | 13.2 to 1 |
| Flop a four-out gutshot | 14.8% | 2,896 / 19,600 | 1 in 6.8 | 5.8 to 1 |
| Pair or better, or a strong draw (eight-out straight draw) or better | 39.4% | 7,732 / 19,600 | 1 in 2.5 | 1.5 to 1 |
| Pair or better by the river | 48.7% | 1,032,752 / 2,118,760 | 1 in 2.1 | 1.1 to 1 |
| Straight by the river (using a hole card) | 7.36% | 155,920 / 2,118,760 | 1 in 13.6 | 12.6 to 1 |
How the flop moves QTo's equity
Equity against one random hand with the flop out and the turn and river to come. Exact counts over every deal of the opponent's two cards and the board — no simulation.
Against one random hand, QTo goes from 57.3% before the flop up to 79.3% when either card pairs, and down to 46.7% when both miss. It connects 32.4% of the time (6,356 of 19,600 flops). Missing with a card above Q on board leaves 50.5%; missing with nothing above Q leaves 43.5%.
By board shape: rainbow 57.6%, two-tone 57.1%, monotone 56.8%. A monotone flop in one of your suits gives 66.1%. A paired board gives 56.1%, and a connected board (three ranks within five) 54.0%. The best row in the table is "Either card hits (a matching rank on the flop)" at 79.3%, the worst "and nothing above Q" at 43.5%.
The 57.1% at the top of the page is a 400,000-hand simulation; this table counts every deal of the opponent's two cards and the five-card board (2,097,572,400 per starting hand), which puts the pre-flop figure at 57.29% (a gap of 0.19 points). Each equity is taken with the flop out and the turn and river still to come.
| Flop | How often | Flops (of 19,600) | QTo equity | vs before the flop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before the flop (average of every flop) | 100.0% | 19,600 | 57.3% | — |
| Either card hits (a matching rank on the flop) | 32.4% | 6,356 | 79.3% | +22.1pt |
| Neither card hits | 67.6% | 13,244 | 46.7% | −10.6pt |
| and nothing above Q | 36.4% | 7,140 | 43.5% | −13.8pt |
| and at least one card above Q | 31.1% | 6,104 | 50.5% | −6.8pt |
| Rainbow (three different suits) | 39.8% | 7,800 | 57.6% | +0.4pt |
| Two-tone (two cards share a suit) | 55.0% | 10,788 | 57.1% | −0.2pt |
| Monotone (all three one suit) | 5.16% | 1,012 | 56.8% | −0.4pt |
| Monotone in one of your suits | 2.24% | 440 | 66.1% | +8.8pt |
| Exactly two cards of one of your suits | 25.6% | 5,016 | 56.9% | −0.4pt |
| Paired board (two or more of a rank) | 17.2% | 3,364 | 56.1% | −1.2pt |
| Connected board (three ranks within five, A can play low) | 18.6% | 3,636 | 54.0% | −3.3pt |
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | QTo equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 15.5% | -34.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 14.0% | -36.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 11.2% | -38.8 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 29.2% | -20.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 33.7% | -16.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 45.2% | -4.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 46.4% | -3.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 33.9% | -16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 48.0% | -2.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 26.3% | -23.7 | DOMINATED |
| AJs | 11 | 36.7% | -13.3 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 35.6% | -14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 26.4% | -23.6 | DOMINATED |
| AQo | 14 | 27.3% | -22.7 | DOMINATED |
| AJo | 15 | 38.4% | -11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 25.5% | -24.5 | DOMINATED |
| 66 | 17 | 47.9% | -2.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 41.0% | -9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 27.4% | -22.6 | DOMINATED |
| KJs | 20 | 35.4% | -14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A8s | 21 | 41.1% | -8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 25.4% | -24.6 | DOMINATED |
| KQo | 23 | 26.2% | -23.8 | DOMINATED |
| A7s | 24 | 41.7% | -8.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A9o | 25 | 43.0% | -7.0 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 55 | 27 | 49.0% | -1.0 | COINFLIP |
| QJs | 28 | 26.2% | -23.8 | DOMINATED |
| A6s | 29 | 42.0% | -8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 40.0% | -10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A8o | 31 | 43.4% | -6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 41.7% | -8.3 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 26.4% | -23.6 | DOMINATED |
| QTs | 34 | 47.5% | -2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A4s | 35 | 41.6% | -8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 44.0% | -6.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K8s | 37 | 41.2% | -8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 41.8% | -8.2 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 27.1% | -22.9 | DOMINATED |
| K9o | 40 | 42.3% | -7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9s | 41 | 67.9% | +17.9 | DOMINATING |
| A5o | 42 | 43.9% | -6.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 41.7% | -8.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 42.0% | -8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A6o | 45 | 44.1% | -5.9 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 69.3% | +19.3 | DOMINATING |
| 44 | 48 | 49.3% | -0.7 | COINFLIP |
| K6s | 49 | 41.9% | -8.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 44.0% | -6.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 68.2% | +18.2 | DOMINATING |
| K8o | 52 | 43.7% | -6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 43.9% | -6.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 42.2% | -7.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 60.4% | +10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 71.9% | +21.9 | DOMINATING |
| JTo | 57 | 73.2% | +23.2 | DOMINATING |
| K7o | 58 | 44.2% | -5.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K4s | 59 | 42.2% | -7.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 44.2% | -5.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 68.2% | +18.2 | DOMINATING |
| K6o | 62 | 44.1% | -5.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 42.1% | -7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 61.3% | +11.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 68.4% | +18.4 | DOMINATING |
| Q8o | 66 | 72.1% | +22.1 | DOMINATING |
| 33 | 67 | 50.0% | +0.0 | COINFLIP |
| Q6s | 68 | 67.7% | +17.7 | DOMINATING |
| K2s | 69 | 42.4% | -7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 64.1% | +14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 44.5% | -5.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5s | 72 | 67.7% | +17.7 | DOMINATING |
| J7s | 73 | 62.3% | +12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T8s | 74 | 68.4% | +18.4 | DOMINATING |
| K4o | 75 | 44.5% | -5.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7o | 76 | 72.1% | +22.1 | DOMINATING |
| Q4s | 77 | 68.0% | +18.0 | DOMINATING |
| J8o | 78 | 65.1% | +15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 72.2% | +22.2 | DOMINATING |
| K3o | 80 | 44.6% | -5.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 68.3% | +18.3 | DOMINATING |
| Q6o | 82 | 71.8% | +21.8 | DOMINATING |
| 98s | 83 | 61.1% | +11.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 69.9% | +19.9 | DOMINATING |
| J6s | 85 | 63.0% | +13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 44.7% | -5.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 72.0% | +22.0 | DOMINATING |
| 22 | 88 | 50.5% | +0.5 | COINFLIP |
| Q2s | 89 | 68.7% | +18.7 | DOMINATING |
| J5s | 90 | 63.0% | +13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 72.7% | +22.7 | DOMINATING |
| J7o | 92 | 66.0% | +16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J4s | 93 | 63.1% | +13.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 62.1% | +12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4o | 95 | 72.0% | +22.0 | DOMINATING |
| T6s | 96 | 69.6% | +19.6 | DOMINATING |
| J3s | 97 | 63.2% | +13.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 74.5% | +24.5 | DOMINATING |
| Q3o | 100 | 72.5% | +22.5 | DOMINATING |
| 87s | 101 | 60.8% | +10.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J6o | 102 | 67.0% | +17.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 63.6% | +13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 63.0% | +13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 72.9% | +22.9 | DOMINATING |
| J5o | 106 | 66.8% | +16.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 71.0% | +21.0 | DOMINATING |
| T4s | 108 | 71.0% | +21.0 | DOMINATING |
| 97o | 109 | 65.8% | +15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 86s | 110 | 61.4% | +11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 66.9% | +16.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 74.1% | +24.1 | DOMINATING |
| T3s | 113 | 71.5% | +21.5 | DOMINATING |
| 95s | 114 | 64.1% | +14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 60.3% | +10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J3o | 116 | 67.2% | +17.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 87o | 117 | 64.5% | +14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T2s | 118 | 72.2% | +22.2 | DOMINATING |
| 85s | 119 | 62.4% | +12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 66.7% | +16.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 75.2% | +25.2 | DOMINATING |
| J2o | 122 | 67.5% | +17.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 65.3% | +15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 61.4% | +11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 75.5% | +25.5 | DOMINATING |
| 93s | 126 | 65.2% | +15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 65.0% | +15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 60.1% | +10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 67.8% | +17.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 63.5% | +13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 75.9% | +25.9 | DOMINATING |
| 92s | 132 | 65.5% | +15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 63.9% | +13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 74s | 134 | 62.1% | +12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 76.7% | +26.7 | DOMINATING |
| 64s | 136 | 61.0% | +11.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 66.1% | +16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 59.7% | +9.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 69.3% | +19.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 65.0% | +15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 64.9% | +14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 63.6% | +13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 65o | 144 | 63.7% | +13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 93o | 145 | 69.2% | +19.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 61.1% | +11.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 62.2% | +12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 67.4% | +17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 69.4% | +19.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 61.3% | +11.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 66.1% | +16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 63.5% | +13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 64.9% | +14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 62.6% | +12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 64o | 155 | 64.7% | +14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 63.7% | +13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 68.7% | +18.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 62.5% | +12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 68.9% | +18.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 67.4% | +17.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 53o | 161 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 63o | 162 | 66.1% | +16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 63.0% | +13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 68.9% | +18.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 52o | 166 | 66.4% | +16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 67.5% | +17.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 66.6% | +16.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 66.8% | +16.8 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of QTo?
57.1% against one random opponent, which ranks it 47 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 21.5%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 14.3%.
How much better is QTo than QTs?
QTo is worth 57.1% and QTs 59.5%, a difference of 2.4 points — rank 47 versus rank 34.
How many of the 168 other hands does QTo beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 107 hands and an underdog against 61. 4 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
How often does QTo hit the flop?
A pair or better 32.4%, top pair or better 20.7%. A made straight 0.980% and an eight-out straight draw 7.02%. One of those happens 39.4% of the time (all 19,600 flops counted).
What is QTo worth when it misses the flop?
Against one random hand, 46.7% on a flop where neither card pairs (57.3% before the flop, 79.3% when it connects). Exact counts over every deal of the opponent's cards and the board.
440 words / 42 distinct figures — Method
