169hands
MENU
offsuitace high

A9o

60.8%
Equity vs one random hand — #25 of 169

An ace-high hand — watch out for kicker trouble and domination.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
60.8% · #25
6-handed (5 opponents)
20.4% · #47
9-handed (8 opponents)
12.6% · #64
Chen score
5
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
146 of 168 hands

A9o (ace-nine offsuit) wins 60.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 25th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 14.8% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 20.4% and its rank moves to 47; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 12.6% for rank 64. An ace-high hand — watch out for kicker trouble and domination.

Its suited/offsuit twin A9s runs at 62.8% (rank 18), a gap of 2 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is A7s at 60.9%, and directly below is KJo at 60.5%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, A9o is a favourite against 146 of them and an underdog against 22. Its best matchup is 92o at 76.9% and its worst is AA at 6.1% — a spread of 70.8 points, which is why calling A9o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.

A9o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 92o at 76.9%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves A9o with only 24.6%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 6 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 4.6 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 28.5 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, A9o lands +9.8 points from the middle of the pack, and 24 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 60.8% against one opponent, 41.6% against two, 24.4% against four and 12.6% against eight. That last figure is 114% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why A9o reads as 60.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 60.8% against one opponent down to 12.6% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%35%70%60.8141.6230.8324.4420.4517.0614.4712.68opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
A9o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankA9o equityvs 50%Shape
AA16.1%-43.9PAIR VS CARDS
KK228.5%-21.5PAIR VS CARDS
QQ328.1%-21.9PAIR VS CARDS
JJ427.9%-22.1PAIR VS CARDS
TT527.6%-22.4PAIR VS CARDS
99629.4%-20.6PAIR VS CARDS
88742.9%-7.1PAIR VS CARDS
AKs824.6%-25.4DOMINATED
77943.6%-6.4PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1025.3%-24.7DOMINATED
AJs1125.9%-24.1DOMINATED
AKo1225.8%-24.2DOMINATED
ATs1326.7%-23.3DOMINATED
AQo1426.3%-23.7DOMINATED
AJo1526.8%-23.2DOMINATED
KQs1654.8%+4.8HIGH CARD
661744.2%-5.8PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1847.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
ATo1928.0%-22.0DOMINATED
KJs2054.7%+4.7HIGH CARD
A8s2165.3%+15.3DOMINATING
KTs2254.7%+4.7HIGH CARD
KQo2358.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
A7s2465.0%+15.0DOMINATING
KJo2658.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
552745.0%-5.0PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2853.5%+3.5HIGH CARD
A6s2965.1%+15.1DOMINATING
K9s3070.0%+20.0DOMINATING
A8o3169.3%+19.3DOMINATING
A5s3263.4%+13.4DOMINATING
KTo3358.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
QTs3454.0%+4.0HIGH CARD
A4s3564.1%+14.1DOMINATING
A7o3669.0%+19.0DOMINATING
K8s3760.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
A3s3864.1%+14.1DOMINATING
QJo3957.0%+7.0HIGH CARD
K9o4074.2%+24.2DOMINATING
Q9s4168.5%+18.5DOMINATING
A5o4267.3%+17.3DOMINATING
A2s4364.5%+14.5DOMINATING
K7s4459.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
A6o4569.0%+19.0DOMINATING
JTs4652.6%+2.6HIGH CARD
QTo4757.0%+7.0HIGH CARD
444845.9%-4.1PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4959.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
A4o5067.8%+17.8DOMINATING
Q8s5159.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
K8o5264.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
A3o5367.9%+17.9DOMINATING
K5s5459.7%+9.7HIGH CARD
J9s5567.0%+17.0DOMINATING
Q9o5672.4%+22.4DOMINATING
JTo5755.9%+5.9HIGH CARD
K7o5863.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
K4s5960.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
A2o6068.5%+18.5DOMINATING
Q7s6160.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
K6o6263.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
K3s6360.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
J8s6458.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
T9s6565.6%+15.6DOMINATING
Q8o6662.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
336746.3%-3.7PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6859.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
K2s6960.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
J9o7070.9%+20.9DOMINATING
K5o7163.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
Q5s7259.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
J7s7358.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
T8s7456.8%+6.8HIGH CARD
K4o7563.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
Q7o7663.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
Q4s7759.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
J8o7861.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
T9o7969.2%+19.2DOMINATING
K3o8063.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
Q3s8160.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
Q6o8263.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
98s8366.3%+16.3DOMINATING
T7s8457.9%+7.9HIGH CARD
J6s8559.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
K2o8664.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
Q5o8763.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
228847.2%-2.8PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8960.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
J5s9059.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
T8o9160.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
J7o9262.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
J4s9359.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
97s9467.5%+17.5DOMINATING
Q4o9563.5%+13.5HIGH CARD
T6s9658.6%+8.6HIGH CARD
J3s9760.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
98o9870.1%+20.1DOMINATING
T7o9961.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
Q3o10063.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
87s10158.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
J6o10263.5%+13.5HIGH CARD
J2s10360.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
96s10468.7%+18.7DOMINATING
Q2o10564.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
J5o10663.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
T5s10759.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
T4s10859.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
97o10971.6%+21.6DOMINATING
86s11059.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
J4o11163.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
T6o11262.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
T3s11360.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
95s11470.5%+20.5DOMINATING
76s11558.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
J3o11663.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
87o11762.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
T2s11860.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
85s11961.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
96o12072.7%+22.7DOMINATING
T5o12163.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
J2o12264.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
94s12371.7%+21.7DOMINATING
75s12460.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
T4o12563.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
93s12672.0%+22.0DOMINATING
86o12763.5%+13.5HIGH CARD
65s12858.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
95o12974.6%+24.6DOMINATING
84s13062.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
T3o13163.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
92s13272.5%+22.5DOMINATING
76o13362.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
74s13461.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
T2o13564.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
64s13660.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
85o13764.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
54s13859.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
83s13963.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
94o14076.2%+26.2DOMINATING
75o14163.5%+13.5HIGH CARD
82s14263.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
73s14362.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
65o14462.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
93o14576.3%+26.3DOMINATING
53s14660.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
63s14761.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
84o14866.3%+16.3HIGH CARD
92o14976.9%+26.9DOMINATING
43s15060.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
74o15165.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
54o15262.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
72s15364.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
52s15461.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
64o15563.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
62s15662.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
83o15767.9%+17.9HIGH CARD
42s15861.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
82o15967.9%+17.9HIGH CARD
73o16066.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
53o16163.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
63o16265.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
32s16361.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
43o16464.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
72o16567.9%+17.9HIGH CARD
52o16665.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
62o16766.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
42o16865.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
32o16965.8%+15.8HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
A9s62.8%

FAQ

What is the equity of A9o?

60.8% against one random opponent, which ranks it 25 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 20.4%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 12.6%.

How much better is A9o than A9s?

A9o is worth 60.8% and A9s 62.8%, a difference of 2 points — rank 25 versus rank 18.

How many of the 168 other hands does A9o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 146 hands and an underdog against 22. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

424 words / 42 distinct figures — Method